Archive edit

Article Licensing edit

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. Ram-Man (comment) (talk)[[]] 14:44, Dec 9, 2004 (UTC)

An anon POV-pusher is insisting that it's really in New Jersey because, based on its map location, he thinks New Jersey deserves it. Please help. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 11:06, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Call for AMA election edit

AMA Member Advocate,

There's a poll currently in the AMA Homepage about making a new AMA Coordinator election. Please, cast your vote there (though it's not mandatory). Any comments you have about this, write it on the AMA Homepage talk page. Cheers, --Neigel von Teighen 18:43, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Proposals for AMA Membership Meeting edit

As AMA Coordinator I am requesting that suggestions be placed on Wikipedia:AMA Membership Meeting plans for our first membership meeting, to be held in the near future, (hopefully before any election occurs.) Since we have never had any kind of "official" meeting we need to discuss how this will occur (i.e. Wiki pages or IRC channel), how it will be structured (i.e. meeting agenda) and if there will be any "chair" to supervise the meeting and meeting "secretary" to write up minutes or keep some kind of official record of what transpires. Thanks in advance for your input and your continued work as an advocate. — © Alex756 20:30, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)

COORDINATOR'S OFFICIAL AMA MEETING NOTICE edit

The first AMA Membership meeting will be held on Sunday January 23, 2005 at 19:00 UTC on freenode IRC channel #AMA. That is 2 PM Eastern NA (Miami/Montreal) Time, 11 AM Pacific NA (Los Angeles/Vancover)Time, and 8 PM Central European (Amsterdam/Stokholm/Warsaw/Venice) Time. All members are invited to attend. — © Alex756 01:32, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Logs of first AMA Membership meeting edit

You may view the log of the first meeting on the following two pages: Wikipedia:AMA IRC Meeting log (1-23-05) (first hour) and Wikipedia:AMA IRC Meeting log (1-23-05) Pt II (remainder of meeting). If you are interested in commenting on the agenda of the meeting please do so here:Wikipedia:AMA Meeting (suggested topics).

OFFICIAL SECOND MEETING NOTICE AND REQUEST FOR INFORMATION edit

"The second AMA Membership meeting will be held on Sunday January 30 2005 at 19:00 UTC on freenode IRC channel #AMA. That is 2 PM Eastern NA Time, 11 AM Pacific NA Time, and 8 PM Central European (Amsterdam/Stokholm/Warsaw/Venice) Time. All members are invited to attend."

The coordinator is requesting that members submit the following information for the upcoming coordinator’s report:

  • How many individuals did you help as an advocate
  • What is the maximum amount of time you put into a case
  • Do you feel your work as an advocate was successful?
  • How can the advocacy program of the AMA be improved?

Thank you. Please submit your responses here: Wikipedia:AMA Coordinator/January 2005 Survey

— © Alex756 23:30, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC) (The Coordinator)

OFFICIAL AMA THIRD MEETING NOTICE edit

The second AMA IRC Membership meeting was held on Sunday January 30, 2005 at 19:00 UTC on freenode.net IRC channel #AMA. Attending were Wally, Metasquares, Anthere, Sam Spade, and alex756 (coordinator). The log of the second meeting can be found here: Wikipedia:AMA IRC Meeting log (1-30-05).

"The third AMA Membership meeting will be held on Saturday February 12, 2005 at 17:00 UTC on freenode IRC channel #AMA. That is 12:00 Noon Eastern NA Time, 9 AM Pacific NA Time, and 6 PM Central European (Amsterdam/Stokholm/Warsaw/Venice) Time. All members are invited to attend.

Suggested Topics and Specific Proposals edit

MEMBERS PLEASE REVIEW
Suggestions for topics/proposals and agenda to be discussed at the next meeting are to be found at: Wikipedia:AMA Meeting (suggested topics). All members are requested to make proposals there and respond to proposals on the talk page there before the beginning of the next meeting so discussion can be held forthwith concerning such proposals. Thank you, your Coordinator.

The coordinator is requesting that members who have not done so already submit the following information for the upcoming coordinator’s report:

  • How many individuals did you help as an advocate
  • What is the maximum amount of time you put into a case
  • Do you feel your work as an advocate was successful?
  • How can the advocacy program of the AMA be improved?

Thank you. Please submit your responses here if you have not done so already. — © Alex756 23:33, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Azabu edit

Nice new article on Azabu. Thanks Fg2 19:50, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)

Jeb Bush edit

Sekicho — I see that you were involved in the editting of the Jeb Bush article in the past. There is currently a dispute over the article's neutrality, photographs, formatting, and other issues. If you'd like to weigh in, we'd love your opinion. Thanks. --BaronLarf 18:38, Apr 24, 2005 (UTC)

AMA Meeting Proposal edit

Hi! I put together a proposal for another AMA meeting that I'm hopeful you can chime in on. --Wgfinley 20:09, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

BOS_map image edit

BOS_map.png listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, BOS_map.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —MetsBot 18:59, 9 December 2006 (UTC) The image has been obsoleted by the updated airfield map in Image:BOS_airfield_map.png.Reply

Tokyo railways edit

Railways and subways are not the same. Change it back please. Photojpn.org 14:02, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

lots of edits, not an admin edit

Hi - I made a list of users who've been around long enough to have made lots of edits but aren't admins. If you're at all interested in becoming an admin, can you please add an '*' immediately before your name in this list? I've suggested folks nominating someone might want to puruse this list, although there is certainly no guarantee anyone will ever look at it. Thanks. -- Rick Block (talk) 14:12, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)

Human Rights Servey on Wikipedia (The final post of I_sterbinski) edit

Dear all,
Wikipedia was recently a subject of intensive research of an huge international human right organization. A team of people from different nationalities and ages were acting on Wikipedia for 20 days, investigating previously noted anomalities of Wikipedia free editing and forming a final report, which (between the others similar reports) will later be a guide to all future moves of the organization concerning Wikipedia. Acting under an account of a real person, their privacy is to be held private. Therefore, very few private information will be revealed.
Also, this is a result of the lack of final possition of the organization concerning Wikipedia and human rights, which was still not formed.
The team's final post on Wikipedia, where they explain their actions can be found on the following addresses:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:I_sterbinski
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Macedonia#Human_Rights_Servey_on_Wikipedia_.28The_final_post_of_I_sterbinski.29
The team would like to thank to all the persons who took part in the correspondence with us.
We also want to appologise for keeping our identity secret for a longer period.
Best regards,
Aleksandar, Biljana, Asparuh, Christos, Valjon, Michael and Ana Luiza
I sterbinski 01:43, 28 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Fairbanks photo edit

Hi, I've listed the Fairbanks photo Image:Fairbanks-overhead.gif, uploaded by you, for deletion as it's been replaced by Image:Fairbanks-overhead.jpg. Hope this is OK. Mysid (talk) 12:20, 28 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

User categorisation edit

Greetings, Sekicho! Please accept this message as an invitation to categorize your user page in the category Category:Wikipedians in Pennsylvania and removing your name from the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Pennsylvania page and the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Philadelphia County, PA page. These pages will be removed when all users have been removed. Even if you do not wish to be placed in a category, could you take a moment to remove your name from the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Pennsylvania page? Thanks!

For more information, please see Wikipedia:User categorisation and Category:Wikipedians by location. -- CComMack, fellow Pennsylvanian, on behalf of the User Categorisation Wikiproject

Shinkansen map edit

It's cool (Image:Shinkansenmap.png), but the high resolution vs. seems to be different, see [1]. Hmm why? feydey 23:00, 9 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Seems to have been a temporary glitch. - Sekicho 23:37, 9 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Could you upload your maps into commons:? And you can make your images smaller by using pngcrush. -- ChongDae 20:11, 13 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

whatever it takes: edit

I want your MSN! ;-) I need to discuss something with you. PBS27 19:46, 19 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Template/Workshop edit

You, or any Wikipedia user, can contribute your suggestions and comments to the /Workshop page of any active arbitration case. Comments on evidence or proposals can help in understanding the import of evidence and in refining proposals. Proposed principles, findings of fact, or remedies may be listed on /Proposed decision and form part of the final decision. Fred Bauder 19:16, 26 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Philadelphia Project edit

Hi i have noticed that you have edited several articles on subjects related to the Philadelphia area. Several other users and myself have got together to creak a project to help improve, expand, and create articles concerning the Philadelphia/Delaware Valley region. While our project is still new, we are inviting people to join us to help it get started off on the right foot. You can find the project at Wikipedia:WikiProject Philadelphia, feel free to add your name and drop off an suggestions that you might have. If you have any questions, drop me a line anytime. Thanks. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 04:15, 28 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Sources for Kozu Station edit

Hello, good work on Kozu Station, and thanks for the contribution. However, you forgot to add any references to the article. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and there is currently a push to encourage editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. From what websites, books, or other places did you learn the information that you added to Kozu Station? Would it be possible for you to mention them in the article? You can simply add links, or there are several different citation methods list at WP:CITET. Thanks! Lupin|talk|popups 19:57, 4 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

deeceevoice rfc edit

Hi Sekicho,

You might be interested in commenting on the deeceevoice rfc:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Deeceevoice

-Justforasecond 16:23, 6 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

deeceevoice arbitration edit

As a party to her RfC, you might be interested to know a request for arbitration has been filed towards deeceevoice Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Deeceevoice.

-Justforasecond 18:28, 16 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

AMA edit

Hello, you are receiving this message because your name is on the list of members of the Association of Members' Advocates. There is a poll being held at Wikipedia talk:Association of Members' Advocates for approval of a proposal for the revitalisation of the association. You are eligible to vote and your vote and input are welcome. Izehar 22:29, 6 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

KKs and American corporations edit

I was glad to see some of the changes you made to the article on kabushiki gaisha. It looks like an earlier contributor didn't know that any incorporated entity is a corporation, let alone many of the finer distinctions between types of corporations.

In your edits today (23 January), you refer to "closed KKs" and "non-closed KKs"; I'm uninformed about these terms (closed vs non-closed); could you elaborate on these a little? I'm familiar with "closely held" companies—ones whose unlisted shares are held by a small group of people—and was wondering if there is any distinction here; e.g., "closed" KKs being ones whose shares are all held by one person or other entity, and "non-closed" but also not public being ones whose shares are held by a limited number of people.

Could you also give the Kabushiki kaisha#History paragraph a once over? The statement that kabushiki gaisha resemble "prewar American corporations" looks a little fishy. Given the context, writing that they resemble prewar Illinois corporations would make sense, but saying just American corporations seems to me to be a bit of a broad sweep of the brush. I think it should say what kind of American or Illinois corporation as well.

Also, given your self-intro on your user page, I'd like to suggest that you take a look at the article on yugen kaisha, since some of the terminology there looks a bit imprecise. Maybe you can tighten it up a bit.

Thanks, Jim_Lockhart 15:50, 24 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Godo gaisha edit

Great article! Solid writing, too. :)

One quibble: your English renderings of 定款 and 社員. Isn't a 定款 a document usually called articles of incorporation in English? I'm sure, in your position, you've seen numerous 定款; if not articles of incorporation, what is the equivalent document called in English speaking countries? (I realize that it might be different from country to country, and even state to state in the US; so what is the generic term?) And—please correct me if I'm wrong—but isn't the generic equivalent of 社員 called partner or founding partner in English?

In translating Japanese terms, I personally tend to avoid looking too hard at the constituent kanji used to express them and try to look for a functional equivalent that will ring a bell with the English reader. Though operating agreement for 定款 is probably defensible in certain contexts (e.g., when you're explaining what a 定款 is), I have some doubts about using it as a functional equivalent, especially when operating agreement can mean something else in English. Further, I think member is misleading as a translation of 社員, unless it is used in English as a term of art meaning the same thing.

Apologies if this sound pedantic, but I hope it'll help you make a great article even better. Best regards, Jim_Lockhart 13:10, 25 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

AMA Coordinator Election edit

Dear AMA Member,

You are entitled to vote in the AMA Coordinator election, set to begin at midnight on 3 February 2006. Please see the pages on the election and its candidates and the procedure and policy and cast a vote by e-mail!

Wally 11:31, 2 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Please check your WP:NA entry edit

Greetings, editor! Your name appears on Wikipedia:List of non-admins with high edit counts. If you have not done so lately, please take a look at that page and check your listing to be sure that following the particulars are correct:

  1. If you are an admin, please remove your name from the list.
  2. If you are currently interested in being considered for adminship, please be sure your name is in bold; if you are opposed to being considered for adminship, please cross out your name (but do not delete it, as it will automatically be re-added in the next page update).
  3. Please check to see if you are in the right category for classification by number of edits.

Thank you, and have a wiki wiki day! BD2412 T 03:03, 17 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Florida university userbox collection page? edit

I wonder if there should be a portal or something where all the Florida university userboxes should go, so people can select theirs. I only really thought about it after creating my userbox.

USFThis user attends or has attended
the University of South Florida.
Go Bulls!

Tell me what you think. Mike H. That's hot 11:11, 10 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Table of regions and prefectures edit

The table you added to Japan is awesome! Thanks Fg2 13:23, 18 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Pan Am dates edit

I noticed you added the sumo wrestling tidbit to the Pan Am page. The sponser dates you included ran from 1961 to 1991. But Pan Am left the Pacific in early 1986 (after selling the division to UAL). Can you confirm that the sponsorships didn't actually end when Pan Am left the Pacific in 1986?

Welcome to WikiProject Japan edit

Thanks for joining up! We look forward to working with you. (^_^)

I noticed that you know a decent amount of Japanese, and that you also have a decent command of legalese. I'd appreciate if you'd look over my proposed replacement page for the current Shōnen (which I would like to see moved to Shōnen manga, which seems more appropriate based on the content of the current Shōnen article). I'd especially like help making sure I correctly translated the legalese part of the Japanese article. I think I got it right, but there were parts that were confusing to me and had me guessing what they actually meant. Thanks for sany help! (^_^) --日本穣 06:02, 25 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Trains in Japan edit

Hello Sekicho. I see you've been editing some pages on Japanese railways. I have proposed the creation of WikiProject Trains in Japan to improve the quality and visibility of such articles. If you're interested, please take a look at the proposal. I hope you can join! Thank you. - Tangotango 06:58, 26 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

E2 edit

Hey there, I'm avalyn on Everything2... and I noticed you contribute here as well as there. I recently made up a userbox for noder-wikipedians, if you're keen on using it. It's at User:UBX/noder. Avalyn 08:50, 5 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Midwest Law Studnet edit

Hi, please see my contributions to Yokohama (if you plan on visiting). I'm a law student in the Midwest, and plan to work in Japan after graduation (2007). Hope to work with you on articles about Japan. Greenw47 05:05, 13 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hikari (Shinkansen) edit

Thanks very much for your help with the Hikari article merge. JRHorse 12:32, 21 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi edit

Sekicho: I was wondering if you could take a look at Island of Palmas Case. It isn't great, but it is a start. Any additions or comments or clarifications would be appreciated. Thanks! Tortfeasor 07:15, 22 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging for Image:BettyCastorHeadShot.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:BettyCastorHeadShot.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:06, 26 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Narita International Airport Corporation edit

I notice you've replaced the stub with a redirect. The company is quite distinctive from the airport and deserves its own article. It is a corporate identity not a physical airport Softgrow 21:31, 6 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Userbox Public Transit edit

According to Wikipedia:The German solution, here’s a a tip for you: {{User:Olve/Userboxes/Public transport}} (in lieu of the blanked template:User Public Transit). -- Olve 22:51, 7 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Railway Route Maps edit

I am particularly impressed by your Seibu route diagram. What drawing package did you use? Softgrow 10:45, 15 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Anti Japanese sentiment edit

I can't believe that you think that "I just think a lot of the anti-Japanese sentiment in Asia (and a lot of the anti-Asian sentiment in Japan) is unfounded or at least very exaggerated."

Maybe its because you are in Japan, but I don't think you know anything about Japanese war crimes from the medieval ages all the way to WWII.

Read cruelties of Japanese soldiers during the Imjin War (1592-1597). Japanese soldiers raped, kidnapped, pillaged, looted, and burned buildings, people, women, men, even dogs.

You have no idea how Korean or Chinese people feel today because of Japanese crimes.

Take a look at the Rape of Nanking. Historians think at least 300,000 Chinese civilians were killed, raped, or kidnapped!

Read about the Unit 731. Unite 731 was a secret medical unit during WWII. Vivisections were perfomed. Japanese scientists put animal blood into humans (notably Russian POWs, Chinese, Koreans, and Mongolians. They put humans into extreme conditions (freezing them), and blew them up with various weapons (such as flamethrowers or bombs)

Japanese soldiers had contests between captains to see which one would kill 100 Chinese people first.

Looting was at a very large scale and the Japanese goverment did nothing to prevent it.

Is it because you are in Japan and think it is a great country? Of course it is a great country. Japan is a world power today.

But consider the Japanese crimes. Consider why you think that the "anti-Japanese sentiment is exaggerated" Its just ridiculous how so many people do not know the true horrors behind Japan. Good friend100 00:34, 23 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

THanks Your advice edit

I use the Kansai translation machine[2]. I apologizes when feeling that my word is dirty.


まいど!あんはんの言うことはよくわかるんや。わいも朝鮮半島の影響を否定しまへん。せやけど、彼らの主張は大げさすぎまんねん。もうちびっとバランスを考えた記事にしてくれまっか。(韓国の記事を見たんやが、彼らは中国や日本から受けた文化の影響について、ほとんど書いとりまへん。)わいは幕末と戦国時代の記事を書きたいんや。日本の記事はもうちびっと韓国人が大人しくなれば、関わりまへん。ほなら、失礼しまんねん。 --HaradaSanosuke 18:52, 26 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

わいは彼らの非難[JapaniseBias]に反応したちうわけや。これは正しい対応ではおまへんやった。Sekichoのアドバイスに従いまんねん。たしかに、感情的な主張は百科事典にふさわしくおまへん。せやけど、Edgerの主張は間違いをようけ含んでいまんねん。その指摘は続けまんねん。--HaradaSanosuke 17:43, 27 June 2006

(UTC)

この人の立ち居地は韓国支持ですよ? 竹島問題の投票も韓国を全面支持して、リアンクールロックからDokutoに変更したメンバーの一人ですし・・・。なぜ、欧米人が日本人ではなく韓国人を支持するのか、本気で考えたほうがよいのでは? この人は日本に留学しているのに、日本よりも韓国を信じています。それは日本が信じられない国だからではないでしょうか

Nice Meeting You Again Too edit

So that was you? Wow! what a small world, even online.-Jefu 14:56, 27 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree Image:No Filipinos sign.jpg edit

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:No Filipinos sign.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Angr 14:09, 17 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Your AMA statement was deleted edit

Your AMA statement was deleted apparently carelessly from the AMA statements page (see this edit)if your statement needs to be restored, the text is at User:Pedant/AMA error Pedant 02:00, 22 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Help of article's expansion edit

Hello, nice to meet you, Mr. Sekicho. I'd like you to help me with expanding the article because I'm not so good at English language. I expand Masashi Tashiro's article from most of 田代まさし波瀾万丈伝 website now but not excellent English. (I do it while using Microsoft Word) I'll soon contribute that sentence in his article. Please, therefore, contribute your edit in his article after my contribution. Would you correct and expand his article? --Hatto 02:41, 18 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

I editted his article now. Please correct and expand it from reference 田代まさし波瀾万丈伝 from now! --Hatto 01:50, 19 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Roppongi edit

Your edit to Roppongi#History left a non-sentence:

"Although the area was trafficked for centuries and served as the site of the cremation of Shogun Tokugawa Hidetada's wife in 1626, [1]"

I cannot determine from the edit history what the second clause of the sentence should be. Also, what does "trafficked" mean in reference to a place? Do you mean there was much traffic through the area? Your edit also removes some seemingly relevant and interesting information:

"Roppongi was a simple crossing of two streets until after the Meiji Restoration when it became a quartering area for the Imperial Japanese Army."

Your userpage edit

Not sure if you already noticed, but another user, Winkie, edited your userpage[3] back on July 10, 2006. I see he has no talkpage so my guess is he no longer edits Wikipedia. Regards, Abc def 22:24, 27 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Toshihiro Nikai edit

I saw that you created Toshihiro Nikai.[4] It's very good, but you did not cite your sources. Please do so. Thanks, Ya ya ya ya ya ya 20:05, 1 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

{{User Pennsylvania}} edit

I was clearing out Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Pennsylvania. I added this template to your page. Feel free to remove it, and thanks for understanding. --evrik 04:58, 18 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

  You are invited to participate in WikiProject Philadelphia, a project dedicated to developing and improving articles about Philadelphia. We are currently discussing prospects for the project. Your input would be greatly appreciated!

You can also add yourself to the list of people to be invited to our next meet-up!

--evrik 05:01, 18 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Regarding Association of Members' Advocates edit

Hi, you are receiving this message because you have listed yourself as an active member of WP:AMA. If you aren't currently accepting inquiries for AMA, or if you have resigned, please de-list yourself from Wikipedia:AMA Members. If you are still active, please consider tending to any new requests that may appear on Category:AMA Requests for Assistance. We're going to put AMA on wheels. :) Sorry for the template spamming - we're just trying to update our records, after we had a huge backlog earlier in the week (if you've been taking cases, then sorry, and please ignore this :)). Again, sorry, and thanks! Martinp23 21:30, 22 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

barnstar edit

  The Original Barnstar
For your hard work and dedication to improving Wikipedia, I, Sharkface217, hereby award you this Original Barnstar. Good job! Sharkface217 19:53, 4 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Assistance in an area of possible expertise edit

Would you mind coming over here? Fg2 recommended that you may be useful for this little project. If you can help, I'd appreciate it. Thanks. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 04:29, 1 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source for Image:Whitney MacArthur Almond 1950.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Whitney MacArthur Almond 1950.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then you need to specify who owns the copyright, please. If you got it from a website, then a link to the website where it was taken from with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:55, 12 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Conscious 11:55, 12 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source for Image:JFK_airport_map.gif edit

Thanks for uploading Image:JFK_airport_map.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:45, 28 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shyam (T/C) 10:45, 28 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

The "Yayoi" passage in Japan; see Talk:Japan#Suggesting "China and Korea" edit

Hello, Sekicho

I know you've been away from the Japan article for a while. But I was hoping that you can comment again, regarding where the "Yayoi" came from, at Talk:Japan#Suggesting "China and Korea"?

Our current discussion is between the following 2 choices:

Option 1 — Most recent consensus (as of 3 January 2007)...
  • The Yayoi period, starting around the third century BC, introduced new practices, such as wet-rice farming, iron and bronze-making and a new style of pottery, brought by migrants from the Chinese mainland and the Korean peninsula. With the development of Yayoi culture, a predominantly agricultural society emerged on the Japanese archipelago.
  • The points that differ are: "from the Chinese mainland and the Korean peninsula" in the 1st sentence, and "on the Japanese archipelago" in the 2nd sentence.
  • Pros: Some of us claim this is the more stable and accurate wording, using "Korean peninsula" instead of "Korea", and will prevent any potential revert-wars.
  • Cons: Detractors claim it is "original research" to replace "China", "Korea", and "Japan" with "the Chinese mainland", "the Korean peninsula", and "the Japanese archipelago", based on wording used by the majority of sources.
  • This wording was agreed upon (on 3 Jan.) by the 5 of us: Endroit, Jefu, HongQiGong, LordAmeth, and John Smith's.
Option 2 — Currently suggested wording...
  • The Yayoi period, starting around the third century BC, introduced new practices, such as wet-rice farming, iron and bronze-making and a new style of pottery, brought by migrants from China and Korea. With the development of Yayoi culture, a predominantly agricultural society emerged in Japan.
  • The points that differ are: "from China and Korea" in the 1st sentence, and "in Japan" in the 2nd sentence.
  • Pros: Some of us claim this is the more accurate wording based on sources, the majority of which uses "China", "Korea", and "Japan" (instead of "Chinese mainland", "Korean peninsula", and "Japanese archipelago").
  • Cons: Detractors claim this wording is cause for content dispute, and the word "Korea" is particularly problematic because a "state of Korea" did not exist during the "Yayoi" times as claimed by Endroit in the discussions.
  • This wording is currently being suggested by: Jefu, HongQiGong, and Sir Edgar.
FYI - Current Citations used for this passage...
  1. "The Yayoi period (c. 250 BC–c. AD 250)". Encyclopædia Britannica. 2006. Retrieved 2006-12-28.
    • Note: This source uses "from the Korean peninsula or China", uses "China" but never "Chinese mainland", uses both "Korea" and "Korean peninsula", uses "Japan" but never "Japanese archipelago".
  2. Diamond, Jared. ""Japanese Roots", Discover Magazine Vol. 19 No. 6 (June 1998)". Retrieved 2006-12-28.
    • Note: This source uses "from the Asian mainland", uses "China" but never "Chinese mainland", uses "Korea" but never "Korean peninsula", uses both "Japan" and "Japanese archipelago", also mentions "Russia", "Russian mainland", "mainland Russia", and "Okinawa".
  3. "Pottery". MSN Encarta. Retrieved 2006-12-28.
    • Note: This source says that Yayoi pottery were "made by a Mongol people who came from Korea to Kyūshū". This source uses only "China", "Korea", and "Japan".
  4. De Bary, William Theodore (2005). Sources of Japanese Tradition. Columbia University Press. pp. p. 1304. ISBN 023112984X. Retrieved 2007-01-29. {{cite book}}: |pages= has extra text (help)
    • Note: This source uses "Chinese mainland", "Korean peninsula", and "Japanese archipelago".
Comment

We are trying to build a new consensus again, and your comments will be greatly appreciated. Thank you very much!--Endroit 14:22, 30 January 2007 (UTC)Reply


FSU edit

Actually, I looked into the history of UF and FSU and FSU really has a better historic case as the "flagship". Since that designation is troublesome, I wrote the "one of two" text and added one of the significant links establishing/supporting the claim. Please, lets not inflame this particular issue more than it already is.Sirberus 15:06, 13 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Aviation Newsletter delivery edit

The March 2007 issue of the Aviation WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 18:33, 13 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Imperial_Japan_Airways_route_map.png listed for deletion edit

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Imperial_Japan_Airways_route_map.png has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. – riana_dzasta 13:07, 17 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (Image:AmericanEagleLogo.gif) edit

Thanks for uploading Image:AmericanEagleLogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:42, 20 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Dokdo naming dispute edit

Hey, another Dokdo naming dispute has arisen, & RM has taken place. Please check archive for previous discussions & pariticipate in the vote. Thanks. I'm also going to note all others who participated in the previous poll. (Wikimachine 18:27, 21 May 2007 (UTC))Reply

Non-free use disputed for Image:Shidehara TIME.jpg edit

  This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Shidehara TIME.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:57, 4 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Currency Image:10000 yen note.JPG edit

Hi, To assist global anti-counterfeiting efforts you may wish to consider marking images of banknotes you upload as "Specimen" in some way, if those banknotes represent legal tender. ShakespeareFan00 12:57, 19 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Article for Deletion: Hitomi Soga edit

Hello Sekicho,

The article Hitomi Soga, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. The discussion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hitomi Soga.

Fg2 01:20, 23 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source for Image:AmericanEagleLogo.gif edit

Thanks for uploading Image:AmericanEagleLogo.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:39, 3 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK 11:39, 3 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Notability of Jim Stork edit

 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Jim Stork, by Addd wiki (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Jim Stork seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Jim Stork, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 20:11, 25 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Need cite from past article edit

Sekicho - You are a prolific contributor, so this may seem like a pretty random request. You placed an article on everything2 about Dodge v. Ford in Dec. 2005. In that article, you said that Ford Motor was worth $130M in 1916. I am putting together material for a class I teach at NYU, and was wondering if you could cite a source for that figure. It's interesting to me as the only valuation I found for Ford in that year, and it's a plausible number, but I need a source before I can use it in my materials. If you can do this, just let me know here or on my user page at DocGov, and I will give you my e-mail address. Thanks. --DocGov 03:53, 27 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, Sekicho. I will look for the cite in Bauman, then.--DocGov 22:27, 29 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Japan taskforces edit

In order to encourage more participation, and to help people find a specific area in which they are more able to help out, we have organized taskforces at WikiProject Japan. Please visit the Participants page and update the list with the taskforces in which you wish to participate. Links to all the taskforces are found at the top of the list of participants.

Please let me know if you have any questions, and thank you for helping out! ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 01:39, 8 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Template:Law firm edit

A template you created, Template:Law firm, has been marked for deletion as a deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there has been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to its deletion, please list your objection here and feel free to remove the {{deprecated}} tag from the template. If you feel the deletion is appropriate, no further action is necessary. Thanks for your attention. --MZMcBride 05:11, 26 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Shinzo Abe edit

The Shinzo Abe article received heavy editing today by unregistered users, which I noticed at WikiRage.com. The article may benefit from a good review. According to Wikipedia Page History Statistics, you are one of the top contributors to that page. If you have the time, would you please read over the article and make any necessary changes. Thanks. -- Jreferee (Talk) 07:38, 13 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source for Image:Tokyobay.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading Image:Tokyobay.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:00, 17 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 01:00, 17 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source for Image:Kawaramachi.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading Image:Kawaramachi.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:06, 17 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 01:06, 17 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Vietnam 787.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Vietnam 787.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:36, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Invite edit

 
Century Tower

As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject University of Florida, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of University of Florida. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks!


Question on Chuo Shinkansen Image edit

Hi there Sekicho. I have a question on the Chuo Shinkansen image (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Chuo-Shinkansen.png): Is there any further info on where the train will stop etc. I didn't see anything in the official release from JR Tokai yesterday but according to the Japanese page there will be 9 stops ("沿線9都府県(東京、神奈川、山梨、長野、岐阜、愛知、三重、奈良、大阪)にそれぞれ1駅ずつ、計9駅を設置"). Any idea where they will be and would it be possible to change the image accordingly. At the moment it looks as if there will only be 4 stops. Also, JR Tokai have only said they will build the Chuo Shinkansen to Nagoya (nothing official on an extension to Osaka yet I think). Thanks again for all your work on Wikipedia. Regards, --Fusebokme (talk) 21:00, 27 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Kawaramachi.jpg edit

Your image Image:Kawaramachi.jpg is actually looking eastward to Gion shrine, on east-westerly Shijo Street, not on north-southerly Kawaramachi Street. Shijo Ohashi is the exact place. Maxima m (talk) 03:13, 8 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Masatoshi Abe edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Masatoshi Abe, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Has been unsourced for 3 months, fails the sourcing requirement at WP:BLP

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Kevin (talk) 11:12, 1 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with File:Fukuda and Carter 1977.gif edit

Thanks for uploading File:Fukuda and Carter 1977.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:47, 5 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Tocho.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tocho.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

An exciting opportunity to get involved! edit

 

As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. - Trevor MacInnis contribs 05:16, 23 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Shinkansenmap.png edit

Hi, is there any reason for the different colors? Does Japan split its system into different lines like that? Is the gray not high speed? Could you please add some of that to the description page? Thank you. gren グレン 17:23, 1 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:Tran14G3.jpg edit

Hi. As we now have more than 100 free licensed images of Lockheed Constellations, I don't think we need this image under a fair use rationale.

 

Thanks for uploading File:Tran14G3.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Thanks, Infrogmation (talk) 00:18, 30 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced BLPs edit

  Hello Sekicho! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 12 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 1,558 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Yasuhisa Shiozaki - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Jinen Nagase - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Gen Nakatani - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Chikara Sakaguchi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  5. Masajuro Shiokawa - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  6. Kenji Kosaka - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  7. Seiken Sugiura - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  8. Mineichi Iwanaga - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  9. Tom Gallagher - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  10. Doug Gallagher - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
More...
11. Mikio Aoki

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:46, 17 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Kawaramachi.jpg listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kawaramachi.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:41, 30 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Tokyo meetup edit

Interested in attending a Tokyo Wikipedia Meetup?

If you are interested in a Tokyo meetup, please visit Wikipedia:Meetup/Tokyo and voice your interest.
Not in the Tokyo area? Check out other meetups around the world!

--Saki talk 07:04, 16 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Miami-landsat.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Miami-landsat.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:51, 26 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:51, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

You are now a Reviewer edit

 

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:32, 19 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Doug Gallagher edit

 

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Doug Gallagher requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Horologium (talk) 12:15, 30 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

November 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. OhanaUnitedTalk page 06:51, 12 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Japanese only sign.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Japanese only sign.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 02:22, 1 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Sato and Nixon 1972.gif edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Sato and Nixon 1972.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:10, 1 January 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 05:10, 1 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Lake Clinton Panetta 1994.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Lake Clinton Panetta 1994.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:03, 4 May 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:03, 4 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Jetway.jpg listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jetway.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:20, 20 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Asks for your opinion for Maidashi ryokuchi. edit

How do you do? My name is Hot cake syrup, I read your article Hibiya Park with considerable interest, thank you.
Maidashi ryokuchi is proposed deletion, but I think it is to leave over. The reason is that the park is not famous, but it has substantial implication for the Fukuoka's modern history. And in Wikipedia there are too few articles for Japanese garden. If your concurrence on my opinion, please note your comment on Talk:Maidashi ryokuchi. Bye for now. --Hot cake syrup (talk) 04:50, 1 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with File:2004 RNC banner.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:2004 RNC banner.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kelly hi! 17:51, 1 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Yokohama.jpg listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Yokohama.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:40, 15 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Wikitravel's future edit

Hi Sekicho. Given all the hard work you have done on Wikitravel's Tokyo articles, I wanted to double check that you are aware of and up-to-date regarding the project's status. We're planning to migrate to the Wikimedia Foundation as a new project. We have a Migration FAQ up at Wikivoyage [5], and a Request for Comment at Meta. --Peter Talk 17:47, 19 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for December 13 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reno Air, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Midway Airlines (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:54, 13 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 10 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

East Japan Railway Company (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Omiya Station
Takadanobaba Station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Nakano Station

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 10 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Blakemore & Mitsuki edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Blakemore & Mitsuki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Randykitty (talk) 10:46, 12 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 17 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited AirAsia Japan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Load factor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 17 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

June 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Morrison & Foerster may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *[[Image:Flag of Hong Kong.svg|20px]] [[Hong Kong]] ([[The Landmark (Hong Kong)|The Landmark]] (1982)

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:26, 23 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 2 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Japan Airlines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mexicana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:18, 2 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

July 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Skymark Airlines may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:36, 31 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Merge discussion for Zero interest-rate policy edit

  An article that you have been involved in editing, Zero interest-rate policy, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. greenrd (talk) 21:39, 21 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of New Japan Aviation edit

Hello, Sekicho. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, New Japan Aviation, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:37, 20 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

January 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to House of Councillors may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ] provided that half of the councillors elected in the first House of Councillors Election (the [[Japanese House of Councillors election, 1947|1947 election]] would be up for re-election

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:22, 22 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Skymark-logo.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Skymark-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:39, 19 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Tokyo merge proposal edit

Hi. In case you haven't noticed, there has been a proposal to merge another article into Tokyo, and on the Talk page some people are proposing some rather major changes. I see you've been a major contributor, and thought I'd ask if you had an opinion on these ideas. Or if you could invite some other people who might. Thanks. --Margin1522 (talk) 21:05, 7 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Mitsui Bank edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mitsui Bank, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://maps.thefullwiki.org/Sumitomo_Mitsui_Banking_Corporation.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:45, 7 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Taiyo Kobe Bank edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Taiyo Kobe Bank, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.smbc.co.jp/aboutus/english/profile/history.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:55, 7 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

April 2015 edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:18, 9 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

User Box WP Japan edit

Hi. I have a discussion up at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Japan#Membership Roll? which concerns users who display <tt>{{User WikiProject Japan}}</tt> on their user page.

If I can get consensus, I would like to list you all under Category:WikiProject Japan participants. As of now, you will not be listed unless you switch to the other User box <tt>{{User WP Japan}}</tt>.

And if you really do not want to get listed, would you still mind switching to the other User box and use the feature that suppresses listing?
If you don't want to be listed, replace {{User WikiProject Japan}} with {{User WP Japan|nocat=true}}, or on your {{Babel}} replacing your |WikiProject Japan| with |special-boxes={{User WP Japan|nocat=true}}|
Thanks. --Kiyoweap (talk) 10:02, 13 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Updating jus soli map? edit

Greetings. The map you added to jus soli needs updating. I'd do it myself, but I don't know how. A few of the differences between the map and the text are here. Might make more sense to take it down until its done. Thanks! Also its a great addition to the article. Bangabandhu (talk) 11:01, 28 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

I don't think Sekicho was the creator of the map. 72.191.248.253 (talk) 17:32, 18 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:PanAm KeyWest.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PanAm KeyWest.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly hi! 09:42, 28 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Reference errors on 5 February edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 6 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Sekicho. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Sekicho. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed Deletion of Glaucus Research Group edit

Hello Sekicho, this is to advise you that I have place an AfD (Article For Deletion) for the article Glaucus Research Group because it does not currently meet criteria of inclusion in Wikipedia and is more or less a self-promotion of a non-notable company, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glaucus Research Group to vote for/against or comment on the proposed AfD. Please DO NOT DELETE the AfD notice from the article page as this would be a violation of the AfD and Wikipedia policy and to do so would be considered an act of vandalism. The notice will be removed after the closure of voting in 7 days from the date of the proposal. YborCityJohn (talk) 06:23, 14 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello again Sekicho, For your information the AfD for this article has been closed and the result was DELETE with a total of 7 'Votes For Delete' (including the nominator), 1 'Vote To Keep' and 3 Comments. YborCityJohn (talk) 05:07, 24 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

National Stadium (Beijing) edit

Hi, I opened request of moving at Beijing National Stadium. Please leave a comment. I think that this is same case of National Stadium (Tokyo).01:32, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

That alt text edit

About this edit, the alt text was added in the major re-write here. The description is intentional, though I can understand why you thought it might not be serious. There should be some alt text, but it could be changed. @Iridescent: (who wrote that) to see what they think. Carcharoth (talk) 10:56, 19 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Actually, the alt text appears to be an in-joke referencing the use of the phrase in the works of Agatha Christie and E. Nesbit, as is explained in the article (I missed this, having clearly never read that far down the article before...). Carcharoth (talk) 14:30, 19 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Autopatrolled granted edit

 

Hi Sekicho, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Schwede66 07:48, 5 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Abdul Latif Jameel edit

The wording is promotional, but I agree it's borderline, so I've restored it. Please improve it in accordance with the guidelines. I am not aware of ever having suggested a COI. Deb (talk) 15:42, 28 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Yes, the use of the company's own publicity material as the main references was a concern. It's certainly a lot better now - thank you for adding more reliable references. Deb (talk) 06:51, 29 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Sekicho. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Discretionary sanctions edit

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Jytdog (talk) 18:53, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Edit war warning edit

 

Your recent editing history at William Saito shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk) 18:53, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Help request for mapping section titles edit

Hi. We (the Research Team at Wikimedia Foundation) are building an algorithm that will align Wikipedia article sections across languages. For improving this algorithm we need the help of multilingual Wikipedia editors to provide true statements to the algorithm. You are contacted because based on your Babel template and/or content translation tool usage you know at least two of the following languages: ar (Arabic), fr (French), ja (Japanese), en (English), es (Spanish), ru (Russian).

(Note: by clicking the links in the following paragraph, you will be taken to Google spreadsheet.) If you'd like to help us with translating a subset of the section titles on or before 2018-05-06, please read and follow the instructions. If you see instructions in another language, please scroll down to find your preferred language. If you have questions about this message, you can contact us via Diego. Thank you! :) --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:49, 23 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Rosetta Barnstar
Thanks for translating Tech Bureau! Λυδαcιτγ 02:58, 21 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Tech Bureau edit

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the blockchain and cryptocurrencies. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

MER-C 20:02, 21 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Sekicho. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Yoshihide Suga edit

Hi, thanks for your contribution to Yoshihide Suga. I note that you wrote: "Suga was replaced following Taro Aso's accession to the premiership in August 2007", though Aso did not become the Prime Minister until 2008. Can you take a look? Thank you. --North wiki (talk) 11:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Special purpose company (Japan) for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Special purpose company (Japan) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Special purpose company (Japan) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Koridas 📣 03:05, 2 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Marquette Airlines for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marquette Airlines is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marquette Airlines until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Chetsford (talk) 15:09, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Taisho democracy" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Taisho democracy. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 8#Taisho democracy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Loafiewa (talk) 15:00, 8 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

The WikiEagle - January 2022 edit

 
The WikiEagle
The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter
Volume I — Issue 1
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
Announcements
  • After over a decade of silence, the WikiProject Aviation newsletter is making a comeback under the name The WikiEagle. This first issue was sent to all active members of the project and its sub-projects. If you wish to continue receiving The WikiEagle, you can add your username to the mailing list. For now the newsletter only covers general project news and is run by only one editor. If you wish to help or to become a columnist, please let us know. If you have an idea which you believe would improve the newsletter, please share it; suggestions are welcome and encouraged.
  • On 16 December, an RfC was closed which determined theaerodrome.com to be an unreliable source. The website, which is cited over 1,500 articles, mainly on WWI aviation, as of the publishing of this issue.
  • Luft46.com has been added to the list of problematic sources after this discussion.
  • The Jim Lovell article was promoted to Featured Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Hawkeye7.
  • The Raymond Hesselyn article was promoted to Good Article status on 4 December after being nominated by Zawed.
  • The Supermarine Sea King article was promoted to Good Article status on 22 December after being nominated by Amitchell125.
  • The William Hodgson (RAF officer) article was promoted to Good Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Zawed.
Members

New Members

Number of active members: 386. Total number of members: 921.

Closed Discussions


  Featured Article assessment

  Good Article assessment

  Deletion

  Requested moves

Article Statistics
This data reflects values from DMY.
New/Ongoing Discussions

On The Main Page


Did you know...

Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list.
Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 1 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Interested in starting a WikiProject? edit

I've noticed that you've edited a lot of Japanese keiretsu, for example Mitsubishi and Mitsui. I've always been fascinated by keiretsu and am wondering if you want to help start WikiProject Keiretsu? At this point I'm just looking to see if people would be interested in such a wikiproject, not sure if it'd ever be created. —Panamitsu (talk) 01:00, 7 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for EVA Air edit

EVA Air has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:09, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Tech Bureau for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tech Bureau is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tech Bureau until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ne (00) olli (talk) 13:26, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply