Disruptive IP edit

I noticed you reverted an edit of 2605:8d80:13bc:131c:9917:6bac:cc7e:4dae, they have been extremely disruptive towards any of Sokolov's work and on the Battle of Kursk page, and continue to do so, as you can check the Battle of Kursk page and see that the IPs are in the same location of Toronto. Reaper1945 (talk) 15:36, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.4 macOS Big Sur.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.4 macOS Big Sur.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:02, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
106   Alternative media (U.S. political right) (talk) Add sources
20   Borland Kylix (talk) Add sources
685   JetBrains (talk) Add sources
2,628   Buddy Ebsen (talk) Add sources
1,092   Record producer (talk) Add sources
99   C++Builder (talk) Add sources
188   Component-based software engineering (talk) Cleanup
569   Carl Benjamin (talk) Cleanup
566   Respiration (physiology) (talk) Cleanup
231   Patriot Prayer (talk) Expand
12   Honey Hunt (talk) Expand
1,872   Proud Boys (talk) Expand
1,089   Automation (talk) Unencyclopaedic
93   Terrorgram (talk) Unencyclopaedic
1,272   The Horus Heresy (talk) Unencyclopaedic
161   Far-right politics in the United Kingdom (talk) Merge
120   Epik (talk) Merge
246   Antisemitism in the United States (talk) Merge
512   Tin Woodman (talk) Wikify
13   Canarium indicum (talk) Wikify
21   Alexander Raven Thomson (talk) Wikify
3   Marie Lannoo (talk) Orphan
2   Twyla Exner (talk) Orphan
4   Charles Coleman (music producer) (talk) Orphan
48   Haakon Forwald (talk) Stub
41   Ghost skin (talk) Stub
11   Phoenix Object Basic (talk) Stub
18   Cantera (stone) (talk) Stub
10   Revolutionary Conservative Caucus (talk) Stub
12   Absolutely Productions (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:32, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Renamed account edit

Hi K6ka :) I was randomly scrolling through edit filter hits & I came across this note you left on Draddex’s talk. I just thought I should leave you a message; as you mentioned in that diff that you’d lifted the block on the account, but it still appears to be blocked.

Apologies if I’ve missed anything. All the best. ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 12:28, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

@A smart kitten: Oops! Thanks for catching that; I have now actually unblocked the user. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 13:58, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

About your block of 148.69.166.217 edit

Their two edits at Niggerhead need revision delete for hate speech.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:51, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Skywatcher68:   Donek6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 15:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 16, 2024) edit

Hello, K6ka. The article for improvement of the week is:

Antarctic

Please be bold and help improve it!


Previous selections: Fire safety • Jean Gabin


Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 15 April 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Tech News: 2024-16 edit

MediaWiki message delivery 23:27, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Besins healthcare page edit

Hello,

I noticed you reverted the changes I made on the Besins Healthcare page, citing a lack of adherence to Wikipedia's tone guidelines. While I understand the importance of maintaining a consistent tone, I believe the revisions I made were in line with improving the article's accuracy and relevance.

I'm open to constructive feedback and suggestions on how to better align with Wikipedia's standards, I would appreciate to not see my work be cancelled instead have some suggestion to make it fit the tone.

Best regards,

Vic01toire

Vic01toire (talk) 07:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Vic01toire, your work is not "cancelled"; it was reverted because it was not written in the encyclopedic tone that Wikipedia is written in. Reverting an edit does not mean "cancellation", it means someone else disagrees with it and feels the article was better before. Please see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution for guidance on this; Wikipedia is written by many people who will all eventually disagree with something at some point, and Wikipedia is built as a result of people with differences working to resolve disputes. Using terms such as "cancelled" is simply not correct and may inhibit your ability to resolve disputes, because it implies that you believe other people have an agenda to silence you.
Your edit here looks like something found on the company's "About Us" page, not something in an encyclopedia. Wikipedia is written in the style of an academic paper, so it presents the facts "with a straight face", not with the perspective of an employee at the company. For an example of encyclopedic tone, see a featured article and take note of the way it is written. It also removed a lot of sourced material, particularly those in the "Controversy" section; Wikipedia is about verifiability, not truth. Information that is well supported by reliable sources is what's reported on Wikipedia, not material that something believes to be truthful. Even if you think something isn't true based on your own perspective, that's not justification to remove it from Wikipedia if it's been supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia is a reflection of what reliable sources report on a topic, not an independent curator of information.
You may find it difficult to write about Wikipedia on these terms because you're receiving payment for these contributions; as such, you have a conflict of interest. Most Wikipedia editors are impartial to the topics they write about, which makes it easier to write in an encyclopedic tone. You'll need to keep your own biases in mind when drafting content about this company.
I've provided you with a lot of links to policy pages above. You may also be interested in the Teahouse, an environment for newcomers to ask questions; help on writing your first article; and the Five Pillars of Wikipedia, which summarize the core principles.
k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 12:32, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
78   Ottawa Titans (talk) Add sources
898   Resurrection (talk) Add sources
207   Northern Ireland Executive (talk) Add sources
1,893   Rogers Centre (talk) Add sources
15   Social shopping (talk) Add sources
5   Comhairle na nÓg (talk) Add sources
22   Morpeth, New South Wales (talk) Cleanup
370   Annihilationism (talk) Cleanup
19   All Saints College, Maitland (talk) Cleanup
5   Geelong High School (talk) Expand
74   Moe, Victoria (talk) Expand
281   Udhampur (talk) Expand
1,825   Endianness (talk) Unencyclopaedic
25   New musicology (talk) Unencyclopaedic
24   Music of Crete (talk) Unencyclopaedic
6   Fourth Amendment of the Constitution Bill 1968 (talk) Merge
13   Phonophoresis (talk) Merge
4   Third Amendment of the Constitution Bill 1968 (talk) Merge
282   Customer to customer (talk) Wikify
86   Conversion marketing (talk) Wikify
1,072   Christian eschatology (talk) Wikify
3   Bryant Villeponteau (talk) Orphan
2   Banister Branch (talk) Orphan
4   Agnes Baliques (talk) Orphan
5   Goulburn River National Park (talk) Stub
4   Coolah Tops National Park (talk) Stub
9   The Hill, New South Wales (talk) Stub
6   East Geelong, Victoria (talk) Stub
8   Tomaree National Park (talk) Stub
19   East Maitland, New South Wales (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:35, 18 April 2024 (UTC)Reply