Ethiopic and South Arabian show particular common features, and are often grouped together as South Semitic
. The proper classification of Arabic with respect to other Semitic languages
is debated.
In older classifications, it is grouped with the South Semitic languages. However, Hetzron and Huehnergard connect it more closely with the Northwest Semitic languages, to form Central Semitic
. Some Semiticists continue to argue for the older classification, based on the distinctive feature of broken plurals
. Some linguists also argue that Eteocypriot
was a Northwest Semitic language spoken in ancient Cyprus
- ^ The Semitic Languages: An International Handbook, Chapter V, page 425
- ^ Aaron D. Rubin (2008). "The subgrouping of the Semitic languages". Language and Linguistics Compass. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2 (1): 61–84. doi:10.1111/j.1749-818x.2007.00044.x. P. Haupt (1878) first recognized that the qatala past tense found in West Semitic was an innovation, and that the Akkadian prefixed past tense must be archaic. It was F. Hommel, however, who recognized the implications of this for the subgrouping of Semitic; cf. Hommel(1883: 63, 442; 1892: 92–97; 1926: 75–82).
- ^ Fritz Hommel, Die semitischen Volker und Sprachen als erster Versuch einer Encyclopadie der semitischen Sprach- und Alterthums-Wissenschaft, (1883)
- ^ Hoftijzer, Jacob; Kooij, Gerrit Van der (January 1991). The Balaam Text from Deir ʻAlla Re-evaluated: Proceedings of the International Symposium Held at Leiden, 21-24 August 1989. ISBN 9004093176.
Alice Faber, "Genetic Subgrouping of the Semitic Languages", in Hetzron, ed., 2013, The Semitic Languages, Routledge.
Last edited on 12 April 2021, at 04:00
Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0
unless otherwise noted.