This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of countries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CountriesWikipedia:WikiProject CountriesTemplate:WikiProject Countriescountry articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
RCB88, you are correct that all the material you removed is uncited. Materialscientist, was your initial revert because you believe this content is likely to be verifiable information? If so, I agree. RCB88, would you be willing to look for sources to verify some of the content you've removed? That would be the best way to improve the article. Otherwise, would you be willing to just mark it with "citation needed" tags so that someone else can find the sources? Thanks for drawing attention to this problem with unsourced information in the article! Larataguera (talk) 12:36, 17 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
.svg)
