Emmette Hernandez Coleman
Joined 14 January 2008
User page Talk
This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.
This is a Wikipedia user page.
This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wiki​pedia.org/wi​ki/User:Emmette_Hernandez_Coleman​.
This user has a page on Simple English Wikipedia.
This user is a member of WikiProject Redirect.
This user is part of
WikiProject Red Link Recovery.
This user is a proud member of
WikiProject Virginia.
This User is a member of the Northern Virginia Task Force.
This user is a member of
WikiProject U.S. counties
Don't forget about Larry!
Were this user to act in a foolish, trollish, or dickish way, they are open to being slapped with a large trout.
I created {{History of the Palestinian territories}}, {{Nagorno-Karabakh Topics}}, Years in the Palestinian territories, and helped with the early development of {{History of Israel}} I created allot of redirects, including Whether and Prime Minister Churchill. My pet peeve is WP:NOTBROKEN. I suppose the one thing I'm most proud of I suppose is this bot idea. Once the bot is operational it will correct the spelling of of a link to a redirect tagged with {{R from misspelling}}.
"[T]emplates do not need to be as precisely named as articles - no one ever sees the name of the template [...] and shorter names are easier to use." Apteva (talk) 8:33 pm, 14 November 2012, Wednesday (1 month, 30 days ago) (UTC−5)[1]
We shouldn't put pointless extra words in disambig parentheses. The purpose of disambig parentheses is simply to distinguish multiple articles with the same title. Disambig parentheses don't always need to be as precisely named as article titles, and shorter names are easier to use. - Myself 08:18, 6 December 2013 (UTC), based on Apteva's above qoute
"A few of the project's participants can be, not to put a nice word on it, pretty nasty. And this is tolerated. So, for any person who can and wants to work politely with well-meaning, rational, reasonably well-informed people--which is to say, to be sure, most people working on Wikipedia--the constant fighting can be so off-putting as to drive them away from the project. This explains why I am gone; it also explains why many others, including some extremely knowledgeable and helpful people, have left the project."Larry [2]
"Keep. Little reason to keep, no reason to delete, little trumps no" Unknown, at an RFD
"[W]hat matters [...] is not whether [the articles are about] theoretically distinct entities in some abstract sense; what matters is that what we factually have to say about them is 99% overlapping. Our definition of article topics is not necessarily meant to reflect abstract classifications and ontologies of things out there, but efficient packaging of information for readers." Fut.Perf. on merging articles. 20:20, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
This editor is a
Veteran Editor
and is entitled to display this
Iron Editor Star.
The Barnstar of Diligence
For exemplary community service in both content creation and just plain caring about the quality of this project, it is my pleasure to bestow this Barnstar of Diligence on you. Thanks for all your good work. PMDrive1061 (talk) 17:37, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Last edited on 12 January 2017, at 11:45
Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted.
Privacy policy
Terms of Use
HomeRandomNearbyLog inSettingsDonateAbout WikipediaDisclaimers
WatchHistoryContributionsEdit User groups Logs Page information Permanent link What links here