User talk:Garuda3: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:10, 21 July 2021

Welcome!

Hello, NemesisAT, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! –Prototime (talk · contribs) 00:05, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ouya / 8th Gen

To answer your question from the template, there is not consensus to include at this time. You can participate in the discussion here: Talk:History_of_video_game_consoles_(eighth_generation)#Expanding_the_list_to_include_Ouya_console_and_the_Shield_Handheld. -Kai445 (talk) 01:11, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

NemesisAT, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi NemesisAT! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Garuda3. You have new messages at Talk:BBC Radio 1.
Message added 16:50, 5 June 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

BZTMPS ★ · (talk? contribs?) 16:50, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Julio Bashmore

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Julio Bashmore requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wgolf (talk) 21:06, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, NemesisAT. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, NemesisAT. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, NemesisAT. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mothership (website)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mothership (website), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cabayi (talk) 12:16, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Parkrun

Please Assume good faith and avoid confrontational edit summaries. FYI I have no issue with Parkrun. I simply noticed some non-encyclopaedic promotional piffle on one article which then lead me to discover the same problem was widespread on countless other articles. Unlike the other 2 individual parkrun articles, I still see no reason for the Cardiff instance to have it's own article so have tagged for notability. If I was so inclined I'd login and send it to WP:AFD. Thanks. 51.9.187.2 (talk) 13:15, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A90 road, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A92 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Inverbervie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montrose (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please see

Hello Nemesis, Please see Template talk:Infobox public transit#Additional field or parameter Peter Horn User talk 20:01, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Peter Horn: Thanks for this, I've added my thoughts on that page. NemesisAT (talk) 21:04, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zhongshan West railway station

I've tagged Zhongshan West railway station, an article you created, as unsourced. All statements in Wikipedia articles should be supported by citations to reliable sources, per WP:V. Hog Farm (talk) 00:24, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Farthings Wood, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hawthorn and Wild cherry.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:47, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Glasgow–Dundee line, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stirling railway station.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chongqing–Wanzhou high-speed railway

The article Chongqing–Wanzhou high-speed railway has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not yet under construction

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 11:17, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lianyungang–Zhenjiang high-speed railway

Thanks. I'm not much concerned about whether to use the short names or not, I mostly use them to reduce the clutter and people can click on the links anyway. Incidentally I didn't link Hengshan station because this needs to be disambiguated from a station in Taiwan and I'm not sure what its final name will be. I note on the Shanghai–Huzhou high-speed railway, you translate 2 stations as Fenhu and Shengze, which seem to be called Suzhou South and Wujiang South on the Chinese page, but presumably these names may change.--Grahame (talk) 01:53, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chapelton, Aberdeenshire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A92.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:18, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Portlethen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montrose.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:47, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chongqing–Wanzhou high-speed railway moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Chongqing–Wanzhou high-speed railway, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 07:53, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chengdu–Chongqing intercity railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fuxing.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:34, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dali–Lincang railway, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dali and Dali railway station.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Berwyn (musician)

Hello, NemesisAT,

Thank you for creating Berwyn (musician).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This appears to be a tad bit WP:TOOSOON

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Celestina007}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Celestina007 (talk) 18:28, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Foshan-Dongguan intercity railway

http://td.gd.gov.cn/attachment/0/406/406092/3138485.pdf The station called "Panyu Avenue" during construction will be officially called "Donghuan".

The station called "Changlong" during construction will be officially called "Guangzhou Changlong".

Your edit is incorrect and I really wonder why you didn't look at Chinese wikipedia before you edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramramger (talk • contribs) 17:12, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ramramger: Hi, I do read the Chinese Wikipedia while editing however it's not always updated. I have created various articles on English Wikipedia that do not yet exist on Chinese Wikipedia, so I don't always assume Chinese Wikipedia is correct and updated. However it looks like I made a mistake here, thanks for bringing it to my attention. I was using this document as reference, which has a later date than the document you cited so it appears the Chinese government can't keep track of its own station names. Best wishes NemesisAT (talk) 17:34, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Panyu railway station moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Panyu railway station, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:54, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kaiyuan West railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kaiyuan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

John Mallard

Hello, Garuda3. You have new messages at 94.197.159.215's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Changsha–Ganzhou high-speed railway moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Changsha–Ganzhou high-speed railway, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:47, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dezhou–Dajiawa railway moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dezhou–Dajiawa railway, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:19, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dezhou–Dajiawa railway has been accepted

Dezhou–Dajiawa railway, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 18:46, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Chongqing–Wanzhou high-speed railway

Hello, NemesisAT. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chongqing–Wanzhou high-speed railway, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Huzhou–Hangzhou high-speed railway moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Huzhou–Hangzhou high-speed railway, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:39, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Baotou (Yinchuan)–Hainan corridor

Hello, NemesisAT

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Whiteguru, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Baotou (Yinchuan)–Hainan corridor, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Whiteguru (talk) 05:49, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pengze railway station

Hello, NemesisAT

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Whiteguru, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Pengze railway station, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Whiteguru (talk) 07:30, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Xiaolin–Lishan railway

Hello, NemesisAT

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Whiteguru, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Xiaolin–Lishan railway, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Whiteguru (talk) 07:42, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Huzhou–Hangzhou high-speed railway has been accepted

Huzhou–Hangzhou high-speed railway, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 10:53, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Railway stations in China opened in 1898

A tag has been placed on Category:Railway stations in China opened in 1898 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:31, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, NemesisAT

Thank you for creating Jet 727.

User:Herpetogenesis, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Herpetogenesis}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 00:05, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, thanks! NemesisAT (talk) 00:32, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Minqing railway station moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Minqing railway station, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:21, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Line 16 (Guangzhou Metro) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Line 16 (Guangzhou Metro), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:04, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Minqing railway station has been accepted

Minqing railway station, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 21:40, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Editing news 2021 #2

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter

Earlier this year, the Editing team ran a large study of the Reply Tool. The main goal was to find out whether the Reply Tool helped newer editors communicate on wiki. The second goal was to see whether the comments that newer editors made using the tool needed to be reverted more frequently than comments newer editors made with the existing wikitext page editor.

The key results were:

Newer editors who had automatic ("default on") access to the Reply tool were more likely to post a comment on a talk page.
The comments that newer editors made with the Reply Tool were also less likely to be reverted than the comments that newer editors made with page editing.

These results give the Editing team confidence that the tool is helpful.

Looking ahead

The team is planning to make the Reply tool available to everyone as an opt-out preference in the coming months. This has already happened at the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedias.

The next step is to resolve a technical challenge. Then, they will deploy the Reply tool first to the Wikipedias that participated in the study. After that, they will deploy it, in stages, to the other Wikipedias and all WMF-hosted wikis.

You can turn on "Discussion Tools" in Beta Features now. After you get the Reply tool, you can change your preferences at any time in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.

–Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)

00:27, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Notice of discussion at WP:AN/I

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Buses route 123. Thank you. Thryduulf (talk) 22:16, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notification. NemesisAT (talk) 22:20, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

London Buses route 123

Hello NemesisAT, I appreciated your message here. I apologise for the way the discussion got out of hand. Polyamorph (talk) 10:17, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Polyamorph, don't worry about it. I will be more careful in the future. And I've been busy the past couple of days IRL, I think it was good for me to have that break from WP. Thanks NemesisAT (talk) 21:08, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tony Clay (July 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The Daily Express and the Daily Star are not reliables sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tony Clay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tony Clay, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curbon7 (talk) 04:44, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mongolian National Modern Art Gallery has been accepted

Mongolian National Modern Art Gallery, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 09:52, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Changsha–Ganzhou high-speed railway has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Changsha–Ganzhou high-speed railway. Thanks! Bkissin (talk) 17:09, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Line 16 (Guangzhou Metro) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Line 16 (Guangzhou Metro). Thanks! Bkissin (talk) 17:11, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciation for a warm welcome!

NemesisAT, I appreciate the welcome message you left on my talk page a month ago. I recently read the Wikipedia guidelines page entitled "Please do not bite the newcomers" and wanted to give you kudos for exemplifying the ideals discussed on that page. I also wanted to try out the quadruple-tilda signature that your post, as well as welcome posts all over the site, reminds new users to use. Thanks for the welcome!

— Scholascarlata (talk) 03:31, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Starting on Wikia (now called Fandom) before I started on Wikipedia probably helped me get used to things like signing posts, as it isn't always intuitive. I personally reccommend going into the "Beta" menu at the top of the page (on desktop) and enabling "Discussion tools", it makes it easier to reply to any comment on a talk page, and is what I'm using to reply to you now. No signatures required! You can always leave me a message if you think I can help with something, though there's also the Wikipedia:Teahouse if you'd like to ask a wider range of people. Best wishes NemesisAT (talk) 16:34, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak content

The weak content was removed in the Pokémon articles expressly because the content was there to justify the article's merit, merely by making the Reception look bigger than it actually was. I would have redirected the first one too, I was merely deleting the content to see how much reception actual content the Reception section had. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 00:48, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your message. I'll be honest, I'm not sure why you feel content like the Official Nintendo Magazine should be removed. But my main objection was to redirecting, nothing personal, I just feel there should always be discussion before that happens. As AfD discussions are now taking place, I'll keep my nose out and let others decide. Best wishes NemesisAT (talk) 16:24, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Santhosh Damodharan has been accepted

Santhosh Damodharan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 03:19, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

Thanks for this edit here [1] [2], without it the article wouldn't be in AfD as of now and would be gone, eventually it saved Lapras. 180.194.128.118 (talk) 23:41, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, thank you for your message. NemesisAT (talk) 23:51, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Cruis'n Blast

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Cruis'n Blast, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.mobygames.com/game/cruisn-blast, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Cruis'n Blast and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Cruis'n Blast, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Cruis'n Blast. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Cruis'n Blast with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Cruis'n Blast saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! JBchrch talk 10:02, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @JBchrch:, I restored someone else's edit as it had been re-phrased since the copyright violating edit earlier on. I was under the impression that re-writing in your own words resolves the copyright issue. Could you please clarify? Thanks NemesisAT (talk) 10:26, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @NemesisAT: Earwig's copyvio tool detected what I considered to be close paraphrasing of https://www.mobygames.com/game/cruisn-blast. In other words, some text in the article was extremely similar to this website, with only a few words changed or swapped, and the structure of the sentences and the paragraphs remaining the same. The article has been added to the Copyright problems log so that specialized editors will take a look. I hope this clarifies. JBchrch talk 11:31, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help, @JBchrch:. I can re-write it again which would hopefully resolve the issue, or am I best to leave it for just now? I do think the article should be kept, which was the primary reason for me restoring the content. Best wishes NemesisAT (talk) 17:53, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@NemesisAT: Maybe let's just leave it now to see what the community thinks. The worst that can happen is that the section in question gets deleted and revdeled, but the article should remain on the mainspace. JBchrch talk 17:43, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I only noticed after writing that comment that the template placed on the article asks for the content not to be edited. NemesisAT (talk) 17:44, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@NemesisAT: You have probably seen this on your watchlist, but the article has been cleaned of any copyright infringement. You may rewrite the WP:REVDELed sections, but please please be careful of close paraphrasing. Thank you and cheers. JBchrch talk 19:10, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cityrider 56 has been accepted

Cityrider 56, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 12:43, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Platform 1 has been accepted

Platform 1, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Mcguy15 (talk, contribs) 13:58, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: M41 (Durban) (July 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Locomotive207 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:M41 (Durban) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:M41 (Durban), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🌀Locomotive207-talk🌀 02:50, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

prod

Hi, I note that you removed the PROD for Arthur Tyde. Can I please ask you what your rationale is? The concerns are:

the article doesn't assert the notability of the subject
the references given don't seem to show *proper* coverage in *independent* *reliable* sources
the article serves as a linkfarm for various companies

Thank you, Dr. Vogel (talk) 19:51, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I generally favour keeping articles rather than deleting them as we have practically infinite space here on Wikipedia. While I agree the article is problematic (no inline references for a start), I feel the Wired and Linux Magazine sources are enough that notability could be established and as such I didn't want to see this one be deleted without further discussion and analysis. The other links appear to be promotional, but this is okay IMO as long as we have some secondary sourcing, and they can always be removed or replaced with secondary sources in the future. You are always welcome to nominate the article for deletion if you still wish. An easy way to do this is with Twinkle, and under the "TW" dropdown selecting "XFD". Best wishes NemesisAT (talk) 20:02, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sick Wid It Records for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sick Wid It Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sick Wid It Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Yappy2bhere (talk) 20:13, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jempson's has been accepted

Jempson's, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bogger (talk) 12:07, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wendover Dean Viaduct has been accepted

Wendover Dean Viaduct, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 21:51, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello, how are you? It has been reopened for discussion, I would appreciate it if you could express your opinion again. :) Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Berkay Çatak --𝘋𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘺𝘦𝘴 ϟ ^Heyyo? 09:07, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Dicayes: thanks for your message, I'm good thanks. While I would be happy to add another comment, my understanding is there should be only one vote per person so you should change the second "keep" to a "comment" instead. While you can make as many comments as you like, there is no requirement to do so after a relisting. Right now, the article hasn't changed since I last edited it, so there isn't anything new for me to comment on. However, if you are able to expand the article more please do so and leave me a message, and I'll take another look. Best wishes NemesisAT (talk) 18:21, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 526: / Line 526: @@
 ::::{{Reply|NemesisAT}} Maybe let's just leave it now to see what the community thinks. The worst that can happen is that the section in question gets deleted and revdeled, but the article should remain on the mainspace. [[User:JBchrch|<span style="color:#494e52">'''JBchrch'''</span>]] [[User_talk:JBchrch|<span style="color:#494e52">talk</span>]] 17:43, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
 :::::Thank you. I only noticed after writing that comment that the template placed on the article asks for the content not to be edited. [[User:NemesisAT|NemesisAT]] ([[User talk:NemesisAT#top|talk]]) 17:44, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
+::::::{{ping|NemesisAT}} You have probably seen this on your watchlist, but the article has been cleaned of any copyright infringement. You may rewrite the [[WP:REVDEL]]ed sections, but please ''please'' be careful of close paraphrasing. Thank you and cheers. [[User:JBchrch|<span style="color:#494e52">'''JBchrch'''</span>]] [[User_talk:JBchrch|<span style="color:#494e52">talk</span>]] 19:10, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 == Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Cityrider 56]] has been accepted ==