Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roxy Blue (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:21, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Roxy Blue edit

Roxy Blue (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of meeting notability criteria. Shortlived band that reformed and released a second record since previous article deleted, but no significant coverage. noq (talk) 11:10, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:16, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:16, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep - They were a rock band on a major label in the early '90s, when the print journalism model was still robust and ensured coverage of every little thing, all over North America. The band, their debut, and their reunion are covered by Billboard, Chicago Tribune, Waterloo Region Record, Newsday, Houston Chronicle, San Francisco Chronicle, The Chattanoogan, etc. I've never been that clear on which charts are "Wikipedia-notable", but the debut and a single were on the Heatseekers and Rock ones for a few weeks. Almost worth keeping for their truly moronic album art alone. ;) Caro7200 (talk) 12:42, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep - due to the sources provided by Atlantic306 (talk) it passes WP:MUSICBIO . Samat lib (talk) 08:47, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep exercising WP:AGF the sources identified by Caro 7200 are enough for WP:GNG, will provide links in a couple of days, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 01:56, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 14:45, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless (talk) 15:20, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.