Search results

deletion policy that describes how we delete things by consensus Wikipedia:Deletion process – our guidelines on how to list anything for deletion Wikipedia:Guide...

that non-admins may make are detailed at Wikipedia:Deletion process#Non-administrators closing discussions. For a result of "keep", this procedure differs...

Shortcut WP:ADD Discussions are only listed here when it's removed from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old. See Wikipedia:Deletion process for the preferred...

Wikipedia:Category deletion policy#Normal closure Wikipedia:Deletion process#Categories for Discussion page Template:Cfduserend may optionally be placed...

result of the discussion was retarget to XFD. signed, Rosguill talk 05:49, 21 May 2020 (UTC) XfD → Wikipedia:Deletion process#Deletion discussions  (talk ·...

Retarget to Wikipedia:Deletion process per Thryduulf. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 19:51, 15 January 2019 (UTC) Retarget to Wikipedia:Deletion process. Rubbish...

What I cited is exactly Wikipedia:Deletion process which is not an essay, it is a guideline. If you want to close discussions not eligible for NACs, and...

thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, FASTILY 00:04, 8 December 2020 (UTC) As Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting...

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:11, 15 January 2019 (UTC) Wikipedia:Votes for keep → Wikipedia:Deletion process  (talk · links ·...

was VfD -- votes for deletion , so this is commentary about the Wikipedia deletion process in the form of a redirect. (like WP:DRAMA used to [1] about WP:AN)...

more willing to assume good faith in any future interactions that you may have. Wikipedia:Deletion process#Early closure Wikipedia:Clean up your own mess...

should be made to this section. The result of the discussion was retarget to Wikipedia:Deletion process#Early closure. -- Tavix (talk) 21:35, 19 February...

June 2018 (UTC) Apparently you disagree with Wikipedia:Deletion_process#Non-administrators_closing_discussions but it is inappropriate to bypass this guideline...

consensus" closure would be better at this point. Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions states that "if the closer feels there has been substantive...

(talk) 13:42, 21 June 2008 (UTC) May I suggest a retarget to Wikipedia:Deletion_process#Articles_for_Deletion_page? That's the instructions on how to...

Suggestion - how about making it Category:Wikipedia deletion process with main article Wikipedia:Deletion process? Occuli (talk) 14:47, 3 June 2009 (UTC)...

Transferred from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ANAPROF 1988 per Wikipedia:Deletion_process#Procedural_closure. czar ⨹ 20:04, 18 December 2014 (UTC) Comment...

fullfilled in discussion of this redirect. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 19:42, 9 August 2014 (UTC) Comment  Wikipedia:Deletion process states, "Never...

(talk) 19:32, 30 May 2009 (UTC) The original proposal was Category:Wikipedia deletion process — obviously having the word "deletion" in it. I am unaware of...

faith" and "vandalism". --Farix (Talk) 01:41, 18 August 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia:Deletion process. Vegaswikian (talk) 04:25, 18 August 2009 (UTC) There is nothing...

thousands of articles it appears on. See this Wikipedia:Deletion_process#Non-Administrators_closing_discussions--Crossmr 22:04, 1 July 2006 (UTC) Comment...

but only by using one of two methods listed at Wikipedia:Deletion process#Redirects for Discussion page. I recommend this one: "Another option, useful...

replaced by {{oldafdfull}} many months ago (2005-09-02). See Wikipedia:Deletion process. Likewise, {{oldcfd}} was replaced by {{cfdend}} (2005-10-14)...

Feb 9, 2005 (UTC) Delete. Intended usage does not conform to Wikipedia:deletion process. Admin doing the deletion needs to do independent check for consensus...

should have read the section Redirects for Discussion page at Wikipedia:Deletion process, which states "Sometimes a redirect has history, and the history...

No WikiProject, no matter its self-importance, can supersede Wikipedia deletion process. — Dan | Talk 20:27, May 25, 2005 (UTC) That's not Wikipedia policy...

template closed the TfD. According to Wikipedia:Deletion process this shouldn't happen- People should not close discussions in which they have been involved...

11:09, 20 July 2006 (UTC) Delete. According to Wikipedia:Deletion process, admins should close discussions that result in delete - I see that as just common...

FYI  – Pointer to relevant discussion elsewhere. Please see Wikipedia talk:Templates for discussion#RfC: Proposal to make TfD more RM-like, as a clearinghouse...

from orientation to Wikipedia:Deletion process#No quorum. Q𝟤𝟪 21:23, 24 May 2023 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus...

the discussion may be closed at the closer's discretion and best judgement. Common options include, but are not limited to: relisting the discussion. closing...

--William Allen Simpson 15:29, 17 April 2006 (UTC) Noticed that the Wikipedia:Deletion process still had references to moving to the old log, so I updated it...

we can fix. John Reid 21:07, 17 April 2006 (UTC) Please read Wikipedia:Deletion process. That's very well documented tradition, since 2005-01-05 16:55:24...

As far as I know, any editor can close the discussions, the directions are in Wikipedia:Deletion process. You just need to move anything other then keep...

--William Allen Simpson 04:19, 31 January 2006 (UTC) According to Wikipedia:Deletion process non-admins can onlty close uncotriversial Keeps. But if it is...

instructions on this page and the instructions at Wikipedia:Deletion process. Please contribute to the discussion there if you are interested. —Bkell (talk)...

2018 (UTC) I don't know why you're asking here. It's covered at Wikipedia:Deletion process#Deletion review. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 09:15, 21 December 2018...

(UTC) The last paragraph of Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions currently reads: When relisting a discussion, it should be removed from the...

at Wikipedia:Deletion_process#Non-administrators_closing_discussions. The CfD details are at Wikipedia:Deletion_process#Categories_for_Discussion_page...

my opinion due to this: From Wikipedia:Deletion process#Categories for Discussion page {emphasis added): "If the discussion failed to reach consensus, then...

so is better handled at a global page. The RFD banner links to Wikipedia:Deletion process which has a section that discuss the topic, but does not use the...

WP:CFDAI and Wikipedia:Deletion process that I'd helped write back in 2006. Checking, WP:CFDAI was copied from Wikipedia:Deletion process in 2008, so it's...

However, there's a qualifier on TexasAndroid above, there are Wikipedia:Deletion process strict rules about what a non-administrator can close, although...

July 2021 (UTC) I added one word "deletion" to WP:WITHDRAWN at Wikipedia:Deletion process#Early closure to aid those like me who reached there via the shortcut...

deletion. Rossami (talk) 07:25, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC) You changed Wikipedia:Deletion process to say that on the 5th. While I don't disagree with it, why are...

shouldn't be made a summary of prospective content at a page like Wikipedia:Deletion process and other policy and guideline pages (perhaps even a new page)...

supplement to the project pages on Wikipedia:Deletion policy, Wikipedia:Deletion process, Wikipedia:Guide to deletion (see, e.g., Wikipedia:Guide_to_d...

information from this article has been merged to Wikipedia:Deletion process, per consensus at the Merge discussion. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:29, 26 January...