Talk:IEEE Spectrum

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electrical engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electrical engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electrical engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Electrical engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Electrical engineeringelectrical engineering articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electronics Low‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Can we use the IEEE summary description?[edit]

It's short, to the point of the article, clearly attributed, and does not hurt the value of the magazine, so I think it should be allowed in the same manner as a low-res cover picture. If there is a specific reason this seems like not fair use, please help me out and discuss here, since I commonly include quotes to indicate a view is not original research... LouScheffer 23:04, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I dunno . . . In this case, it's about 40% of the entire article. Can it be paraphrased? That would moot the issue. -- But|seriously|folks 08:21, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A plea for a cleanup and rewrite[edit]

I'm an editor at IEEE Spectrum: there's a lot of stuff that's factually incorrect here, so as per Wikipedia guidelines I'm making a plea for some edits. In particular, article submission to IEEE Spectrum is not open access. Individuals and corporations do not have the right to post their IEEE-copyrighted materials on their own servers without express permission. And while we do have a peer review process for our feature articles, news and other articles are not peer reviewed. Also the statement "Additional content is gleaned from several hundred annual international conferences," is misleading: we do attend many conferences over the course of the year, but not several hundred of them. We use a mix of freelance and expert authors alongside staff-written pieces. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.68.141.58 (talk) 00:26, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]