Welcome!

Hello, Sauer202, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 17:04, 19 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Sauer202 can you please help me edit Christian Sailer's wikipedia page? it is a draft I have been working on and since after the world shoot I think it'll go through. Thank you sir! HBowman00 (talk) 04:48, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

IPSC Australasia Multi-Gun Championship edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of IPSC Australasia Multi-Gun Championship, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=IPSC_Australasia_Multi-Gun_Championship&redlink=1.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:25, 31 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Northern Ireland Practical Shooting Confederation edit

Hi, I'm Crystallizedcarbon. Sauer202, thanks for creating Northern Ireland Practical Shooting Confederation!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add references from independent reliable sources to the article to meet our verifiability and notablility requirements.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 12:46, 7 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Please use edit summaries edit

  Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! JustinTime55 (talk) 13:23, 11 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of IPSC European Action Air Championship edit

Hello Sauer202,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged IPSC European Action Air Championship for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ætoms (talk) 10:38, 19 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello Ætoms, the page has now got some more info on it and I will try to fill in more results as I find them. Sauer202 (talk) 11:44, 19 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

List of receiver threads (firearms) edit

This list you wrote has had a set of clean-up tags on it for nearly a year, including ones noting the lack of any sources. Have you abandoned it or are you able to bring it up to Wikipedia standards? Felsic2 (talk) 15:38, 15 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of List of receiver threads (firearms) edit

 

The article List of receiver threads (firearms) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Multiple issues, including lack of notability, going back 12 months. Contacted creator, but no response.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Felsic2 (talk) 20:38, 12 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of receiver threads (firearms) for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of receiver threads (firearms) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of receiver threads (firearms) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Felsic2 (talk) 20:58, 12 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: World Rimfire and Air Rifle Benchrest Federation (March 1) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MatthewVanitas (talk) 05:29, 1 March 2017 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Sauer202, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 05:29, 1 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Upload "Diopter sight picture" to commons edit

Hello, I see you are the original uploader of the nice image "Diopter sight picture.jpg", which amongst others is used in the diopter sight article. I would like to use this image on the Norwegian Wikipedia as well, but then the image has to be uploaded to commons. Would you please do that? Sauer202 (talk) 20:16, 15 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

It can be found here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Diopter_rear_sight.jpg --Francis Flinch (talk) 08:07, 16 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
This is the image I had in mind: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Diopter_sight_picture.jpg Sauer202 (talk) 16:57, 16 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of IPSC South African Handgun Championship for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article IPSC South African Handgun Championship is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IPSC South African Handgun Championship until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - MrX 02:27, 16 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Draft:World Rimfire and Air Rifle Benchrest Federation concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:World Rimfire and Air Rifle Benchrest Federation, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:10, 24 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:World Rimfire and Air Rifle Benchrest Federation edit

 

Hello, Sauer202. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "World Rimfire and Air Rifle Benchrest Federation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. LinguistunEinsuno 10:59, 28 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Warsaw Pact rail for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Warsaw Pact rail is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warsaw Pact rail until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Sandstein  17:44, 13 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Irish Target Sports edit

Can you do something with this as there does not seem to be any notability proven and the website is dead. Thanks ww2censor (talk) 16:17, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the message. I would hope they are notable as an important sport organization in Ireland. Their website seems to be down, I have added a link to an archived version at web.archive.org. A quick look at the 2017 IPSC Handgun World Shoot competitor listing show that they had three competitors at the 2017 IPSC Handgun World Shoot. The minutes show that they were a voting region at the 2017 IPSC General Assembly, and they are still currently listed as an active region in the IPSC Regions list. I would love to add more history to the article, but have to do some searching first. Sauer202 (talk) 19:20, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, but a self-source is not considered a reliable third-party source. You need to find something better such as national newspapers. ww2censor (talk) 20:48, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve List of bicycle registers edit

Hi, I'm Lineslarge. Sauer202, thanks for creating List of bicycle registers!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I think most of the entries need to be removed from this list. In general, you should only include something in a link if it has a page on Wikipedia (the external pages you've linked to do not count).

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Lineslarge (talk) 19:42, 29 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thank you... edit

...for your interest in the biathlon article, Sauer202. And thanks for finding a reference for your recent contribution. That article is in need of more references, if you were willing to take some time to add references to paragraphs where they do not now exist. If you edit using the Visual editor ("Edit", versus "Edit source"), it can automatically format references, using the "Cite" toolbar at the top of the page. Cheers, HopsonRoad (talk) 15:16, 19 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

The Norwegian Civilian Marksmanship Association listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Norwegian Civilian Marksmanship Association to the article National Rifle Association of Norway. Since you had some involvement with the The Norwegian Civilian Marksmanship Association redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Sam Sailor 07:50, 17 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of United Kingdom Practical Shooting Association edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on United Kingdom Practical Shooting Association requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  Velella  Velella Talk   21:34, 4 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Northern Ireland Practical Shooting Confederation edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Northern Ireland Practical Shooting Confederation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  Velella  Velella Talk   21:35, 4 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of the Northern Ireland Practical Shooting Confederation.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of the Northern Ireland Practical Shooting Confederation.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 6 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of ReMarkable for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ReMarkable is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ReMarkable until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:09, 3 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 2 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of straight pull rifles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Musgrave (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:55, 2 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Steiner-Optik edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Steiner-Optik, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Lopifalko (talk) 13:06, 9 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

The Danish shooting movement moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, The Danish shooting movement, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 06:04, 15 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Svensk Jakt moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Svensk Jakt, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 00:49, 2 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Danish shooting movement has been accepted edit

 
The Danish shooting movement, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 05:22, 4 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Borris Skydeterræn moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Borris Skydeterræn, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PATH SLOPU 13:36, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Irvington, New York edit

Articles about American subjects use standard American measurement units. Please do not change mph to kph again. Beyond My Ken (talk) 07:41, 10 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry, but per Wikipedia:Manual of Style, conversion to SI units are to be provided. Sauer202 (talk) 07:42, 10 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks! edit

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Changing reference source content edit

I have reverted this change - it's not generally normal WP practice to refactor published details (when they appear to be as-intended).--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 14:21, 13 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 18 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Recreational vehicle, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ventilation and Rain water (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 18 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

03/10/20 edit

 

The article World Federation of Direct Selling Associations has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable/no secondary source coverage

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rhode Island Red (talk) 04:00, 11 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello Rhode Island Red, I don't have time to work on that article right now. Can you help me move the article to draft space? Sauer202 (talk) 08:49, 11 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Sverige S-1 edit

Hello, Sauer202,

Thank you for creating Sverige S-1.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This is a great start, good job.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Cliffsteinman}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

cliffsteinman -- Discuss 00:55, 20 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 1 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Decimal separator, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Period (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Svensk Jakt concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Svensk Jakt, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 2 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Q (firearms manufacturer) edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Q (firearms manufacturer), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tatupiplu'talk 19:41, 6 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Borris Skydeterræn concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Borris Skydeterræn, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:39, 7 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 8 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Metallic silhouette shooting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Binocular (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started edit

Hello, Sauer202

Thank you for creating SR-25 pattern magazine.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:39, 25 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

6,5 × 55 mm SKAN edit

What is the Pmax of the 6,5 × 55 mm SKAN and can you provide a C.I.P. TDCC like reference or references regarding this standard? For the C.I.P. 6.5×55mm case 3,988 bar (398.8 MPa) would yield a similar bolt thrust as the C.I.P. .308 Winchester chambering the modern SIG Sauer 200 STR match rifles must be capable to use.--Francis Flinch (talk) 18:30, 28 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Will see if I can dig and find pressure and dimension specifications for both the original 6.5x55 specification as well as SKAN. I am quite certain that 6,5 × 55 mm SKAN is officially rated for 380 MPa as measured according to the C.I.P. method, but sources are needed. In the meantime I can provide some info that may be of relevance.
Vihtavuori provides reloading data for 6,5 x 55 SE / 6,5 x 55 SKAN with the max pressure for both set at 380 MPa,[1] and write "do not use with Krag-Jörgensen, Mauser M1896 or similar rifles".
For competitions in Norway under DFS the maximum permitted chamber pressures as listed in the competition rules have been:
  • 250 MPa in 6.5×55 for the youngsters (rekrutt) aged 11 to 15 years.[2]
  • 330 MPa in 6.5×55 for Krag-Jørgensen.[3] Ammunition made for the Krag by Raufoss is said to have been reduced further to 280 MPa during the 1960s or 1970s, for example with the «RA SUPER sierra» and «RANO super» factory ammunition, but a source is needed for this. The well known Norwegian handloading manual Ladeboken also mentions 280 MPa as a safe pressure for Krag.[4]
  • 380 MPa in 6.5×55 for SIG Sauer 200 STR and Mauser M67.[3]
  • 415 MPa in 7.62×51 for Sauer and Mauser.[3]
Hot factory ammo is available for Nordic Rifle Field-Shooting, for example "Norma Diamond Line Felt 6,5 130gr / 8,4g" with a muzzle velocity of 900 m/s in a SIG Sauer 200 STR with a 740 mm barrel.[5] The pressure is not stated by the manufacturer, but since it is used in competition it is probably close to 380 MPa.
Even though the same pressure is set for both 200 STR and M67, the 200 STR is considered to be much stronger, similar to how a Remington 700 is considered much stronger than a Mauser 98 (the M67 is built from old k98's). It is not uncommon for handloaders to load past this without pressure signs. To paint a picture, the following are unsourced examples loads used by handloaders, but it can give a rough idea. These are for a 9 gram (140 grain) bullet in SIG Sauer 200 STR with a 740 mm barrel:
  • 6.5x55 SAAMI pressure, 350 MPa, 810-820 m/s.
  • 6.5x55 CIP/SKAN pressure, 380 MPa, 860-880m/s.
  • 6.5x55 handload max (without pressure signs), 415 MPa (.308 pressure), 900-920 m/s.
  • 6.5 Creedmoor, 435 MPa CIP pressure, 830 m/s.
In the other end of the spectrum we have the Krag. It is a strong action, but not as strong as the more modern Mauser og Sauer actions, and as 100 year old competition rifles that could go through thousands and thousands of rounds, wear became an issue. Decent Krag loads have been available that achieves a lower pressure using heavier bullets and slower burning powder.
Older pressure ratings for the 6.5x55 are also interesting, because they may have been measured with different methods such as CUP.

Sauer202 (talk) 20:30, 28 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Svensk Jakt edit

 

Hello, Sauer202. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Svensk Jakt".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:41, 3 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

European Cartridge Research Association moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, European Cartridge Research Association, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ─ The Aafī (talk) 14:53, 11 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

European Cartridge Research Association moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, European Cartridge Research Association, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Nathan2055talk - contribs 23:01, 11 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Elgin Gates moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Elgin Gates, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 06:59, 29 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Scandinavian Ammunition Research Association edit

 

The article Scandinavian Ammunition Research Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't find enough in-depth sources from independent reliable sources to show it passes WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 15:05, 12 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Scandinavian Ammunition Research Association was merged into European Cartridge Research Association. Sauer202 (talk) 22:08, 19 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Non-magnified optic for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Non-magnified optic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Non-magnified optic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 14:35, 15 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: European Cartridge Research Association has been accepted edit

 
European Cartridge Research Association, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 02:34, 7 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Sako 75 moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Sako 75, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 01:58, 17 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sako 75 has been accepted edit

 
Sako 75, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:48, 17 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Don’t edit

Add red links to “see also” sections. I won’t tell you again Celestina007 (talk) 22:31, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello, thank you for taking the time to give me feedback. I suppose this is about red linking to Tikka T1x from other Sako .22 LR rifles. It is not something I do too often, but I will end the practice. Sauer202 (talk) 08:45, 9 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Workpiece moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Workpiece, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster talk 16:56, 7 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 20 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Pinchcliffe Grand Prix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sheik.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 20 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Borris Skydeterræn (March 26) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by -noah- was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Noah 💬 22:26, 26 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Borris Skydeterræn has been accepted edit

 
Borris Skydeterræn, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 08:01, 27 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Elgin Gates edit

  Hello, Sauer202. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Elgin Gates, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 31 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Workpiece has been accepted edit

 
Workpiece, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sandstein 11:04, 7 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 22 edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Barrel threads
added links pointing to Enfield, Zastava, Husqvarna, Sako, Tikka and Ruger American

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 22 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

A Dobos torte for you! edit

  7&6=thirteen () has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.


To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen () 13:43, 7 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. Sauer202 (talk) 18:29, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 11 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Apache Synapse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SFTP.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 11 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elgin Gates has been accepted edit

 
Elgin Gates, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sionk (talk) 18:39, 14 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 31 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Disc coupling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Servo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 31 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Fanatec moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Fanatec, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. IceWelder [] 18:20, 14 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fanatec (August 17) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-Liancetalk/contribs 21:52, 17 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of the International Practical Shooting Confederation.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of the International Practical Shooting Confederation.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the heads up. The logo has now been replaced with a .png version. Sauer202 (talk) 18:23, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 11 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Google Search, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Your Money or Your Life.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 11 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Det frivillige Skyttervesen logo.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Det frivillige Skyttervesen logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 16 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

I see that the official logo has been replaced by this homemade variant: (picture on the right)
 
It is okay I guess, although it seem a bit unofficial. Sauer202 (talk) 18:22, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of IPSC Armenia edit

 

The article IPSC Armenia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no sources cited, searching finds little, fails notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gab4gab (talk) 17:21, 24 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello @Gab4gab: The organization seems to not be active. I have no problem with the deletion. Thanks for letting me know. Sauer202 (talk) 17:26, 24 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
I see that more sources now has been added by another user, so deletion may not be warranted. Sauer202 (talk) 18:18, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 27 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Scrum (software development), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Advanced technology.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the heads up, fixed. Sauer202 (talk) 18:20, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for November 29 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sentroller, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Controller.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 29 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the heads up, fixed. Sauer202 (talk) 07:31, 29 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Shoulder dolly moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Shoulder dolly, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 12:15, 12 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, it is hard to find good sources which are not advertisements, but it is clear that the topic in question is a very useful tool for moving objects. Not sure if I can contribute more on the matter. Sauer202 (talk) 12:25, 12 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fanatec (February 11) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 05:15, 11 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of the French Shooting Federation.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of the French Shooting Federation.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:35, 23 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 12 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Launch control (automotive), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Center console.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 12 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, fixed. Sauer202 (talk) 06:33, 12 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Tool board moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Tool board, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE💕 18:24, 17 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Cane holder moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Cane holder, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 22:23, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started edit

Hello, Sauer202

Thank you for creating Brake balance.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 01:44, 27 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started edit

Hello, Sauer202

Thank you for creating CoreXY.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. Possibly should be merged into a broader article. I marked as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:10, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Dynamic Shooting Association Singapore edit

 

The article Dynamic Shooting Association Singapore has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced for 7 years, WP:BEFORE does not turn up any articles

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 09:53, 23 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of the Dynamic Shooting Association Singapore.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of the Dynamic Shooting Association Singapore.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 3 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shoulder dolly has been accepted edit

 
Shoulder dolly, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 21:22, 11 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started edit

Hello, Sauer202

Thank you for creating Mainspring (firearms).

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:07, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 29 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Milliradian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mil.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 29 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 9 edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Data mesh
added a link pointing to Data platform
Kaggle
added a link pointing to Data platform
The Echo Nest
added a link pointing to Data platform

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Fanatec edit

 

Hello, Sauer202. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fanatec".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 07:04, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 16 edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Data mesh
added a link pointing to Data platform
Kaggle
added a link pointing to Data platform

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 2 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Data management platform, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Data platform.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 2 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 14 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Translation (geometry), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pitch angle.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tool board has been accepted edit

 
Tool board, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Primefac (talk) 08:15, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Import One-Stop Shop moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Import One-Stop Shop, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 12:29, 5 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello onel5969, and thanks for the heads up. I don't have time to work on that article, and therefore would like to contest the move to draftspace, and hereby ask for the article to instead be listed under Articles for deletion to get broader attention, and if the article is not of high enough quality, to be deleted. Sauer202 (talk) 12:47, 5 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi Sauer... no worries. Have moved it back, and removed the unsourced material. I think it is notable, just the current sourcing doesn't have enough in-depth coverage from independent sources to show it. I didn't want to delete all that material, which is why I moved it to draft in the first place. But I've marked it reviewed, since I don't think AfD is warranted. Thanks for all you do on the project. Onel5969 TT me 12:55, 5 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Cane holder edit

  Hello, Sauer202. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cane holder, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:32, 30 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Cane holder edit

 

Hello, Sauer202. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cane holder".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:34, 25 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for December 5 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Communication and leadership during change, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Character.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for February 6 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited DMAIC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Resource planning.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 6 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Fanatec edit

 

Hello, Sauer202. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fanatec".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 07:56, 11 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for February 13 edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Positive locking device
added a link pointing to Cotter pin
Splunk
added a link pointing to Repository

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Furniture screws moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Furniture screws, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 15:40, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello User:Onel5969, I have added some sources to the furniture screws article. While I have submitted the draft, I do not have the patience to wait up to 4 months for it to just maybe get accepted. I therefore ask if it can be included in mainspace again, or that it is listed for discussion if you do not think it passes in its current state. As a side note, knock-down fastener could also be considered for merging into furniture screws. I am generally not a fan of draftspace, since in my experience that is a place where stubs are left to die - in other words just a long, painful and non-transparent deletion process.. Sauer202 (talk) 19:29, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hello User:Onel5969, I have now moved the article back to mainspace with the following reason: "I hereby contest the move to draftspace, and in the event that the article in its current state is not deemed suitable for inclusion in mainspace I ask that it be listed for discussion instead". Sauer202 (talk) 20:39, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 3 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Behavioral pattern, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Recursive function.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Conflict Minerals Regulation edit

What is the intended target of Conflict Minerals Regulation? It is currently a self redirect. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 17:50, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello Eejit43, thanks for letting me know about the error. I have changed the target to Conflict minerals law#Conflict Minerals Regulation in the EU as intended. Sauer202 (talk) 17:55, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! :) ~ Eejit43 (talk) 18:26, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 10 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anchor modeling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Data vault.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 6 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Unit of work, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transaction.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Motorcenter Norway for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Motorcenter Norway is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Motorcenter Norway until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 TT me 13:36, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Effectiveness (disambiguation) for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Effectiveness (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Effectiveness (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:15, 21 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 30 edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Unified Process
added links pointing to Scrum and Timebox
Essential systems analysis
added a link pointing to Object-oriented analysis

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Toroidal propeller edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Toroidal propeller, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:00, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 19 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bicycle lighting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glare.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Stringbike edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Stringbike, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:54, 27 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 2 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited DMAIC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Data-driven.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 2 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for December 29 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Probability mass function, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Probability function.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Samir Thapar for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samir Thapar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samir Thapar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

User4edits (talk) 06:40, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Decision time (February 11) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 00:14, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks @Robert McClenon:. I was a little unsure what to do since I was asked to "pledge" to publish it. Sauer202 (talk) 08:46, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Who asked you to make that pledge? Robert McClenon (talk) 14:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Robert McClenon:, apparently it was from a standard template. You can see it at Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion#Draft:Decision_time. Not exactly plain language if you ask me. And in general, I think Draftspace is the worst, most user unfriendly place on Wikipedia. Sauer202 (talk) 15:49, 12 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Staircase edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Staircase, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:06, 14 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Guam Shooting Sports Federation edit

 

The article Guam Shooting Sports Federation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Virtually no content or context, no secondary sources, fails WP:ORGCRIT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 16:22, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

@AusLondonder: Hello, Wy are you systemaitcally removing articles about notable sports governing bodies which have been standing for about 10 years? Yes, they can be expanded nd more sources added, then please do tag them as such. But to claim that they are unsourced and not notalbe is not true. Do you have an anti-sport agenda or something? Sauer202 (talk) 06:54, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Channel Islands Practical Shooting Association edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Channel Islands Practical Shooting Association requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder (talk) 16:27, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

@AusLondonder: Hello, Why are you systemaitcally removing articles about notable sports governing bodies which have been standing for about 10 years? Yes, they can be expanded nd more sources added, then please do tag them as such. But to claim that they are unsourced and not notalbe is not true. Do you have an anti-sport agenda or something? I contested this deletion, but it still went through. Sauer202 (talk) 06:54, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of IPSC Cayman Islands edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on IPSC Cayman Islands requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. AusLondonder (talk) 16:31, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

@AusLondonder: Hello, Wy are you systemaitcally removing articles about notable sports governing bodies which have been standing for about 10 years? Yes, they can be expanded nd more sources added, then please do tag them as such. But to claim that they are unsourced and not notalbe is not true. Do you have an anti-sport agenda or something? Sauer202 (talk) 06:55, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of IPSC Kyrgyzstan edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on IPSC Kyrgyzstan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder (talk) 17:44, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

@AusLondonder: Hello, Wy are you systemaitcally removing articles about notable sports governing bodies which have been standing for about 10 years? Yes, they can be expanded nd more sources added, then please do tag them as such. But to claim that they are unsourced and not notalbe is not true. Do you have an anti-sport agenda or something? Sauer202 (talk) 06:55, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of IPSC Cayman Islands edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on IPSC Cayman Islands requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder (talk) 17:49, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

@AusLondonder: Hello, Wy are you systemaitcally removing articles about notable sports governing bodies which have been standing for about 10 years? Yes, they can be expanded nd more sources added, then please do tag them as such. But to claim that they are unsourced and not notalbe is not true. Do you have an anti-sport agenda or something? Sauer202 (talk) 06:55, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of IPSC Kyrgyzstan edit

 

The article IPSC Kyrgyzstan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources, no substantive content, no indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 04:17, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

@AusLondonder: Hello, Wy are you systemaitcally removing articles about notable sports governing bodies which have been standing for about 10 years? Yes, they can be expanded nd more sources added, then please do tag them as such. But to claim that they are unsourced and not notalbe is not true. Do you have an anti-sport agenda or something? Sauer202 (talk) 06:55, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Curaçao Practical Shooters Club edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Curaçao Practical Shooters Club requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder (talk) 04:19, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

@AusLondonder: Hello, Wy are you systemaitcally removing articles about notable sports governing bodies which have been standing for about 10 years? Yes, they can be expanded nd more sources added, then please do tag them as such. But to claim that they are unsourced and not notalbe is not true. Do you have an anti-sport agenda or something? Sauer202 (talk) 06:55, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Guam National Shooting Sports Federation edit

 

The article Guam National Shooting Sports Federation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No secondary sources to demonstrate notability, only a dead external link.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 10:13, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Aruba Practical Shooters Club edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Aruba Practical Shooters Club requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder (talk) 11:28, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of IPSC Moldova edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on IPSC Moldova requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder (talk) 11:37, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Gibraltar Pistol Association edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gibraltar Pistol Association requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder (talk) 14:22, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello @AusLondonder:, Do whatever you want, per all my last replies it is clear that I strongly disagree with your approach to this matter. I'm not going to try to reason with you on your power trip. Sauer202 (talk) 20:28, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
You really need to stop your personal attacks.
I replied to you on my talkpage but you haven't responded. AusLondonder (talk) 01:54, 17 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry if you have perceived any of my posts as personal attacks. What I want to ask for is collaboration and guidance. Thanks for your input. Sauer202 (talk) 08:00, 17 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Aruba Practical Shooters Club.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Aruba Practical Shooters Club.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of IPSC Moldova.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of IPSC Moldova.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of the Channel Islands Practical Shooting Association.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of the Channel Islands Practical Shooting Association.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Guam Shooting Sports Federation.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Guam Shooting Sports Federation.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

IPSC articles edit

Hi there, have you been working on adding sources to any of the IPSC articles? AusLondonder (talk) 14:43, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, thanks for reaching out. Of those nominated, I only had time to work on IPSC Kyrgyzstan and Guam (Marianas Practical Shooting Association). Sauer202 (talk) 16:37, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply