JRHorse

/Archive 1

Advice requested on recent edits

I've noticed over the last few days that there have been numerous IP edits to the article Sheryl Leach. The edits have made the article look more like a resume, and I'm concerned that there also may potentially be a conflict of interest issue because the three or four IPs used are solely editing this specific article. I have listed the article on WP:CLEANUP but the article still seems to be getting a little out of hand, and I would like to request more experienced help for possibly addressing this. Thanks so much! JRHorse (talk) 12:29, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

I've removed most of the unsourced/otherwise inappropriate information. I've also posted a COI notice on the talk page of the most recent editor. 331dot (talk) 13:37, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks so much for your assistance. JRHorse (talk) 13:57, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Ajigawa stable (2022) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ajigawa stable (2022), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:50, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

@Onel5969 The article has been re-created (in virtually identical form) by another user. That's now three different editors who have attempted to put in into mainspace. Perhaps AfD is the way to go if you really don't think it's a notable topic. Pawnkingthree (talk) 00:27, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Missing banzukes

Mind helping out? See more info here. And your help will be truly appreciated, in advance. Nanchang17 (talk) 14:47, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Corey Lanerie

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Corey Lanerie, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:52, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Churanoumi Yoshihisa has been accepted

Churanoumi Yoshihisa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 22:42, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Opinion on a possible redesign of the Wikiproject: Sumo page

Hello! I went back to look for possible new sources on the WP:Sumo page recently to work on improving the article related to tokoyama and I noticed that the WP page lacked a bit of organization compared to other pages (like WP:FR or WP:HV).

Of course, it's not a critical but I've worked on reorganization of the page (I'm still working on it) and I'd like to have your opinion on example the home page and the assessment page. Cheers! - OtharLuin (talk) 12:40, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi, apologies as I just got around to this now.

I like that the style looks a lot cleaner. I don't know if it's possible to reduce the width of the top graphic to match the rest of the page (the width is a little too big on my screen, but then again it could just be how the wikimarkup works). Also I don't know how I feel being opted into the member list haha. The assessment page looks very well done and organized.

I am sure you have brought your proposals to the attention of others. Overall, this is a great job and a vast improvement to the current WP page. Thanks very much for sharing! JRHorse (talk) 03:42, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi! Thanks for the feedback, I've reduced the size of the logo at the top of the page. Regarding your name among the participants, I thought it was quite logical, you have a more than sustained participation in articles related to WP:SUMO and many articles are up to date because you do the updates during tournaments. However, if you don't want your name among the participants, I'll remove it when I implement my sandbox page in the main domain. - OtharLuin (talk) 07:33, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello and thanks, the logo fits quite nicely now on my screen. JRHorse (talk) 19:05, 23 January 2024 (UTC)