Jenhawk777
 |
|---|
| 25 April 2024 |
Index
|
||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 10 sections are present. |
 | This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
(I have relocated these very precious kindnesses from others to the top of my talkpage, so they will never be lost or forgotten. I am very grateful for each one.)
A barnstar for you! edit
|
The Barnstar of Diplomacy |
| For your well-chosen words at Talk:Christian ethics. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 18:15, 29 November 2020 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you! edit
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
| Phenomenal job on History of Christian thought on persecution and tolerance! Your deep grasp of the scholarly literature and your tireless commitment to addressing my large number of comments and generally improving the article is very impressive! Thank you for all your hard work! DocFreeman24 (talk) 14:46, 1 December 2020 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you! edit
|
The Barnstar of Diligence |
For your diligence at Biblical criticism and elsewhere.  —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 23:56, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
|
 |
Your praises played by Moop Mama, more on my talk, or the Main page ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:20, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you! edit
|
The Friendship Barnstar | |
| Thank you again for your kind comments and friendly gesture. You are a fine example of a Kindness Campaign member. History DMZ (talk)+(ping) 04:09, 26 September 2020 (UTC) |
P.S. Feel free to take over the 'Gerda's newsletter' idea. I'm going to re-focus on maybe starting a Kindness Campaign newsletter :)
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
| You definitely deserve this for your work on History of Christian thought on persecution and tolerance! HouseBlaster (talk) 17:47, 1 November 2020 (UTC) |
Precious anniversary edit
 | |
| "What do you mean, I can´t rewrite the entire article!?" | |
|---|---|
| ... you were recipient no. 1915 of Precious, a prize of QAI! |
miss you --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:58, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
|
The Christianity Barnstar | |
| You deserve this for your herculean efforts to improve Biblical criticism and respond to the comments at its recent FAC. As Gog mentioned in the closing note, with some additional work it will have a good chance at passing next time around. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 05:04, 14 December 2020 (UTC) |
Fruits edit
Ovinus has given you a bowl of peaches! This delicious fruit promotes WikiLove and has hopefully made your day juicier. Spread peachiness and WikiLove by giving someone else some peaches, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, by adding {{subst:Peach}} to their talk page with a friendly message!
Was thinking of you and your work earlier, Jen. Thanks for everything and I hope you have a good day! I certainly will be... today is a dim light at the end of this year-long tunnel. Warmly, Ovinus (talk) 13:38, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
A barnstar for you! edit
|
The Christianity Barnstar | |
| Dear Jenhawk777, I award you The Christianity Barnstar for all your hard work in WikiProject Christianity-related articles, especially your recent creation of Evolutionary theodicy. Keep up the good work! Your efforts are making a difference here! With regards, AnupamTalk 04:21, 24 March 2021 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you! edit
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar |
| Thank you Jenhawk777 for the message that you left on Gerda's page for me. Truly, the volunteers of these huge projects like WP, LibriVox, DP cannot go the extra mile without people like Gerda and you, who inject fresh energy into the volunteers. The kind words are our only salary, and fortunately we all can pay each other a lot. :) Qapisce (talk) 10:57, 21 September 2021 (UTC) |
A superior barnstar for you! edit
|
The Order of the Superior Scribe of Wikipedia | |
| For all the time and effort you have put in — across thousands of edits — to markedly improve numerous articles related to Christianity all these years. The magnitude of the positive impact you have had with regard to Wikipedia's coverage of academic topics related to Christianity is unprecedented; I cannot think of any other editor who has worked so rigorously and improved those topics to the extent that you have. You are a phenomenal editor and your work is awe-inspiring. Thank you for all that you do! — The Most Comfortable Chair 21:12, 1 June 2022 (UTC) |
- This has touched me so deeply I almost cried. Thank you so, so very much. Jenhawk777 (talk) 21:29, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Barnstar edit
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| For tireless and invaluable efforts on creating and improving Christianity-related pages. Avilich (talk) 12:10, 24 June 2022 (UTC) |
Not the first you receive, but the first I ever hand out. Avilich (talk) 12:10, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- Avilich Bless your heart! Thank you so much! This is very kind of you and I appreciate it. Jenhawk777 (talk) 18:10, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Referencing of Conversion to Christianity edit
The content now reads as a proper Wikipedia article as well. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 10:50, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
- ActivelyDisinterested Bless you! Thank you! I so deeply appreciate you and all your work. You are still the one I will reach out to when I have a problem, but you have taught me a lot, and this article was just too much to ask someone else to do for me. I would have enjoyed banging my head against a wall more, but hey, I followed your example and got it done. I put it up for peer review and others suggested adding back a theology section which I am beginning work on today. Thank you again. You are a great blessing. Jenhawk777 (talk) 15:22, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
 |
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| For excellent work on Theodosius I and Massacre of Thessalonica Richard Keatinge (talk) 21:02, 20 May 2021 (UTC) |
I think I remember you said you liked this guy too edit
IAN McSHANE TALKS ABOUT LOVEJOY. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 14:36, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- I deeply admire Ian McShane's talent. I thought he was under appreciated in America. He makes it look so natural that it's hard to tell he's acting - he just seems to be being himself - but that's really the epitome of good acting isn't it? He's brilliant. Thank you for this! Jenhawk777 (talk) 20:38, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Eric: Here, you forgot your meat yesterday.
- Lovejoy: Ah! Now the winter of our discontent is made glorious summer by that loin of pork! Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:24, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Since you involve yourself in the GA-process now and then, you might find this bit of WP-drama interesting: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#TonyTheTiger_is_gaming_the_WikiCup_through_GAN_spam. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:26, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
And this was also an impressive piece of WP-drama: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Follow_up_from_VPM. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 17:09, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
March music edit
 | |
| story · music · places |
|---|
I uploaded vacation pics (from back home), and I listen to Bach's St John Passion today, - 300 years after it was first performed. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:54, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- My church did an Easter cantata that included Bach's "Oh Sacred Head now Wounded" this year. It always makes me cry. I love Bach. Happy Easter! Jenhawk777 (talk) 19:46, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Understand. I always cry when the orchestra begins the opening of the St Matthew Passion. - Two days later in time, Bach music for Easter! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:44, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- And that includes all the reasons why I love you.
Jenhawk777 (talk) 21:16, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- And that includes all the reasons why I love you.
- Understand. I always cry when the orchestra begins the opening of the St Matthew Passion. - Two days later in time, Bach music for Easter! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:44, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red April 2024 edit
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Greetings am requesting for your assistance in creating a company page --Avantabo (talk) 05:11, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Don't. Read this instead: [1] Jenhawk777 (talk) 06:34, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello
I want to add https://tolpuddletothecotswolds.co.uk/ where?!!
Question from SandhuuSingh (03:54, 7 April 2024) edit
Hi, one question How do you create something? --SandhuuSingh (talk) 03:54, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Do you mean how do you create your first article or do you mean how do you write anything anywhere? To write something, first you must have something worth writing, and that begins with good research in secondary sources. Click on edit source at the top of whatever you are editing, write and cite your sources, then press publish. Before writing anything though I suggest reading:
Contributing is easy: see how to edit a page. For a quick summary on participating, see contributing to Wikipedia, and for a friendly tutorial, see our introduction. For a listing of introductions and tutorials by topic, see getting started. The Simplified Manual of Style and Cheatsheet can remind you of basic wiki markup.
Be bold in improving articles! When adding facts, please provide references so others may verify them. If you are affiliated with the article subject, please see our conflict of interest guideline.
Jenhawk777 (talk) 04:59, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Question from MatteoSilver (09:24, 11 April 2024) edit
Hello, I’m new to editing. Is it okay to be done from a phone or tablet? I don’t typically use a computer. --MatteoSilver (talk) 09:24, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- @MatteoSilver Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Yes, it's ok, though depending on how you do it, things may look different from when you work with a laptop. User:Cullen328/Smartphone editing may have something you find useful. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 18:32, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello edit
You may or may not find this discussion interesting: Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard#Methuselah it's not really in the right place and will probably not "decide" anything by itself, but it's a recurring topic for some articles you've heard of. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 18:27, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Question from Lim Ban Siew (15:11, 18 April 2024) edit
how can i start to personal information ? --Lim Ban Siew (talk) 15:11, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Please do not do that on Wikipedia. This is not a social platform, and there are those who will abuse and misuse that information. This is an encyclopedia published by those who do research and write what amounts to Master's level research papers. Protect your work and yourself by keeping all personal information personal. Jenhawk777 (talk) 17:27, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Question from Mitsoukorussie (19:22, 22 April 2024) edit
Hi, I believe I provided valid reasons for editing the Stewart Shining article, but another editor removed my edits without verifying why they were edited in the first place. I believe this was an aggressive move by him. Today, I entered entries under the "talk" section of "Stewart Shining," as well as the "Museum of Contemporary Art Santa Barbara," before adding any changes. Am I going about this correct way? Can I ask another editor to help me verify my edits and make the changes? --Mitsoukorussie (talk) 19:22, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- You are doing exactly right. The list of problems on the Talk page suggests this article should be nominated for deletion. Go here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion and follow the instructions. The article can be recreated in the future if it becomes appropriate to do so. Jenhawk777 (talk) 14:23, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
I love writing about technology and famous people. I am not experienced per se, but I have written mini-articles for my club. --ZH09 (talk) 21:14, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Cool. Just remember to source everything you write here. Enjoy! Jenhawk777 (talk) 14:23, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Question from Tet-Math2 on User:Tet-Math2/sandbox (22:29, 24 April 2024) edit
I'm trying to get this published. It has equations in it that I could not find anywhere when I needed them. Perhaps others are in the boat I just escaped from.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Tet-Math2/sandbox --Tet-Math2 (talk) 22:29, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Well that's easy to explain. Read this entire page: Wikipedia:Verifiability especially this Wikipedia:Verifiability#Original research because what you have is 100% original research without a single source cited. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that only publishes verifiable material from secondary sources - research papers. All original research will be deleted. If you don't delete it, I will. Jenhawk777 (talk) 03:04, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- While you're at it, read this as well. Wikipedia:Citing Wikipedia Jenhawk777 (talk) 03:09, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Question from Tet-Math2 on User:Tet-Math2/sandbox (12:01, 25 April 2024) edit
Hello Jenhawk777 I'm User:Tet-Math2/sandbox There's NO submit for review option at the bottom of my sandbox. I'm asking you to review my efforts & hopefully inject them into Wikipedia. It's not much good if they just stay in my sandbox !!! I'm dying to know if these are new equations never seen before. Gasp Gasp Gasp --Tet-Math2 (talk) 12:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- I have already answered this. I looked at it before answering above. You must abide by Wikipedia policies. Wikipedia does not publish original work. There is not a single secondary source cited for any of this other than Wikipedia itself. If you publish this, it will be deleted. Jenhawk777 (talk) 15:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC)