Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabé Hirschowitz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Bbb23 (talk) 15:49, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gabé Hirschowitz edit

Gabé Hirschowitz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promo/vanity piece on a non-notable businessperson (I think?), borderline speediable, but maybe the 2016 award counts as a claim to fame. The sources cited are all non-RS interviews, and a search finds nothing better. (I did also search for 'Gabé Hirsch', which this IMDb entry suggests may be the same person, but still found naught.) Fails WP:GNG / WP:ANYBIO. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:17, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:17, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:17, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:17, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:17, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:17, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:17, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete. I couldn't find a single reliable source via a ProQuest database search of Australian and NZ newspapers (broader and deeper than Google). Via Google, I found the same 4 magazine articles currently included on the page, and of them, this and this do not meet IRS in my view-- the magazine publishers are seeking a distributor and have only published 8 issues. The other 2 sources are questionable but arguably enough to support more reliable sources if some could be found. Cabrils (talk) 02:41, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 17:44, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seddon talk 01:24, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 10:17, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.