Phil Bridger

BLPPRODs

Hello, Phil Bridger,

I'll never forget how, years ago, you scolded me for tagging some articles with a BLPPROD tag and argued that I should have done some investigation to look for references for them rather than tagging them for deletion. I soon stopped tagging these articles BLPPROD after that and moved on to other tasks that still keep me very busy.

Well, I wanted to let you know that there are currently 200+ articles that are tagged BLPPROD for the coming week that you may be interested in reviewing. Just go to User:DumbBOT/ProdSummary to see the master list or you can browse Category:BLP articles proposed for deletion and see if any of them stand out as articles worth preserving. I hope you are having a pleasant summer. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:37, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality of edits

Regarding this comment: I imagine you were trying to express that the number of edits doesn't matter, as long as they are good edits? Your first sentence, though, seems to imply that as long as you make a good edit, all your bad edits don't matter. Perhaps you might consider rewording it a bit? isaacl (talk) 20:51, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

I have stricken the bit where I don't say what I mean. Phil Bridger (talk) 15:27, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Regarding ANI of User:Landnama

Hi @Phil Bridger. I just added reply about the evidences of abusing 'extended' status by User:Landnama in WP:ANI on Persistent small edits on multiple pages by User:Landnama section. Idk if these can be considered evidence or not tbh, but I'm quite sure that's why I added it. Thank you. EdhyRa (talk) 12:52, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

I see that this has been dealt with. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:09, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Language speaks

Hello, @Phil Bridger!

Thanks for your interest in this page. I definitely do not want to delete anything of potential value to even a small handful of readers. If someone were to come in and work to make this a contentful page, I would gladly assist to the best of my ability. At present, however, it only reports that Heidegger uses a two-word phrase that the article does not define or explain and which, to the best of my ability to determine, is not considered notable by scholars.

The article, just because it says nothing, is quite harmless. For the same reason, however, it does not seem to me to belong on Wikipedia. If you think it should just sit there anyways, that does not bother me. But if you think there should be a discussion, would you mind initiating this on the talk page or wherever is most appropriate?

Cheers, Patrick J. Welsh (talk) 19:13, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

I don't really feel qualified to start a discussion. but simply based my contesting of the WP:PROD tag (which calls for deletion without discussion) on the books that I mentioned in the edit summary and on the results of this Google Scholar search. If you still feel that this should be deleted (maybe our other articles about Heidegger cover this topic adequately?) then WP:AFD is the place to discuss it. Phil Bridger (talk) 08:40, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

About DS Penske

Toyota in Formula One begins with the following line: "Panasonic Toyota Racing was a Formula One team owned by the Japanese automobile manufacturer Toyota Motor Corporation and based in Cologne, Germany. "

Should we do something similar for DS Penske: "DS Penske is a Formula E team owned by the French automobile manufacturer DS Automobiles and based in Los Angeles, United States"? 78.131.72.186 (talk) 19:40, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

I have no great interest in motor sport so will make no recommendation. Go to Talk:DS Penske with your suggestion and collaborate with others (who may well include WikiCleanerMan) on the wording, I just know that when anyone claims to have proof, or even more so PROOF, of anything then it usually ends in tears. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:00, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

A request

Hello there. So I reported a user yesterday for what I thought was vandalism due to how they were going about it and you were the one who responded so this is why I came to you.

As another user (who commented on the report) pointed out to me, the person I reported was a VERY newcomer and, as policy WP:DONTBITE should be followed. Well, I think I overstepped the mark with the user who is clearly very new to editing. I'm afraid I did it out of emotion and after a difficult day. I've given a lenghty apology and explanation in their talk page. I would like you to please close the report.

Once again, I apologize for how I behaved towards this newcomer, and thank you for your time. Omnis Scientia (talk) 07:06, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

~ ~ ~ Merry Christmas! ~ ~ ~

Hello Phil Bridger: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, --Dustfreeworld (talk) 13:20, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

NPA

Hello, just a quick message about this edit you made. Saying "If your mission is to make Andrew Tite an unemployable laughing stock then you're doing a very good job at it." is a bit uncivil and is a bit like insult to injury. Please refrain from such comments in the future as they're simply unneeded and a bit toxic. — MATRIX! (a good person!)_{[citation unneeded]} 17:15, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Typo?

In the Museumand AfD, did you mean to type "irrelevant" rather than "relevant"? PamD 20:57, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Yes, I did. I seem to make more and more typos as I get further into my 60s. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:07, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

You wait until you're 80! I find it hard to get a single word right at first attempt. A word that I've often accidentally omitted is "not". Athel cb (talk) 15:53, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

troiuvpr

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Special:Diff/1214593734

Perhaps c:Commons:Convenient Discussions would help? Aaron Liu (talk) 01:19, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

help plea

Having looked at the history of edits in the article, I saw that you once saved an article from deletion and now I would like to ask you to cancel the merger from another article. I hope you can help again to save this article Aharon Erman (talk) 19:06, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

I do not have time now to look into this topic as much as it deserves, and contesting WP:PROD deletion is not the same as saying whether this should or should not be merged with another article. You, Smpad, and maybe others will have to come to an agreement about this. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:18, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Where is Kate? for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Where is Kate? is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where is Kate? (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 13:34, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Composing

Thanks for the writing tip. I will improve through formal lessons I will attend, acknowledging the extensive impact on my poor communication skills to all aspects of life besides Wikipedia. Your insight has led to a pivotal change. Maxim Masiutin (talk) 04:31, 19 April 2024 (UTC)