Archive edit

User talk:Mdupont/Archive 1
User talk:Mdupont/Archive 2
User talk:Mdupont/Archive 3

Lets Talk edit

  • please be specific, because there are lots of things to talk about.
  • please be constructive, cause I want to learn
  • please assume good faith, cause I have it!

Your turn edit

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
7   Divi Blasii (talk) Add sources
19   Kosovar Cup (talk) Add sources
811   Team Foundation Server (talk) Add sources
4   Rossiter Johnson (talk) Add sources
9   University of Pristina (1969–99) (talk) Add sources
98   Slurm Workload Manager (talk) Add sources
688   GitLab (talk) Cleanup
664   Eames Lounge Chair (talk) Cleanup
24   Federal Reserve responses to the subprime crisis (talk) Cleanup
63   Ionomer (talk) Expand
249   Demographics of Kosovo (talk) Expand
80   Oracle Grid Engine (talk) Expand
27   Crime in Kosovo (talk) Unencyclopaedic
215   Search engine indexing (talk) Unencyclopaedic
46   Error account (talk) Unencyclopaedic
54   The Water Club (talk) Merge
81   Federal drug policy of the United States (talk) Merge
8   Landolphia owariensis (talk) Merge
18   National Infrastructure Advisory Council (talk) Wikify
168   Social policy of Donald Trump (talk) Wikify
4   Carl E. Grunsky (talk) Wikify
3   Anon Pairot (talk) Orphan
3   Strengthening State and Local Cyber Crime Fighting Act of 2017 (talk) Orphan
3   Fatmir Dalladaku (talk) Orphan
9   White Drin Waterfall (talk) Stub
6   Kokaj (talk) Stub
59   Unikkatil (talk) Stub
69   QCad (talk) Stub
10   Cathedral of Saint Mother Teresa, Pristina (talk) Stub
6   Drenica (river) (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:08, 5 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Category:Open content companies edit

Hi, you created Category:Open content companies as "not a subcat of Category:Open content". Why not? It seems to me that it should be. – Fayenatic London 10:53, 30 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Yes, because a company is a subcat of company, not of content. Content is something that can be digitally transfered across tcpip, a company cannot be therefore is not a subcat. Just because it is related to does not make it a sub category see Subcategory James Michael DuPont (talk) 15:43, 30 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
But even though food and drink are substances that can be ingested, whereas Category:Food and drink companies/Category:Food- and drink-related organizations cannot be ingested, yet the latter is a valid sub-category of Category:Food and drink. In Wikipedia, sub-cats are used for broader relationships between topics than the sub-set principle stated in the mathematical article subcategory.
For a recent discussion on how sub-cats do have shifts in meaning, you might be interested to see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Categories#A_big_problem_with_our_category_structures. – Fayenatic London 21:29, 30 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
I dont think this is a good idea. Is this official policy? James Michael DuPont (talk) 23:29, 30 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
I admit that WP:SUBCAT doesn't say so. I have started a discussion at WT:CAT on this. Feel free to raise your objection there. – Fayenatic London 22:35, 5 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Advocate (student newspaper) for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Advocate (student newspaper) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advocate (student newspaper) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 04:23, 13 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

good job! another bit of history deleted. better would be to merge with this article about the college.

James Michael DuPont (talk) 01:57, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
38   Lego Chess (talk) Add sources
39   Lego Legends of Chima Online (talk) Add sources
54   Prokuplje (talk) Add sources
42   Jakarta Project (talk) Add sources
212   Apache Lucene (talk) Add sources
21   Apache Brooklyn (talk) Add sources
19   Apache XAP (talk) Cleanup
427   GitLab (talk) Cleanup
77   Watcom C/C++ (talk) Cleanup
5,448   New York (talk) Expand
76   Apache Axis2 (talk) Expand
778   Computer cluster (talk) Expand
23   Albania's Golgotha (talk) Unencyclopaedic
1,723   Corporate title (talk) Unencyclopaedic
613   Message Passing Interface (talk) Unencyclopaedic
65   Cannabis policy of the Donald Trump administration (talk) Merge
134   Social policy of Donald Trump (talk) Merge
216   Dataflow programming (talk) Merge
1,107   Apache Tomcat (talk) Wikify
189   Manufacturing in the United States (talk) Wikify
204   Play Framework (talk) Wikify
7   National Training Institute of Education, Science and Technology (talk) Orphan
25   Education in Mitrovica (talk) Orphan
15   Big Data Partnership (talk) Orphan
65   Albert Boscov (talk) Stub
19   Apache Gora (talk) Stub
21   Apache C++ Standard Library (talk) Stub
115   Lego Creator: Knights' Kingdom (talk) Stub
18   José Isabel Blandón Figueroa (talk) Stub
424   Google Fuchsia (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:35, 25 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Mdupont. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Navin Bhakta edit

 

The article Navin Bhakta has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. CoolSkittle (talk) 20:21, 21 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Arias, Aleman & Mora edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Arias, Aleman & Mora requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 13:32, 27 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:GNUstep-Mac OS X edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:GNUstep-Mac OS X requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 03:40, 29 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Free software programmed in Smalltalk edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Free software programmed in Smalltalk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 06:03, 23 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

2019 US Banknote Contest edit

  US Banknote Contest  
November-December 2019

There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons.

In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate.


If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)Reply

"Ãushkë" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Ãushkë. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 18#Ãushkë until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 122.61.73.44 (talk) 22:49, 18 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Sites using OpenStreetMap data has been nominated for deletion edit

 

Category:Sites using OpenStreetMap data has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. fgnievinski (talk) 02:28, 5 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Ferlogo.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Ferlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 02:45, 10 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Navin Bhakta edit

 

The article Navin Bhakta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 17:22, 13 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:NJHPO row edit

 Template:NJHPO row has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 21:27, 21 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:NJHPO header edit

 Template:NJHPO header has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 21:27, 21 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:NJHPO Focus edit

 Template:NJHPO Focus has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 06:37, 24 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Block reflector edit

 

The article Block reflector has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Poorly sourced, poorly explained, orphaned-for-a-decade highly technical topic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 25 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

The file File:AuthorBookPageContent Francesco Maria Emanuele e Gaetani march di Villabianca title Della Sicilia nobile year 1754 pages 569 Content CAMPOREALEi ARcadio Bicchet e Zumbo fu il primo M di queílo titolo per con ceífione del Samo Rè Cario Secondo.png has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the file should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 21 February 2024 (UTC)Reply