Talk:Universal suffrage

Latest comment: 16 days ago by Boers1 in topic "Milestones" table is problematic

How to label autocracies? edit

Universal suffrage in an autocracy or hybrid regime is completely different than in a democracy. Feels incomplete to not acknowledge when suffrage is not genuine. Superb Owl (talk) 21:02, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

The ideal Caribbean citizen edit

•As respect for human life to emotionally secure with a healthy level of confidence and self-esteem.

•views ethnic and religious diversity as a source of strength and cultural richness.

•as a strong appreciation of family and kinship there is value.

•demonstrate a positive attitude towards work.

•contribute to the health and welfare of the community and country.

•Is aware of and displays respect for cultural heritage. 63.143.124.195 (talk) 20:24, 12 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Milestones" table is problematic edit

The section makes clear that "States have granted and revoked universal suffrage at various times.", which is true. But in this context, what good is it to list the most recent "milestone", if rights have been revoked since? For example, 2004 is listed as a milestone year for Afghanistan, but "All political parties have been banned since August 2023." Boers1 (talk) 13:51, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply