This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
430
MIGRATION
  


A very important transformation has taken place in the proportionate number coming from different countries during the last half of the 19th century. At first the Irish and Germans were most prominent. Of later years, the Italians, Czechs, Hungarians and Russians were, as will be seen from the following table, numerously represented.

Nationality of Immigrants to the United States, 1901–1905.
Number.  %
Austria-Hungary 944,239 25·0
Belgium  16,884  0·44
Bulgaria, Servia and Montenegro      6,637  0·17
Denmark  33,968  0·9
France  31,419  0·8
Germany 176,995  4·6
Greece  49,962  1·3
Holland  18,501  0·48
Italy 959,768 25·0
Norway 103,065  2·7
Portugal  30,532  0·8
Rumania  35,185  0·4
Russia 658,735 17·0
Spain  10,243  0·27
Sweden 154,607  4·0
Switzerland  17,820  0·46
Turkey  10,909  0·3
United Kingdom—
 England 155,343  4·0
 Ireland 184,096  4·8
 Scotland  38,842  1·0
 Wales   6,972  0·18
All other European countries 216  0·006


Total 3,645,018   95

The following table shows the relative number of different nationalities represented in the immigration to the United States:—

Country. 1861–70. 1871–80. 1881–90. 1891–1900.
Great Britain 24·5 16·4 12·5  7·5
Ireland 18·8 15·5 12·5 10·0
Germany 34·0 25·5 27·7 14·0
Austria-Hungary  0·3  2·6  6·7 16·0
Norway and Sweden   4·7  7·5 10·8  8·6
Russia and Poland  0·2  1·9  5·1 14·0
Italy  0·5  2·0  5·9 18·0

Sex and Age.—Of all the immigrants (1871–1895), 61·25% were males and 38·75% were females.

This percentage remains fairly constant, but the proportion differs somewhat among different nationalities. The following table shows the proportions for 1905:—

Males. Females.
Austria-Hungary207,034 77,933
France  5,574 3,889
Germany 21,58615,357
Holland  3,082 1,758
Italy216,26851,273
Russia111,79566,065
Sweden and Norway  29,90718,105
United Kingdom—
 England 29,99318,160
 Ireland 18,75418,890
 Scotland  9,264 5,022

The immigrants were in the most vigorous period of life, few children and few old people, as shown in the following table:—

Ages of Immigrants to the United States, 1881–1890.
Country of
Origin.
Under 15. From 15 to 40. Over 40 years.
Number. Percent. Number. Percent. Number. Percent.
Germany 386,934 26·6 904,002 62·2 162,034 11·2
Ireland  92,308 14·1 515,089 78·6 48,085  7·3
England 151,315 23·5 420,303 65·2 73,062 11·3
Sweden and Norway 104,254 18·3 414,609 73·0 49,499  8·7
Italy  47,603 15·3 212,475 69·2 47,771 15·5
Russia (including Poland)   65,427 24·7 174,754 65·9 24,907  9·4
Austria  50,027 22·1 149,909 66·3 26,109 11·6
Scotland  36,192 24·2 97,819 65·2 15,858 10·6
Hungary  18,785 14·7 95,635 74·9 13,261 10·4

Occupation.—The immigrants are for the most part unskilled labourers. The statistics for the United States show the following figures for the years 1881–1890:—

Occupation of Immigrants to the United States.
Males. Females. Total.
Professional 25,257 1,749 27,006
Skilled 514,552 25,859 540,411
Miscellaneous 1,833,325 245,810 2,079,135
Not stated 73,327 42,830 116,157
Without occupation  759,450 1,724,454 2,483,904
Total  3,205,911  2,040,702  5,246,613

Those “without occupation” are mostly women and children. The “miscellaneous” are day labourers. It is probable that about 20% of the adult males are “skilled.”

Immigration to Other Countries.—In no other country is immigration conducted on so important a scale as in the United States. The statistics are very imperfect. The main figures have already been given in the table of emigration. Australia has an annual immigration of about 250,000, mostly of British origin. This is offset by a very heavy emigration, which sometimes exceeds the immigration in certain of the states. The immigration to Canada for the year 1905 was put down as 146,266, but a portion of this consisted of immigrants passing through to the United States. Brazil has had a large immigration (in 1895 equal to 169,524, but in 1904 only 12,447). The Argentine is credited with an immigration in 1905 of 177,117, and Uruguay with an immigration in 1903 of 6247. In all the South American immigration the countries principally represented are those of southern Europe, especially Italy. The majority of the immigrants are adult males and farm labourers.

Balance of Emigration and Immigration.—Even in the case of emigration from Europe to countries beyond the seas there is some return movement. Emigrants who have been successful in business return in order to end their days in the old country. Those who have not succeeded return in order to be cared for by friends and relatives, or simply from home-sickness. Thus, for Great Britain and Ireland, while the emigration of persons of British and Irish origin was, in 1905, 262,077, the immigration of persons of the same category was 122,712, leaving a net emigration of only 139,365. In the United States’ statistics we cannot distinguish in the outgoing passenger movement emigrants from other persons. But if for a period of years we take the total inward passenger movement and subtract from it the total outward passenger movement, we ought to have the net immigration. By this method we arrive at the conclusion that while the gross immigration during the five years 1901–1905 was 3,833,076, the net immigration was only 1,779,976, showing an outward movement of 273,134, or about 7·12% of the total number of immigrants.

Temporary Emigration.—In many European countries there is not only emigration beyond seas, but a very considerable movement to neighbouring countries in search of work, and generally with the intention of returning. Thus in Italy, the “permanent” emigration (i.e. to countries beyond seas) numbered, in 1905, 447,083; the “temporary” emigration to European or Mediterranean countries amounted to 279,248. This temporary emigration is strongest in the spring, and consists principally of adult males (agriculturists, farm and day labourers, bricklayers and masons) in search of work. It resembles somewhat the movement of Irish labourers into Great Britain at harvest time. It is notorious that the Italians who emigrate to the United States largely return.

Effects of Emigration.—There are two views with regard to emigration: one unfavourable, viz., that it is a drain on population, reducing its economic strength and disturbing social and political relations; the second looking upon it as a relief from over-population and a congested labour market. As a matter of fact, emigration has not succeeded in diminishing the population of Europe, which, on the contrary, doubled during the 19th century. The one great exception is Ireland, where population declined from 8,175,124 in 1841 to 4,458,745 in 1901. From 1851 to 1901 the total emigration from Ireland was 3,881,246 or 72·5% of the average population. Emigration, by carrying off the young men and women, also reduced the Irish marriage and birth-rates, which were almost the lowest in Europe. But hitherto the countries of strongest emigration (England, Germany, &c.) have shown practically undiminished birth and marriage-rates and a steady growth in population.

The intensity of emigration is measured not by the absolute number of emigrants, but by the number of emigrants to the total population. Its, effect is shown by comparing the number of emigrants with the excess of births over deaths per 1000 of the

population. This is shown in the following table (1905):—