Talk:Bleach (manga): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
+ annual report
FACBot (talk | contribs)
Merge old peer review into article history
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Vital article|class=C|level=5|link=Wikipedia:Vital articles/Level/5/Arts|anchor=Manga (21 articles)}}
{{Vital article|class=C|level=5|link=Wikipedia:Vital articles/Level/5/Arts|anchor=Manga (21 articles)}}
{{oldpeerreview|archive=1}}
{{Skip to talk}}
{{Skip to talk}}
{{talk header}}
{{talk header}}
Line 17: Line 16:
|action1result=Listed
|action1result=Listed
|action1oldid=128739082
|action1oldid=128739082

|action2=GAR
|action2=GAR
|action2date=18:20, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
|action2date=18:20, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Line 23: Line 21:
|action2result=listed
|action2result=listed
|action2oldid=211495568
|action2oldid=211495568

|action3=GAR
|action3=GAR
|action3date=11:14, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
|action3date=11:14, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
Line 29: Line 26:
|action3result=delisted
|action3result=delisted
|action3oldid=214385387
|action3oldid=214385387

|action4=GAN
|action4=GAN
|action4date=04:19, 3 December 2010
|action4date=04:19, 3 December 2010
Line 35: Line 31:
|action4result=not listed
|action4result=not listed
|action4oldid=400133958
|action4oldid=400133958
|action5=PR

|action5date=09:30:19 11 July 2014 (UTC)
|topic=Langlit
|action5link=Wikipedia:Peer review/Bleach (manga)/archive1
|action5oldid=1026023625
|action5result=reviewed
|currentstatus=DGA
|currentstatus=DGA
|topic=Langlit
}}
}}
{{WikiProject Anime and manga
{{WikiProject Anime and manga

Revision as of 06:18, 1 June 2021

Template:Vital article

Former good articleBleach (manga) was one of the Language and literature good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 7, 2007Good article nomineeListed
May 10, 2008Good article reassessmentListed
May 26, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
December 3, 2010Good article nomineeNot listed
July 11, 2014Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Delisted good article
WikiProject iconAnime and manga: Bleach C‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Bleach work group.
Note icon
This article has been featured on the Anime and manga portal.
This is a summary of our archived standardization topics for the Bleach (manga) article, originated by tjstrf and with additional compilation from Dekimasu. Although consensus can change, please consider these points when adding information to Bleach-related articles.
  • In titling, we use Bleach (manga), not Bleach (series), Bleach (anime) or BLEACH.
  • We are using the English naming conventions for characters (given name first).
  • Quincy, Bount and Soul Society are capitalized, but we do not capitalize most other terms (hollow, plus, zanpakutō, etc.).
  • It's lieutenant, not vice-captain; the onmitsukidō is to be referred to as "special forces"; demon arts has been superseded by kidō, since all versions of the series use the Japanese term; Soul Reaper is preferred to shinigami.
  • The main characters on the page are listed in the order of their appearance.
  • Correct character spellings include Bount (pl. Bounts), Visored (pl. Visoreds), Yammy, Luppi, and Kuroud.
  • We refer to "artificial souls" rather than "modified souls" in order to incorporate all manufactured souls.

New Bleach anime is not confirmed to be new television series

An anime project was announced, but it was not made clear that it would be a TV series or a film. You're making the same mistake made for the Code Geass: Lelouch of the Re;surrection and the Sailor Moon Eternal movies by automatically assuming its going to be a new television anime. monstersandcritics is clearly an unreliable source that has misinterpreted the news; it didn't even bother to cite its own sources. MarcoPolo250 (talk) 14:11, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why would they make a movie for such a broad storyline such as the "Quincy Holy War".It will be an anime series.I think it's the most logical decision if they wanna secure the bag💰 Mlambo2122 (talk) 14:35, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:56, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]