, generally, is any person or institution
on, or determine claims or disputes—whether or not it is called a tribunal in its title.
For example, an advocate
who appears before a court
with a single judge could describe that judge as "their tribunal". Many governmental
bodies that are titled 'tribunals' are so described to emphasize that they are not courts of normal jurisdiction
. For example, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda
was a body specially constituted under international law
; in Great Britain
, employment tribunals
are bodies set up to hear specific employment disputes. In many (but not all) cases, the word tribunal
implies a judicial (or quasi-judicial
) body with a lesser degree of formality than a court, to which the normal rules of evidence and procedure may not apply, and whose presiding officers are frequently neither judges nor magistrates. Private judicial bodies are also often styled 'tribunals'. However, the word tribunal
is not conclusive of a body's function—for example, in Great Britain, the Employment Appeal Tribunal
is a superior court of record.
Andrew Birrell (after Henry Fuseli
), Caractacus at the Tribunal of Claudius at Rome
The term is derived from the tribunes
, magistrates of the Classical Roman Republic
. "Tribunal" originally referred to the office of the tribunes, and the term is still sometimes used in this sense in historical writings. The tribunal was the platform upon which the presiding authority sat; having a raised position physically as symbolic of his higher position in regard to the adjudication of the law.
In Australia, the term tribunal generally implies a judicial body with a lesser degree of formality than a court, with a simplified legal procedure, often presided over by a lawyer (solicitor or barrister) who is not a judge or magistrate (often referred to as a member of the tribunal). In many cases the lawyers who function as tribunal members do so only on a part-time basis, and spend the greater part of their time carrying out other aspects of legal practice, such as representing clients. In many cases, the formal rules of evidence which apply in courts do not apply in tribunals, which enables tribunals to hear forms of evidence which courts may not be allowed to consider. Tribunals generally deal with simpler matters; while legal representation is permitted and not uncommon, self-representation is much more common in tribunals than in courts, and tribunal members and registry staff are generally more accustomed to dealing with self-represented parties than courts are. Appeal from a tribunal is to a court.
Tribunals in the Australian judicial system include:
In several Australian states, tribunals function as the equivalent of a small claims court
In Bangladesh, tribunal
refers to a court that serves some special purpose, of which Bangladesh has several. These have been set up to ensure speedy trial and reduce case congestion in the normal courts. Beside this, Article 117 of the constitution of Bangladesh empowers the parliament to set up one or more administrative tribunals. No court can entertain any proceeding or make any order in respect of any matter within the jurisdiction of such tribunal.
In several states, Food Safety Appellate Tribunals have been created to hear appeals against orders of adjudicating officers for food safety (additional deputy commissioners).
In the Republic of Ireland
popularly refers to a public inquiry
established under the Tribunals of Inquiry (Evidence) Act 1921
. The main difference between a Parliamentary Inquiry (non statutory) and a Tribunal of Inquiry in Ireland is that non-statutory inquiries are not vested with the powers, privileges, and rights of the High Court. Tribunals of Inquiry are. Tribunals are established by resolution of the Houses of the Oireachtas
to enquire into matters of urgent public importance
. It is not a function of Tribunals to administer justice, their work is solely inquisitorial
. Tribunals are obliged to report their findings to the Oireachtas
. They have the power to enforce the attendance and examination of witnesses and the production of documents relevant to the work in hand. Tribunals can consist of one or more people. A layperson, or non-lawyer, may be the Sole member of a tribunal.
Historically, in the Netherlands, before the separation of lawmaking, law enforcement, and justice duties, all sentences were delivered by a tribunal of seven schepenen
, or magistrates, appointed by the local count. Such a tribunal was called a Vierschaar
, so called for a rope—or cord—that was drawn (schaar
) in a four-square dimension, wherein the judges sat on four benches. These benches were positioned in a square as well, with the defendant standing in the middle. Towns had the Vierschaar
privilege to hear their own disputes. The Vierschaar
was usually located in the town hall, and many historic town halls still have such a room, usually decorated with scenes from the Judgment of Solomon
system of the United Kingdom
is part of the national system of administrative justice
. Though it has grown up on an ad hoc
basis since the beginning of the twentieth century, from 2007 reforms were put in place to build a unified system with recognised judicial authority, routes of appeal
and regulatory supervision.
"Tribunal" is used in the U.S. generally to refer to courts or judicial bodies, as in the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct
. The Ohio
Rules of Professional Conduct, for instance, define "tribunal" as "a court, an arbitrator in a binding arbitration
, or a legislative body, administrative agency, or other body acting in an adjudicative capacity."
In the Catholic Church
, ecclesiastical courts
are called tribunals. Tribunals are distinguished by grade, while proceedings are distinguished by instance; for example, an archdiocesan tribunal may hear a cause in first instance if the cause is first brought before the archdiocesan tribunal, or, if the cause was first heard before the diocesan tribunal and is now appealed to the archdiocesan tribunal, the latter may hear the cause in second instance. Only the Roman Rota is competent to hear causes in third instance, with limited exceptions. Other tribunals are incompetent in third instance by reason of grade (ratione gradus
), since they do not have the jurisdiction to judge in third instance. Tribunals include:
- diocesan or eparchal tribunals (including archdiocesan or archeparchal tribunals)
- interdiocesan tribunals, that is, a tribunal erected by the Holy See for more than one diocese, either as a tribunal of first instance, or as an appellate tribunal in second instance
- the synod of bishops of patriarchal churches is the highest tribunal within the territory of the patriarchal church, without prejudice to the primacy of the Apostolic See
- ordinary tribunal of the patriarchal church, distinct from the eparchial tribunal of the patriarchal church
- ordinary tribunals of the Apostolic See
In health sector
Tribunals also play an integral role in health sectors both within and across nations. Often referred to as "adjunctive tribunals", these quasi-judicial bodies possess regulatory, oversight, and dispute resolution powers to aid in health decision-making and governance. At the same time, the actual effects of adjunctive tribunals on health services are disputed, as little evidence exists to evaluate their efficacy. More empirical evaluations are needed to ensure that tribunals operate in a more evidence-based, systematic manner within the health sector.
Look up tribunal
in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Vierschaar
- ^ Walker, David M. (1980), Oxford Companion to Law, Oxford University Press, p. 1239, ISBN 0-19-866110-X
- ^ The Constitution Of The People's Republic Of Bangladesh, Article-117
- ^ "Government to restructure tribunals, autonomous organisations", The Economic Times, 21 February 2016
- ^ Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches, canon 1062 §1.
- ^ Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches, canon 1063 §1.
- ^ S.J. Hoffman, L. Sossin. 2012. “Empirically Evaluating the Impact of Adjudicative Tribunals in the Health Sector: Context, Challenges and Opportunities,” Health Economics, Policy and Law 7(2): 147-174. doi:10.1017/S1744133111000156
- ^ L. Sossin, S.J. Hoffman. 2010. “The Elusive Search for Accountability: Evaluating Adjudicative Tribunals,” Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice 28(2): 343-360.
Last edited on 23 March 2021, at 11:26
Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0
unless otherwise noted.