I do get emails from Talk messages, so by all means try to contact me here. Martin (talk) 23:42, 21 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Extraterritorial crossroad edit

 

The article Extraterritorial crossroad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Most of the sources I found were likely copied from this article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 14:55, 12 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Extraterritorial crossroad for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Extraterritorial crossroad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extraterritorial crossroad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

LaundryPizza03 (d) 02:22, 15 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cc-sa edit

 Template:Cc-sa has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. HouseBlastertalk 23:13, 3 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Facial Expression Markup Language" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  The redirect Facial Expression Markup Language has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 13 § Facial Expression Markup Language until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:58, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply