Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mobilegov

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 23:37, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mobilegov edit

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:CORP or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 20:57, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:15, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:15, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An article whose text sets out the wares of a defunct company. I updated the article in 2018 to include the company's renaming and then demise. I then added a PROD notice with the rationale "This former company received some product coverage and listings in start-up awards but not the sustained and in-depth coverage needed for WP:CORPDEPTH" but I see the PROD was challenged. Looking again for sources (for both the Mobilegov and later Login People names and their main product name) I am finding mainly sporadic announcements from their lifespan which are trivial coverage under WP:CORPDEPTH. The most substantial source is the WebTime Medias posting about the firm's funding difficulties and closure - a thorough-enough piece which could contribute towards WP:NCORP but which does not in itself indicate any attainments which would be of encyclopaedic notability, so my opinion continues to be that this article fails WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 12:15, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:42, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.