Wikipedia:Help desk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 331dot (talk | contribs) at 13:40, 9 March 2019 (→‎User registered vandal with puppet accounts: re). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

    Welcome—ask questions about how to use or edit Wikipedia! (Am I in the right place?)

    March 6

    Recreating a deleted page for disambiguation

    I'd like to create a disambiguation page from Shriving (and Shrove) to link to Shrovetide, Shrove Monday, and Shrove Tuesday. However, I'm doubtful about doing so because a similar page already existed and was deleted in 2018. I don't have a plan to overcome its shortcomings because I don't think the old version had any shortcomings except for lacking the {{disambiguation}} template. For some reason the deletion discussion didn't consider its usefulness as a disambiguation page and discussed only its lack of promise as an article. Should I just be bold and recreate it? Krubo (talk) 00:18, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    A disambiguation page is meant to list articles that use the exact term but in different contexts/meanings (i.e., "may refer to..."). Would you say that "Shrove" can be construed as "referring to" Shrove Monday/Tuesday/Sunday /Shrovetide (on all of which we've got articles) - or is just contextually related? In the latter case, I don't think a disambiguation page is indicated. The lede of Shrovetide already does seem to do the job of linking all of these up. - By my assessment, a redirect from both Shrove and Shriving to Shrovetide would be handy though. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 02:58, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    That makes sense to see Shrovetide as the article that can tie all the terms together. I'll go ahead and redirect Shrove to Shrovetide. I won't touch Shriving for now since its relationship to the other terms is less obvious. Krubo (talk) 07:44, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Agree, "shriving" (going to confession, receiving absolution) doesn't relate only to a particular time of year and calls for a separate article. The deletion discussion linked above gives some pointers: Bhunacat10 (talk), 10:15, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Uploading a picture

    Hi there, I find this all very confusing. How do I prove when I upload a picture that I have taken myself please?Missmadameclaude (talk) 03:15, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Missmadameclaude for photos you took yourself you can use commons uploader; it will ask you if it's your own photo. You'll have to register, but it's easy, fast, and free. valereee (talk) 11:06, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Katherine Dettwyler - notability

    Someone has recently added a tag disputing the notability of Katherine Ann Dettwyler. The Talk page says that a proposal to delete was in fact rejected back in 2007 with a consensus to Keep – but there is no link to the archived deletion discussion, which I had to search out manually. How do I wikify the template on the Talk page so that the sentence "The result of the discussion was Keep" is linked to the pertinent deletion discussion? Muzilon (talk) 08:18, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    @Muzilon: The box is generated by {{Old AfD multi}} and needs to be amended by the page= parameter. I fixed it. Regards SoWhy 08:36, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Is there a reason why my quoting the source the website: aalt.law.uh.edu is unacceptable?

    Is there a reason why my quoting the source the website: aalt.law.uh.edu is unacceptable? — Preceding unsigned comment added by RosemaryHSimons (talkcontribs) 10:34, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    No idea, RosemaryHSimons. But it would help if you would indicate what you are trying to do, and what happened to make you ask if it is unacceptable. --ColinFine (talk) 10:43, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    What policies wiki-en has about politicians in the US?

    Hi! I just read some news about Margareth Shepard. Apparently she is the first Brazilian to be elected to a political office in the United States, in the city council of Framingham. I'm not sure how relevant this is for wiki-en. I would try to find relevant information about her like any other politician. User:Tetizeraz. Send me a ✉️ ! 12:07, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    The English Wikipedia covers anything and everything that reliable sources have discussed in enough depth. There is a special guideline for politicians, with a specific allowance for local politicians with a lot of media coverage. If you can find enough reliable sources (that don't treat the subject in a WP:Routine manner) for an article, be bold and create it! The first Brazilian elected to public office in the US sounds like a very interesting article topic. – Teratix 12:22, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Family Picture deleted

    Can I ask why? I uploaded a picture of my great grandfather, a family pic I own and it was removed.  :( — Preceding unsigned comment added by KimMouse (talkcontribs) 14:10, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    @KimMouse: You uploaded it at commons:File:PhilipKeeper.jpg and it was deleted at commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:PhilipKeeper.jpg. I cannot see deleted Commons files or which information was given about them. This is an issue for Commons and not the English Wikipedia. You didn't answer when the photo was created. This is important for the copyright status. Make an estimate if you are uncertain. PrimeHunter (talk) 14:25, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Mainly, we need to know who made the photo. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:11, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Commons have a template for inherited images commons:Template:PD-heirs, you will still need to provide as much info on where the picture came from. MilborneOne (talk) 19:37, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi there, 1 need to update a logo on our wikipedia page. How do I do this?

    Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CreativeRaleys (talkcontribs) 17:22, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    CreativeRaleys, it would help if you were to point out which article you're referring to. †dismas†|(talk) 17:36, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • @CreativeRaleys: First of all, if you are doing that as part of your job duties, see that link and make the appropriate disclosure.
    Have a look at our guideline about logos (short version: except if the logo is simple enough not to be eligible to copyright, it must be uploaded only as a low-resolution raster image) and come back if you have any questions. TigraanClick here to contact me 17:40, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm assuming that you are attempting to work on Raley's Supermarkets along with Kbuffalino. There are a lot of problems here which you must address before editing further. First, the username "CreativeRaleys" suggests that it is not a personal username but a corporate one. All usernames must be personal and used by one person only, see our policy on usernames. Next, both "CreativeRaleys" and "Kbuffalino" look like employee accounts. If so you must comply with our conflict of interest policy and our paid-contribution disclosure. Once that is sorted out you should generally request another editor to make the change by explaining what is needed on the talk page. Finally, you do not have "our wikipedia page". If the page belongs to anyone it is the community and the Wikimedia Foundation. Wikipedia has a page describing you. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 17:52, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Recent discussion about getting rid of the Wikipedia Reference Desks

    There was a (relatively) recent discussion about getting rid of the Wikipedia Reference Desks. It started around Christmas time, and it dragged on for a good month or two. I assume it has been closed by now. Where can I find that link? Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 18:35, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    @Joseph A. Spadaro: There have been a few. This is a recent one: Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)/Indefinitely_semiprotecting_the_refdesk. The one before that is Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)/RfC:_Should_the_Reference_Desks_be_closed. You can search the archives at WP:VP for others. RudolfRed (talk) 18:42, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    @RudolfRed: Thanks. That is what I was looking for. Thank you. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 15:21, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Moving files

    Hi there. I uploaded a movie poster with the name, Dishdogz (2006) Film poster.jpg. However, I just now found out that the film was, actually, released in 2005 and the file should be named File:Dishdogz (2005) Film poster.jpg. I tried to move it to fix my own mistake, but I don't have the right to do so. I don't know where or how to request its move, either. If someone could help me I would appreciate it.--SirEdimon (talk) 19:58, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Look at WP:FFR. There is a tag you can add to the file and a user with permissions will move it. RudolfRed (talk) 20:09, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    @SirEdimon: fixing bad ping. RudolfRed (talk) 20:10, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    @RudolfRed: I get it. Thank you for your help.--SirEdimon (talk) 20:27, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    SirEdimon, I've moved the page without a redirect Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:58, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Jimfbleak Thank you.--SirEdimon (talk) 18:39, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    2019 NCAA Division I FBS football season

    There are 3 Categories that have been still red and they need to turn to blue now The 2019 C-USA football season article. The 2019 Mountain West Conference Football Schedule. and The 2019 Sun Belt Conference football schedule for the past month it has been doing nothing. 68.103.78.155 (talk) 21:36, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Images published in 1923 now in public domain?

    I have seen several articles such as this one about material published in 1923 entering the public domain as of January 1, 2019. I noticed, however, that the Upload Wizard at Wikimedia Commons still has "First published before 1923" under the heading "The copyright has definitely expired in the USA". Does the recent change not apply to images uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, or has the Upload Wizard just not been updated to reflect the change? Eddie Blick (talk) 22:28, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    The wizard has a "Leave feedback" link to commons:Commons:Upload Wizard feedback. The issue has been reported at commons:Commons:Upload Wizard feedback#Change "before 1923" to "before 1924". But I don't know whether the page is read by anyone who works on the code. It may have more effect to report at Phabricator with the "Report a bug" link in the infobox at mw:Extension:UploadWizard. PrimeHunter (talk) 02:52, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks, PrimeHunter. I didn't know about that option. I will try using that page and see what happens. I appreciate your help. Eddie Blick (talk) 16:03, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Usage of Google My Maps in a wikipedia article

    Visualization of history associated with a geographical large area entry can sometimes be useful in the body of an article (or as a reference). For instance, check https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_Northwest and the "Early Settlements" subsection (under History section). A number of important locations are cited. It would be most useful to include a map showing these locations of interest via a powerful tool such as Google My Maps (and even allow further visualization of the historical data via the map). Check https://www.google.com/maps/d/view?mid=14M4ikDB2SSJSNIqTjuvqbQwtwOuYkFxA&ll=49.21753099599351%2C-125&z=5 Can such a Google My Maps link be included? Or just a screen snapshot (with URL link embedded if further clicked)? Or nothing?

    Otherwise stated, what are the restrictions (if any) in the usage of Google My Maps in wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeCanardQuoi (talkcontribs) 23:02, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    I believe a screenshot would not be possible. Google maps content is all copyrighted, and there is no reasonable way to claim fair use in Wikipedia articles. A link might be permissible per both there terms of use and Wikipedia's. Better is to have our own free maps hosted on commons, there are number of tools over there for creating maps. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:30, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    LeCanardQuoi (talk) 05:49, 7 March 2019 (UTC) @Beeblebrox THanks for your comment. Wikipedia article link validation does not accept special characters used by Google My Maps. Nor tinyurl links. Wikipedia:WikiProject Maps does not say anything about Google My Maps usage. Does not look promising.[reply]

    @LeCanardQuoi: Let's take a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Maps. I haven't read it yet. -Arch dude (talk) 02:39, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    please help - publisher for ref number 9 is wrong. I cannot get it right. Sorry Srbernadette (talk) 23:10, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    I formatted the citation using the Google book citation tool. MB 23:55, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Rowspan behavior

    I recently added a table to Joe Taufeteʻe, but can't seem to get the last entry to span all three rows of table like I want to. Your assistance is appreciated! ebbillings (talk) 23:33, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    @Ebbillings: class=sortable apparently has issues if the last row has both rowspan and a header cell. One solution is to add an invisible row at the end with | colspan=8 style="display:none;" |. PrimeHunter (talk) 01:17, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


    March 7

    Referencing plot summaries

    I'm watching the Star Trek: The Next Generation episode "Force of Nature" and looked up the article. I notice that every paragraph of the plot summary is tagged with 'Citation needed'. What reference can be used for a plot summary? Can the episode itself not be the reference? †dismas†|(talk) 00:20, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction#Plot summaries of individual works says: "Because works of fiction are primary sources in their articles, basic descriptions of their plots are acceptable without reference to an outside source. References should be provided if a plot point is ambiguous (e.g. Gaston's fate in Beauty and the Beast)." PrimeHunter (talk) 00:58, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    @Dismas: All removed. Thanks for the heads up. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 01:09, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Can't find space in template

    If you go to Beacon Falls, Connecticut#Demographics, you'll see that there's a space between the estimated 2016 population and its citation. If you look at {{US Census population}} you'll see that there's no space between the estimate= and estref= parameters. How does one eliminate the space? If you're not an admin, you can still make this change by going to Template:US Census population/sandbox; if you make a workable fix and can't transfer it to the template yourself, let me know and I'll do it. Nyttend (talk) 03:12, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    There is no space character but estimate and estref are in different cells. Is there a reason for that? Several things can contribute to spacing between content in different cells. The simplest solution seems to be moving them to the same cell. PrimeHunter (talk) 04:19, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Creating a new Wikipedia page

    We are trying to create a new Wikipedia page but unable to find the link here we can update all the information about the Company article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MobiGarage (talkcontribs) 06:31, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    This user has been blocked. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:26, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Kelly

    There is an article on Mandarin profanity. It includes an image which I tried to edit, but failed. It refers to a pair of hanzi which it translates as 'Kelly = bad egg'. The real characters in pinyin are 'huài dàn', nothing whatsoever to do with my family name. I consider this as an intended insult and wish it corrected or removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.145.183.75 (talk) 13:18, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    On the assumption that this relates to Mandarin Chinese profanity (please provide a link to pages you wish to discuss), there is an image of the Chinese characters, which the page interprets as 'huài dàn'. However I was unable to see where 'Kelly' is mentioned. Please clarify. Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~). Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 13:36, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Apologies Mr or Ms Kelly: this was a piece of vandalism introduced into Mandarin Chinese profanity on 29 December last year, and corrected in this edit on 14 February. Most vandalism gets noticed pretty quickly, but this one took several weeks to correct. However, if you are still seeing it, I think you must be looking at an old version of the article for some reason. --ColinFine (talk) 16:04, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    To see the current version of a Wikipedia article, access it by way of the Wikipedia website, rather than through a "mirror" site.--Quisqualis (talk) 02:53, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    How to Create My Personal Collection of Articles?

    Feeling a bit dumb as I searched a lot. Sorry, but did not find the answer. Thus, could you please point me to the right place to find out how a registered user can create her own collection of Wikipedia articles seen only by the registered user herself and not by other users. Looking for online and internal Wikipedia solution, only (meaning: I do not need to download and PDF's are not necessary). Hope, I have phrased my q clearly enough.  :)

    If such a solution exists, is it also possible to make personal categories for those articles (areas of interest)?

    Thank you.

    br,

    Marko — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.181.57.113 (talk) 13:38, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Not possible, all articles posted here are viewable by everyone, registered or not Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:49, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    English is not my mother tongue and I was not able to formulate my q correctly. I do not want to hide any articles. I want to make a personal Wikipedia article collection that I can return to at will for rereading purposes. I other words I would like to Save some articles OR in other words create a list of articles that I deem personally important, so that I can find them again easily. I do not know, what word to use to accurately from your point of view to describe, what I want to accomplish. From my poin ot view I would like to create a permanent view to certain articles I like. I hope I am more clear now.  :)

    br,

    Marko Finland — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.181.57.113 (talk) 13:55, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi Marko, welcome to the Teahouse! If you want a certain group of articles available for easy access, couldn't you just bookmark all such articles within a folder on your browser? (Oh, this isn't the Teahouse? My bad.) Bus stop (talk) 13:59, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    As a registered User you could also create a list of such articles on your User page. This would allow for easy and permanent access. (Disregard my first suggestion. As this is a better suggestion.) Bus stop (talk) 14:02, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Hey, Marko! You can do that at your userpage, but I'd suggest creating an account. I'll put instructions on the IP's talk page here . valereee (talk) 14:03, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Or use the Books extension, which is designed for this exact purpose. Yunshui  14:04, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi,

    I am a registered user. So there is this article (Ipso facto - in English) that I would like to "save". 1) Books extension seems to be under renovation at the moment from what I read in the page linked to in the answer above. 2) I do not see "a user page" when I go to this article "Ipso facto". I am loged in Wikipedia with my user name. 3) The user talk page that was kindly provided by you, did not have links to the info I am looking for. I followed some of the links further and arrived to different types of tutorial pages to no avail. Sorry, but could you help me further? Where is this user page? Cn you give me a link or something? I tried to find the userpage (as you suggested that as a solution) as I was reading the Ipso fact article and was not successful.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mheikin (talkcontribs) 14:17, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    @Mheikin: I've created your user page for you. Feel free to change it around as you need. There's also a basic welcoming message on your talk page. I seriously suggest you spend some time browsing the links, it will pay off by making your work easier. Regards, Martin of Sheffield (talk) 14:30, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Thank you for creating the User Page for me. I was not able to come up with that solution myself. I understand that there is a strong preference in self help and thus your recommendation is fine. I tried to follow your recommendation before contacting this page to the point it became futile. My observation is that finding a solution to the problem (a common one, I suspect) I described in my question is difficult. Thus I recommend making some additions to FAQ's and Tutorials as regards the topic of this discussion. Thank you for your help! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mheikin (talkcontribs) 15:05, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Mheikin, WP is very overwhelming at first. One of best tips anyone gave me was to search for help by searching in the "Search Wikipedia" box at the top using WP:search term. Over the years people have set up a lot of redirects that help with finding stuff. For instance, searching WP:user page will bring up ten different suggested help or guidelines pages. valereee (talk) 16:35, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Mheikin There once was a tool such as you describe. It was called "Gather", however development was shut down while it was still in beta testing. See this RFC, and this page on MediaWiki about Gather. It looks like the software developers are currently working on a similar concept for "reading lists". See this discussion on "reading lists", and this page on MediaWiki. In the meantime though, you've found your userpage and it should work well enough for your purposes. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 16:35, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Mheikin There is unlikely to be a place within Wikipedia where you can keep a truly private list. However, You can create such a list on your own computer in a file of links to URLs at Wikipedia. Depending on your browser and your skill level, there are several ways to do this. I personally use SeaMonkey Composer to create my local HTML pages, but you can use a simple text editor to build a minimal HTML file with a list of URLs. After you build the file, open it with your browser, then just click on the links as you need them. Alternatively, some browsers let you build a hierarchy of bookmarks. Build your list in a bookmark subfolder.-Arch dude (talk) 17:58, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    non-free fair use question

    I've been working on Ten Talents (cookbook), which has a non-free image of the current edition's cover. The earlier editions show an interesting progression in the cover art. Would including the two covers used for previous editions be acceptable under free-use policies? I wasn't sure how to interpret 'minimal' in this case. Thanks for any help! --valereee (talk) 16:30, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    I'm inclined to think your best bet for a well-informed answer to this would be to post it again at Wikipedia:IMAGEHELP. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:51, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    I fear that unless you can find reliable sources which specifically discuss the evolution of the cover art at some length, such non-free image use would not qualify as fair use. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:53, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you both! valereee (talk) 09:40, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    March 8

    recent changes

    The definition, "Left-wing" Politics, is inaccurate. It states left-wing supports social equality, and that is not a truth. Look at the behavior today. I wish to have the definition changed to match the "real" behavior. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.15.25.60 (talk) 01:25, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikipedia is based on reliable sources, not your own opinions. If you can find enough credible sources supporting your changes, you are welcome to start a discussion on Talk:Left-wing politics. – Teratix 01:31, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Just look — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.15.25.60 (talk) 01:38, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Looked. Follow what Teratix mentions above. Thanks, Lourdes 08:37, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Adding a photo

    Hello. I would like to add a historical photo. How can I do this? Thank you, Peter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Strafrag (talkcontribs) 12:42, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello @Strafrag:, the basics are as follows:
    To use an image on Wikipedia, follow these steps:
    1. Ascertain carefully the copyright status of the image. If in doubt, ask. As a rule of thumb, images that you did not take yourself are almost always under copyright, and images that you took can be released under a free license.
    2. If the image is in the public domain, or under a free license compatible with Wikimedia Commons' license requirements, or if you hold the copyrights and are willing to release the image under such a license, upload it on Wikimedia Commons using the Upload Wizard.
    3. If the image is neither public domain nor available under a free license, check whether it satisfies all non-free content criteria. In particular, photographs of living people almost never qualify. If it does not, it cannot be used on Wikipedia; do not upload it. If it does, upload it on Wikipedia (not on Wikimedia Commons).
    4. Once the image has been uploaded to the Wikimedia Foundation's servers (either to Commons or Wikipedia), follow the steps in the picture tutorial to place the image in an article.
    But please feel free to ask here again, if you have any further specific questions. WP:Media copyright questions is also a good forum, if you are unsure about the copyright status of a specific image or have other copyright-related questions. GermanJoe (talk) 12:46, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Change Page name

    Hello, the Museum I work for has recently rebranded and we would therefore like to update our Wikipedia listing by changing the name on the landing page. I don't seem to have the capacity to do it myself, can anyone help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joe Faretra (talkcontribs) 13:50, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi Joe, there are a number of points you need to be aware of:
    • You don't have "our Wikipedia listing", Wikipedia has a page about you. You have no more control over the page than any other editor.
    • Before editing further you must read, understand and apply the following policies: WP:COI and WP:PAID.
    • Because you have done so little in Wikipedia (3 edits including the above) you have not yet reached "Autoconfirmed" status and have restricted rights. This is to protect the encyclopedia against people creating an account purely for vandalism (not in your case of course).
    Once you have set up the required disclosures for COI and PAID, then the correct course of action is to request changes on the article's talk page. An uninvolved editor can then review the changes and implement them. Please don't try to cheat or "game" the system; it leads to unpleasantness whereas following the correct procedures makes life easy for all. Regards, Martin of Sheffield (talk) 15:16, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Also, we are not here to support your re-branding. We are here to provide reliable information. If your museum is still known primarily by its old name, the article name should not change yet. Once your new name is in common use, the article name can change. This may not be important in this case. -Arch dude (talk) 15:28, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Reliable source

    Hello, I wondered if this website would be considered as a reliable source for a biography. Transdiffusion's stuff does get used for television programme related articles, but I'm less sure about a biography. The subject doesn't currently have an article on Wikipedia, but I feel that as an early female television producer she would be notable enough for one. I know we have WP:RSN for stuff like this but that seems to deal with existing articles and existing sources. Thanks in advance, This is Paul (talk) 15:04, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    TV Times certainly had a good reputation so I would assume reliability. I'd be careful with the Dennis Vance issue though unless you can find corroborating evidence. Both appear to be dead, so WP:BLP isn't an issue except where it touches on living people (like the daughter). I'd certainly feel she was notable. Quite apart from the attack her achievements seem pretty significant. Just my 2d worth though, Martin of Sheffield (talk) 15:31, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Article improvement tagging

    Is there any way to get a list of articles that I have created that have been tagged for improvement so that I can work on improving them? Adamtt9 (talk) 19:56, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    For cleanup tags there is Category:Articles needing cleanup. Does this help? RJFJR (talk) 22:26, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    @RJFJR: I was kind of hoping for a list that would be exclusively articles that I created. Adamtt9 (talk) 23:31, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Do you know how many articles you have created? Is is a number low enough that you can compare that list against the list mentioned above? If not, then surely there is another editor whom you can enlist to assist you in locating the articles. Someone with whom you have edited in your area of interest? As articles are not "owned", that may explain why your quest is not automated.--Quisqualis (talk) 01:55, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Lol no. I have created around 2500 articles though a user has recently started tagging some of them as under-referenced. I was just wondering if there was an easy way to determine all of the articles that the user tagged since they didn't post on my talk page for each article they tagged. Adamtt9 (talk) 02:34, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    there isn't.--Quisqualis (talk) 02:45, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Adamtt9, yes it is possible. You can probably get it done easily using WP:AWB. If you don't know how to use it, post at Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/Tasks requesting assistance. Someone would create the list and dump it in your sandbox. If you can share which user has done the tagging, the user themselves may be able to give you the list (as they would have probably created the list using AWB). Thanks, Lourdes 03:52, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    how to send letter to congressman regarding medicare insurance that is being delayed due to their error

    How to contact my congressman regarding medicare issues — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taylorcenter (talkcontribs) 20:29, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Google their office for contact details. Send an email or postal mail (postage free by the way) Legacypac (talk) 20:37, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    (edit conflict)Taylorcenter Per the notice at the top of this page...
    This page is only for questions about how to use or edit Wikipedia.
    Sorry but you'll have to look up the answer yourself on how to contact your Congressperson. Shearonink (talk) 20:40, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi, regarding the above document, is there any way to create a "regular" (i. e. visible) heading paragraph line spacing before the two headings Bookselling and swapping and Non-English book sources, which is to say without using new line tags such as <br> (creating a line spacing larger than usual)?--Hildeoc (talk) 20:51, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Yes. But I would suggest not to do that. The spacing looks fine. If it doesn't look fine to you, take the discussion to the respective talk page. Thanks, Lourdes 06:59, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    In the above template, why is the Wikisource logo included twice (see the relevant cases in the template documentation as well as transclusions like in Fur#External links)?--Hildeoc (talk) 21:47, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    • One icon is to represent the superset (e.g. the Encyclopaedia Britannica), and the other icon is the represent the actual article being referenced within the encyclopaedia. You can suppress the leading icon by using the code |noicon=1 within the template. I've used the noicon code for your benefit in your example of the article on Fur. Please revert my edit after you've seen the same. Thanks, Lourdes 07:08, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    What actually counts as a reliable source?

    I mean something like BYU.edu Or only article from Fox News? My real question is, if a magazine in the Uk is reliable and notable within its industry. Ex: fashionthirst.com Is this a reliable source or is it only about Fox News and Bloomberg? Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.84.100.141 (talk) 23:19, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    See WP:RS and WP:RSN. What counts as reliable can vary according to the viewpoint of the person assessing it. I've had NOAA, UKHO and RYA dismissed as unreliable because they conflict with the accademic BIPM. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 23:26, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Thanks, I mean the person I am writing about has a lot of sources by small magazines which are viewed as blogs. When they have offices and a real outlet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahloha989652 (talkcontribs) 23:31, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    You may be confusing two things here. Sources are reliable or otherwise. Pages are notable or otherwise. If a lot of reliable sources mention a person only in passing, then they are probably not notable, and no page is needed. If only a few reliable sources mention a person in detail, he may be notable (editorial judgement is required). If multiple unreliable sources mention a person in detail then you need to go looking for better sources. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 23:35, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    References problem

    Does anybody have an idea how to fix that references section?--Hildeoc (talk) 23:46, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    The place to raise the problem is Talk:Dead Sea Scrolls. The problem with ref 108 arises in the transclusion of some (but not all) of the information from List of manuscripts from Qumran Cave 3. --David Biddulph (talk) 00:08, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    You could also ask User:JohnThorne. --David Biddulph (talk) 00:09, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    @Hildeoc and David Biddulph: Sorry for the problem. I fixed those related to the reference [used to be] #108. Please check and, if it's good, you can remove the tag. Peace. JohnThorne (talk) 00:50, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


    March 9

    How to get the Article "Carsten Momsen" from German Wikipedia to English Wikipedia in translated version?

    How to transfer the above mentioned article from German to English Wikipedia ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by H.Olmes (talkcontribs) 02:02, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    You do it yourself. It's fine to retain any non-English references, provided they are of adequate quality. Depending on the article, Google Translate, plus your own good sense and subject familarity might suffice; however, this isn't encouraged.--Quisqualis (talk) 02:29, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    How to upload new wiki article

    Hi Am a footwear designer for brand swatimodo Please advise how can i upload my article My brand is 11 years old and with much credits to its name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.224.144.91 (talk) 08:13, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    If you mean that you want to create an article about Swati Mehrotra [1], that may be possible but not easy.
    You have some reading to do: Wikipedia:Your first article, WP:Notability (people), WP:Conflict of interest and WP:Promotion. Let's add WP:An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing and WP:Autobiography as well. If, after reading those, you decide to have a go at it, good luck! Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:54, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    User registered vandal with puppet accounts

    The user Greatwish, it's a puppet account of Enciclopiedicomutante, Nicert, Canary88 and Atlantecan. All these are puppet accounts that have been blocked in Spanish, see here Canary88, But he continues to create puppet accounts to vandalize. Is vandalizing in the article: Canary Islands.--87.223.111.202 (talk) 09:21, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    You can open a sockpuppet investigation here. Mstrojny (talk) 11:46, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    The user has created another account Spanishwikilp.--87.223.111.202 (talk) 13:39, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    You've been told how you can proceed with this or any other alleged sockpuppets. 331dot (talk) 13:40, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    The career section in in this article has the incorrect link for Sir John Fife - it goes to the wrong person. It should go to John Fife (surgeon). Please alter if you can - I cannot on my device. Please keep the "Sir" in. Please fix if able. Sorry 175.32.70.221 (talk) 10:28, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

     Done Thanks for drawing attention to this. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 10:31, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    How To Edit Title Or Delete Draft Article

    I started a draft article but want to edit the title or delete the article and create a new article with new title. How do I do it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pequena Princesa (talkcontribs) 10:29, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Since this account appears to not be autoconfirmed, you can request renaming a draft here. If you would like to delete your draft you can put {{db-g13}} on top of the draft you want to delete and an administrator will delete it for you. Mstrojny (talk) 11:44, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    @Pequena Princesa: The more usual CSD criterion for deletion of a draft you have created woul be {{Db-g7}}. G13 is used for drafts that have been 'abandoned' (not edited for more than 6 months). However, your editing history does not show an edit in draft space. Which draft are you referring to and what would be the reason for deletion? Please do not ask the same question in multiple locations. Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~). Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 12:07, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]