Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G. Wray Gill

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Bbb23 (talk) 18:34, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

G. Wray Gill edit

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG. There are sources, but not enough coverage to meet notability guidelines. Boleyn (talk) 20:36, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:19, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:19, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:19, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:17, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep. Google shows some news sources related to many of his legal cases, and a check ofavailable print an online files would probably find more. This is only a weak keep bcause i'm not going to have time to do the checking myself. DGG ( talk ) 01:16, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:43, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Once more, in the hope of getting a few more opinions.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:15, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extremely weak keep. Tons of mentions of his name in newspapers.com (about 450) but the vast majority just seem to be him getting mentioned/quoted in connection with his cases. There appears to be almost no coverage about him. Seems plausible that it may exist within those 450 articles, but I don't have time to go through all of them. The one exception is that he murdered someone as a young adult (!) and then was pardoned, a fact that is not currently mentioned in the article. It appears to have been quite a scandal, and there is plenty of coverage of that (of the Wikipedia:NOTNEWS and Wikipedia:BLP1E variety). I added a few new sources (about his marriage, the murder, and his death) to the article. Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:11, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.