Wikipedia:WikiProject Canadian law

Some Wikipedians have formed a project to better organize information in articles related to Canadian law. This page and its subpages contain their suggestions; it is hoped that this project will help to focus the efforts of other Wikipedians. If you would like to help, please inquire on the talk page and see the to-do list there.

Scope edit

This WikiProject's scope is all areas of Canadian law, from federal constitutional law, to provincial law and municipal bylaws, to expand the amount of information on these laws on Wikipedia. We will also strive to include case law, and various court rulings.

WikiProject Canadian law statistics edit


Index · Statistics · Log

Requests edit

Are you talking about the human rights tribunal case from 1975 regarding Aborginal rights? Unfortunately, given that it's a tribunal case from the 70s, and not a court case, it is not easy to find the text of the article. Perhaps someone with access to the case can write something (if it's noteable)? Otherwise, this request should be removed. Singularity42 (talk) 17:39, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The cases are Haida Nation v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests), [2004] 3 S.C.R. 511 and Taku River Tlingit First Nation v. British Columbia (Project Assessment Director), [2004] 3 S.C.R. 550. They were indeed heard together. Unfortunately, aboriginal law is not my strong suit, but if I have time I'll see if I can at least put a small article together... if someone doesn't beat me to the punch. Singularity42 (talk) 17:39, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There are a number of related cases, from 2002 to 2008. More info required, or this request will have to be removed. Singularity42 (talk) 17:39, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • unceded claims is a POV title, in my estimation, but I was concerned on the Delgamuukw talkpage about the apprent misrepresentation of how it was that BC came to ignore aboriginal claims, which the article currently says was the colony's doing; the provicne's position has always been (until recanted in recent times) that it was one of the consequences of joining Confederation that absolved BC of any responsibility for unresolved claims. Land claims in BC ara separate subject than elsewhere, e.g. in Land claims; not sure what an appropriate title should be i.e. where unceded claims/unceded lands might redirect to; those are buzzpharses from the native polity and carry with them implicitly judgments so they won't do.Skookum1 (talk) 01:57, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fred Quilt case or Fred Quilt investigation. The beating-death of Fred Quilt, a Tsilhqot'in chief, in the early 1970s, was one of the hinge-events galvanizing aborignail reform in British Columbia; largely hushed up now. here is a google for "Fred Quilt"
I believe this request is outside of this project's scope. Your are looking for more of a biographical/historical article versus an article about Canadian law. Consider Wikipedia:WikiProject History of Canada instead. Singularity42 (talk) 17:47, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • BC Legislature Raids needs the legal cases broken off and expanded, especially given the many extraordinary judgments to do with evidence during the preliminary hearings so far, and issue to do with privilege and more....sadly, because of a near-blackout by the major media, most of the online sources for this are in blogspace, althouyg Bill Tielemann has published various articles in The Tyee, The Straight and occasionally in other outlets. Skookum1 (talk) 01:57, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • A number of the judges listed at Template:FederalCourtsOfCanada needs bios written (most are in stub form at the moment). Thanks Sherurcif for putting together such a useful template! Singularity42 (talk) 16:27, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Could someone write an article on Canada's Customs Act? -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 04:29, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have added third party references to the McCarthy Tetrault article page to enhance its validity. It would be great to have external confirmation that these references are suitable. Many thanks! Toogreen (talk) 20:06, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I would like to request a page made on Breach of undertaking or a proper redirect to the appropriate/equivalent charge. CaffeinAddict (talk) 15:53, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've recently added all of the Supreme Court of Canada decisions to Wikidata (https://w.wiki/9qHj). These include connections to CanLII and to the SCC docket (when a docket number is available). I'm in the process of adding how the judgements were made (https://w.wiki/9p8H) to these decisions. I would like to be able to also note who were the interveners in each SCC case in Wikidata. If you are in support of this possibility, please consider my proposal for an intervenor property in Wikidata: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal/Organization#intervener Copystar (talk)

Participants edit

Please add your name to the bottom of the list.

  1. Dyslexic agnostic 20:52, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. OzLawyer 14:41, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. -- Robocoder (talk | contribs) 00:16, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. pbryan 08:30, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Padraic 00:41, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. MBueckert 19:21, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Qyd (talk) 17:24, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Skittleys (talk) 02:45, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Cjilgott (talk) 03:58, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Singularity42 (talk) 16:07, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Bepa (talk) 21:53, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Raellerby (talk) 14:54, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Unavoidable (talk) 22:45, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Wieno (talk) 06:27, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Mkdwtalk 06:19, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Legalremix(talk) 18:38, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  17. /wiae /tlk 14:42, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz, 4:49, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
  19. Graham (talk) 07:25, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. UmpireRay (talk) 01:09, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Sancho 19:26, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  22. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 01:02, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Gaurish.kohli (talk) 23:14, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  24. HollerithPunchCard (talk) 13:51, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  25. CASalt (talk) 03:50, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  26. ReactionEquipment (talk) 20:35, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  27. ShinyObjectsOnly (talk) 21:35, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Copystar (talk) 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Things You Can Do edit

  1. Tag related articles talk pages (at the top) with {{WikiProject Canada| canlaw=yes}}.
  2. Come up with a potential list of missing articles that need to be created.
  3. Re-tag related stub pages with {{Canada-law-stub}}.
  4. Adopt an article: Similar to the Collaboration of the week, but on a smaller scale, you might want to "adopt" an article. This would involve doing the research, writing, and picture-taking (if possible) for either a non-existent article or a stub. Of course, everyone else can still edit an adopted article, and you can work on other things too, but the idea is to find a focus for a while, to try and build up the number of quality articles the Project has produced. Example article: User:Example
  5. Develop common standards and formats for pages on Canadian law.
  6. Expand the number of articles on Canadian law.

Project guidelines and strategy edit

  • /Strategy - future plans for the Canadian law project
  • /Policy - general policy for writing articles related to Canadian law
  • Cleanup discussion

Citation style edit

For case law and legislation, whether mentioned in-text or in a footnote citation, use the post-2010 McGill Guide format (no full-stops). For other material, follow the advice at WP:CITESTYLE. Wikipedia:Citation templates can help produce consistent citation formatting.

Templates edit

Infoboxes edit

Stub templates edit

Talk Page template edit

{{WikiProject Canada|canlaw=yes}} will add the article to both this project and to the general WikiProject Canada. It also allows the article to be assessed. Please add it to all relevant Talk pages.

 Canada: Law NA‑class Mid‑importance
 This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
NAThis article has been rated as NA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
This page is supported by WikiProject Canadian law.

Volunteer recognition edit

  •  
    The Canadian Content Award
    This is for outstanding contributions to Canadian related pages on Wikipedia.


Resources edit

Law edit

  • Baudouin, Jean-Louis; Allen M. Linden (2010), Tort Law in Canada, Wolters Kluwer, ISBN 978-90-411-3373-1
  • Borrows, John (2002), Recovering Canada: the resurgence of Indigenous law, University of Toronto Press, ISBN 0-8020-3679-1
  • Black-Branch, Jonathan L (1995), Making sense of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Canadian Education Association ISBN 978-0-920315-78-1
  • Casey, Brian; Janet Mills (2005), Arbitration law of Canada: practice and procedure, Juris Pub, ISBN 978-1-929446-68-1
  • Greene, Ian (1989),The Charter of Rights, Toronto, James Lorimer and Company, ISBN 978-1-55028-185-9
  • Kronby, Malcolm C (2010), Canadian Family Law (10th ed.), J. Wiley, ISBN 978-0-470-73682-1
  • Dahlitz, Julie (2003). Secession and international law: conflict avoidance – regional appraisals. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press. ISBN 90-6704-142-4.
  • Goldman, Calvin S; John D. Bodrug (2002), Competition Law of Canada, Volume 1, Juris Pub, ISBN 978-1-57823-096-9
  • Morton, Frederick Lee (2002). Law, politics, and the judicial process in Canada. University of Calgary Press. ISBN 1-55238-046-7.
  • McRae, Donald M (2006), The Canadian yearbook of international law, University of British Columbia Press
  • Moon, Richard (2008), Law and religious pluralism in Canada, UBC Press, ISBN 978-0-7748-1497-3
  • Songer, Donald R (2008), The transformation of the Supreme Court of Canada: an empirical examination, University of Toronto Press, ISBN 978-0-8020-9689-0

Crime edit

Wikipedia articles on WikiProject Canadian law edit

Wikipedia namespace and Meta-Wiki articles on WikiProject Canadian law edit

New Wikipedia articles related to WikiProject Canadian law edit

Please feel free to list your new WikiProject Canadian law-related articles here (newer articles at the top, please). Any new articles that have an interesting or unusual fact in them should be suggested for the Did you know? box on the Main Wikipedia page. DYN has a 72 hr. time limit from the creation of the article.

WikiProject Deletion sorting edit

Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting is a new effort that attempts to classify various articles nominated for votes for deletion by major categories. The WikiProject Canadian law-related articles at VFD are listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Canadian law.

WikiProject Canadian law Article alerts edit

Article alerts list this project's articles (and categories) nominated for deletion per WP:AFD, WP:PROD, or WP:CFD. Articles deleted per WP:SD will only show on the project's assessment log.

Wikipedia:Article alerts is wholly dependent on the assignment of the {{WikiProject Canada|canlaw=yes}} as above.

Requested moves

Articles to be split

Related WikiProjects edit

Discussion edit

  • General discussion of this project occurs here.

Descendant WikiProjects edit

No descendant WikiProjects have been defined.

Categories edit

Category Canadian law not found

Tools edit

Main tool page: toolserver.org
  • Reflinks - Edits bare references - adds title/dates etc. to bare references
  • Checklinks - Edit and repair external links
  • Dab solver - Quickly resolve ambiguous links.
  • Peer reviewer - Provides hints and suggestion to improving articles.

Related projects edit

WikiProject Canada  

Provinces/territories
Communities

Wikiproject Watchlist edit