Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel Scott (businessperson)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. This has already been relisted twice, so I am closing this, but the "debate" suffered from a lack of participation, so no prejudice to a speedy re-nomination. I add that if this had been tagged for G11 I would likely have deleted it. Randykitty (talk) 13:45, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel Scott (businessperson) edit

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to meet our notability guidelines and article is entirely promotional (and created by the subject) ElKevbo (talk) 21:43, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:59, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:59, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if you look at the talk page for the article, you will see that it was looked at by several editors and that the page was revised in accordance with their recommendations and that the connections were disclosed in accordance with Wikipedia policy. It was then accepted by the editors.--Sjscott80 (talk) 07:35, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:45, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Samuel Scott is well-known in the tech and marketing area and published many articles concerning these topics (writing books isn't very popular in this field). Btw, Sjscott80 I think you mean "history" and not "talk page". Tec Tom (talk) 15:36, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:05, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:SIGCOV and WP:AUTOBIO. Cites to The Drum and AdWeek? Bearian (talk) 15:53, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. He looks like a subject-matter expert to me. WP:SNG could apply. His expertise appears to be in the area of digital advertising fraud. Because of his expertise, he appears to get cited or interviewed for articles on digital advertising fraud relatively often. The places that write about digital advertising fraud are themselves "tech niche" publications. The fact that apparently an involved/COI editor wrote the article is unfortunate and alienating, but doesn't really tell us whether the individual is or isn't notable. Novellasyes (talk) 18:31, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.