Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masternodes (Blockchain)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus notability is not met Nosebagbear (talk) 14:46, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Masternodes (Blockchain) edit

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Crytpocurrency article- lacks coverage in third-party sources to establish notability of topic. MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:37, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:26, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I'm seeing some coverage from a Google search. If Dash (cryptocurrency) and Firo (cryptocurrency) are noteworthy, then this article is too. Benevolent human (talk) 20:46, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:29, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I can't comment as to whether Dash (cryptocurrency) and Firo (cryptocurrency) are noteworthy, but I don't believe notability is inherited. My own search on google and elsewhere has only revealed trivial coverage; User:Benevolent human, if you have found non-trivial coverage could you provide examples? BilledMammal (talk) 05:41, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Given the toxicity of the blockchain hustle, the notability criterion should be assessed conservatively. While the concept seems interesting enough, we don't have the kind of disinterested coverage of the topic needed to provide neutral, reliable coverage.— Charles Stewart (talk) 21:30, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.