Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aeris Williams

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel (talk) 23:41, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aeris Williams edit

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Routine college athlete, fails WP:NGRIDIRON and WP:GNG. UW Dawgs (talk) 08:24, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:50, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:50, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:28, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 09:41, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a run-of-the mill college athlete who does not meet the relevant inclusion criteria.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:57, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Not a routine athlete. He was Mr. Football in the State of Mississippi, a 1,000+ yard rusher at Division I FBS football power Mississippi State, and a Doak Walker Award candidate. A quick search (not exhaustive) reveals a good deal of WP:SIGCOV. E.g., (1) here (profile in USA Today), (2) here (also USA Today), (3) part 1/part 2, (4) here, (5) here, (6) here, (7) part 1/part 2, (8) part 1/part 2, (9) here, (10) here, (11) here, (12) here, (13) here, (14) here, (15) here, (16) here, (17) here, and (18) here. Cbl62 (talk) 21:00, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Meets WP:GNG and WP:BASIC, per the sources provided by Cbl62. Ejgreen77 (talk) 11:29, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per Cbl62. USA Today profile looks to be enough to me, if added. Suriname0 (talk) 14:31, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.