Rynb99
Welcome! edit
Hello, Rynb99, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Chicago Comets. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Greyjoy talk 06:37, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Magdalena Fürstin (March 7) edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Magdalena Fürstin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Magdalena Fürstin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Rynb99!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 08:19, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: The Vanished (podcast) has been accepted edit
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
-Liancetalk/contribs 00:45, 5 April 2020 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Alfred William Amandus Plate (April 7) edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alfred William Amandus Plate and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alfred William Amandus Plate, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Magdalena Fürstin has been accepted edit
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits, you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
DGG ( talk ) 17:06, 8 May 2020 (UTC)Women in Red edit
Hi there, Rynb99, and welcome to Women in Red. I see you have already created a number of interesting articles, including one or two about women. I hope there will be many more. In order to avoid acceptability problems, you might find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any problems or need assistance.--Ipigott (talk) 11:09, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
July 2020 at Women in Red edit
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August 2020 at Women in Red edit
|
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Sunset Corner painting edit
Hello! I am pretty sure that Sunset Corner is not notable enough to stay on Wikipedia, but I look forward to seeing what sources you come up with. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 20:12, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi ThatMontrealIP! I have added more sources and hope that's enough, but you might be right that this work isn't notable enough. Thanks for the feedback!Rynb99 (talk) 20:35, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Jason DeMarte edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Jason DeMarte requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://lenscratch.com/2020/04/jason-demarte-2/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Zoodino (talk) 06:45, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
September Women in Red edithons edit
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October editathons from Women in Red edit
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Speedy deletion nomination of The Baby-Sitters Club Club edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on The Baby-Sitters Club Club requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://headgum.com/the-baby-sitters-club-club?page=7 and https://www.google.com/podcasts?feed=aHR0cHM6Ly9yc3MuYXJ0MTkuY29tL3RoZS1iYWJ5LXNpdHRlcnMtY2x1Yi1jbHVi. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 TT me 15:25, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
November edith-a-thons from Women in Red edit
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:49, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Contrary to what you say on your user page, that you are "creating and editing pages about artists and artworks in UMMA's collection", in fact all you seem to do is add external links to your employer's website, often of dubious relevance & utility. You say you are aware of WP:COI. I suggest you give it another read. Johnbod (talk) 16:18, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
I appreciate the feedback, Johnbod, and I will review WP:COI as well as Sharing Institutional Knowledge through GLAM Partnerships to be more careful that my edits adhere to Wikipedia's policies. Best, Rynb99 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:37A0:32A0:153F:34E9:434:5CE6 (talk) 16:40, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Please stop spamming links on every page you can find to your employers website. The links you're providing are not helpful in many occassions and linking to a non-notable collection of some subjects is just coming across as per Wp:SPAM. Also you're failing WP:PAY by editing the articles and putting the links in directly. Please stop. Canterbury Tail talk 17:54, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December with Women in Red edit
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your submission at Articles for creation: Bella with White Collar has been accepted edit
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
DGG ( talk ) 16:43, 15 December 2020 (UTC)A New Year With Women in Red! edit
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
February 2021 at Women in Red edit
|
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 15:00, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March 2021 at Women in Red edit
|
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your draft article, Draft:Alfred William Amandus Plate edit
Hello, Rynb99. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alfred William Amandus Plate".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:21, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Status and advice edit
As reviewing administrator, I did not delete it, for it might well be a viable article. As suggested by a previous reviewer, I think it would probably be best to rework it as an article on the firm. This is likely to be helpful, for the presence of its work in major museums is good evidence for notability under WP:CREATIVE. What would be needed, though ,are exact references to at least some of the photographs in the permanent collection of the museums. If you need help with this, you might try Pharos, who has worked extensively with museum collections. You've got another 6 months automatically--ask me if there are any difficulties. DGG ( talk ) 01:51, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Further advice about WIR edit
I was previously WIR for the NYPL Library of Performing Arts, but I did it as a volunteer, and did not consider that I had a conflict of interest. (and ,though I thought at first I would write some articles on the collections, I mainly gave advice to people who wanted to do so) . Under our current interpretation of the guidelines, if you write about articles in their collection, you are a coi editor, and must declare it for every article under the provision of WP:PAID. (I feel rather strongly about this, for I was one of those who helped establish the rule). With respect to adding links, as mentioned above, If you are adding a link for a unique item to an article about the item, this is justified and not spam but must still be declared. If you are adding links to a copy of a photograph that is in many museums, you should try to list other museums as well, or add the link through WikiData. Again, if in doubt consult User:Pharos. DGG ( talk ) 02:26, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi DGG, thanks for your advice. I will take a close look at the WP:Paid page and see what next steps I need to take. Still learning how all this works, but I really appreciate the guidance! -- Rynb99
April editathons from Women in Red edit
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nomination of Flay (James Madison) for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flay (James Madison) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2019 paintings edit
A tag has been placed on Category:2019 paintings requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:43, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Please DON'T stuff this with regular sculptors - we have thousands of these, most of whom carved stone. Thanks. Johnbod (talk) 21:38, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
May 2021 at Women in Red edit
|
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:37, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June 2021 at Women in Red edit
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nomination of Akosua Amo-Adem for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akosua Amo-Adem until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
""Angel Nafis"" listed at Redirects for discussion edit
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect "Angel Nafis". The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 13#"Angel Nafis" until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 11:10, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
July 2021 at Women in Red edit
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:06, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August Editathons with Women in Red edit
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:27, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2021 at Women in Red edit
|
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:31, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October 2021 at Women in Red edit
Special event:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 01:37, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November 2021 at Women in Red edit
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:32, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit
| | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Women in Red refreshed edit
I see you have refreshed your membership of Women in Red but you've actually been an active member since May 2020. Keep up the good work!--Ipigott (talk) 07:45, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
December 2021 at Women in Red edit
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:13, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for December 21 edit
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Notable American Women, 1607–1950
- added links pointing to Mary McCarthy, Lillian Smith, Mary Anderson, Margaret Wade, Muna Lee, Marie Manning, Mary Fisher, Katharine White, Elizabeth Harrison, Gordon Hamilton, Clara Driscoll, Mary Louise Smith, Anna Morgan, Rebecca Jones, Sophia Smith, Frances Dickinson, Donna Allen and Mary Reed
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
January 2022 Women in Red edit
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Golf tournaments in "Category:History of women in foo (state/country)" categories edit
Can you please explain this as there do not really seem to fit with the general purpose of the category? Given some of the other categorisation you have done, it looks like they have been put there simply because "Category:Women's sport in foo (state/country)" does not exist. If this is valid categorisation, then for consistency should those articles that have been put only in "Category:Women's sport in foo" categories not also be in "Category:History of women in foo", since one is not sub-cat of the other? I also notice some articles have be categorised in "Category:History of..." when "Category:Women's sport in..." exists. Thanks. wjematherplease leave a message... 11:22, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi User:Wjemather, thanks for checking on this. You are correct, I was adding the women's golf tournaments to "category: history of women in foo" because the "Category:Women's sport in foo" does not exist for a many them. Part of my thinking too was that I had done it for other sports events/awards (ex. Miss Basketball, since those pages are very clearly about women in those states), but I'm realizing now (a little late) that these golf tournaments are not actually made up of athletes who live/play in that area. I still might create a "women's sports in foo" category for the states that are missing them, and am trying to figure out the most efficient process, so I appreciate you bringing this up! Rynb99 (talk) 13:39, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Native American casinos categories edit
Don't think these belong in their respective History of Native Americans in X state categories, as they aren't historic events in their own right. The existing Category:Native American casinos could simply be divided by state if that were needed. SounderBruce 02:23, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
International relations edit
Again, please stop spamming art articles with diplomatic relations categories. Only a handful of these articles, where there have been actual diplomatic exhanges, should be included. Johnbod (talk) 03:50, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
February with Women in Red edit
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March editathons edit
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
List of Sigma Delta Tau chapters edit
While I can understand adding this page to the category in question, it seems odd not to do this with other sororities and women's fraternities at Category:Lists of chapters of United States student societies by society. I'm not sure whether it makes sense to split Category:Lists of chapters of United States student societies by society by gender as several are co-ed.Naraht (talk) 14:19, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
April Editathons from Women in Red edit
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your draft article, Draft:Alfred William Amandus Plate edit
Hello, Rynb99. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alfred William Amandus Plate".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:38, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Earth Day 2022 Edit-a-thon - April 22nd - 2PM EST edit
| You're invited! NYC Earth Day 2022 Edit-a-thon! April 22nd! | |
|---|---|
 Sure We Can and the Environment of New York City Task Force invite you to join us for:
This Edit-a-Thon is part of a larger Earth Day celebration, hosted by Brooklyn based recycling and community center Sure We Can, that runs from 1PM-7PM and is open to the public! See this flyer for more information: https://www.instagram.com/p/CcGr4FyuqEa/ | |
-- Environment of New York City Task Force - Wil540 art (talk) 21:25, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
Help getting page approved edit
Hi! I saw you've done a lot of really great work creating artist profiles for Wikipedia. I'm working on one for an Indian artist, Pritika Chowdhry, and am wondering if you can offer any insight into ensuring the citations qualify the article as reliable/sufficiently notable. Thanks!
The article link is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Pritika_Chowdhry
Tysm! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matriarch-info (talk • contribs) 19:24, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- Hi! Thanks for reaching out. The citations look pretty good to me; I'm searching for more sources now, and it looks like you have used just about all of them already. One possible issue is that I couldn't find anything about her work being in any museum collections (and for many of the artists I made pages for, they had artwork in several museums and that helped confer some notability). But, I'd think all of the research papers she is mentioned in would be a plus. (WP:BASIC "People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.") This page also has some good info although it may be stuff you already know.
- Another thing you could keep in mind for the future is that it's possible to skip the AfC process and instead create pages via these methods (I prefer #1). The downside of this is needing to write a substantial amount all at once instead of having a long time to work on a draft. A couple I have made this way have eventually been nominated for deletion, but overall I have found it to be a lot more efficient than going through AfC. But of course, AfC has a lot of benefits too so take that with a grain of salt.
- Hope this helps! Rynb99 (talk) 14:10, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
May 2022 at Women in Red edit
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 04:57, 2 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June events from Women in Red edit
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nomination of Disappearance of Ali Gilmore for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disappearance of Ali Gilmore until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:44, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in July 2022 edit
|
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:49, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2022 edit
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:59, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in September 2022 edit
|
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:38, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2022 edit
|
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:01, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
I have sent you a note about a page you started edit
Hello, Rynb99. Thank you for creating Jessica Rickert. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:22, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started edit
Hello, Rynb99. Thank you for your work on Susanne Stephenson. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:09, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red November 2022 edit
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:35, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in December 2022 edit
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:56, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2023 edit
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:04, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:History of women in Tajikstan edit
A tag has been placed on Category:History of women in Tajikstan indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 02:12, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Whoops, looks like I misspelled "Tajikistan" when creating it, and the correct version (Category:History of women in Tajikistan) already exists, so yes, this one should definitely be deleted. Thank you for catching this! Rynb99 (talk) 21:42, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red in February 2023 edit
|
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:29, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Mary Seton Watts page has an error edit
The page says Mary Seton Watts (née Fraser Tytler) is listed as having work in the World Expo show in Chicago in 1893,but the Miss Fraser Tytler in that show was not Mary but another artist K A Fraser Tytler.
Link
sculpture.gla.ac.uk
Please change. She was Mrs GF Watts in 1893. 213.31.189.233 (talk) 20:14, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Kaira Jewel Lingo for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaira Jewel Lingo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Women in Red March 2023 edit
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:55, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red April 2023 edit
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red May 2023 edit
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:29, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - June 2023 edit
|
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Paintings of women edit
You are going for a huge category. I've added Category:Paintings of the Virgin Mary which should handle hundreds of entries. Randy Kryn (talk) 13:22, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red July 2023 edit
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
CS1 error on Winnetka, Illinois edit
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Winnetka, Illinois, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:55, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red 8th Anniversary edit
|
|
Women in Red 8th Anniversary |
| In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap! |
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:01, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Invitation edit
Hello Rynb99!
- The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
- We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
- Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
- Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
- If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.
Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!
Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red August 2023 edit
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:26, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Thank you for the CFD nomination edit
It's great to get new editors there. I made some friendly format fixes to your nomination but, if you disagree with them, feel free to revert. - RevelationDirect (talk) 00:28, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
September 2023 at Women in Red edit
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Victuallers (talk) 16:59, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2023 edit
|
See also
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - November 2023 edit
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red December 2023 edit
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2024 edit
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Camille de Chantereine edit
Hello. You created the page Camille Chantereine, however her name, as indicated inside the article, was Camille de Chantereine. Is it possible to change the title ? Thanks a lot. 2A01:E0A:AAA:29B0:4C9E:4CAB:65D7:822 (talk) 23:32, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red February 2024 edit
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:10, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Category:African-American women economists has been nominated for splitting edit
Category:African-American women economists has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:36, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Category:African-American women chemists has been nominated for splitting edit
Category:African-American women chemists has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 22:58, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Category:African-American women computer scientists has been nominated for splitting edit
Category:African-American women computer scientists has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 22:58, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Category:African-American women biologists has been nominated for splitting edit
Category:African-American women biologists has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 22:59, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Category:African-American women neuroscientists has been nominated for splitting edit
Category:African-American women neuroscientists has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 22:59, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Category:African-American women philosophers has been nominated for splitting edit
Category:African-American women philosophers has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 05:01, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Category:African-American women musicologists has been nominated for merging edit
Category:African-American women musicologists has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 05:02, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Category:African-American women legal scholars has been nominated for merging edit
Category:African-American women legal scholars has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 05:02, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Category:African-American women folklorists has been nominated for merging edit
Category:African-American women folklorists has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 05:03, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Category:African-American women historians has been nominated for merging edit
Category:African-American women historians has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 05:07, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red March 2024 edit
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Category:18th-century American women sculptors has been nominated for splitting edit
Category:18th-century American women sculptors has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 16:23, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:History of women in Grenada edit
A tag has been placed on Category:History of women in Grenada indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 07:29, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red April 2024 edit
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:43, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Category:Women cryptographers by nationality has been nominated for merging edit
Category:Women cryptographers by nationality has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:36, 1 April 2024 (UTC)