Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 October 13

< October 12	October 14 >

October 13 edit

File:Lennon and Chapman.jpg edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Textbook WP:NFCC#8 violation. No prejudice to restoration if the article(s) this image was used in are significantly expanded to explicitly discuss this image in-depth -FASTILY 22:23, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFCC#10c is not satisfied as there is not a separate and specific non-free use rationale for each use. Additionally, the existing rationale does not address the purpose of use / criterion 8 (a necessary component). Use in the Lennon and Chapman articles isn't minimal, and the articles are easily understood without it (criterion 8). It may be debatable whether use in Murder of John Lennon could be policy-compliant if someone were to write an appropriate rationale addressing criterion 8; however, I don't think that it is. There is no sourced commentary in the article about the photo itself and what is written (that one was taken) can be easily understood without the photo. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:16, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: It hasn't been a problem before, so why is it a problem now? Also, the image is iconic as it's one of the last images of him alive. If you want it removed from the Murder of John Lennon page, I will gladly do that. Angelgreat (talk) 02:23, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Whoa said it wasn't a problem before? WP:ITSHISTORIC. The rationales that you added are not specific to each use and do not describe how the image is used. All of them claim that For visual identification of the object of the article. The article as a whole is dedicated specifically to a discussion of this work., which is not true. It is not used for visual identification, and neither the photo nor what it depicts are the subject of any of the articles (Lennon, Chapman, and Lennon's murder). They also all claim It would only be used on the article about <article>. That isn't true since it is used three times, not one. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:34, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There are a bunch of FURs which are not relevant to the use. For visual identification of the object of the article. The article as a whole is dedicated specifically to a discussion of this work. Really? The main subject of those three articles is this photograph? --Stefan2 (talk) 16:08, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- If you wan't, I'll remove it from the Murder of John Lennon article if it makes everyone happy. Angelgreat (talk) 17:15, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - None of the uses currently are WP:NFC compliant as noted in the nomination, and appear to be boiler plate copies of non-free usage rationales. Usage of non-free images is not a mere formality of filling in some fields on a non-free usage rationale. There is no proper stated purpose nor can I see one being created that would justify this images use in any of the articles it is currently used in. -- Whpq (talk) 21:16, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stggatic-assets-upload1ukjhjk6913762457542955738.webp edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:03, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused file, only used once for a vandalized article. Enwiki~enwiki (talk) 12:26, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nintendo Switch Online banner.png edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Essentially the same as File:Nintendo_Switch_Online_logo.svg (a free image) but includes non-free copyrighted elements. For identificaton of the Nintendo Switch Online service, the logo is sufficient, and this file is unnecessary Masem (t) 12:35, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:People First Party flag.svg edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Convert to {{PD-ineligible-USonly|Taiwan}} -FASTILY 22:23, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vector image not produced by the copyright holder of the non-free logo should not be used, per Wikipedia:Non-free_content#Multiple_restrictions. Wcam (talk) 13:16, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: this could probably be retagged as {{PD-ineligible-USonly|Taiwan}}. Ixfd64 (talk) 04:09, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and retag per Ixfd64. The image is not copyrightable in the United States. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 01:57, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Newmarket South Train Station.jpg edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It says Photographed by Geoff Blackmore, Jan 2009 but the uploader's user page identifies the uploader as Iain Palmer. Geoff Blackmore needs to complete the process at WP:CONSENT. Stefan2 (talk) 16:03, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Port Elgin, New Brunswick.png edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The URL goes directly to the image, so it is not possible to determine if there is a free licence or not. Stefan2 (talk) 16:19, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Samyang Instant Noodles.jpg edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See c:COM:PACKAGING. Also, {{wrong license}}. Stefan2 (talk) 16:21, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Children’s hospital Basel around 1870.jpg edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

German Wikipedia only lists the source as "Internet" and there is no Creative Commons licence on German Wikipedia, only here. With no real source, it's not possible to show that the photo was taken around 1870 as suggested in the file name. Stefan2 (talk) 16:35, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Alamo Sculpture in at the University of Michigan- Ann Arbor.jpg edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image of possibly copyrighted sculpture. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:26, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

From SIRIS (quoted text should be PD-USGov):

“

Sculptor:

   Rosenthal, Tony 1914-2009

Medium:

   Sculpture: Cor-Ten steel, painted; Foundation: metal and concrete

Type:

   Sculptures-Outdoor Sculpture
   Sculptures-Kinetic
   Sculptures

Owner/Location:

   Administered by University of Michigan Physical Properties Building 326 East Hoover Ann Arbor Michigan 48109
   Located University of Michigan Regents Plaza, between the Michigan Union & Fleming Administration Building Ann Arbor Michigan

Date:

   1966-1967. Dedicated June, 1969

Notes:

   Save Outdoor Sculpture, Michigan survey, 1993.
   Image on file.
   (On edge of sculpture, raised lettering:) ROSENTHAL66,67 signed
   The information provided about this artwork was compiled as part of the Smithsonian American Art Museum's Inventories of American Painting and Sculpture database, designed to provide descriptive and location information on artworks by American artists in public and private collections worldwide.

Summary:

   The sculpture is a large, black-painted cube adorned with rectangular and circular projections and recessions. It balances on an edge which is set on a metal spindle allowing the sculpture to rotate when gently pushed. The sculpture is anchored in a circular concrete foundation.

Topic:

   Abstract--Geometric

Control number:

   IAS MI000528

Data Source:

   Art Inventories Catalog, Smithsonian American Art Museums

EDAN-URL:

   edanmdm:siris_ari_337880

”

From the above, it sounds as if there is no copyright notice, so I propose retagging this as {{PD-US-no notice}}. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:42, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ama Abebrese.png edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Youtube account has been deleted. Impossible to verify the licence. Stefan2 (talk) 21:27, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I was the uploader of this image. I just want to say that I endorse this nomination. I remember being unconvinced by the legitimacy of "eNollyTrailers", but decided to go against my better judgement at that time. Since there is now an alternate picture in the article then a removal is no longer as significant as it once was. HandsomeBoy (talk) 20:32, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PRR32 gene location.png edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 21:33, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 06:52, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Robgj02.jpg edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused unsourced userphoto. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 21:56, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 06:53, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sighting of gun on a level target, according to the Rifleman's Rule.jpg edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 21:56, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 06:53, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Green Apple Hi-Chew.jpg edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See c:COM:PACKAGING. Stefan2 (talk) 22:01, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Luo-xihe.jpg edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The quoted permission statement suggests that either commercial or non-commercial use isn't permitted. It is also unclear whether modification is permitted. Stefan2 (talk) 22:13, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.