HuffPost
POLITICS
Jim Crow Ballot ‘Purity’ Phrase Yanked From Texas Vote Suppression Bill At Last Minute
GOP lawmakers ultimately decided not to advertise the segregationist nature of the voting measure.
By Mary Papenfuss
05/09/2021 09:59 AM ET
A segregationist term from the Jim Crow era referring to the “purity” of ballots was yanked at the last minute before the Texas House passed a measure restricting voting.
Eighteen amendments — 13 of them from Democrats — were added to the Republican election bill before it was passed 78-64 Friday. 
But an initial fight was over the bill’s statement of purpose. It initially said that said the measure was designed to “preserve the purity of the ballot box” — a phrase “drafted specifically to disenfranchise Black voters following the Civil War,” Democratic Rep. Rafael Anchía told bill sponsor Rep. Briscoe Cain (R).
“Are you aware of the history of that?” he asked in comments on the floor.
“No, I’m sorry to hear that ... Those are troubling things,” Cain said.
Cain later noted that he’d be willing to agree to an amendment to change “purity” to “integrity or something,” reported the Austin-American Statesman. The word was stricken from the bill.
“Purity of the ballot box” was a term drafted specifically to disenfranchise Black voters following the Civil War. This justification was used again during the Jim Crow Era. And today, this lie was resurrected in the #txlege to justify #SB7. Full clip: https://t.co/aYq4bHcNG7​pic.twitter.com/l9rEAThIkz
— Rafael Anchía (@RafaelAnchia) May 7, 2021
The measure would increase regulations on voting by mail, create several new election-related crimes, and boost protections for partisan poll watchers. It could make it a felony for someone to give a person a vote-by-mail application unless they requested one.
Anchía argued that Texans were more likely to be struck by lightning than to encounter the vote fraud GOP lawmakers insist they’re addressing. 
“You know what undermines confidence in our elections? It’s the lies that are told in the face of all contrary evidence by politicians for their own and their party’s political gain,” said Anchía.  
The bill passed along party lines and now goes to a conference committee, where lawmakers will resolve differences between the House and Senate versions of the bill. 
BEFORE YOU GO
Mary Papenfuss
Trends Reporter, HuffPost
Suggest a correction by emailing us.
RELATED TOPICS
Voter Suppression
Texas
Jim Crow Laws
GOT A TIP?
Do you have info to share with HuffPost reporters? Here’s how.
CONTINUE READING
You May Also LikeAds by Verizon Media
Ivanka Distances Herself From Donald Trump
HuffPost
Stephen Colbert Points Out The Most Hurtful Part Of New Trump Bombshell Report
HuffPost
Jennifer Aniston Says One Rude ‘Friends’ Guest Star Acted ‘Above’ Being On Show
HuffPost
Michael Cohen Exposes One Of Donald Trump's Decades-Old Lies
HuffPost
8 Years On, John Roberts’ Disastrous Voting Rights Ruling Is Wreaking Havoc
HuffPost
Roberto Santibañez: What Americans Get Right About Mexican Food
HuffPost
Can We Trust Corporations To Deal With Their Own Waste?
HuffPost
COVID-19 Rescue Plans Sent Personal Income Spiking Nationally
Former FDA Chief Says COVID-19 Variant May Cause Surge In States With Low Vaccination
Biden Slams Republicans For Blocking Debate On Voting Rights Bill
Deadly Pride Parade Crash In South Florida Was Not Intentional: Officials
Joe Biden Announces 300 Million Coronavirus Vaccines Have Been Administered
The Best Under-$50 Deals During Amazon Prime Day
Paul Walker’s Daughter Meadow Honors Late Father At ‘Fast And Furious’ Movie Premiere
Biden Outlines Global Vaccine Plan, Will Fall Short Of June Distribution Goal
NEWS
POLITICS
ENTERTAINMENT
LIFE
COMMUNITIES
HUFFPOST PERSONAL
VIDEO
NEWSLETTERS
DMCA POLICY
DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
Part of HuffPost Politics. ©2021 BuzzFeed, Inc. All rights reserved.
The Huffington Post