"Voiced" redirects here. For the organization, see VOICED
The term, however, is used to refer to two separate concepts:
- Voicing can refer to the articulatory process in which the vocal folds vibrate, its primary use in phonetics to describe phones, which are particular speech sounds.
- It can also refer to a classification of speech sounds that tend to be associated with vocal cord vibration but may not actually be voiced at the articulatory level. That is the term's primary use in phonology: to describe phonemes; while in phonetics its primary use is to describe phones.
For example, voicing accounts for the difference between the pair of sounds associated with the English letters "s" and "z". The two sounds are transcribed as [s] and [z] to distinguish them from the English letters, which have several possible pronunciations, depending on the context. If one places the fingers on the voice box (i.e. the location of the Adam's apple
in the upper throat), one can feel a vibration
is pronounced but not with ssss
. (For a more detailed, technical explanation, see modal voice
.) In most European languages
, with a notable exception being Icelandic
and other sonorants
(consonants such as m, n, l,
are modally voiced
When used to classify speech sounds, voiced
are merely labels used to group phones
together for the purposes of classification.
The International Phonetic Alphabet
has distinct letters for many voiceless and voiced pairs of consonants (the obstruents
), such as [p b], [t d], [k ɡ], [q ɢ]. In addition, there is a diacritic for voicedness: ⟨◌̬⟩. Diacritics are typically used with letters for prototypically voiceless sounds.
, the symbols are encoded U+032C ◌̬COMBINING CARON BELOW
) and U+0325 ◌̥ COMBINING RING BELOW
Partial voicing can mean light but continuous voicing, discontinuous voicing, or discontinuities in the degree of voicing. For the example, ₍s̬₎ could be an [s] with (some) voicing in the middle and ₍z̥₎ could be [z] with (some) devoicing in the middle.
Partial voicing can also be indicated in the normal IPA with transcriptions like [ᵇb̥iˑ] and [ædᵈ̥].
The distinction between the articulatory use of voice and the phonological use rests on the distinction between phone
(represented between square brackets) and phoneme
(represented between slashes). The difference is best illustrated by a rough example.
The English word nods is made up of a sequence of phonemes, represented symbolically as /nɒdz/, or the sequence of /n/, /ɒ/, /d/, and /z/. Each symbol is an abstract representation of a phoneme. That awareness is an inherent part of speakers' mental grammar that allows them to recognise words.
However, phonemes are not sounds in themselves. Rather, phonemes are, in a sense, converted to phones before being spoken. The /z/ phoneme, for instance, can actually be pronounced as either the [s] phone or the [z] phone since /z/ is frequently devoiced, even in fluent speech, especially at the end of an utterance. The sequence of phones for nods might be transcribed as [nɒts] or [nɒdz], depending on the presence or strength of this devoicing. While the [z] phone has articulatory voicing, the [s] phone does not have it.
What complicates the matter is that for English, consonant phonemes are classified as either voiced or voiceless even though it is not the primary distinctive feature between them. Still, the classification is used as a stand-in for phonological processes, such as vowel lengthening that occurs before voiced consonants but not before unvoiced consonants or vowel quality changes (the sound of the vowel) in some dialects of English that occur before unvoiced but not voiced consonants. Such processes allow English speakers to continue to perceive difference between voiced and voiceless consonants when the devoicing of the former would otherwise make them sound identical to the latter.
English has four pairs of fricative
phonemes that can be divided into a table by place of articulation
and voicing. The voiced fricatives can readily be felt to have voicing throughout the duration of the phone especially when they occur between vowels.
However, in the class of consonants called stops
, such as /p, t, k, b, d, ɡ/, the contrast is more complicated for English. The "voiced" sounds do not typically feature articulatory voicing throughout the sound. The difference between the unvoiced stop phonemes and the voiced stop phonemes is not just a matter of whether articulatory voicing is present or not. Rather, it includes when voicing starts
(if at all), the presence of aspiration
(airflow burst following the release of the closure) and the duration of the closure and aspiration.
English voiceless stops are generally aspirated
at the beginning of a stressed syllable, and in the same context, their voiced counterparts are voiced only partway through. In more narrow phonetic transcription
, the voiced symbols are maybe used only to represent the presence of articulatory voicing, and aspiration is represented with a superscript h
Voicing contrast in English stops
When the consonants come at the end of a syllable, however, what distinguishes them is quite different. Voiceless phonemes are typically unaspirated, glottalized
and the closure itself may not even be released, making it sometimes difficult to hear the difference between, for example, light
. However, auditory cues remain to distinguish between voiced and voiceless sounds, such as what has been described above, like the length of the preceding vowel.
Other English sounds, the vowels and sonorants, are normally fully voiced. However, they may be devoiced in certain positions, especially after aspirated consonants, as in coffee, tree, and play in which the voicing is delayed to the extent of missing the sonorant or vowel altogether.
Degrees of voicing
There are two variables to degrees of voicing: intensity (discussed under phonation
), and duration (discussed under voice onset time
). When a sound is described as "half voiced" or "partially voiced", it is not always clear whether that means that the voicing is weak (low intensity) or if the voicing occurs during only part of the sound (short duration). In the case of English, it is the latter.
and some of the neighboring languages are typologically unusual in having contrastive partially voiced consonants. They have aspirate and ejective
consonants, which are normally incompatible with voicing, in voiceless and voiced pairs.
The consonants start out voiced but become voiceless partway through, allow normal aspiration or ejection. They are [b͡pʰ, d͡tʰ, d͡tsʰ, d͡tʃʰ, ɡ͡kʰ] and [d͡tsʼ, d͡tʃʼ] and a similar series of clicks.
Voice and tenseness
There are languages with two sets of contrasting obstruents
that are labelled /p t k f s x …/ vs. /b d ɡ v z ɣ …/ even though there is no involvement of voice (or voice onset time) in that contrast. That happens, for instance, in several Alemannic German
dialects. Because voice is not involved, this is explained as a contrast in tenseness
, called a fortis and lenis
There is a hypothesis that the contrast between fortis and lenis consonants is related to the contrast between voiceless and voiced consonants. That relation is based on sound perception as well as on sound production, where consonant voice, tenseness and length
are only different manifestations of a common sound feature.
- ^ The parentheses should appear under the letter, but that is not fully supported by Unicode. As of version 8.0, only central voicing and devoicing, [s̬᪽] and [z̥᪽], is encoded.
- ^ Kretzschmar (1993) Handbook of the Linguistic Atlas of the Middle and South Atlantic States, University of Chicago Press, p. 122.
- ^ Consonants that are called "voiced aspirate" normally have breathy voice, not voiceless aspiration, as in Juǀʼhoansi, Taa and similar languages.
- ^ Ladefoged, Peter; Maddieson, Ian (1996). The Sounds of the World's Languages. Oxford: Blackwell. pp. 63, 80–81. ISBN 978-0-631-19815-4.
Last edited on 28 February 2021, at 01:25
Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0
unless otherwise noted.