Your submission at Articles for creation: Ted Ferguson (actor) (August 2) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 13:45, 2 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Huey117! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 13:45, 2 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Images... edit

I can help with images - tricks to help cut out the aggravation...hit me up at americanwikiwriter@gmail.com.CaliBuds (talk) 13:42, 3 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matt Maltese (August 3) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 17:50, 3 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matt Maltese (August 4) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mcmatter were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 05:08, 4 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matt Maltese has been accepted edit

 
Matt Maltese, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:04, 12 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vega Jane has been accepted edit

 
Vega Jane, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bilorv (talk) 18:35, 23 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Writer's Barnstar
Thanks for creating Vega Jane! Really well-written. It looks like each of the four books are also notable for standalone articles - they are if they have two reviews of the quality of Kirkus/The Guardian, and bestseller lists like NYT count as one towards that tally (see WP:NBOOK criterion #1). We underrepresent youth fiction a bit on Wikipedia, I guess because the readers are generally a bit too young to edit, so it's nice to see someone working in this area. — Bilorv (talk) 18:44, 23 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
Thank you so much, Bilorv, I wasn't expecting the article to be accepted so soon, thank you, and I'll definitely work to improve it. Huey117 (talk) 03:31, 24 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1971 Qantas bomb hoax has been accepted edit

 
1971 Qantas bomb hoax, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gorden 2211 (talk) 23:18, 23 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Original Barnstar
Thank you for your support Marathi.Wiki.Editor (talk) 03:29, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
No worries Marathi.Wiki.Editor, if you ever need help, don't be afraid to ask me or the teahouse :) Huey117 (talk) 04:36, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

DYK for 1971 Qantas bomb hoax edit

On 19 October 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1971 Qantas bomb hoax, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Peter Macari extorted $500,000 from Qantas Airways, and that more than $200,000 remains unaccounted for? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1971 Qantas bomb hoax. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1971 Qantas bomb hoax), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 19 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

My question is why didn't you approve this Wikipedia Page? edit

Dear Sir,

I am Anshuman Tiwari Indian Musical artist from Dehradun Uttarakhand. My question is why didn't you approve this Wikipedia Page? The sources of the book are also included in this Wikipedia Page. All reliable sources are included in this Wikipedia Page.

I have also seen many such pages in Wikipedia, there is no source on them. Even then that page is published on Wikipedia.

I don't understand why you do this. When will you publish my page?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Anshuman_Tiwari_(musician) Officialanshumantiwari (talk) 09:53, 4 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Well to put it simply: I didn't. But despite what reliable sources you may have included, your article wasn't accepted because of self promotion, sorry. Huey117 (talk) 09:09, 10 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:The Darkest Minds (book series) edit

  Hello, Huey117. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Darkest Minds (book series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:55, 24 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply