Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vardaan Arora

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Nomadicghumakkad has summed up the difficulty in finding a consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:11, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vardaan Arora edit

Vardaan Arora (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cant see any in-depth coverage. No reliable sources to show for. Lacks independent coverage. This would need consensus to stay. A bit puffy too and in my opinion the subject in question does not warrant a standalone page on Wikipedia. - FitIndia Talk Admin on Commons 20:51, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. - FitIndia Talk Admin on Commons 20:51, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. - FitIndia Talk Admin on Commons 20:51, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment This is difficult (and also exciting where it leads). So the sequence of my alignment were first Delete because none of his singles seem to be on any chart. And no other criteria of WP:NMUSICIAN is being satisfied. Then, Second Keep because Billboard (magazine) is reviewing his work and so is Rolling Stone. And third, I don't know anymore because so many times Bill Board has written about him that it is starting to lose it's worth. Gay Times is another source that's repeatedly writing about him. If we disprove the hypothesis that Bill Board and Gay Times might be writing about him again and again because he got connections, we might just move towards keep at least as per WP:BASIC. Sigh. I am looking forward what others got to say. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 15:33, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:34, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Google news is littered with articles about him. Examples from just the first two pages of search results: 1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6; 7; 8; 9; 10. --Usernameunique (talk) 01:49, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 03:10, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.