Ingratis

Ingratis, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ingratis! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:06, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

"Mediacid" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mediacid. Since you had some involvement with the Mediacid redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:31, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Jordan Hall statues

Hi Ingratis, thanks for your comments on the Jordan Hall AfD. In addition to your comments, you also wondered whether Statue of Louis Agassiz and Statue of Alexander von Humboldt (Stanford University) were notable either. I thought that you might be interested in a rather stale discussion at Talk:Statue of Louis Agassiz#Proposed merge. There are suggestions on merging these articles into the Main Quad article and another to merge all Stanford sculpture articles into a single page covering the whole set of public art. Someone at a recent RM that I closed made a similar suggestion, and I thought you might be interested in trying to restart that discussion. Wug·a·po·des​ 03:44, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Redirect from "venturies"

Hello, Ingratis!

I've been looking over the Typo Team moss work, and I wanted to address the article SCORE Lites, which you updated a couple of days ago. You provided a link on the word "venturies" to the relevant section of the Venturi effect article. Thanks for this!

But I think that the preferred spelling of this plural should be "venturis", probably because it stems from a proper name, rather than a plural of a word ending in 'y'.

I'd like to change this, and I think one way to do this would be to move your redirect page [1] from "venturies" to "venturis". There might be other ways. Does this sound reasonable? Jkgree (talk) 20:14, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

@Jkgree: Hi there - and thank you for asking nicely! You are right, of course, about the correctness of the plural but I created the redirect from "venturies" with the superfluous "e" because that was what I found - and not only in SCORE Lites. Rightly or wrongly (although I have not checked beyond Google searches) it is a spelling in use in the industry and in engineering alongside "venturis". How about creating a separate redirect from "venturis" and leaving "venturies" as a Redirect from a misspelling? Ingratis (talk) 23:12, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestion. I really didn't know how to create a new page-- never done that before-- especially a "special" page like a redirect. I read up, and played around, was ready to give up, when I finally figured out one way of doing it. Thanks for your input, and for nudging me into generating my first new article (albeit, kind of a sad excuse for a new article, but, hey, you gotta start somewhere). I don't know what the relationship, if any, is between the "Venturies" page and the "Venturis" page. Does this make a difference? Jkgree (talk) 17:58, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

P.S. - I'm going to delete the entry for SCORE Lites from the Typo Team moss/S page. Jkgree (talk) 18:01, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

@Jkgree: Glad to hear it worked. There's no need to try to connect the two redirect pages, as the target article does that. All best, Ingratis (talk) 03:09, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:49, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

"Combies" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Combies. Since you had some involvement with the Combies redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:11, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Help

Help me check the page Tambor (dance). It's too bad. Đông Minh (talk) 13:12, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

@Đông Minh: I'll have a go at some of the formal problems, which are fairly easy to fix, but it badly needs more decent sources, and without those it may not have much future, so that is the real problem. I think there may also be copyvio issues. Ingratis (talk) 13:17, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Excuse me, Mr @Ingratis: can you help me edit Trần dynasty military tactics and organization and Tây Sơn military tactics and organization true English grammar and delete the sign on the top page. So thank you. Đông Minh (talk) 14:09, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

@Đông Minh: I'll take a look, but it may take me some time! Ingratis (talk) 15:02, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

I hope you lost little time to help me, thank you! Đông Minh (talk) 15:20, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Expand tag

Please teach me: what does the "expand" tag mean. It's so normal that articles that are translations from foreign languages are covered better in that language, - why mention it? Seen at Altenberg Abbey. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:42, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

@Gerda Arendt: It depends on the language! For the wider picture may I refer you to WP:Translation, of which the Expand tag system forms part. I added it to this specific article because there is a lot of additional usable content (not just a small amount, and not just any content) at the German article which I don't have time to translate myself presently. As you will have seen, the tag adds articles to a category of articles in German (and other languages) requiring translation, the theory being that this may bring them better to the attention of potential translators who might not otherwise spot them. I find it useful to signal articles like this where there is a lot of good content to add, and also those where the addl content is not in the obvious language - for example, some articles about French monasteries have better content in German (occasionally vice versa). I don't expand-tag articles where the addl content is not usable on en-Wiki - for example, many French local historical articles are hopelessly verbose / excessively detailed / based on OR, and many in other languages are very lax about referencing, so the addl content is not worth translating - so I disagree that it is not worth indicating foreign-language articles where appropriate. Ingratis (talk) 11:03, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for explaining. For my - perhaps too simple - understanding, tags on top typically indicate that an article is missing something or even has problems. I often translate, but confess that I was more interested in the church, Altenberger Dom. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:52, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

About typos: Bhu-Bif

hello, it seems you are also fixing typos. can you please create talk page on Wikipedia:Typo Team/moss/B and announce on it your desired section. i have announced my plan on Wikipedia:Typo Team talk page.

once again i sincerely apologise for suggesting or contacting you.

regards Leela52452 (talk) 16:21, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

@Leela52452: Thank you for your polite message! Although perhaps people should do as you have done, I don't think anyone else does, so I'm not in the habit of checking that page but will try to avoid you for the rest of this list. However, because the lists at the beginning are extremely long - as you will see when C is posted, which will be soon - and because not many people take part in typo fixing, in practice it is usually easy enough to avoid other editors, although I do realise from past experience that it is annoying to discover an overlap. I usually edit from the end upwards, if that helps. All best wishes, Ingratis (talk) 18:08, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

"Klostersekretär"

I hope you are well. I wonder if you are able to help me with an English language translation of "Klostersekretär" and of "Domstiftssekretär"? Here is where I got to so far with this, but "monastery administrator" is short on euphony, and does not look particularly "genau".

I am conscious that it says somewhere that you are wiki-retired, but that was somewhere else. You should in any event, and please, on no account reply unless you want to. I have no wish to get in your way. Either way, thank you for having thought about it, and I wish you all necessary strength and fulfilment for the year ahead Best wishes Charles01 (talk) 17:21, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

@Charles01: Happy New Year - and decade! and thank you for your good wishes for what may well turn out to be a difficult year. I'm very pleased to hear from you. I hope you are well too. I "retired" for a while and forgot my password, so when I returned I had to start again. In this incarnation I'm doing more gnoming and less article creation but am still interested in monasteries.

As to "Klostersekretär" and "Domstiftssekretär", your translation seems fine - "abbey [or monastery] secretary" / "chapter secretary" would be alternatives, but no real need for them. The post itself, which I hadn't come across before, is an interesting one. If you read Gothic print, this is a detailed account of how it developed at St Marienthal (coincidentally) from the earlier post of steward (Schulze) - an employed "man of business" or (as you say) administrator, mostly for nunneries, apparently. Skimming through google I saw a couple of other passages where the Sekretär was also the librarian and archivist. All best, Ingratis (talk) 13:44, 7 January 2020 (UTC) (irl Andrew)

Archaeosphaeroides

Good catch on the typo. Thanks :) ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:12, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the thanks! Ingratis (talk) 15:01, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Ingratis, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Chetsford (talk) 15:32, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Thank you very much! Ingratis (talk) 17:07, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Ash grove (Charyn ash forest summerhouse) Almaty region

A tag has been placed on The Ash grove (Charyn ash forest summerhouse) Almaty region requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bhockey10 (talk) 19:04, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Thanks - I meant to tag it and forgot. Ingratis (talk) 21:16, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Church naming convention

I agree with you when you say that Italian church titles should not be different to titles for churches in other countries. But since 95% of Italian churches titles already uses the same standard, except for those with a clearly established English name, I referred to WP:CONSISTENT. I moved just a few compared to the hundreds Italian churches articles we have. If you are interested in starting a discussion involving other users it would be great, so we'll finally have a good naming convention for religious building articles and we can fix this chaotic situation. This generic proposal was written more than ten years ago when English Wikipedia didn't have this huge amount of minor churches from other countries, but it has never been approved and it's totally forgotten now. We can consider bringing it back to life and improving it.--Alienautic (talk) 13:34, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

@Alienautic: I've thought about your suggestion of opening a general discussion but wdn't want to be involved in it, based on repeated experience of when similar things have been discussed at RM. I have a pretty good idea of who among the old lags will take part and what they will say, and it will just be the same old crap as before, so I don't see the point. On the Italian churches, I don't see how you can justify moving perfectly OK English language titles to Italian language ones for no better reason than "consistency" given all the other factors, especially as you agree that the Italian format you're moving to is non-standard, but I don't have the energy to argue it. Italy is not one of my main fields of contribution and I will just have to look away. Thanks at any rate for your civility. Ingratis (talk) 23:36, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

NPP

Unfortunately, I don't really do NPP work, so I'm not the person who could tutor you through their processes. Sorry, but good luck. Bearcat (talk) 16:26, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Oversimplified

Hello CrazyBoy826. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Oversimplified, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: It was not transwikied, and is not a dictionary entry, so it does not meet the criteria. Thank you. CrazyBoy826 (talk | contribs) 16:20, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

My mistake! Ingratis (talk) 16:24, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Thanks for correcting my misunderstanding at the AfD discussion, it's much appreciated. Cheers, -- puddleglum2.0 05:22, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

@Puddleglum2.0: - a nice surprise and greatly appreciated! (and I could be wrong - I usually am - but I'll take the beer anyway!) Ingratis (talk) 11:41, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

speedy deletion

Hi sir/madam i had wrongly accessdated some of my links i had sited on my new article Chreso University and you listed if for somespeedy depletion since now i have corrected my mistakes will it still be deleted? Joseph R Sumaili (talk) 00:23, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Thank you, but..

Thank you for giving me the link to collect info about Peruvian VPs. Unfortunately my knowledge of Spanish is very little , beginner level only. So I could understand a few percent of the pdf file. Anyway I am learning Spanish during lockdown. Thank you. Ppt2003 (talk) 19:51, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Vice presidents of Peru

Will you be kind enough to comment on my articles on Peruvian Vice presidents, and the style in which they have been written. I have written many articles about Vice presidents of Peru, a significant portion of which have been translated from Spanish . With my limited knowledge in Spanish, I fear whether these articles are merely literary translations, or remain in complete. Another thing is that the Freddy Centurion thesis discusses on the need of the expansion of the powers of the Vice presidents, not necessarily their careers and political achievements. Ppt2003 (talk) 21:38, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

@Ppt2003: - I'll be glad to look at your articles, if you could give me until tomorrow. As for Centurion's thesis, I'm sure there are much better sources out there, which you've doubtless located by now. However, it does seem to name most if not all the VPS and give a few summary details on most of them. So my thought about it was simply that it could serve as an independent and reliable reference by confirming that obscure personalities like Garmendia Puertolas really were VPs, and that including it in the articles (until better sources appear) might stop some of the objections about sourcing that you were experiencing. Ingratis (talk) 00:23, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

@Ppt2003: - I've looked at some of them now, including the longer article on Ricardo Bentín Sánchez. There is nothing wrong with the English - there are very few mistakes, mostly typos, and those are easily corrected by copyediting. The articles don't read like translations, probably exactly because you're translating from a language in which you're not fluent. What you could do however is to pay more attention to the formatting: check your articles against MOS:BIO, especially in the lead. You should also check that in dates and spellings of names you are being consistent: for example, in the article on Ricardo Bentín Sánchez you have some dates in the format dd-mm-yy but another in the format mm-dd-yy (I edited this) and you spell the man's name sometimes as Bentín and other times as Bentin (I didn't change this but you should). Also punctuation: most punctuation marks follow directly after text, and are followed by a space: text[punctn mark]{space}next txt

One very specific thing on Vice Presidents: note the difference between "X was the first Vice President" (i.e., the first ever VP of Peru) and "X was the First Vice President" (i.e., a holder of the office titled First VP): it's the second one you need (in all except one case, which I suppose would be "the first First Vice President"!)

As to completeness, Wikipedia articles are almost all works in progress, and few if any are "complete": they build up over time. What you do have to do is to provide enough sources / references from the beginning to make the notability clear and support the contents you have. This is very important. The point of the Centurion thesis was that it provides a source - maybe not the most detailed but an acceptable source - which confirms that they really were Vice Presidents, which may be useful for the most obscure ones like Garmendia. You can replace it once you find better ones. I often translate from other languages (not Spanish), where the sources are listed at the bottom without any inline citations, and it's not always possible to get footnotes from them. I've found it useful to tag the article myself with the {{no footnotes}} tag, because it shows that the issue's been considered and acknowledged.

I don't know if any of that is of any use! to sum up the articles are mostly fine, subject to a little copyediting and format checking, but make sure you include sources/references - cf e.g. Diego de Aliaga. All best wishes, Ingratis (talk) 18:07, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Articles for Creation: List of reviewers by subject notice

Hi Ingratis, you are receiving this notice because you are listed as an active Articles for Creation reviewer.

Recently a list of reviewers by area of expertise was created. This notice is being sent out to alert you to the existence of that list, and to encourage you to add your name to it. If you or other reviewers come across articles in the queue where an acceptance/decline hinges on specialist knowledge, this list should serve to facilitate contact with a fellow reviewer.

To end on a positive note, the backlog has dropped below 1,500, so thanks for all of the hard work some of you have been putting into the AfC process!

Sent to all Articles for Creation reviewers as a one-time notice. To opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Regards, Sam-2727 (talk)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Your co-operative attitude is commendable

Thank you, sir for taking your time and toils to engage in the perusals and revisions essential to the modifications of my articles. The precipitous attitude of mine compelled me to compose so many articles within a few days. I will rectify the errors according to your suggestions. Your kindness is worth commendations. Ppt2003 (talk) 18:24, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

You're very welcome! Ingratis (talk) 23:36, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Griestal-Strauße

Hello Ingratis. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Griestal-Strauße, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims coverage in reliable sources. Thank you. SoWhy 08:43, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Notability of Savion Castro

Hi Ingratis! I noticed you put a notability tag on Savion Castro. May I ask your rationale? The article cites ample sources. Is it because a school board member, by definition, isn't notable enough for Wikipedia? (I note there is a category for Wisconsin School Board members). Thank you for your response!WondermentDaily (talk) 13:40, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

@WondermentDaily: Thank you for asking nicely! My reason for questioning notability here is based on the guideline for the notability for politicians, WP:NPOL:

"The following are presumed to be notable:

• Politicians and judges who have held international, national, or (for countries with federal or similar systems of government) state/province–wide office, or have been members of legislative bodies at those levels. This also applies to people who have been elected to such offices but have not yet assumed them.
• Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage.
  

Just being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the general notability guideline."

I understand this to mean that something as relatively minor politically as membership of a school board is not enough by itself for notability.

On the categories, these will overwhelmingly be for people notable in some other way who also happened to be members of school boards. The numbers are interesting: the range is from Delaware and Nevada with 2 each, up to Illinois, which has 85, + 16 for Chicago, with the average towards the lower end of the range, but Wisconsin has 389. This seems to suggest something unusual in the way Wisconsin bio articles have been categorised formerly! Best wishes, Ingratis (talk) 15:04, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick response! The question, then, concerns local figures who have received "significant" press coverage. In the case of Castro, I would argue he has. He was singled out in a speech by First Lady Michelle Obama, and has been noted for being the youngest person to ever serve on the school board, and has received fairly substantial local coverage. In addition, with all the racial tensions in America, I would argue it is notable that, for the first time, there are two African Americans on this board. Therefore, I would argue, the press coverage merits the standard for "significant." If you think it would be beneficial, I found citations of coverage in other papers, including the Chicago Tribune, one of the biggest papers in the US. Would it be helpful to add this and other sources beyond Madison, WI?WondermentDaily (talk) 15:24, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

@WondermentDaily: If you're aiming to demonstrate "significant" press coverage, then further non-local sources of the appropriate quality certainly wouldn't hurt. My own opinion is inclined to be that, other things being equal, if being a school board member isn't notable per se then notability is unlikely to be created by being in a particular sub-group of school board members but other things may not be equal: there may well be local factors that I'm not aware of that affect this, and I'm sure that there are other editors who would see it differently, especially with the support of more non-local sources, as you suggest. The notability tag can be removed by anyone at any time, by the way! All best wishes, Ingratis (talk) 16:23, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer newsletter June 2020

Hello Ingratis,

Your help can make a difference

NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.

Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate

In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.

Discussions and Resources

• A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
• Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
• A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
• Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Translated articles

Thank you for your note and assistance about M.S.Ö. Air & Space Museum. I will do that for the translated articles in the future. Tauslu (talk) 08:26, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Unreviewed

@Ingratis: Why do you keep unreviewing articles I review???scope_creep^Talk 22:56, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

@Scope creep: - I unreviewed Monastery of Vallbona de les Monjas for the reason given: it duplicates an existing article, which was already indicated when you reviewed it. I will not have unreviewed others without a valid reason, but you would have to remind me of the articles. Ingratis (talk) 23:21, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

@Ingratis: I had a second look at it. It seems to be phenomena now, these double articles. You see them in NPP/AFC. Its weird. Thanks for spotting by the way. I never noticed, prattling on. scope_creep^Talk

@Scope creep: - It isn't obvious straight away - one has the Spanish title and the other one the Catalan title. It was clearly a genuine oversight by the translator of the second article. On the other hand, I'm guessing that the other duplicates you mention - you're right: there do seem to be a lot of them - are mostly down to people not wanting to take No for an answer! Best wishes, Ingratis (talk) 00:58, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Lohsar has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Lohsar. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:03, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lohasar has been accepted

Lohasar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ingratis (talk) 03:58, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mark Sheldon

@Ingratis: - Panama City Beach hosts 17 million + visitors each season - thats more than double the entire population of NYC. Your stated position, which was condescending and not factual, regarding Mark Sheldon's position, Mayor, and I quote you: "a small town (less than 13,000 inhabitants) with no trace of significant press coverage - fails".

The economic impact of this town is over $2 billion annually.

{{subst:dtag|nowiki|}}Bell, Megan. "PCB sees record breaking year". wjhg.com. wjhg.com. Retrieved 5 July 2020.{{subst:dtag|nowiki|}}

--Guitarhistory (talk) 03:47, 5 July 2020 (UTC)Guitarhistory

@Guitarhistory: - I should point out that the nomination is not for a speedy deletion, but for a discussion at AfD. I see you've already made your point there at greater length, and I've given my reasons for making the nomination, so let's keep the discussion together - there. If there is press coverage of Mark Sheldon beyond the local, it would help if you were to add the references to it to the article. Ingratis (talk) 12:53, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Thanks,A beer for you! Nd12052010 23:55, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

@Nd12052010: - thanks - much appreciated! Ingratis (talk) 01:21, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:South African folklore

A tag has been placed on Category:South African folklore requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:56, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

@UnitedStatesian: - not emptied until 9 July, when the only article in it was draftified.Ingratis (talk) 16:26, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

. . . which is why it is now in Category:Empty categories awaiting deletion, where it will remain for seven more days at least in case it is repopulated. UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:06, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Helpful Advice

Thank you for your welcome message / advice. I was under the impression that Wikipedia was supposed to use American spellings, so thanks for clearing that up! TheAwesomeAtom (talk) 17:55, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

New Page Patrol December Newsletter

Hello Ingratis,

Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.

Rank	Username	Num reviews	Log
1	DannyS712 bot III (talk)	67,552	Patrol Page Curation
2	Rosguill (talk)	63,821	Patrol Page Curation
3	John B123 (talk)	21,697	Patrol Page Curation
4	Onel5969 (talk)	19,879	Patrol Page Curation
5	JTtheOG (talk)	12,901	Patrol Page Curation
6	Mcampany (talk)	9,103	Patrol Page Curation
7	DragonflySixtyseven (talk)	6,401	Patrol Page Curation
8	Mccapra (talk)	4,918	Patrol Page Curation
9	Hughesdarren (talk)	4,520	Patrol Page Curation
10	Utopes (talk)	3,958	Patrol Page Curation

Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

DDR German

Hiya! Thanks for getting involved - that was an unusually civil and sensible conversation with a productive outcome! Cheers Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:02, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

@Alexandermcnabb: - no problem, and thanks to you too for your reasonableness. I hope the creator will come back to expand the examples. Ingratis (talk) 17:13, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello Ingratis:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 2400 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:53, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.

New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021

New Page Review queue September 2021

Hello Ingratis,

Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.

Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.

At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.

There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.

Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.

---

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:31, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

November 2021 backlog drive

New Page Patrol | November 2021 Backlog Drive
On November 1, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. (t · c) buidhe 01:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Possible copyright issue

Hi, I'm ToBeFree. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Tamaşalı, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:29, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

(sorry for the context-less notification, I wanted to create this first: WP:AN#Elmar Baxşəliyev re-blocked for copyright violations, 28 recent articles remain (permanent link). You have done nothing wrong, and the specific article may even be fine. I just wanted to make sure that each of these articles gets a second review with the copyright issues in mind.) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:45, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

The Copyright Cleanup Barnstar

		The Copyright Cleanup Barnstar
		Thank you very much for identifying and reporting the copyright violation at Tamaşalı. Thank you as well for all the work that goes into reviewing articles on Wikipedia. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:33, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank You

Hi Ingratis, Thank You for reviewing ONG & ONG. DMySon (talk) 18:20, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

A Barnstar for You

		The Patroller's Barnstar
		Thank You for reviewing Wikipedia articles DMySon (talk) 18:21, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

• DMySon - very belatedly, thank you very much! Ingratis (talk) 04:15, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your participation in the November 2021 New Pages Patrol drive

		The Reviewer Barnstar
		For reviewing at least 50 articles during the drive. buidhe 12:36, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing or re-reviewing 56 articles, which helped contribute to an overall 1276-article reduction in the backlog during the drive. (t · c) buidhe 12:36, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sallent, Coll de Nargó, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ars.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Katori Sea

It includes part of the Spanish (but, the part in Spanish is extracted from WP Japanese), part of two pages referred to in Japanese (I use a translator; although I speak something, but in general it is factory language), a detailed view of the place on Google Map, other old plans of the place (Katori Sea and Tokyo Bay, Jōmon period) and various articles. The first reference to its existence, I got it from the page in Japanese some time ago. I lived in Tsukuba City. I have been to Lake Kasumigaura, Tone River and Katori City, etc. My user, kasutoro is on rōmaji. Thank you.

Port of Kashima

I have used several IPs in Spanish WP, as the Internet provider changes them. That page in Spanish started by IP 190.107.18.84 on Febrary 15, 2014 about Puerto de Kashima, I did it myself. This year 2021 I was writing in Ibaraki Prefecture in English WP, and I didn't have a Port of Kashima page. Like others that I elaborated or expanded in Spanish, the primary source was Japanese WP, but I also used English WP. When I have written or expanded on Japan, I usually do it on Ibaraki Prefecture, there I lived and I know the environment. Thank you again.

Jkasutoro (talk) 23:13, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Thank you

I wanted to thank for your help with the article on Sergej Grecicho and its deletion discussion. I was beginning to lose patience when what seemed like obvious common sense to me wasn't making any headway. Your addition made all the difference. Papaursa (talk) 23:47, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
@Papaursa: - You're very welcome - I can certainly see where the problem was! All best, Ingratis (talk) 01:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Grindle

Hi, thanks for the prompt and hopefully straightforward page review. One question, I couldn't see Grindle on Special:NewPagesFeed, am I doing something wrong? TSventon (talk) 12:14, 7 January 2022 (UTC).

TSventon - no problem - as you say, should be straightforward. You're not doing anything wrong - the page is on the NewPagesFeed under the date of creation, 15 April 2007. Ingratis (talk) 18:51, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Thank you, I knew the redirect was creatyed in 2007 and pages are listed by creation date, but for some reason didn't put two and two together. TSventon (talk) 19:24, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Quartier Thiers

Hello. Thank you for the modifications on the article "Quartier Thiers". The geolocation at the beginning of the page is wrong because it points to the 7th district. I don't know how to modify and place the right geolocation which is on the equivalent article in French. Thank you for your help. All best. --Parsedan (talk) 10:55, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

@Parsedan: - no problem. I've added the coordinates from the fr-Wiki article, so I hope it's OK now. I'm also making a small spelling change ("neighborhood" to "neighbourhood"), for consistency of ENGVAR, as elsewhere you're using UK English spellings. Best wishes, Ingratis (talk) 23:12, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Thank you and, by the way, happy new year 2022.--Parsedan (talk) 07:57, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

@Parsedan: Thank you! and happy 2022 to you as well! Ingratis (talk) 08:26, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Ellen Alpsten / The 'Tsarina' series

Hi, the novel is not about Catherine the Great, and the quartet of novels deals with the early Romanov dynasty, which has not been treated at all in Literature. Catherine the Great was born as a German Princess and ruled at the end of the 18th century. M — Preceding unsigned comment added by Makkimekko (talk • contribs) 11:34, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

@Makkimekko: - You're right - apologies. I've acknowledged as much om the talk page. Ingratis (talk) 22:36, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

draft review

Hey, I noticed you are an active person at AfC. I've helpe this draft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Gohenry and filled it with reliable sources. Could you please take a look? --82.40.169.107 (talk) 11:35, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Irmintraut Schneider

thankyou for redirecting the article on Irmintraut Schneider. The events that happened with this article make me very heavily question the justifiability of Lugnuts mass reverting my redirects. I feel that he is specifically trying to limit my ability to contribute to Wikipedia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:03, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

@Johnpacklambert: - hi John. Thanks for the thanks! Since you approach me directly, my take on the whole thing is that it's seldom clear with older Olympians whether they're going to be notable without a lot of pre-internet foreign-language research so there is a wholly legitimate point here about redirecting too quickly, which parallels the concerns about articles being created too quickly - I can see the points of view of both of you. My own feeling FWIW is that if some form of bulk deletion really has to happen then wherever possible redirection is preferable to outright deletion, without necessarily being convinced that the wholesale deletion programme is a "good thing" in the first place. (I am however quite angry that these deletions have now extended to medalling Olympians - see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aage Høy-Petersen. This is really taking the piss, but I'm aware that this nomination was not yours, so this is not directed at you). Try not to take it all personally! Certainly wise to focus the bulk of your editing away from this area to give yourself a breathing space. All best wishes, Ingratis (talk) 17:40, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

WP:AFC Helper News

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

• AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
• The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Olympics

Hello. I've begun a deletion sorting page for articles about the Olympics which are nominated at AfD. Hope you find it useful. No Great Shaker (talk) 14:01, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

@No Great Shaker: Great idea, and thanks for letting me know. I was sorry to see that the SPI came to nothing, but I think FWIW that there were enough grounds to raise the question.Ingratis (talk) 19:15, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Ingratis. I think there certainly were grounds and the Icewhiz one was inconclusive, perhaps because we muddied the waters. I was completely wrong about the first one, although the activity was similar. It was a case of investigate or ignore, and I think it would be wrong to ignore. Anyway, glad you like the delsort. All the best. No Great Shaker (talk) 08:45, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For your excellent work on the Bishops of Vienne. Doric Loon·(talk) 15:24, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

@Doric Loon: Thank you! much appreciated. An unexpected side effect of the exercise was to renew my interest in AfC, so I may well look at more reviewing. All best, Ingratis (talk) 01:06, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter May 2022

New Page Review queue March 2022

Hello Ingratis,

At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.

Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.

In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 817 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 861 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.

This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.

If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent 05:17, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Arbitration case opened

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct_in_deletion-related_editing. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct_in_deletion-related_editing/Evidence. Please add your evidence by July 9, 2022, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct_in_deletion-related_editing/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, firefly ( t · c ) 11:21, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter June 2022

New Page Review queue June 2022

Hello Ingratis,

Backlog status

At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000 at the end of May.

Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.

In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).

While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).

Backlog drive

A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by buidhe and Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up here. Barnstars will be awarded.

TIP – New school articles

Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.

Misc

There is a new template available, {{NPP backlog}}, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:

Very high unreviewed pages backlog: 14677 articles, as of 00:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC), according to DatBot

There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.

Reminders

• Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
• If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
• If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
• To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Notes

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

NPP July 2022 backlog drive is on!

New Page Patrol | July 2022 Backlog Drive
On 1 July, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 20:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Re: Lucifera (ancient name/goddess/epithet) vs Lucifera (comics)

Thanks for help with Lucifera; I overdid the subject making separate '(name)' article. I don't know the original ancient name/goddess/epithet (mainly Diana/Artemis) is large enough subject so can you say either way if should still be disambiguation (now stub) or just move back Lucifera (comics) as main with hat-note to Diana? I prefer articles start with history (like Boston should be about UK with hatnote to 'Boston (USA,)' and many similar cases) but maybe not always done. Luciferas certainly have citations/quotes/references for respective articles, which sounds like what cross-references are for.--dchmelik (t|c) 10:54, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

@Dchmelik: - thanks - I've replied at the article's talk page, to try to keep everything together. Ingratis (talk) 10:56, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rabin Koirala has been accepted

Rabin Koirala, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ingratis (talk) 01:39, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pedro Braillard Poccard has been accepted

Pedro Braillard Poccard, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ingratis (talk) 01:03, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Guillaume Hoorickx

I'm just wondering about this edit you made - is it really a pseudonym, or is it just a different spelling (Anglicization) of his name? What do the sources say? StAnselm (talk) 19:44, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

• @StAnselm: I think it's a side-effect of being Belgian that the name occurs in two languages, i.e., French and Dutch. Some Dutch sources call him Willem, and many of the art and auction sites give it as an alternative. (One or two Anglophone sources also call him William, but I'm discounting that). If you think it's a distraction, by all means take it out again. Ingratis (talk) 20:38, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

NPP drive award

		The New Page Patrol Medal of Merit
		This award is given to Ingratis for 218 reviews in the July NPP backlog reduction drive. Your contributions played a part in the 9895 reviews that took place during the drive. Thank you for your contributions. Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 08:18, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter August 2022

New Page Review queue August 2022

Hello Ingratis,

Backlog status

After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators Buidhe and Zippybonzo, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to Dr vulpes who led with 880 points. See this page for further details.

Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the other 600 reviewers to do more! Please try to do at least one a day.

Coordination

MB and Novem Linguae have taken on some of the coordination tasks. Please let them know if you are interested in helping out. MPGuy2824 will be handling recognition, and will be retroactively awarding the annual barnstars that have not been issued for a few years.

Open letter to the WMF

The Page Curation software needs urgent attention. There are dozens of bug fixes and enhancements that are stalled (listed at Suggested improvements). We have written a letter to be sent to the WMF and we encourage as many patrollers as possible to sign it here. We are also in negotiation with the Board of Trustees to press for assistance. Better software will make the active reviewers we have more productive.

TIP - Reviewing by subject

Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages by their most familiar subjects can do so from the regularly updated sorted topic list.

New reviewers

The NPP School is being underused. The learning curve for NPP is quite steep, but a detailed and easy-to-read tutorial exists, and the Curation Tool's many features are fully described and illustrated on the updated page here.

Reminders

• Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
• If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
• If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
• To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

NPP Award

		The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		For over 100 article reviews during 2021. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:10, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

NPP message

Hi Ingratis,

Invitation

For those who may have missed it in our last newsletter, here's a quick reminder to see the letter we have drafted, and if you support it, do please go ahead and sign it. If you already signed, thanks. Also, if you haven't noticed, the backlog has been trending up lately; all reviews are greatly appreciated.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:10, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

NPP Award for 2020

		The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		For over 100 article reviews during 2020. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:20, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Here is a barnstar to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2020. We realize this is late, but NPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We are just getting caught up. If you don't want to receive "old" barnstars, please just ignore this and reply (with a ping) to let us know not to send you any more. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:20, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

October 2022 New Pages Patrol backlog drive

New Page Patrol | October 2022 backlog drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 21:16, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022

Hello Ingratis,

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

NPP backlog May – October 15, 2022

Suggestions:

• There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
• Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
• Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
• This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

Reminders

• Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
• If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
• Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

NPP Award for 2022

		The New Page Reviewer's Iron Award
		For over 360 article reviews during 2022. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:14, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023

Hello Ingratis,

New Page Review queue December 2022

Backlog

The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.

2022 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!

Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)

New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js

Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.

Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.

Reminders

• Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
• There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Dominican priory

Thanks for the education. I admit to not knowing much about the order besides the song. I moved the article to "Dominican priory", which is what I think you were recommending. If not LMK Elinruby (talk) 20:48, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Another question about Dominicans

If you know: I am getting a disambiguation notice for "Phylactery" in that article. I have only previously encountered the word in the context of Orthodox Judaism, which is why I wikilinked it. Do you know which of those choices on the dab page, if any, is appropriate? Elinruby (talk) 21:12, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

@Elinruby: New to me too, except, as you say, in the Jewish sense. But it does also apparently sometimes mean some type of small Christian reliquary or amulet (e.g. here). Since this article is about a Christian subject, perhaps "reliquary" would work better? Ingratis (talk) 21:39, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

good suggestion. Seems to be accurate and solves my dab problem Elinruby (talk) 23:40, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects and categories participation

Hello. Thank you for participating and helping out at WP:AFC/R. I thought I'd suggest that you utilize Enterprisey's script for processing requests which can be found here. I mention this because it looks like you're processing requests manually and, in doing so, you appear to have made a typo in a request that you processed (here). No big deal, these things happen, but I wanted to suggest it since I've found it's made life easier for me. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:49, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

@Hey man im josh: Thanks for the link - I've tried out the script and it's indeed very helpful. Best wishes, Ingratis (talk) 08:15, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ancient World: History of Dress

A tag has been placed on Ancient World: History of Dress requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ℰmi1y_⧼T·C⧽ 19:40, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Ingratis,

You certainly create a lot of redirects. It concerns me because we have had editors get in trouble in the past for creating too many frivolous redirects. There was even a special CSD criteria category to delete the thousands of unnecessary redirects created by one admin editor who resigned as an admin and then blocked from the project. Be sure you are only creating redirects that make sense according to Wikipedia guidelines and serve a useful purpose. Just because a redirect is requested doesn't mean it should be created. You've been an editor for a long time now so please use the judgment that came with all of that editing experience. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:46, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

• @Liz: - Hello Liz. Thank you for your message. I have indeed recently created a lot of redirects because I was working on the lists of requests at WP:AFC/R. I started on this just a couple of days ago but have already had so much grief from it that I will not touch it again. As with SIGCOV and GNG, there is a large subjective element in what constitutes a useful redirect, and clearly my filters are differently aligned, but do please be assured that I am not a frivolous editor and do give thought to all my edits, even those that displease. Ingratis (talk) 12:51, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive

New Page Patrol | May 2023 Backlog Drive
On 1 May, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of redirects patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. Article patrolling is not part of the drive. Sign up here! There is a possibility that the drive may not run if there are <20 registered participants. Participants will be notified if this is the case.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023

Hello Ingratis,

New Page Review queue April to June 2023

Backlog

Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.

Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.

Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.

You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.

Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).

Reminders

• Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
• There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord and #wikimedia-npp ^connect on IRC.
• Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

New pages patrol needs your help!

New pages awaiting review as of June 30th, 2023.

Hello Ingratis,

The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.

Reminders:

• There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wareham Priory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wareham.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Draft question

Hi Ingratis - did you intend to decline and then subsequently resubmit this draft? LittlePuppers (talk) 13:55, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

@LittlePuppers: Yes, I did. I declined it because this particular editor has been submitting machine-translated crap for years under many different IP addresses, and also because there isn't enough content to warrant an article. After doing so I thought I might have been a bit unfair, since the references are adequate and there aren't any translation issues, so for fairness' sake thought it should have a second opinion, so resubmitted it. I'll point out however that if anyone did accept it I'd immediately redirect it under NOPAGE! Ingratis (talk) 14:36, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

...which I've now done. In the past in these situations the IP editor has then gone on to copy/paste their draft over the redirect, which is why I wasn't in a hurry to do it this time, but we'll see. Ingratis (talk) 23:38, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Don't mention it... oh, you didn't... Ingratis (talk) 06:32, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Sorry, somehow I missed your second comment here. It sounds like a bit of a convoluted process, but thanks for taking care of it. LittlePuppers (talk) 06:53, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol | October 2023 Backlog Drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Articles will earn 3x as many points compared to redirects. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol newsletter

Hello Ingratis,

New Page Review article queue, March to September 2023

Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!

October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.

PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.

Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.

Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

November Articles for creation backlog drive

Hello Ingratis:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 2400 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Response:

Yeah, I translated the Swedish article. I modified a few words to make it better readable, but it's like 99% translation. Go ahead and do the attribution thing, because I have no idea about that, sorry. Thanks for your interest on the article in any case. 12qwas (talk) 14:20, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Helsfyr-Sinsen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Helsfyr-Sinsen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helsfyr-Sinsen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Egil (talk) 12:21, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

NPP Awards for 2023

		The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		For over 100 article reviews during 2023. Well done! Keep up the good work and thank you! Dr vulpes (Talk) 02:42, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Unreferenced articles February 2024 backlog drive

WikiProject Unreferenced articles | February 2024 Backlog Drive
There is a substantial backlog of unsourced articles on Wikipedia, and we need your help! The purpose of this drive is to add sources to these unsourced articles and make a meaningful impact. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles cited. Remember to tag your edit summary with [[WP:FEB24]], both to advertise the event and tally the points later using Edit Summary Search. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you have subscribed to the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:38, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Welcome to the drive!

Welcome, welcome, welcome Ingratis! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Fix a random page lacking sources

CactiStaccingCrane (talk)18:52, 1 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)

January 2024 NPP backlog drive – Points award

		The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to Ingratis for collecting more than 100 points during the January 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 16,070 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 22:34, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

January 2024 NPP backlog drive – Streak award

		Worm Gear Award
		This award is given in recognition to Ingratis for collecting at least 7 points during each week of the January 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 16,070 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 23:03, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

A citation barnstar for you

		The Citation Barnstar
		For good work during WP: FEB24 drive! Davidindia (talk) 15:46, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Much appreciated - thanks! Ingratis (talk) 16:53, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

February 2024 WikiProject Unreferenced articles backlog drive – award

		Citation Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to Ingratis for collecting more than 100 points during the WikiProject Unreferenced articles's FEB24 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing 14,300 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! – – DreamRimmer (talk) 18:44, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thanks for the barnstar! I enjoyed working on the British Rabbit Council, but it's nice to have one's efforts noticed too. Best wishes, Tacyarg (talk) 08:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024

Hello Ingratis,

New Page Review queue January to March 2024

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Editor experience invitation

Hi Ingratis :) I'm looking for experienced editors to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 11:05, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Referencing

Hello Ingratis. I learned how to properly reference articles. I created a new article about the Roman consul Lucius Cornelius Lentulus Lupus of 156 BC. Please check it to see if I did it correctly. If it is insufficient by all means, please delete it and inform me. Thank you, Edgar Aetheling 25 (talk) 17:50, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ananias of Lakedaemonia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mani.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)