Talk:Stanley Kubrick

Latest comment: 13 days ago by Nikkimaria in topic Semi-protected edit request on 11 April 2024
Good articleStanley Kubrick has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 19, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
May 12, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
June 15, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
April 24, 2014Good article nomineeNot listed
August 24, 2015Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Semi-protected edit request on 21 June 2023 edit

Change " "big bang"; " in 4th paragraph to " "big bang;" " Grammar error Charliegoose (talk) 05:50, 21 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: it's correct Hyphenation Expert (talk) 07:13, 21 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Stanley Kubrick 1966-11-27 Interview jeremy bernstein edit

search:

  • Stanley Kubrick 1966-11-27 Interview jeremy bernstein

2601:646:201:480:4690:5278:E18F:5E4B (talk) 07:07, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

potential missing word edit

Current quote: "Despite the notoriety this provoked among actors, many of Kubrick's films broke new cinematic ground are now considered landmarks." Possibilities: "Despite the notoriety this provoked among actors, many of Kubrick's films [that|which] broke new cinematic ground are now considered landmarks." or "Despite the notoriety this provoked among actors, many of Kubrick's films broke new cinematic ground [and] are now considered landmarks." or something else! 213.120.28.36 (talk) 20:25, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

I vote for the [and] option. I think that sounds great! Georgelazenby (talk) 21:52, 28 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 13 January 2024 edit

The second sentence says "Widely considered one of the...". It should say "Widely considered as one of the..." BillyShearsss (talk) 05:52, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: The use of "as" would be redundant here - the current phrasing works fine. EphemeralPerpetuals (they/them)talk 01:49, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Barry Lyndon: Zeiss 50mm F/0.7 lens edit

The source doesn't support the claim that this lens was intended for satellite photography. 202.190.25.42 (talk) 05:13, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 11 April 2024 edit

Add in as source: Kubrick: An Odyssey (February 2024), by Robert P. Kolker and Nathan Abrams; Pegasus Books, Ltd.; ISBN: 978-1-63936-624-8; https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Kubrick/Robert-P-Kolker/9781639366248 Andyamo72 (talk) 13:06, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Done '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 13:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Not done. What do you want this to be used as a source for? Nikkimaria (talk) 03:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply