Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marek Sacha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. In most circumstances where there is a close-to-even split there is no consensus, but the policy issues need to be considered as well. There are some valid concerns that the sourcing in the AFD are more about the company than Mr. Sascha, but looking through the sources there seem to be several companies, not just one, a fact noted by some of the sources in the article (e.g. the Czech Forbes article). As such, there is some merit to the keep side, and the lack of consensus therefore defaults to the article being retained at this point. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:59, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Marek Sacha edit

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not much reputed reference available that covers him significantly other than few media announcements. Fails WP:BLP and WP:SIGCOV. Dixiku (talk) 14:31, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Dixiku (talk) 14:31, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:19, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:17, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, there are references allowing significant coverages in UKTN, deutsche startups, bdaily, Forbes. There must be some more to pass WP:BLP and WP:SIGCOV. Cirton (talk) 19:42, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 00:26, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No possible notability independent of the company. As far as I can tell, the references are almost entirely about the firm, not the person. DGG ( talk ) 01:19, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheChronium 05:31, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:N. Slovenichibo (talk) 06:08, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
keep as per WP:GNG and WP:N the person has good coverage. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. So he is eligible as notable according to policy. Saniorita (talk) 06:41, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Almost of the sources provided here at the AFD are about the company started by Marek Sacha and not Marek Sacha himself. Notability is not inherited. Fails WP:SIGCOV.4meter4 (talk) 04:07, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I see significant coverages about the person as can be found here, here, here, here etc. Passes WP:BASIC and WP:GNG per WP:THREE. Chirota (talk) 05:19, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.