Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a reliable source
This page in a nutshell: Do not use a Wikipedia article as a source for another Wikipedia article.
Wikipedia is not a reliable source
for citations elsewhere on Wikipedia. Because it can be edited by anyone at any time, any information it contains at a particular time could be vandalism
, a work in progress, or just plain wrong. Biographies of living persons
, subjects that happen to be in the news, and politically or culturally contentious topics are especially vulnerable to these issues. Edits on Wikipedia that are in error are usually fixed after some time. However, because Wikipedia is a volunteer-run project, it cannot constantly monitor every contribution. There are many errors that remain unnoticed for hours, days, weeks, months, or even years. Therefore, Wikipedia should not
be considered a definitive source in and of itself.
The same applies to Wikipedia's sister projects
, as well as websites that mirror
it as a source themselves, and printed books
or other material derived primarily or entirely from Wikipedia articles.
- Wikipedia generally uses reliable secondary sources, which vet data from primary sources. If the information on another Wikipedia page (which you want to cite as the source) has a primary or secondary source, you should be able to cite that primary or secondary source and eliminate the middleman (or "middle-page" in this case).
- Always be careful of what you read: it might not be consistently accurate.
- Neither articles on Wikipedia nor websites that mirror Wikipedia can be used as sources, because this is circular sourcing.
- An exception to this is when Wikipedia is being discussed in an article, which may cite an article, guideline, discussion, statistic or other content from Wikipedia or a sister project as a primary source to support a statement about Wikipedia (while avoiding undue emphasis on Wikipedia's role or views, and inappropriate self-reference).
Articles are only as good as the editors
who have been editing them—their interests, education and background—and the efforts they have put into a particular topic or article. Since we try to avoid original research
, a particular article may only be as good as (a) the available and discovered reliable sources
, and (b) the subject matter may allow. Since the vast majority of editors are anonymous, you have only their editing history
and their user pages
as benchmarks. Of course, Wikipedia makes no representation as to their truth. Further, Wikipedia is collaborative by nature, and individual articles may be the work of one or many contributors over varying periods. Articles vary in quality and content, widely and unevenly, and also depending on the quality of sources (and their writers, editors and publishers) that are referenced and/or linked. Circumstances may have changed since the edits were added.
Last edited on 13 April 2021, at 17:37
Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0
unless otherwise noted.