Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 January 31

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< January 30 February 1 >

January 31 edit

Template:PL-railway-routemap edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:58, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no incoming links. No route map content, and no edits at all since creation in 2020. Appears to be an abandoned experiment. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:58, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2021 MLS Cup Playoff Bracket edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:22, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not used. 2021 MLS Cup Playoffs already has the bracket as part of the article under the Bracket section. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:18, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Already in the only article it can sensibly go in. Nigej (talk) 06:46, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Agrippa edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:22, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused with no direct links to the subject. No category exists for the topic. Links related to the subject's life in the first section are to article sections. No navigational benefit. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:00, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Sidebar with some of the links simply linking to different sections of the parent article. Others are only very loosely connected with him. Overall, there's nothing like enough to think that we have a "series" of articles on him. Nigej (talk) 06:51, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Does not seem useful enough to keep. Azuredivay (talk) 12:25, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:YYY0s in EnglishScottishWelsh sport category header/core edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:21, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as it was removed from the parent here. Gonnym (talk) 22:31, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:YYYY in EnglishScottishWelsh sport category header/core edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:21, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as it was removed from the parent here. Gonnym (talk) 22:30, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:YYYY in nationality sport category header/core edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:20, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as it was removed from parent here. Gonnym (talk) 22:28, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tram line two interlined edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:07, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, incoming links, or documentation. The only substantive edit was in 2005. Appears to be abandoned with unclear potential use. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:29, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Presumably related to {{Tram line}} but unused after 15 years. Nigej (talk) 21:35, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Suffolk County Route 83 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:08, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. This is single-article content that already exists in the article at County Route 83 (Suffolk County, New York). – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:25, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Map is already in the only plausible place it could be used in. Nigej (talk) 21:29, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as unneeded. Imzadi 1979 → 17:46, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Soling Publications edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Please let me know if you would like a copy of the content to add elsewhere. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:09, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NAVBOX says "external links should not be included in navigation templates". This one is 100% external links. Needs to be deleted. Nigej (talk) 21:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: this seems like a useful set of links for a WikiProject, but it should not be transcluded in an article or exist as an article navbox. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:33, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's really article content for International Soling Association. Also "Do not rely solely on navboxes for links to articles highly relevant to a particular article." and that seems to be the case here. Nigej (talk) 06:44, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Do you suggest that it is better that the content is be included in the article International Soling Association self?Dragon Genoa (talk) 12:21, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Personally I'd say it was too detailed per WP:INDISCRIMINATE, but a section at that article on Soling Publications might work and could be a way forward. Nigej (talk) 17:59, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:India National Archery Team - 2012 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:09, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, and contains parameters |caps= and |goals= from soccer that do not apply in archery. The only substantive edit was creation of this template in 2012, so it looks like an abandoned, half-built, single-article template. A reasonable summary version of this content exists at India at the 2012 Summer Olympics. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:07, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:HexShade/cell edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:07, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Appears to have been orphaned during parent template updates, including conversion to Lua. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:02, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Agree : After checking, I actually created it here and another wiki (not wm) but apparently never bothered to use it here. Thanks for noticing it! Julio974◆ (Talk-Contribs) 21:27, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Footer Uruguayan Championship Winners in Soling edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:10, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Navbox with no main article and no blue links in the body. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:58, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Footer Soviet Union Championship Winners in Soling edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:10, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Navbox with no main article and no blue links in the body. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:58, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Utterly useless for navigation. Nigej (talk) 21:01, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Footer Argentine Championship Winners in Soling edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:10, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. There is no main article for this navbox, and the only blue link is to a person who no longer passes the new WP:NOLYMPICS criteria for notability. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:50, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete No obvious content about this Argentine Championship. Also nearly all red links, so even if we did it should be deleted. Clearly no use for navigation. Nigej (talk) 21:00, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FC Khimik-Arsenal squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:11, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. This is a blank squad navbox for a football team that does not appear to be playing anymore. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:46, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom and the fact that we've got no article content on the current squad. Nigej (talk) 20:50, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete team looks like it still exists, but we don't have a squad list for it. If someone finds a sourced squad list, and that list has lots of blue linked players (which I don't imagine is the case, given the low league they play in), then and only then should it be kept. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:59, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 20:25, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 20:29, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:United States squad 2021 CONCACAF Nations League Finals edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:13, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is long-standing consensus that only top level tournaments merit squad templates; this is not one of them. GiantSnowman 20:07, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:S-line/Sweden left/Arlanda and other Sweden rail templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:12, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Orphaned after relevant pages were updated to use Module:Adjacent stations/Sweden. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:05, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 22:01, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:France Regions edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:15, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as Regions of France uses a different map. Gonnym (talk) 19:49, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Find sources twl edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:15, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An unused Template:Find sources variant. Gonnym (talk) 19:47, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Final date edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:15, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An unused date(?) template with the only thing in it "2019". Gonnym (talk) 19:44, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Completely useless. Nigej (talk) 20:24, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FinalTie edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:15, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused football table. Gonnym (talk) 19:44, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Meant to provide some standard style for a final. 15 years old and unused. Nigej (talk) 20:28, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 20:24, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 20:29, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Stockholmståg color edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:16, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions except within this set of templates. These are rail templates that have been replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Stockholm commuter rail. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:31, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Added an S-line template. Gonnym (talk) 19:36, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:S-line/Tranz Scenic left/Northern Explorer and half a dozen other unused S-line templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:17, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. These are {{S-line}} templates that have been migrated to {{Adjacent stations}} and are no longer needed. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 19:36, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
For the Northern Explorer ones specifically, I think deletion is premature as the service still exists and KiwiRail intends to restart it (unless the template has actually been migrated). pcuser42 (talk) 20:06, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pcuser42 is probably right. I wonder if it might be better to restore the Northern Explorer lines to articles like Paraparaumu railway station but modify the Northern Explorer templates to output "(suspended)" after the line name. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:04, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Adding "suspended" would be a reasonable solution. In addition to this, I think the old Tranz Scenic branded templates could be deleted without issues (as that brand is long dead). pcuser42 (talk) 02:30, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
pcuser42 and Jonesey95 looks like Category:Tranz Scenic templates are duplicates of Category:KiwiRail Scenic templates. I have migrated both to Module:Adjacent stations/KiwiRail Scenic but we can obviously rename the module if that's not correct (or add a module redirect). Frietjes (talk) 17:57, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Roman imperialism edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:18, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox crowded out by {{Ancient Rome topics}}. Perhaps too disparate a group of articles, not clearly related to each other. Half taken up by Roman virtues which links to a section in Virtue. The rest is a collection of ideas and thinkers. Nigej (talk) 17:21, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WCCW Championships edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:18, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox superseded by {{World Class Championship Wrestling}}. Nigej (talk) 17:03, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:S-line/Odakyu left/Tama edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:19, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Additional unused s-line templates. Gonnym (talk) 15:22, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NCAA Division I FCS independent football coach navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:19, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused templates relating to NCAA Division I FCS independent schools of which there is only one left. The content has been removed but they need deleting. No plausible use in the near future. Nigej (talk) 15:21, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Empty navboxes so nothing to use them for. Gonnym (talk) 22:07, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment An editor has added 1 item to each, but the arguments for deletion remain the same. Nigej (talk) 06:13, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete None of these are useful for now. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 22:38, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Navbox LDS Temple Status edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:20, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused documentation template which was used on navboxes which were deleted. Gonnym (talk) 15:08, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:List LDS Temple Africa Map edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 15:02, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused maps after the navboxes they were used on were deleted. Gonnym (talk) 15:02, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Heads of State of the Bahamas edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 15:01, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another navbox with a single link. Celia Homeford (talk) 15:01, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Classic example of a navbox being as a decorative banner. Useless for supposed purpose. Nigej (talk) 15:08, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete there would be a second valid link now (as Barbados became a republic in 2021, and so Sandra Mason is now head of state), but two links isn't enough for a template. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:34, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Heads of State of Grenada edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:59, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Utterly ridiculous. A navbox with a single link is in no imaginable way a navbox. Celia Homeford (talk) 14:59, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Being used as a decorative banner. Useless for its supposed purpose. Nigej (talk) 15:08, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete one link is not enough for a template. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:34, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment between 1979 and 1983, weren't there a succession of heads of state? Why did the communist government keep the queen? -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 04:54, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Drew Pearce edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 14:51, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox. Really only one article about him. 2 films directed, 3 co-writer. - where he already appears in the infobox. Little or no use for navigation. Nigej (talk) 14:50, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the links, they are all valid per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Film#Navigation and 5-6 links is also enough for a navbox. @RayneVanDunem when you add a navbox, place it on its own line. Gonnym (talk) 19:56, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:31, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Navbox is now used and per comments above may be worth keeping. Nigej (talk) 21:30, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Imagemap American libertarians edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:31, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused imagemap. Presumably used at one time in a navbox, rather like the one in {{Conservatism US footer}}. 9 random pictures doesn't help navigation. Nigej (talk) 14:30, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sagami color and other unused rail templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:25, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Appear to have been orphaned after conversion from {{S-line}} to {{Adjacent stations}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:23, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 16:32, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Round/- edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:06, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

unused subtemplate of Template:round, which is now redundant to {{formatnum:{{round|...|...}}|R}}. it was used by {{rndpad}} (also unused) and a couple other templates (like {{scinote}}) before being replaced. Frietjes (talk) 14:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Now unused and replaced with other code. Gonnym (talk) 17:30, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hungary at the FIFA World Cup edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:01, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox with only 1 link, the parent article: Hungary at the FIFA World Cup. There used to be more but they were deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hungary at the 1966 FIFA World Cup and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hungary at the 1978 FIFA World Cup. Nigej (talk) 14:01, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Canadian federal election, 2004/Churchill—Keewatinook Aski edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:37, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused duplicates of {{Canadian federal election, 2004/Churchill}}, {{Canadian federal election, 2000/Churchill}} and {{Canadian federal election, 1997/Churchill}}. Seems from Churchill—Keewatinook Aski that it was simply called "Churchill" until 2015. Nigej (talk) 12:26, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 17:29, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Canadian federal election, 1982/Winnipeg South Centre edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:37, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seemingly created in error as it contains the 1962 result, not 1982. {{Canadian federal election, 1962/Winnipeg South Centre}} was created a short time later with the same content. Nigej (talk) 12:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 17:28, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WDW Monorail color edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:49, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Walt Disney World Monorail templates superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Walt Disney World Monorail. Gonnym (talk) 12:08, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:METRORail color edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:49, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused METRORail templates superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/METRORail. Gonnym (talk) 12:06, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NYCS lines edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:49, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused New York City Subway templates superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/New York City Subway. Gonnym (talk) 12:04, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Novak Djokovic 2010 career timeline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:41, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Novak Djokovic timelines. Gonnym (talk) 11:48, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all This style of timeline is really out of fashion now, and looking at these you can see why. Nigej (talk) 11:59, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per Nigej. --Wolbo (talk) 12:48, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Netural (for now) - Ugh. I remember hating these templates while trying to split the one to fix a mistake that was made. They are ugly and need some improvements in being able to edit and format them as it is tricky. This aside for the moment, I am confused why just these three are nominated. As Category:Novak Djokovic templates shows, there are a total of 11 such timelines. Additionally, they are all linked to in Template:Novak Djokovic. I do hate the templates, but they appear to be used at this time. Is there something specific that I am missing in this? --Super Goku V (talk) 03:50, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    As it says, they're "unused", that's the reason they've been highlighted. Being linked to from another template is not usage. Actually 2010 Novak Djokovic tennis season and 2019 Novak Djokovic tennis season do have timelines hardwired in, so the two here are duplicates. 2020 Novak Djokovic tennis season doesn't have a timeline it seems. The others years are used in similar articles but those are single-use so really should be substituted there, but that's for another day. Nigej (talk) 15:33, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Gotcha. Now that I understand, I would support deleting them. --Super Goku V (talk) 22:28, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Nanoelectronics/styles.css edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:42, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as it was removed from the template in September. Gonnym (talk) 11:44, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Message box/style 2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:42, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused message box template. Gonnym (talk) 11:37, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:MMP by-election box independent lose edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:42, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused election template and no foreseeable usage either as Template:MMP by-election box candidate lose itself is using Template:Election box candidate with party link. Gonnym (talk) 11:34, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:MLS SO table row edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:42, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused table template. Gonnym (talk) 11:27, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Electorates of New Zealand, 2020–2026 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:43, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox. Basically a copy of {{Electorates of New Zealand}} which is used. Might be required after 2026, but surely too early to create now. Nigej (talk) 10:22, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. We have a current and historical. There is no other option. Gonnym (talk) 11:11, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
We do have a bit of series here {{Electorates of New Zealand, 2014–2020}} and 2 others. However, surely when the electorates change in 2027, {{Electorates of New Zealand}} can be renamed and a new one started. Honestly I can't really see the point, as you say I suspect that all we need is current and historical. Nigej (talk) 11:54, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pointless series of templates. The European one had a similar series which was deleted recently. Gonnym (talk) 11:58, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at the transclusions of the "used" templates in the set, it would seem that none of them are actually used at the electorate article and are instead used in other articles which aren't even linked to from these templates. A complete failure here. Gonnym (talk) 12:00, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Black Reel Award for Outstanding Guest Actress in a Drama Series edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:44, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bit of a mess here. 3 templates doing the same thing. {{Black Reel Award for Outstanding Guest Actress, Drama}} which is used and these two which aren't. Also templates in talk pages just to confuse it even more. Category:Black Reel Awards templates is a bit of a disaster area. Many duplicates, templates on talk pages. Nigej (talk) 09:47, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: note that Template:Black Reel Award for Outstanding Guest Actress, Drama and Template:Black Reel Award for Outstanding Guest Actress in a Drama Series are the same, while Template:Black Reel Award for Outstanding Guest Actress, Drama Series is incorrectly titled as the link actually leads to Black Reel Award for Outstanding Supporting Actress, Drama Series for supporting and not guest. Gonnym (talk) 11:14, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
... which is a duplicate of Template:Black Reel Award for Outstanding Supporting Actress, Drama Series. So delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 11:16, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. These are duplicate templates that are unused and not as good as the navboxes they duplicate. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:38, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Badminton at the 2016 Summer Olympics – List of Qualified NOCs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:47, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use article content that need substituting at Badminton at the 2016 Summer Olympics – Qualification#Summary and then deleting. Nigej (talk) 09:30, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Badminton at the 2020 Summer Olympics – Qualification edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:44, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate of Badminton at the 2020 Summer Olympics – Qualification#Qualification summary which has the information inline. Nigej (talk) 09:22, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. This appears to be single-article content that is better to have in the article. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:35, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2022 FIVB Volleyball Women's World Championship qualified teams edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:45, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused out-of-date table. 2022 FIVB Volleyball Women's World Championship qualification#Qualified teams has the up-to-date version. Nigej (talk) 09:08, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2021–22 Premiership Rugby Cup Table edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:45, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blank unused league table. 2021–22 Premiership Rugby Cup doesn't use it and indeed seems to have a radically different format. Nigej (talk) 09:00, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2021–2023 ICC World Test Championship Points Table edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:45, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blank unused league table. 2021–2023 ICC World Test Championship#League table is not using it. Nigej (talk) 08:52, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete not needed. Was probably created by one of those IPL fans that likes creating templates for everything... Joseph2302 (talk) 13:31, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2021 Football Queensland League Table edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:45, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused incomplete league table. Final table exists at 2021 Football Queensland season#Football Queensland Premier League. Nigej (talk) 08:42, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hexafluorides edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was procedural close. ✗plicit 12:45, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already coved in Template:Fluorides. Keres🌕Luna edits! 02:02, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_January_31&oldid=1070532318"