Deepfriedokra
Joined 3 March 2006
User page Talk
ToC
Userboxes
This user is an administrator on the English Wikipedia. (verify)
This user is a global renamer. (verify)
UTRSThis user is an admin on UTRS
Created or improved at AfC.
Wikified, etc.
Barnstars.
Not to be confused with User:Deepfriedokra2, who is not I.

Useful
mw:Help:Range_blocks/IPv6#Collateral_damage
Wikipedia:Arbitration_enforcement_log
Tools
Boiler plate messages
More messages
Committed identity: 783cbbdcf49dd0a896db31eb808e772ba6e00608e9b22a3a87e693422789b9004a3a0c8bab7a2d9c772f4a8d71e68f9a1d8beebbccd97732ad3d61e15042b96f is a 512commitment to this user's real-life identity.
WP:42 and other sundries-
Thanks for trying to help build Wikipedia, the world's largest free content encyclopedia.
"All content must be [[WP:cite|cite]]d from [[WP:reliable sources|reliable sources]] that are [[WP:IS|unconnected]] with the subject and have a reputation for [[WP:V|fact checking]]."

[[WP:BRD|Please discuss content and sourcing on article talk page and achieve consensus for any changes]] Please make [[WP:EDITREQUEST]]s on the article's talk page. Please seek [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]] as needed.

Please [[WP:BRD|discuss changes on article talk page.]]. Please make [[WP:EDITREQUEST]]s and/or seek [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]] as needed.

" All content must be [[WP:cite|cite]]d from [[WP:reliable sources|reliable]], [[WP:IS|independent]] sources with a reputation for [[WP:V|fact checking]]."

[[Wikipedia:Purpose|Wikipedia is an encyclopedia]]-- subjects of articles must meet [[WP:N|notability guidelines]] with [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] which are [[WP:IS|unconnected with the subject]] and which provide [[WP:V|verifiable information]]. '''Someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject.
A word on negative BLPs
To my way of thinking, any negative BLP content would need thorough coverage, not passing mentions, in several major media outlets. We have an obligation as human beings and as encyclopedists to not defame anyone. We should avoid repeating defamation at all times. And even if repeating negative content is not effectively actionable, (the plaintive loses in court or in pre-trial preliminaries) the defendant has still been subjected to the expense and horror of defending their action/inactions (or the actions/inactions of their organization), either in deposition or in court.
Aside from that thoroughly self-serving motivation, I strongly believe in not doing unnecessary harm to anyone. It is far better, if one is to err, to err on the side of not adding negative content and/or defaming someone. If, as has happened, I protect a version of a page that an interested party finds objectionable, it is not to preserve that content. It is to stop the disruptive editing so that editors can gather their wits and make policy/guideline based arguments about the content. If it is pointed out to me that I have protected negative BLP, I will ask an uninvolved admin to look it over unless it is unsourced, if it is unsourced, I will remove it.
Another concern is PII of a non article subject in an article. This should be avoided, especially if the person in question has sought to conceal their name or other PII and is in fear of doxing or other harassment. Once again, I would rather err on the side of caution in such matters. It has been said that we cannot always avoid harming people in article content. In this case, we can and must.
COI and unCOI editing and integrity
And in the case of an article being swarmed with UPE, PAID, and COI editors to make a page more favorable to the subject's reputation, the decision as to accepting or rejecting such content does not hinge on the integrity or agenda of these editors. It hinges on our own integrity. If reliable sources can be found to support such content, and if it can be included in a neutral manner, it would be best to have it.
We can't be using this website to trash BLP subjects, even if they trash us. It doesn't necessarily create COI, but we can't just respond in kind; we need to maintain our neutrality and objectivity, even if others don't.... But let's all be clear about what's the right way and what's the wrong way to discuss BLP subjects on-wiki. Levivich 16:49, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
List
I am 444 on the Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by number of edits
More user boxes
Userboxes
This user believes in a solid oblate spheroid Earth, not a flat or hollow one.
This user loves the Ford Mustang.
This user enjoys photography.
de-1
Dieser Benutzer hat grundlegendeDeutschkenntnisse.
This user is a German American.
This user opposes racism and admires Martin Luther King, Jr.
fan
trekkie
trekker
This user is a Star Trek fan, but refuses to be labeled as a Trekkie/Trekker.
A.S.This user has
Asperger syndrome.

This user is owned by a pit bull.


Crat statistics
ActionCount
Edits137220
Edits+Deleted150685
Pages deleted21740
Revisions deleted2128
Logs/Events deleted3
Pages restored699
Pages protected6100
Pages unprotected104
Protections modified595
Users blocked9958
Users reblocked535
Users unblocked657
User rights modified21
Users created7
Pages merged16
Users renamed2602
Last edited on 7 August 2022, at 14:53
Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted.
Privacy policy
Terms of Use
Desktop
HomeRandom Nearby Log in Settings DonateAbout WikipediaDisclaimers
WatchHistoryContributionsEditUser groupsLogsPage informationPermanent linkWhat links here