Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bertille Marcos Guèdègbé

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 21:20, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bertille Marcos Guèdègbé edit

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable for a general manager position. Fails WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV. scope_creep^Talk 12:39, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:58, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:58, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:58, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - head of pineapple industry in Benin. Already has a number of reliable sources cited in text. Could be expanded using fr.wiki article. Furius (talk) 13:54, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:07, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have obviously not read the references. They look like puff pieces. PR to exact. scope_creep^Talk 14:20, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:22, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: coverage in Le Monde and by the FAO NHCLS (talk) 13:24, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Looks like sufficient coverage in French sources. The Le Monde article is what pushes her coverage into notability for me. Suriname0 (talk) 14:25, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Folks, it needs more than one secondary ref. Three would be ideal. The FAO article is a passing mention, mention her investment as an entrepreneur. It is routine coverage really that fails WP:CORPDEPTH. scope_creep^Talk 14:40, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.