Welcome to CaroleHenson's talk page
  Frank Weston Benson, Great White Herons, 1923   Helen Allingham, Harvest Moon, 1879   Vincent van Gogh, Memory of the Garden at Etten (Ladies of Arles), 1888   Elenore Abbott, The Two King's Children  
Articles - Working on - DYK - Recognition - User info
"Sometimes the questions are complicated
and the answers are simple," Dr. Seuss

Another list edit

Just came across this (very incomplete) list page. Cielquiparle (talk) 07:12, 30 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Cielquiparle These two categories might be a good place to start: Category:Freedom suits in the United States and Category:United States slavery case law.–CaroleHenson (talk) 16:01, 30 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
And, this. I get easily overwhelmed. I am still overwhelmed about the List of Underground Railroad sites and have some additions for that list as well. But, it's good to know about this list to pick away at it.–CaroleHenson (talk) 16:09, 30 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Part of me was starting to wonder if some lists exist mainly so that people have pages to link their new pages to... List of Underground Railroad sites is fascinating though and you can start to see all the webs connecting places and people. It may never be completely done but it feels like there is payoff there. One other random point: I just came across the stub for John Krum and thought of your interest in Alton, Illinois. His name is coming up as a judge in the St. Louis Circuit Court (?) and I thought somewhere that Murdoch wasn't happy with him, also because of their history in Alton. For now I find myself back in Jefferson City... Cielquiparle (talk) 18:29, 30 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Cielquiparle, It seems John Krum deserves a better article!
Yes, I keep running across Alton, Illinois - most recently during my editing of Caroline Quarlls.
Good luck with the things you are working on. Nice to hear from you!–CaroleHenson (talk) 00:14, 31 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Territorial Road monument and plaque edit

I just found the article you created on Territorial Road in Michigan, and I can contribute. There is a length of road at the western end of the state called Territorial Road, which splits southwesterly from Red Arrow Highway west of Paw Paw, and appears to have been the original road. You can see an older map which shows it slightly different from today (this one from the USGS archive; maps with older dates listed by that one there are actually newer reprints). I did a personal write-up a couple decades ago which is almost completely OR so it's not usable but I did take some pictures in 1999 of a monument about Territorial and road marker in Keeler along this stretch which are included on that page (I'm not 100% sure if they're still there but they were in 2012). I can transfer those photos to Commons. Mapsax (talk) 00:26, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Mapsax, Sounds great! Are you needing help with the text or photos?–CaroleHenson (talk) 05:35, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
I really don't need any help, I just wanted to inform you about it, in spite of lack of article ownership, because you had put so much work into it, plus I wanted to make sure you were in agreement that the southern alignment was relevant to the article. The files are now here and here. The only concern now is the historical status of the northern route west of Paw Paw, whether it was originally a northern segment or never was and MDOT's predecessor decided to run trunkline along it later. Mapsax (talk) 01:10, 29 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
I have started a discussion at Talk:Territorial Road (Michigan)#Various alignments. It's complicated. Mapsax (talk) 01:33, 30 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Teedyuscung article edit

I noticed that you've edited the Teedyuscung page recently. Thought you'd be interested in this article from the WSWS on the history of the Wyoming Valley and this outstanding figure of the Delaware nation. https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2022/09/05/ccox-s05.html CerroFerro (talk) 22:34, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Leadville Historic District pics edit

Hi CaroleHenson, my notices are pointing out your adding nice Template:Leadville mining to several articles, which reminds me about a big To Do item i have procrastinated about. I have about 1000 or 1200 photos documenting the Leadville Historic District to upload to a Commons category at least, maybe make a list-article of buildings in leadville historic district to display them. The NRHP-listed/NHL-designated area is huge, with about 1000 buildings, for which there is no list of buildings and no systematic documentation in photos. Early NRHP listings were minimal. As time goes by some of the miners' houses get demolished or altered. Drove up and down streets with a friend hanging out car window, a year ago, to try to get at least one photo for each building. You seem to appreciate the place, have you been around it, does it sound worthwhile to upload all. Would require lots of time labelling photos, and I am not aware of a tool to mass-upload besides one app that works on my iphone. Trying to get motivated to start somehow. --Doncram (talk) 02:14, 16 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi Doncram, Wow! That sounds like a huge effort, but it would be nice. Perhaps you could post on commons and ask if there's some way to load the images enmasse.
Since you've posted here, and are interested in Leadville, do you mind looking at my post at Talk:Leadville, Colorado#Non-free material tag? I don't think that there are a lot of watchers for that page.
Really great to hear from you!–CaroleHenson (talk) 16:06, 16 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. About commons uploading I see at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Upload_tools that there are tools I can try. I discover I first have to get access restored to a Dropbox that holds the photos, and I am started on that. I did respond about non-free tag. And I will start looking at the article to see about what improvements can be made. I haven't edited there before, I guess, because it was not on my watchlist. Tx. --Doncram (talk) 17:16, 16 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

A high compliment edit

Hi Carole, I hope you're doing well. I don't know if you've seen it or not, but your work got a high compliment from another talented editor in response to my comment. Well-deserved, I might add. All the best, Carlstak (talk) 14:55, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I wouldn't have seen the reply without your pinging me. A very nice surprise!–CaroleHenson (talk) 18:08, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

A cookie for you! edit

  i hope you like cookies Bluehalooo (talk) 17:05, 12 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
I do like cookies! Thanks!–CaroleHenson (talk) 22:04, 12 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Question from Carmel eloza (05:08, 15 October 2022) edit

how to write down an article --Carmel eloza (talk) 05:08, 15 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Carmel eloza
I see that you've tried to start an article about a musical group TROUBLESOME2KMUSIQ in a Draft and in your sandbox. I did a bit of googling and it does not appear that the group has sufficient experience yet to meet Notability guidelines for musicians. Do you have any other ideas for an article?–CaroleHenson (talk) 06:15, 15 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022 edit

Hello CaroleHenson,

 

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

 
NPP backlog May – October 15, 2022

Suggestions:

  • There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
  • Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
  • Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
  • This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

 

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

Reminders
  • Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
  • If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
  • Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
  • If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
  • To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

WikiProject Colorado online meeting 11/15/2022 edit

 
WikiProject
Colorado

WikiProject Colorado will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, November 15, 2022, at meet.google.com/yoe-aphc-wey. Anyone interested in Colorado articles, history, or photographs is encouraged to attend.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/Colorado/Invitation list. Thanks. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:10, 1 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

You've got mail edit

Please check your Yahoo! email. (FKA 68.97.42.64, FKA Mandruss) 161.97.225.237 (talk) 17:41, 12 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

@161.97.225.237 and Mandruss:,
I am not sure that I can ping an IP address. I did not get an email yet. I have looked in my inbox and spam folders and nothing from Wikipedia.–CaroleHenson (talk) 18:38, 12 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hmmm. I sent it on 11/2, but I'll resend it now. You don't have multiple Yahoo! email addresses by any chance? (No, you can't ping an IP, but I'm watching this thread.) (FKA 68.97.42.64, FKA Mandruss) 161.97.225.237 (talk) 18:56, 12 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Ahhh, I found you in spam this time. I moved you back to my inbox so there shouldn't be a problem moving forward. Good to hear from you,–CaroleHenson (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 53 edit

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 53, September – October 2022

  • New collections:
    • Edward Elgar
    • E-Yearbook
    • Corriere della Serra
    • Wikilala
  • Collections moved to Library Bundle:
    • Ancestry
  • New feature: Outage notification
  • Spotlight: Collections indexed in EDS

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marilyn Gayle Hoff edit

I noticed you withdrew your nomination for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marilyn Gayle Hoff. You can only do this if no one else supported the deletion, per WP:WDAFD and WP:CLOSEAFD. But User:Pahiy voted to delete the article. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:35, 18 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Pahiy:, you voted to delete the article before there had been a lot of work on the article, per the conversation at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marilyn Gayle Hoff and 24 or so edits here by Beccaynr. Would you still vote to delete the article now?–CaroleHenson (talk) 15:36, 18 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
I saw the early close as a reasonable application of WP:IAR based on the 'per nom' !vote without elaboration by Pahiy, although looking more closely at the guidelines, the early close seems to technically be more of a snow keep than a speedy keep. As an involved editor, I don't think the outcome of the discussion will change, but if there is an objection to the close, reopening the discussion is an easy fix. Beccaynr (talk) 18:51, 18 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Actually, it's not a snow keep either; even after User:Beccaynr's comments, User:Lamona still only voted "weak keep". If the AFD had run it's natural course, would it have been a "keep"? Probably. The thing about AFDs though, is that people take them very seriously. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:19, 18 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
I now know that I need to be more careful in the rare situations where I would withdraw a nomination. What do you think we should do Magnolia677? If you think it should be reopened to run it's natural course, as Beccaynr mentioned, I am fine with that.–CaroleHenson (talk) 20:29, 18 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Rock and Roll Hall Of Fame Inductees. edit

Hey I think you may have forgot to add Judas Priest to your list of the 2022 Rock and Roll Hall of Fame inductees 2603:8090:904:7335:998:1B32:C05B:CD4C (talk) 19:26, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

I am not sure what you are talking about. I may have added a link to List of Rock and Roll Hall of Fame inductees but I haven't added or removed people from the list. Is this the page you are talking about? If you select Control+F and search on Judas, it will take you to him.–CaroleHenson (talk) 00:49, 22 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

First Ladies of the United States edit

Hello! I'm currently trying to bring List of first ladies of the United States to Good Topic status. I understand that you're a major contributor to Martha Jefferson Randolph and you've already brought it close to Good Article status. I was wondering if you had any interest in nominating it as a Good Article. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 16:49, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Yes, Thebiguglyalien, that could be interesting. I probably won't get to it this week, but likely next week.–CaroleHenson (talk) 22:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Great! There's certainly no rush; it's probably going to be several months before all of the articles are even at B-class. But each one helps! Thebiguglyalien (talk) 23:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thebiguglyalien I will start getting Martha Jefferson Randolph ready for good article status today, posting a checklist on Talk:Martha Jefferson Randolph for the work that needs to be done.–CaroleHenson (talk) 20:11, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

John Houston (immigrant) and Henry H. Houston edit

You stated that John Houston (immigrant) is the grandfather of Henry H. Houston. However, this means one's grandfather is 130 years older that him, which is unlikely. In addition, such is not supported by Geni.com, though it is not a reliable source to be cited in Wikipedia directly. GZWDer (talk) 17:57, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Copying to Talk:John Houston (immigrant).–CaroleHenson (talk) 04:46, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Also copied to Talk:Henry H. Houston and removed inaccurate sentences from both articles.–CaroleHenson (talk) 05:02, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Happy holidays edit

 
Fairies dangling on and frolicking around flowers
Seasons greetings!

Wishing you joyous holiday spirits,
CaroleHenson!

and best wishes for the New Year


 
Illustration of dancing fairies, 1914, taken from the poem “A Spell for a Fairy,” by Alfred Noyes


Beccaynr (talk) 01:57, 20 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks so much, Beccaynr This card is so lovely. I hope you have a lovely holiday, too.–CaroleHenson (talk) 00:51, 22 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Seasons Greetings edit

  Whatever you celebrate at this time of year, whether it's Christmas or some other festival, I hope you and those close to you have a happy, restful time! Have fun, Donner60 (talk) 00:16, 23 December 2022 (UTC)}} Reply  

Donner60 (talk) 02:16, 24 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Question from 210-Minnesota (21:06, 31 December 2022) edit

Hello CaroleHenson! I created an article in Greek and submitted it under my username in en.wikipedia, and it was rejected, with the suggestion it go over to the Greek Wikipedia. I then submitted the article to Greek Wikipedia (el.wikipedia.org,) and it was rejected without enough explanation for me to take remedial action. If what I am trying to achieve is to post a Greek language version of this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beata_Maria_Kitsikis_Panagopoulos is there a different procedure I should take rather than trying to submit a free-standing Greek article? Thanks for any suggestions you might have for a very new contributor. -Tivey. --210-Minnesota (talk) 21:06, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

210-Minnesota, It would be helpful to know why the Greek article was rejected. Perhaps notability, a problem with the sources, something else?–CaroleHenson (talk) 21:39, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Have you asked this question on the Greek site?–CaroleHenson (talk) 21:41, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Sadly, my conversational Greek is severely limited. But, the two cited reasons in the rejection were 1) what appears to be a policy violation: "Entries should not be advertising or promotion of yourself, your friends, or your company."
And, 2) an additional notation is: "You are recreating a previously deleted page." [I read one comment that an attempt at submitting this, or a similar, biographical Greek-language entry had been rejected in June 2021.] 210-Minnesota (talk) 00:45, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
A further note (originally in Greek) -- 05:53, 23 June 2021 OTtzavaras Beata Maria Kitsikis-Panagopoulos page (content was: '{{da|Non-Lemma - link to another BP}} [1]') 210-Minnesota (talk) 01:01, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
210-Minnesotaz In no particular order: Recreating a deleted page, from my perspective, isn't a reason to not create an article. But it would be good to edit for notable, relevant, objective content. There is a fair amount of unnecessary promotion / WP:PEACOCK language. I think thinning the article down to the most meaningful content would be helpful. For instance: During her watch, the Gennadius Library opened for additional hours and two evenings a week leading to a substantial increase in the number of people using the library. The physical structure of the library was remodeled. A new exhibition room and a section for archival research were added to the building. is not necessary.
It would be good to add information about her awards and anything else that adds to notability to the intro.
I am not sure that I can add anything about creating a Greek article out of this one. But if this article gets tidied up a bit, focusing on her noteworthy achievements, it will be easier. I'll do a bit of editing. It would be good to reorganize some of the headings, for instance, to make it easier to decipher the content in the sections.
The way that the article is written, it sounds like some of the content comes from a WP:Connected contributor, which brings up some additional issues. The linked article will explain the issues.–CaroleHenson (talk) 01:15, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Many thanks for your very helpful and specific recommendations. You have given me much to work with. 210-Minnesota (talk) 02:46, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, too, for taking the time to edit the English language version of the article, and for modeling your recommendations. I am very hopeful that incorporating your suggestions into the Greek language version of the article will improve its chances of acceptance. I appreciate your efforts and expertise. 210-Minnesota (talk) 03:33, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ "Beata Maria Kitsikis Panagopoulos". Wikipedia. 2021-06-21.

Happy New Year, CaroleHenson! edit

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Moops T 03:08, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks so much, Moops. Nice message. Happy New Year to you, too.–CaroleHenson (talk) 23:01, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
TY Carole. I was blocked recently actually for sending too many of these, too quickly, apparently. That said, I still wish you a Happy New Year! Moops T 23:10, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Moops Wow, interesting. Glad it got sorted out.–CaroleHenson (talk) 21:47, 3 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Well.... funny you should mention that... see here. Moops T 21:48, 3 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023 edit

Hello CaroleHenson,

 
New Page Review queue December 2022
Backlog

The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.

2022 Awards
 

Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!

Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)

New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js

Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.

Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.

Reminders
  • Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
  • There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
  • Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
  • If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
  • To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Question from Official606k (14:37, 8 January 2023) edit

Hey Carole,

When I add a reference in Wikipedia article, should I add an archive link regardless of the status of the link or I should only add it if the link is dead? --Official606k (talk) 14:37, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Official606k, The archive url and date are only added if the link is dead (even though it may have been archived over time).
Often I find, though, that the page has been relocated to another spot on the site, so I query the main site for the topic and see if I can find the new "live" url. I hope that makes sense.–CaroleHenson (talk) 05:35, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion declined: Hillsdale (town), New York edit

Hello CaroleHenson. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Hillsdale (town), New York, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: R3 does not apply to redirects from page moves unless that page was also recently created – use WP:RFD if you want deletion. Thank you. ~ Amory (utc) 15:46, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, Amorymeltzer.–CaroleHenson (talk) 15:52, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 54 edit

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 54, November – December 2022

  • New collections:
    • British Newspaper Archive
    • Findmypast
    • University of Michigan Press
    • ACLS
    • Duke University Press
  • 1Lib1Ref 2023
  • Spotlight: EDS Refine Results

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:14, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Precious anniversary edit

Precious
 
Nine years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:03, 24 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

How sweet, thank you Gerda Arendt, Happy ninth year to you, too!

Wikimedia US Mountain West online meeting edit

 

Wikipedia users in the United States Mountain West and High Plains will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, February 14, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the history, articles, or photographs of our region is encouraged to attend.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:42, 7 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment edit

You are receiving this message because you were a Good article reviewer on at least one article that is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 or you signed up for messages. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of Good articles for copyright and other problems, unless a reviewer opens an independent Good article reassessment and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information. A list of the GA reviewers can be found here. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. You can opt in or out of further messages at this page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:20, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello and request edit

Hi! Hope you are well. When you have a moment, could you please read through Ward v. Flood...? Cielquiparle (talk) 05:01, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ghent-Bruges school edit

Hi Carole, I just wanted to drop you a line to say I've added a few sentences to the Ghent-Bruges school article you started once. So far I just added some remarks of criticism against the term, but it's not to wreck havoc with the article but an intended first step in a minor expansion. I'll try to add more on the substance in the coming days and thought I'd let you know what I'm doing. If you want we can discuss what and how. Best, Yakikaki (talk) 19:53, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Ellen Craft (Q18528650) edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ellen Craft (Q18528650) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:22, 24 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

This was just a redirect for a red links page. I see that the main ariticle Ellen and William Craft has stayed... and this link with the wikidata ID in the title is removed. Perfect!–CaroleHenson (talk) 04:57, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Colorado Collaboration invitation edit

 
WikiProject Colorado

WikiProject Colorado invites you to participate in our current collaboration to locate and document the following two original 1861 Colorado Territory county seats:

If you have any questions, please contact User:Buaidh (talk or e-mail).

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/Colorado/Invitation list. Thanks. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:11, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 55 edit

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 55, January – February 2023

  • New bundle partners:
    • Newspapers.com
    • Fold3
  • 1Lib1Ref January report
  • Spotlight: EDS SmartText Searching

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:45, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Colorado collaboration edit

 
WikiProject Colorado

We wish to thank everyone who contributed to our two prior Colorado collaborations to document the Amache National Historic Site and our three lost original county seats of Parkville, St. Vrain, and San Miguel. We invite you to help with our new collaboration to document the seven following former county seats:

If you have any questions, please contact  Buaidh  talk e-mail

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/Colorado/Invitation list. Thanks.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Original Barnstar
Thank you for your support in making the Marie Burde Article possible. Aberlin2 (talk) 04:06, 9 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
My pleasure, Aberlin2. I really liked that story... and when I started to pick around for other sources I remembered how Rolf liked to visit schoolchildren and talk about his experiences... and then I pulled the thread and am finding good info to expland the Rolf Joseph article that I started today from the German version - and with content from Marie's article.
I also noticed that the list of people that receive the Rightousnes? title has a lot of red links. Seems like that could be interesting. Thanks so much for letting me chime in on the article!–CaroleHenson (talk) 04:11, 9 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive edit

New Page Patrol | May 2023 Backlog Drive
 
  • On 1 May, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of redirects patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive.
  • Article patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Sign up here!
  • There is a possibility that the drive may not run if there are <20 registered participants. Participants will be notified if this is the case.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Original Barnstar
great work, on article on Willi Ahrem!
Sm8900 (talk) 17:31, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Sm8900, that was really nice of you!–CaroleHenson (talk) 18:33, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Original Barnstar
Thank you for your article about The White Chapel Church and Cemetery and Indian Run information. I have several Johnston family members buried in the White Chapel Cemetery and am coming to visit there this weekend. Do you know anything more about the history of this church or area or other places to look for history here? Aaronajohnston (talk) 07:39, 21 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hello Aaronajohnston
That was really nice of you! I started the Indian Run, Mercer County, Pennsylvania when working on articles related to the Underground Railroad. I wish I knew more!
If you are interested, it would be lovely if you could take some pictures while you were there and donate them to the commons. You just follow the steps to upload a file and say that it is your photo]. You would be placing it into the public domain.
Thanks for the barnstar!–CaroleHenson (talk) 12:49, 21 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia US Mountain West online meeting 05/09/2023 edit

 
Wikimedia US Mountain West

Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, May 9, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the history, geography, articles, maps, or photographs of the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. Please see our meeting page for details.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Arthur Arndt edit

On 29 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Arthur Arndt, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Arthur Arndt's family was the largest known group of Jews to successfully hide in Germany during the Holocaust? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Arthur Arndt. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Arthur Arndt), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, Amakuru.–CaroleHenson (talk) 15:47, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
April songs
 
my story today

Thank you for a good one that is also featured on Portal:Germany. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:23, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Excellent! I was thinking of you the other day - about how nice it is that you put the anniversary comments on people's talk page. You are very nice. Glad to hear that it's on the portal for Germany! Very nice. Thank you!–CaroleHenson (talk) 15:47, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
I like to hear that, - great to meat your work again! - I do "my story" every day now, keep watching if you are interested. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:44, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
I will, thanks!–CaroleHenson (talk) 17:09, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
@CaroleHenson: thanks for bringing us this article, I was really interested by the hook fact, and when I checked for other examples (because often sources exaggerate "record" claims of this nature) it seems it actually was the largest group of hidden survivors in Germany. It must have been incredibly hard for them. Happy weekend to you, and to Gerda Arendt too.  — Amakuru (talk) 07:46, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, AmakuruCaroleHenson (talk) 08:28, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

You've got mail II edit

Mandruss  07:36, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Mandruss I didn't get it... and sent you an email. Did you get it?–CaroleHenson (talk) 08:30, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Yes. I re-sent the first email and replied to this last one. ―Mandruss  08:57, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Mandruss I still haven't received anything from you. I am getting other emails, though.–CaroleHenson (talk) 14:34, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Never mind. Found it and replied.–CaroleHenson (talk) 14:39, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Replied to your reply. ―Mandruss  19:58, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

You've got more mail, new subject. ―Mandruss  16:18, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Maria de Knuijt edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Maria de Knuijt, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can (bot)&section=new report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:53, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi Qwerfjkl, Yes, I caught that. I keep forgetting that I cannot assume that if it's in JSTOR that it's a journal. Thanks!–CaroleHenson (talk) 00:04, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Mary Brewster Hazelton edit

Thank you for the article on Mary Brewster Hazelton. I am curious, who is the woman depicted in The Letter? Is it a self-portrait of the subject? It's a remarkable work. Viriditas (talk) 09:12, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

My pleasure, Viriditas, I don't know who is the subject of the painting. I bet it's an interesting piece of information, though. She looks similar to other women in Hazelton's paintings.–CaroleHenson (talk) 13:53, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. Is there a catalogue raisonné or equivalent of her work? This particular painting has me intrigued. Viriditas (talk) 22:24, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Viriditas I am not seeing one, but here's a list of her works at the Smithsonian Institution, an incredible reference for works of art.–CaroleHenson (talk) 23:07, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. I will have a go at it. Note, I also left a separate message on the talk page if it interests you. Viriditas (talk) 23:30, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Yes, thanks. I fixed it - and see that you thanked me for the fix.–CaroleHenson (talk) 23:59, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Maria de Knuijt edit

On 15 May 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Maria de Knuijt, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that according to scholarship published in 2023, Maria de Knuijt, rather than her husband, was actually the main patron of Dutch painter Johannes Vermeer (work pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Maria de Knuijt. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Maria de Knuijt), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 15 May 2023 (UTC) Reply

May songs
 
my story today

Thank you for your share of the article! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:20, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, Gerda Arendt!–CaroleHenson (talk) 15:29, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
... and now May scenery pictured when you click on songs --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:15, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Gerda Arendt, the images are really lovely. Viewing them made my lunch very enjoyable, like I was on a trip.–CaroleHenson (talk) 17:55, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
that was so encouraging that I uploaded more ;) - also new memory and music --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:00, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Very lovely, Gerda Arendt! I just noticed that you named this year as the "2023 · in resilience". Great intention for this year! I used to be able to walk to the opera in a large city... and so miss it now. I liked seeing opera on your page!––CaroleHenson (talk) 22:54, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! - keep watching my stories for daily entertainment if you like, - today's is a singer who came right from OTD. Four operas were linked in her DYK hook in 2018 ;) - impossible with today's DYK crew for whom opera is foreign territory. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:59, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Pentecost was full of music, and my story today is that 300 years ago today, Bach became Thomaskantor, with BWV 75, writing music history. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Nice, Gerda Arendt! Thank you.–CaroleHenson (talk) 22:01, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Alonzo Barnard edit

I am have researched Alonzo Barnard for years and years and here I find that you know incredible am't of stuff about him. Would appreciate corresponding. As I write, I am heading to visit Benzonia, Michigan to sniff about. I am focused on Fredric & Elisabeth Ayer who recruited Barnard to Minnesota missions and who lived at Belle Prairie where he apparently lived after leaving Pembina-St.Joseph, for a time and where he had a dauguerrean studio at Little Falls. The history of the "Oberlin Band" of missionaries and their collaboration with the Ayers is a remarkable one, given the sectarian nature of many of the mission projects. To contact me, I am Mrs.Bryan and my email carrier is ATT and its surname is dot net. Linda Bryan, from St. Paul Linda Bryan (talk) 13:04, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

I am moving this discussion to Talk:Alonzo Barnard#Talk conversation about Alonzo Barnard.–CaroleHenson (talk) 18:36, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 56 edit

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 56, March – April 2023

  • New partner:
    • Perlego
  • Library access tips and tricks
  • Spotlight: EveryBookItsReader

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:03, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Women in Green June 2023 Good Article Editathon notification edit

 

Hello CaroleHenson:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Editathon event in June 2023!

Running from June 1 to 30, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event – another Wildcard Edition! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to any and all women and women's works during the event period. Want to improve an article about a Bollywood actress? Go for it. A pioneering female climate scientist? Absolutely. An award-winning book or film by a woman? Yes! GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to receive a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Alanna the Brave (talk)

You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 25 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

June songs edit

June songs
 
my story today

I like today's Main page, and here's why ;) -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:39, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Lovely, Gerda Arendt! I found them here. Lovely!–CaroleHenson (talk) 16:20, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
I have something to share with you. I don't know if you have heard of this story and amazing song, but if not I hope you enjoy this. The singing begins at 2:50 min, and the story is before then and after the song. This melts my heart years after I first heard it... and he went on to get more training and appearances.–CaroleHenson (talk) 16:20, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
I'll check after rehearsal! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:23, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Last weekend was nice, class reunion a funny number of years after completing school, and the lovely park where I spent many Sundays as a child. Today's story is quite dramatic, there's a yt trailer to the hook. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:54, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Gerda Arendt, I am not sure what it is, but I am so touched by this and/or Kölner Domchor. I am a psychic medium, getting poignant feelings beyond my experience, if that makes sense. Is something about the operas or the park that would be especially touching to your grandmother? Was she a sweet, elegant woman? Feel free to email rather than posting personal info here, if there is a connection. –CaroleHenson (talk) 16:33, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
It could also be an aunt. What I am getting is a woman who wore her hair in lovely styles and statement jewelry pieces, like cuff bracelets. Classic, elegant - but not at all fussy - clothing. She didn't have to do a lot (hairdos, jewelry), though, to stand out. She had a lovely presence about her and great posture that signaled that she was a special woman.–CaroleHenson (talk) 16:41, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Interesting. Sorry, no grandmother (but I knew only one) or aunt would fit that description. - 11 June or: Music not only by Bach --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:11, 12 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hi Gerda Arendt. I have been trying to sort it out. The woman appeared before me with as much detail as if I opened my front door to her in real life. Very sophisticated, lovely in spirit, and poised. I don't have relatives quite like her either.
It very rarely happens, but I have had some people who have passed that are in the news, movies, etc. come through to me as I am hearing about them. I had just seen Portrait of Adele Bloch-Bauer I - then read about Adele in Wikipedia, the subject of the painting and movie Woman in Gold (film), just before I messaged with you. I was really emotionally moved (and open spiritually), so the only thing that makes sense to me is that she was Adele from the painting or her family member. I'll try to get a reading from her and see if she comes through. And, if so, why. It's an interesting mystery.
Thanks for the update about your music posts. It's always interesting to take those in.–CaroleHenson (talk) 22:51, 14 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, and the pictured beauty matches your vision much better than any of my relatives ;) - Jörg Widmann is 50 today, and I began Stockholm pics. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:58, 19 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Today: a woman caught by the iron curtain (improved with SusunW and GRuban), yesterday: the Mass in B minor, heard in concert then, three musical videos are out, and the rest of the vacation pics is now there. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:42, 29 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks so much, Gerda Arendt. What a lovely story of triumph by a tenatious woman. And, great vacation pics. I really appreciate it! I hope you are doing well.–CaroleHenson (talk) 12:01, 29 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023 edit

Hello CaroleHenson,

 
New Page Review queue April to June 2023

Backlog

Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.

Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.

Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.

You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.

Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).

Reminders

Prodding, etc edit

We can agree that the article Nikki Hornsby is terrible. However, two things. First, it's a bad idea for anyone who's expressed an opinion on an article (or a part/aspect thereof) to remove others' comments from the article's talk page. I strongly suggest that you should only do this when the material is gratuitously and obviously offensive (crude comments on the subject's imagined sex life or lack thereof, and similar silliness) or appears to be libelous. Even if you haven't expressed an opinion, leave mere indignation: even if I hadn't expressed an opinion, I would not have removed what you removed. Secondly, proposed deletions (prods) are for uncontroversial cases, unsourced articles. The sourcing for this article is grossly inadequate, but some sources are provided: the article is not unsourced. And it's pretty obvious that the faction that, over the years, has been adding promotional blather would strongly object to the article's deletion; thus deletion would certainly not be uncontroversial. (Indeed, the subject may well satisfy WP:PERSON, for all I know. I'm not really competent to judge. I'd ask for Chubbles' opinion.) -- Hoary (talk) 01:23, 29 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Hoary,
First: I get your point about removing talk page content. It's highly rare, I get that. I don't regret it in this case, but I definitely hear you about doing that in the middle of request for input / resolution of an issue. If you want me to set things back in the Grammy section of the talk page, I will do it... with a note and link about talk page guidelines.
Second: I am not sure about meeting Notability guidelines for musicians or people... there's not clear notability that I have seen yet, but it's possible. Gotcha re: prod. I can update the BLP post, changing the prod info to Afd with the link to guidelines for that.
Thanks for taking the time to post this message here. You're right.–CaroleHenson (talk) 01:42, 29 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
I think it would be wise to reinstate what you deleted, yes. You would of course then be free to give your (dispassionate) opinion of it. You might also retract your tentative suggestion of a prod. -- Hoary (talk) 01:49, 29 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hoary, I made the changes to the talk page... and added an ident here. It really helps me keep things straight.–CaroleHenson (talk) 02:21, 29 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

I now read: "Based on the patterns of content additions from IP users over the years, I recommend asking the page to be protected." No. And that's no without even looking at the history. What about content additions from IP users over the last 24 hours? Though one might, perhaps, expand that to a period of as long as one week: how deleterious and time-wasting have their attempts in the last week been? Please read -- OK, it's long and boring, so no immediate need to read, but please at least get the general drift of Wikipedia:Protection policy. -- Hoary (talk) 02:04, 29 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hoary, We don't need to worry about that at the moment, and I realize it would have to be approved. I am gathering by your response is that it likely would not be approved, so it wouldn't make a difference what I thought. In 12 years, I think I only asked once for an article to be protected, if I remember right it was for 7 days and the IP user / sockpuppet issue was resolved soon after due to diligent management of the issue. — In the meantime, I am processing this.–CaroleHenson (talk) 02:21, 29 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
I agree that talk page history should be preserved as maximally as possible, even if benignly off-topic; I think even our guidelines probably go too far in what can be removed. I recommend that prior discussion be retained. I also tried to wrangle the beast of that article a little (note that she or her family has also done some damage at her grandfather's page, Dan Hornsby. Chubbles (talk) 03:03, 29 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Yes, Chubbles, that has been done. Thanks again for your work on finding a good version to start with and help last night on the article. It's nice to see it tag-free and fully cited.–CaroleHenson (talk) 11:47, 29 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Chubbles, When working on Nikki's article, I became interested in her grandfather. So, with a pinch of atonement and more interest, I have been working on that one, too. I hope you like it.–CaroleHenson (talk) 22:25, 29 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

New pages patrol needs your help! edit

 
New pages awaiting review as of June 30th, 2023.

Hello CaroleHenson,

The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.

Reminders:

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Radiator Building - Night, New York, 1927.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Radiator Building - Night, New York, 1927.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 1 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

B, Wow, do you have a cool username!
I don't know why it was deleted. I guess it was used in the Georgia O'Keeffe article - I probably added it to begin with.
If I read somewhere that a file is being questioned - or if I question an image - I just remove it straight away. So, it was possible it was me. If it someone thinks it should be deleted, I think "delete it" and "better to be safe than sorry".–CaroleHenson (talk) 17:53, 1 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
B, As it happens, I am working on images for the Georgia O'Keeffe article and going through the subcategories in Commons. And what did I find? That painting loaded by another user. Can I use it?–CaroleHenson (talk) 18:00, 1 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Catherine de Parthenay edit

On 5 July 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Catherine de Parthenay, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Catherine de Parthenay (pictured), a 16th-century Huguenot leader, was a member of "a highly successful network of information" during the French Wars of Religion? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Catherine de Parthenay. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Catherine de Parthenay), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 5 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your emerging success edit

Hi there, Carole. I've been following your contributions since we first started collaborating back in 2011. Today, thanks to your DYK on Catherine de Parthenay, I though I would drop you a line on how much I have appreciated your contributions over the years. You can see from these assessments that in addition to nine GAs, you have no less than 166 articles which have been B rated and 271 in class C. This is a really significant achievement, especially as more recently you have been creating an increasing number of biographies of women. I realize your beautifully presented user page does not have much room for wikiproject tags but nevertheless, with all your expertise, it seems to me you could be an inspiring member of WikiProject Women in Red where we are trying to chip away at the gender gap. If you would like to help us along, you can sign up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members. Whether on not you become a member, I look forward to many more of your detailed biographies of historical women. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 15:08, 5 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ipigott, How nice of you to make this post and provide a class for a number of articles today. You were among the first people that I communicated withi in the beginning. You were so kind to work on my contributions and provide input and guidance. You were a light in the foggy times when I was trying to figure out how to edit in Wikipedia.
So, it's especially nice to get such a nice message for you. Thank you for all that you do!
I thought I was on the Women in Red members list. I will go add my name. Thanks for catching that. I hope you have a lovely day - and know how much you are appreciated.–CaroleHenson (talk) 16:13, 5 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you so much for your kind words. It's good to have reestablished contact with an old friend. I really enjoyed looking back over your wonderful contributions on art, the Colorado Springs area and all your well developed biographies of both men and women. Many of your articles which had been successfully classed earlier had suffered from those who had added WP United States (without a class rating) and your own use of WP Virtual art (which has none). Virtually all your detailed articles on Van Gogh therefore became "unknown". Thanks to the recent possibility of using WP Banner shell (WikiProject banner shell|class=|blp=|blpo=|activepol=|collapsed=|listas=|1=) for assessments, I'm glad I have been able to sort it all out so that others can see your well developed contributions. It's thanks to contributors like you that Wikipedia has become such a useful resource. Keep up the good work and let me know if you ever think I can be of assistance.--Ipigott (talk) 16:39, 5 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Thank you for signing up and welcome to the project. If you have not already done so, you might find it useful to look at our essays, especially the Primer. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 06:25, 6 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Excellent, thanks, Ipigott. There are some great sources that I didn't know about. Love the part about how to (and not to) write about notable women. I saw something like that within the past week. Very interesting and helpful.–CaroleHenson (talk) 14:35, 6 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

I would like to add my appreciation for the great work you do. I joined your fan club after I saw the great edits on John Brown (Abolitionist). -- Melchior2006 (talk) 07:15, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks so much! That was really nice of you, Melchior2006.–CaroleHenson (talk) 09:41, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red July 2023 edit

 
Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 7, Nos 251, 252, 274, 275, 276


Online events:

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

  Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Ipigott (talk) 06:25, 6 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks so much, Ipigott! Yesterday, I enjoyed looking at your user page (very impressive) and found links to Women with most red links and Most redlined names (men). That would be nice to work on. I also have more biographies of Danish people that helped rescue Danish Jews and resistance fighters during World War II. I started some biographies about the key coordinators / leaders in Denmark that tie into the article Rescue of the Danish Jews, so I want to incorporate them in other articles as well.
You have a wonderful body of work here, LOTS of DYKs, and many well-deserved accolades.–CaroleHenson (talk) 14:28, 6 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Our current Abphabet run on A & B contains links to the most linked women but I think that up to now I have been the only one to pick a name from the lists. Thanks for all your interest in my user page but in fact nearly all the GAs and DYKs have been the result of strong collaboration. In connection with the rescue of Danish Jews, the island of Møn (where I am at moment) is currently celebrating the 80th anniversary of the escapes they arranged from here. Until quite recently, I tried to create a new women's biography every day but I have now decided it is more important to encourage others (like you) to join the team. I hope this will lead to an increase in pertinent contributions. I'm glad you found the Primer useful. It was written mainly by one of our most productive members, SusunW. You'll see that her user page is really impressive.--Ipigott (talk) 14:54, 6 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Oh, that's very interesting, I came across Møn in one of the Danish biographies. Very cool!–CaroleHenson (talk) 14:58, 6 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

July music edit

July songs
 
my story today

Great music (in June, I'm behind: three great RMF concerts)! - Last Saturday, a friend played for us at her birthday party, on four instruments including baryton, with family (granddaughters!) and colleagues, from Renaissance to Haydn. - My story today is very personal: the DYK appeared on Wikipedia's 15th birthday, and describes a concert I sang. I was requested to translate the bio into German for a memorial concert ... - see background, and we talked about life and death. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:14, 12 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Gerda Arendt, thanks so much! Wow! the music program at the birthday party sounds awesome. Fun to hear that you sang at a concert... and I shouldn't be surprised. Interesting article. Lots of good things happening around you!–CaroleHenson (talk) 18:34, 12 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
No you shouldn't be surprised after reading the infobox on my user page ;) - I made up my mind to improve Mozart's Requiem. We'll sing it this year, 26 November. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:57, 12 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Gerda Arendt, Very interesting infobox. Good luck with everything you're working on!–CaroleHenson (talk) 20:19, 12 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. You could actually help "luck" a bit. I look at the people who recently died, and those I care about (music, German, whatever) I try to improve to a state that they can appear in the section for Recent deaths on the Main page, which means everything has to be referenced, and a biography has to have some substance. Then it takes (normally) three supporters. You could be one of them ;) - just look at WP:ITNN and there for my name and cases with two supports already ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:35, 12 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Gerda Arendt, Interesting articles, I supported two articles. I didn't know about this process before. Very interesting.–CaroleHenson (talk) 23:41, 12 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you - and two articles appeared! My story today will be for one of them, and tomorrow the other. The RD process is rewarding in terms of pageviews, did you know? For some reason I can't explain, readers click on the names in that section - where they only get a name - more than in the DYK section where they get a sentence. I like to do memorials. You are very welcome to support the biographies of others as well! ... or even write them? Check Deaths in 2023 for people you would like to see remembered. Most names there I never heard before, such as the two now on the Main page. I learn a lot. - Did you see my idea for that memorial concert mentioned yesterday? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:06, 13 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the link regarding recent deaths. I may check that out. Yes, it would be nice to hear any updates about the memorial concert. It is a good idea. Good luck!–CaroleHenson (talk) 13:44, 13 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
not sure what you mean about updates - it happened in 2016, my idea - to sing the chorale, all of us present - was taken, and then I couldn't sing, for too much emotion, and too small print ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:41, 13 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Gerda Arendt, I misunderstood. I am sorry. I see. I have been really foggy for a couple of days.–CaroleHenson (talk) 17:51, 13 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
No problem. Your reaction to the (bold) request for help was perfectly clear ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:47, 13 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
more? fireworks on the Rhine pictured on 1 July, but the real stars were sun and moon. I love today's story. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:54, 15 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Gerda Arendt, Love the fireworks! Love the title of the article, reminds me of a Danish resistance fighter with the codename Flame or Flammen during the Rescue of the Danish Jews.
I love the article in today's story, too. What a woman!–CaroleHenson (talk) 23:42, 15 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
She got a new pic! - Today, I remember Reger's Requiem, and our choirs' jubilee 2 weeks ago. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:44, 16 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Gerda Arendt Love the new pic!
The Requiem is so powerful. I found this one on youtube. What do you think about having a direct link to a recording, like using the {{External media}} template or perhaps in the Recordings table. If I remember correctly, it's ok to have extneral links in certain lists. WP:ELYES.
I have been crying through this. It makes me think of the Christmas truce during World War I with the dead in "no mans land" and the soldiers cold and wet in the trenches before they call the truce. One of my favorite stories. Wow, this music and use of quiet at times - and then loud and fast - is very powerful! Shivers!–CaroleHenson (talk) 22:09, 16 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, feel understood! The pic is by Storye book, who has helped me to other portraits and would help you as well, I'm sure. About the Requiem, I just spoke to Antandrus. - I've seen external audio in the body of articles, but haven't used it myself. - I found two YouTube videos for a little song we sang today, - one done during COVID with separate tracks for the singers, and one with the text author singing and clapping. - In the Requiem, I hear too little of the bass in the beginning, but too much of the first choir entrance which should be more mysterious for me. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:37, 16 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Gerda Arendt, Thanks for the tip on someone to help with images. I have been working on Anne Gliddon and would love to get a picture of her.
Interesting comments on the requiem. I just picked from a search - without any idea how good the recording was compared to other recordings that might be truer to the composition. I'll hunt around to find one that is even better a bit later. Thanks so much for giving me a window into what is fulfilling for you!–CaroleHenson (talk) 22:48, 16 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. I use only youtube with decent publishers, and avoid it when there many styles of a piece - readers will find something they like, I trust. - On today's Main page, you can find a cantata that Bach first performed 300 years ago, and an iconic saxophonist from East Germany. Also: a bit about the history of QAI on my talk. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:33, 18 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

While today's DYK highlights Santiago on his day, I did my modest share with my story today, describing what I just experienced, pictured. I began the article of the woman in green. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:22, 25 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Gerda Arendt Lovely. I listened to the version by Tenebrae (choir) on youtube. Very emotional. Now I know what the path to miracles sounds like.–CaroleHenson (talk) 15:51, 25 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Today Jahrhundertring, and I'm listening to Götterdämmerung from the Bayreuth Festival, close to the scene pictured, - the image (of a woman who can't believe what she has to see) features also on the article talk. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:01, 31 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red 8th Anniversary edit

  Women in Red 8th Anniversary
In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap!

--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Books & Bytes – Issue 57 edit

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 57, May – June 2023

  • Suggestion improvements
  • Favorite collections tips
  • Spotlight: Promoting Nigerian Books and Authors

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:22, 18 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thomas Williams edit

Dear Carole Hensen, I very much enjoyed the wiki page on Thomas Williams who is one of my ancestors. I believe there were a few errors in the wiki page with respect to his descendants. Angelique is daughter of Thomas and Cecile. Cecile and Jacques Louzon had a large family so John R, Catherine and Angelique had many half siblings. Cecile’s maiden name was Cecile Campau. I found out these facts doing family genealogy work. I can try to send sources. Thank you, Robin Williams Curiouserandcurioser (talk) 03:30, 25 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi Curiouserandcurioser
I will take a look at it, Robin, and see if I mixed up anything. And also if I can find other sources for Thomas Williams (pioneer).
Let's see what comes up that way. I have done a lot of family geneaology work and there are stricter requirements for what is a reliable sources at Wikipedia, which I generally sum up as having an independent editor and an independent publisher. Good to hear from you.–CaroleHenson (talk) 03:56, 25 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Curiouserandcurioser From the sources I have found, Thomas Williams and Cecile Campau (also Campeau) had three children, Catherine, Elizabeth, and John R. And, they are almost always spoken of the same way,
Elizabeth taught in a Catholic school that co-founded with three other young women under the auspices of Gabriel Richard, a Detroit priest. She lived a single, chaste lifestyle, like a nun.[19][b] In 1809, Catherine married Jean Baptiste Peltier with whom she had two children.[4] John R. was the first mayor of Detroit, and served several of times more. He married his cousin, Mary Mott Williams, in 1804. They had ten children.[4]
Yes, I have that Cecile was a Campau, which is mentioned in the article. I also added a link to an article that I started, Campau family. Sometimes the surname is spelled Campeau. Was there a particular reason that you said Cecile’s maiden name was Cecile Campau.?
Regarding Angelique, is there, by any chance, confusion with Angelique Campau, who like Elizabeth taught at the Catholic school with Gabriel Richard - from here?
Angelique Campau (not Williams or Loson) married someone with a similar name to Catherine's husband - Angelique's husband was Jean B. Piquette here. That could have caused some confusion if someone mixed up Angelique Campau with Catherine Williams.
I am having a hard time finding Angelique, including in the French Catholic Church records from Detroit. And had to remove the citation that I had for her, because she wasn't there. It would be great to know what sources you have for Angelique.
You had started your message out that you see a couple of problems, but the only one that I am getting is Angelique's paternity. Or, am I missing something?–CaroleHenson (talk) 00:27, 26 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
I added Angelique Campau's husband's name - underlined.–CaroleHenson (talk) 00:41, 26 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Cecile had a second marriage to Jacques Lozon. They had a lot of children. So John R had many half siblings, which seem to be more or less ignored in the Williams family history thereafter. Could one of them be Angelique? The half siblings of John R aren’t related to Thomas, but still there are some amusing elements to this part of the story. One of John R’s descendants was a younger Thomas Williams who was a military man and at one time the commandant on MacInaw (?) island. The Louzons had family connections with some of the Indians in the area. Also, the St. Clair farm was the only piece of land that was saved from original Thomas’ estate. Jacques Campau, I believe, at one time tried to claim it. I found an old lawsuit by John R and the half siblings relating to this. This is all old research of mine. First I’ll send the genealogical info I have which I will have to extract from ancestry.com. Catherine’s descendants did a great genealogical study which at one point was public and outside of ancestry.com. I think maybe I confused Angelique and Catherine when I wrote to you. More to come. PS As far as Cecile’s name I have always seen it spelled Campau. Interestingly they seem to have been a French speaking family. I have an old letter written by her to John R and it is in French. Curiouserandcurioser (talk) 00:52, 26 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Curiouserandcurioser Interesting info about the Williams - Campau - Losan families. I couldn't find anything in ancestry.com - but if you pass me a link, I can look it up there. Or, tell me what to search for... I have tried Angelique - born 10 years more or less from 1684 when Williams died. And, Angelique with Williams and Campau. If you could point me to a specific record, that would help a lot.
I have also searched through Early history of Detroit books and books about the Campau family.
For now, I removed the sentence about Angelique. I cannot find her as the daughter of Cecile at all.–CaroleHenson (talk) 00:58, 26 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
I wanted to attach a pdf of my ancestry page on Cecile but cannot figure out how to do it. I did find some original documents that are in ancestry. I took a look at some of the source documents such as her marriage to Jacques Lozon. That document is in French and calls her Campeau, but her brother Campau. I can give you viewing rights to my family tree if you want. I’ve never been on wiki before so it is a bit difficult for me to navigate. The Louzon’s had one daughter Marie Angelique but she only lived a year. And Thomas Williams seemed to have only John R, Catherine and Elisabeth as you thought. Robin Williams Curiouserandcurioser (talk) 01:23, 26 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Curiouserandcurioser, What you found about Marie Angelique Louzon makes a lot of sense. There were a series of epidemics in Detroit and its surrounding area that kept the priests busy to manage the ill and dying.
I think we're good right now. It's been an interesting discussion, Robin.–CaroleHenson (talk) 04:43, 26 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red August 2023 edit

 
Women in Red August 2023, Vol 9, Iss 8, Nos 251, 252, 277, 278, 279, 280


Online events:

See also:

  • Wikimania 2023 will be held in Singapore, 16–19 August, and will be facilitated by the
    affiliates in the ESEAP (East/South East/Asia/Pacific) region.

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

  Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Wikimedia US Mountain West online meeting 08/08/2023 edit

 
Wikimedia US Mountain West

Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, August 8, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in articles, history, geography, maps, or photographs of the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. We may try to organize one or more Wiknics. Guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Happy Colorado Day! edit

How lovely, Pbritti! Great picture of Garden of the Gods with the very snowy Pikes Peak in the background. It's a good side shot of the red rock formations. (I am trying to figure out where the picture is taken from... perhaps the visitor center or Mesa Road.) Thanks for the message!–CaroleHenson (talk) 20:10, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
I was wondering about the angle, too. I think it may be from the construction on the hogback just east of GOTG, but I my own photos from that area don't quite align. ~ Pbritti (talk) 20:12, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! Pbritti, Since the road goes to the visitor center, I am thinking it's a little further north and up on Mesa Road. It is a beautiful angle. There's a really cool lookout area there, I am guessing you know.–CaroleHenson (talk) 21:00, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

August music edit

August songs
 
my story today

Today's music is played by my brother's orchestra, conducted by two very young men on their way up, - the picture was taken shortly after the invasion of Ukraine began, - more detail on my talk. Images reached the day of the Tenebrae concert mentioned in July. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:23, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Gerda Arendt What an interesting bit of information: "played by my brother's orchestra". I am not sure if that means that he's one of the conductors or an owner / manager of the orchestra. I bet you are a super proud sister and vice versa.
I really like the selection of The Firebird to honor the Ukranians. Amazing evocative music... that I liked and understood even more when I researched about the meaning of Stravinsky's The Firebird. Amazing! Thanks for sharing it Gerda!
You know I am prone to finding a meaning or connection... today it is my memory of how Pat Conroy (3rd and 4th paragraph), a Southern American teacher of poor black children living on an isolated island, taught his students to appreciate music by explaining the meaning of classical pieces like Beethoven's Fifth or Flight of the Bumblebe. I found a clip of the movie of his life at that time, Conrack, and the place where he explains and plays Beethoven's Fifth here at 32.16, so good! (the bumble bee and Brahms' Lullaby are played 3 minutes earlier). He's like you... spreading your love of music.–CaroleHenson (talk) 18:49, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! I hope It won't disillusion you too much that my sloppy a bit sensational wording just meant that my brother is a player, - more detail on my talk, as said. Also, the program was set months before. - Connections: I just was surprised on radio by "Ach, ich habe sie verloren", from Gluck's Orfeo ed Euridice, to which I held a puppet on strings of Orfeo lamenting in a school production. Conductor Ferenc Fricsay, the same as in the first scenic production (1948) of the piece I worked on here yesterday, Le Vin herbé (because I saw it here). Small world. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:37, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Gerda Arendt Wow! That's very interesting. Yes, a small world.–CaroleHenson (talk) 21:56, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! - My story today - a first - isn't about an article by me, but one I reviewed for DYK, see here. I like all: topic, "hook", connected article (a GA on its way towards FA), image and the music "in the background". I just returned from a weekend of weddings, so also like the spirit ;) - Pics to come, I promise one cake, the other was too large! Good music, and better even in the concert ending the second day, - Goldberg Variations theme for an encore, after Dohnányi Serenade. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:10, 7 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Very cool, thanks! I hope you're having a great day.–CaroleHenson (talk) 15:31, 8 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Again not by me: today's story - with the triumph of music over military - is uplifting! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:24, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks so much, Gerda Arendt, that reminds me of Vedran Smailović, the cellist of Sarajevo, who played during the siege of Sarajevo. It's one of my favorite stories how he sat in the middle of a bombed out square to play his cell for peace. Much appreciated.–CaroleHenson (talk) 23:23, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! - Now: picture of heart-shaped cake(s) uploaded! - Today's story is about a tenor, - why his roles are not linked on the Main page remains a mystery to me. Today is also the birthday of the Bayreuth Festival. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:34, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
One more day uploaded, with another wedding cake - I couldn't resist. Today's story is about the Inkpot Madonna who returned to "her place" 9 years ago, and also has aspects of early learning, remember? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:26, 15 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Today is the anniversary of the premiere of Götterdämmerung. Berit Lindholm sang its final scene in concert at the Royal Festival Hall in London, only four years after her stage debut in a Mozart opera in Stockholm. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:31, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Very interesting! Thanks so much, Gerda Arendt. You have amazing knowledge and passion about music and musicians.–CaroleHenson (talk) 19:39, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
I love your response because DYK doesn't think she is interesting. Today, my focus is on Renata Scotto, after days of updating. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:18, 20 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Very cool, Gerda Arendt! I may have seen Renata at the Met in NYC. I went to a number of operas during the time she was there. You do such great work!–CaroleHenson (talk) 20:39, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
One of the sources (Met roles) has all her performances, and for each the complete cast, and for some a review. You can run it against your memory. I was there some of the time but didn't see her, as I was more interested in Teresa Żylis-Gara. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:47, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Interesting, Gerda Arendt! How cool if we had passed each other at the Met!–CaroleHenson (talk) 00:55, 22 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
yes, cool, - I remember without looking that I saw La bohème twice, on the day after the blizzard in spring 1983 (and the fire was too high when Rodolfo burnt his poems, and Levine had to interrupt until a fireman had extinguished), and on 16 November 1984, Domingo conducting. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:13, 22 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Today is Debussy's birthday. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:43, 22 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Gerda Arendt, Thanks, it's funny how our memories come together! Love your post - and that it was Debussy's birthday. You are fun!–CaroleHenson (talk) 17:04, 26 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Yes, funny! Today is Gwendolyn Killebrew's birthday, - pictured: a spider and sweet food --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:18, 26 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
This too shall pass. - Ten years ago on 28 August, I heard a symphony, with a heavy heart because of the pending decision in WP:ARBINFOBOX, and not worried about my future here but Andy's. - It passed, and I could write the DYK about calling to dance, not battle, and Andy could write the DYK mentioning about peace and reconciliation, - look. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:12, 28 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Gerda Arendt, I love so much of what you have posted here: bugle call to dance, quote from Malala Yousafzai (isn't she amazing! love her!), Ben Gunn's metamorphosis, and the music! Thanks so much!–CaroleHenson (talk) 22:45, 28 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
10 years ago! - my story today: epic voice --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:40, 29 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Gerda Arendt, really lovely expansion of the article from a stub. I like that it not only explores who she was as an artist, but also who she was as the matriarch of the family. She sounds like someone I would really have enjoyed getting to know. Great work!–CaroleHenson (talk) 22:42, 29 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, - quoted on my talk ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:01, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

El Pueblo change regarding original founder James Beckwourth edit

I understand your removal of the change I made which was not accompanied by an appropriate reference. I am away from my library but will complete the task within the next couple of days. Thanks for your attentions - good work!

doktatDoktat (talk) 01:49, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Sounds great, thanks, DoktatCaroleHenson (talk) 20:35, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

September 2023 at Women In Red edit

 
Women in Red September 2023, Vol 9, Iss 9, Nos 251, 252, 281, 282, 283


Online events:

Tip of the month:

  • The books she wrote might be notable, too; learn 5 quick tips about about book articles.

Other ways to participate:

  Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Victuallers (talk) 16:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Sfn references edit

Hi, I've fixed all the sfn errors you introduced to Amanda Knox. DuncanHill (talk) 09:28, 29 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Very cool, DuncanHill. I don't know what you mean by "all the sfn errors you introduced". I saw 2 edits. Anyway. I used the "authors" parameter as the only way I could figure out to solve the duplicate sfn errors - even when using the "ref" parameter within the bibliography entries.
I didn't see the sfn errors. Thanks much for fixing the issue!–CaroleHenson (talk) 16:39, 29 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

September music edit

September songs
 
my story today

Our festival's last concert was most moving and inspiring, and there are seconds of it - plus glimpses of an interview with the conductor, age 96 - in this tv summary. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:40, 3 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Now pics around the memorable concert, and the story of Walter Arlen, - proud that I survived the decision in WP:ARBINFOBOX for 10 years, standing and singing --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:07, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Today's story is about a great pianist with an unusual career, taking off when he was 50. It's the wedding anniversary of Clara and Robert Schumann, but I was too late with our gift. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:40, 12 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Gerda Arendt, Hello! I have not been on Wikipedia much in the last week or so, but will be catching up on your posts soon. Thanks for sharing your stories, articles, and music with me!–CaroleHenson (talk) 05:04, 13 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
take your time - today I remember Raymond Arritt, who still helps me, five years after he died, per what he said in my darkest time on Wikipedia (placed in my edit-notice as a reminder), and by teh rulez. - Latest pics from a weekend in Berlin (one more day to come). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:21, 19 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive edit

New Page Patrol | October 2023 Backlog Drive
 
  • On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Articles will earn 3x as many points compared to redirects.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 58 edit

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 58, July – August 2023

  • New partners - De Standaard and Duncker & Humblot
  • Tech tip: Filters
  • Wikimania presentation

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:26, 12 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Women in Green GA Editathon October 2023 - Around the World in 31 Days edit

 

Hello CaroleHenson:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2023!

Running from October 1 to 31, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Alanna the Brave (talk) 00:53, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.

New pages patrol newsletter edit

Hello CaroleHenson,

 
New Page Review article queue, March to September 2023

Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!

October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.

PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.

Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.

Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red October 2023 edit

 
Women in Red October 2023, Vol 9, Iss 10, Nos 251, 252, 284, 285, 286


Online events:

See also

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

  Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Women in Red - November 2023 edit

 
Women in Red November 2023, Vol 9, Iss 11, Nos 251, 252, 287, 288, 289


Online events:

See also

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

  Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

November Articles for creation backlog drive edit

 

Hello CaroleHenson:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 2400 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:23, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Sky Above Clouds edit

I will be focusing on some other articles for a bit, but if you need something, let me know.

I'm taking you up on your offer! Any chance you can take a look at Sky Above Clouds and make some suggestions for improvement, or give it a copyedit? No rush on this, of course. Viriditas (talk) 19:55, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

US Mountain West online meeting November 14 edit

 
Wikimedia US Mountain West

Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, November 14, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. All guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.

-MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of South Platte River Trail (disambiguation) edit

 

The article South Platte River Trail (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This disambiguation page contains the primary topic and one other topic for the ambiguous title and no other topics can be found within a reasonable time.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:03, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 59 edit

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 59, September – October 2023

  • Spotlight: Introducing a repository of anti-disinformation projects
  • Tech tip: Library access methods

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:15, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red December 2023 edit

 
Women in Red December 2023, Vol 9, Iss 12, Nos 251, 252, 290, 291, 292


Online events:

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

  Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Todd Kashdan for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Todd Kashdan, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Todd Kashdan (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 5 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

December edit

 
December: story · music · places

My story today is about Michael Robinson, - it's an honour to have known him. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:22, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Today, I have a special story to tell, of the works of a musician born 300 years ago. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:44, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive edit

New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
 
  • On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Pop Chalee.jpeg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Pop Chalee.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. holly {chat} 01:02, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:GoodNewsNetwork logo.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:GoodNewsNetwork logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 23 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red January 2024 edit

 
 
Women in Red | January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296


Online events:

Announcement

  • In 2024 Women in Red also has a one biography a week challenge as part
    of the #1day1woman initiative!

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

  Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

Unreferenced articles February 2024 backlog drive edit

WikiProject Unreferenced articles | February 2024 Backlog Drive
 

There is a substantial backlog of unsourced articles on Wikipedia, and we need your help! The purpose of this drive is to add sources to these unsourced articles and make a meaningful impact.

  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles cited.
  • Remember to tag your edit summary with [[WP:FEB24]], both to advertise the event and tally the points later using Edit Summary Search.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you have subscribed to the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:38, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 60 edit

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 60, November – December 2023

  • Three new partners
  • Google Scholar integration
  • How to track partner suggestions

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --13:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Always precious edit

 

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:22, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red February 2024 edit

 
Women in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298


Online events:

Announcement

  • Please let other wikiprojects know about our February Black women event.

Tip of the month:

  • AllAfrica can now be searched on the ProQuest tab at the WP Library.

Other ways to participate:

  Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Category:Ford Foundation fellowships has been nominated for deletion edit

 

Category:Ford Foundation fellowships has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 20:28, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Denver gathering edit

 
WikiProject Colorado

We will hold a casual Wikipedia gathering at the Gonzales Library at 1498 North Irving Street in Denver, on Sunday afternoon, February 11, 2024, from 2:30 to 4:00 PM MST. See details at Wikipedia:Meetup/Denver#February 11, 2024: Denver, Colorado Wiki Meetup.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/Colorado/Invitation list. Thanks.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

U.S. Mountain West Online Meeting edit

 
Wikimedia US Mountain West

Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, February 13, 2024, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. All guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:50, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red March 2024 edit

 
Women in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301


Online events:

Announcements

Tip of the month:

  • When creating a new article, check various spellings, including birth name, married names
    and pseudonyms, to be sure an article doesn't already exist.

Other ways to participate:

  Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

March 2024 reverting edit of Murder of Michele MacNeill edit

Hello CaroleHenson. I'm Quaerens-veritatem . Being reverted is an extremely rare event for me and your reversion of my edit of the infobox of Murder of Michele MacNeill as of 17:11, 4 March 2024 certainly got my attention. While I did make an error with the sentence for identity theft, I stand by the rest of the edit and I have re-added the same information with the correction and minor reorganization for clarity and reflect separation of the theft matter. For my reasons and sources please see my new edit summary that I supplied in detail in this unusual instance to deal with your comments.

Regarding your comment, Additional info without a source. you may note in my new edit summary that I referenced parts of the article to support the edit but did not place particular references in the infobox since references are not usually added in keeping with MOS:INFOBOXREF.

As to your question, why a range of years, sentences are often in a range allowing possible parole of the offender after serving the first part of the range. For instance, a sentence of one to 15 years means the offender must serve one year but could ask for parole after that; however, if the parole board never grants parole, the offender must be released in 15 years (or less if the jurisdiction allows time off for good behavior, etc.).

Before reverting I wish you had investigated the edit and just made the one correction. After you read the new edit summary and this message, if you still have a problem, please let me know. Regards, Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 03:31, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello Quaerens-veritatem,
It sounds like you're upset over having an edit reverted, so I am glad that you posted here so we can sort it out.
It's extremely rare that I get talked to in this way. I think we both have the best of intentions, so perhaps we can continue this conversation from that perspective.
I was really confused by the range of years. I am used to "sentenced to xx years, with the possibility of parole after xx years". The range of years confused me - not a hard thing to do these days - and that's were I think things got muddled.
I now understand what you are doing - and see that the information was cited in the document - so it looks good to me after clarification.
Keep doing great work and continuing to seek the truth!–CaroleHenson (talk) 06:47, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your reply CaroleHenson. Yes, I was out of sorts since I had reviewed the article before posting the original edit, didn’t see the need for refs per MOS:INFOBOXREF, the article reported the sentences (which, for future reference, are typical), and I felt the revert was unnecessary for anyone briefly reviewing the article. Nevertheless, I tried to give my response to you in a direct and concise manner, and didn’t intend to be mean spirited. I agree that you didn’t revert with any ill will and we both have the best intentions. Thanks for your extensive and helpful work for the encyclopedia, let’s move on to productive matters, and consider the matter amicably resolved. Kind regards, Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 08:41, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Quaerens-veritatem, Sounds good to me!–CaroleHenson (talk) 21:45, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 61 edit

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 61, January – February 2024

  • Bristol University Press and British Online Archives now available
  • 1Lib1Ref results

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! :•) edit

Here's a thank you for your contributions to the The Haunted Mansion page! This attraction is iconic in theme park history so I appreciate that you removed uncited content to keep the info neat and tidy.

‧̍̊˙˚˙ᵕ꒳ᵕ˙˚˙ Beware of hitchhiking ghosts ‧̍̊˙˚˙ᵕ꒳ᵕ˙˚˙ MariannLact (talk) 00:05, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi MariannLact, That was awhile ago and the article still needs help. I looked at the changes since I cleared out some content here and see that there's a lot of uncited content, which is confused a bit, I think, because a series of paragraphs are uncited and then the last of the series has a source. I wonder, too, how much of the content has been cut-and-pasted into the article. My gut reaction is to remove all really uncited content. What do you think?–CaroleHenson (talk) 01:44, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sapiah edit

"Sapiah, known Charles Buck and Buckskin Charley ..."

Do you want to add the word as after known?

Cordially,

Jeffrey Beall (talk) 02:22, 12 March 2024 (UTC).Reply

Hi Jeffrey Beall,
Great catch, thanks!
While you're here, do you have any thoughts about the artice title discussed at Talk:Sapiah#Article title?–CaroleHenson (talk) 03:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Abner E. Sprague edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Abner E. Sprague, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:59, 21 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, fixed.–CaroleHenson (talk) 04:09, 21 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red April 2024 edit

 
Women in Red | April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304


Online events:

Announcements

  • The second round of "One biography a week" begins in April as part of #1day1woman.

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

  Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 19:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024 edit

Hello CaroleHenson,

 
New Page Review queue January to March 2024

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

 

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Lexington alarm edit

Hi Carole, the first image in this article is mis-attributed. It is, in fact, by Frank T. Merrill, as noted in the image metadata. Thanks. Andy02124 (talk) 17:32, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks so much, Andy02124.–CaroleHenson (talk) 21:00, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive edit

New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
 
  • On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Mary Lindley Murray edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Mary Lindley Murray, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:36, 22 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Qwerfjkl
We must have passed each other in the ether. I forgot the title in the citation template, saw the error, and fixed it already. Thanks for what you're doing!–CaroleHenson (talk) 04:32, 22 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

A cheeseburger for you! edit

  Thank you for your help in cleaning Hilary Linstead from copyright violations. — GMH Melbourne (talk) 06:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks so much! Love cheeseburgers. Thanks for your help!–CaroleHenson (talk) 07:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 62 edit

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 62, March – April 2024

  • IEEE and Haaretz now available
  • Let's Connect Clinics about The Wikipedia Library
  • Spotlight and Wikipedia Library tips

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply