Logo of Wikidata

Welcome to Wikidata, D-Kuru!

Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!

Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familiarize yourself with:

  • Introduction – An introduction to the project.
  • Wikidata tours – Interactive tutorials to show you how Wikidata works.
  • Community portal – The portal for community members.
  • User options – including the 'Babel' extension, to set your language preferences.
  • Contents – The main help page for editing and using the site.
  • Project chat – Discussions about the project.
  • Tools – A collection of user-developed tools to allow for easier completion of some tasks.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask on Project chat. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.

Best regards!

Creating properties edit

Hi!

It seems that you have tried to create a property "character animator" at Q64221184. In Wikidata we have a distinction between items and properties, and what you created is an item, so you will not be able to use it as a property as you probably expected. To get this created as a property, you need to propose it: see Wikidata:Property proposal. If you need any help with that process, let me know.

Keep up the good work! − Pintoch (talk) 13:02, 3 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Pintoch: Yeah, I already noticed. I also noticed that I'm not in the user group who are allowed to create new properties.
Thanks for the link though that will make my life easier. I will try to care about that this week.
--D-Kuru (talk) 20:29, 3 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
@D-Kuru: great! In the meantime I will delete this item then. − Pintoch (talk) 09:31, 4 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

QQ66481199 edit

As far as I understand Help:Basic membership properties
therefore an actual AMD Phenom II X6 1090T in a computer is a concrete example and instance of (P31) of AMD Phenom II X6 1090T (Q66481199), which is a class. Feel free to ask for advice to other contributors, such in Wikidata talk:WikiProject Informatics, Help talk:Basic membership properties or Wikidata:Project chat. See also https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-todo/tree.html?q=Q5297&rp=279&lang=de . Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 13:04, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Re:P7861 edit

Hi. You should add the item of the category. I noticed that these categories aren't linked to an item, so you have to create them. E.g. Category:Software licenses (Q7020956). --Tinker Bell 20:01, 22 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Tinker Bell: Looks like it works like category for pictures taken with equipment (P2033). Maybe a bit late to request that, but can it work like Commons category (P373) where the links brings you right to the category on Commons? --D-Kuru (talk) 20:05, 22 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
You should check this thread for delete P373. Also, it isn't good store the links as external identifiers, because we can't refer them from other properties rightly. --Tinker Bell 21:12, 22 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
As far I know, there's a bot that populates labels and descriptions in many languages, so you can leave these fields empty. --Tinker Bell 19:35, 26 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
I've created some categories for the property. You can see them with this query. --Tinker Bell 20:08, 26 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Frage zur Modellierung edit

Hi, ich habe da eine Frage zu war memorial Edelsinnstraße (Q91660999). Eine Verständnisfrage. Bei instance of (P31) und commemorates (P547) stehen zwei Einträge je of (P642)-Qualifikator. Ist das gleichwertig mit einem Eintrag wo beide vons gelistet werden oder macht das einen Unterschied? (Ich habe das an einer Stelle geändert, ohne die Information an anderer Stelle zu löschen) Kann mir vorstellen, dass das einfacher beim automationsunterstützten Anlegen ist. Aber sonst? lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 10:51, 8 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Herzi Pinki: Keine Ahnung ob das einen Unterschied macht. Ich habe es vermutlich bei zwei Einträgen belassen, weil das mit QS besser funktioniert und weniger Aufwand ist. Von mir aus kann man auch beide in eines schreiben. Man sollte sich dann aber entscheiden welches der beiden, weil die Info dann sonst 4-fach eingetragen ist. Ich habe hier keine Präferenz und kannst es handhaben wie du willst.
Bezüglich automatisierter Auswertung: Möglich dass es da einen Unterschied gibt. 1) Müssten wir jemanden fragen der es macht und fragen was leichter/besser geht 2) macht das überhaupt wer?
--D-Kuru (talk) 16:43, 8 July 2021 (UTC)Reply