Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Steward requests/Global/2010-03

< Steward requests‎ | Global

Request for global (un)block

Unblocking of 68.221.207.33 and 68.221.204.132/20

Status:    Not done

Yes, I am Pickbothmanlol.

Specifically, I am one of many people who have chronically trolled numerous wikis, notably the English version of Wikipedia. Recently, Wikimedia globally blocked this IP, and thus, I have decided to repent for my past colourful actions for good by any means possible.

This whole mess started as a joke for a Newgrounds topic. One of our members was bickering about homebrew still being supported on the PSP using official firmware, and I decided to link him to a article. Normally, that was all I was going to do until I had an idea pop in my head about making a joke that pointed to an moderator on Newgrounds.

After the first account was banned (I think it was A1a2s but I haven't checked the history.), the vandalism became a bad habit. I would troll, or attempt to vandalize pages just to get a frantic reaction from Wikipedians. Eventually, it became a daily routune at the start of 2009.

I'm done for good, and will never again vandalize Wikipedia. I realized what my vandalism was taking away from others. If someone had vandalized the pages I needed, I would have likely failed out of High School. I hope to eventually contribute to this shared knowledge for the benefit of more than just my warped humour.

I don't expect most of you to believe me and infact I expect most of you to start calling me a troll and reverting for the lulz, but at least I can rest easy knowing that I've moved beyond this childish behavior. 68.221.207.33 20:57, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Please read if you are convinced by the above. It is taken from Willy on Wheels's request from 2005 with small alterations. Ottava Rima 18:52, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
as the link above wasn't clear es:Drini 15:54, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

unblock 193.206.126.34

Status:    Not done

Again I request unblock of IP 193.206.126.34 because it's part of 50 computers in a national library in Italy where thousands different persons connect every day: 1 year global block is by user:M7 for insults but from solo guy in single language. I would like edit for support your project but it's impossible because this IP is static in all computers here in national library; evidence: see http://toolserver.org/~chm/whois.php?ip=193.206.126.34

To all admins I assert: I am not Italian but I am Croat and my name is Milan! You check: http://toolserver.org/~luxo/contributions/contributions.php?user=193.206.126.34 all edits from IP are valid and no vandalism! Evidence examples: 1 and 2 Admins M7 and Vituzzu where found insults? They can block IP in site of insults but 1 year global block is absurd and punitive for thousands different persons who connect in a national library free open for people's use! Consider this point: why punish guys who simple want to edit and develop wikipedia like as me?

You vandalised pt.wiki, it.wiki, en.wiki and simple.wiki (here some sockpuppet of yours): aren't these cross-wiki vandalisms?. Please don't lie you're italian but even if you were croatian you'd be just a troll. Thousands of users? It seems that just two people are using this ip, you and sometime (really rarely) another non-vandal one, please stop lying. --Vituzzu 14:18, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

first of all you don't know me because I am an old editor since 2002 in several languages: sure I am older editor than you are! Do you understand? You must respect my effort and I don't tolerate your insults and personal attacks:

  • lier
  • vandal
  • troll
  • personator

when, why, where, who? You have no evidence for these insults against me! Do you met me in a place of this planet? And when, why, where, who? Do you watch me on your computer? But who are you: Supreme Court? Refrain to insult unknown guy! I usually edit unlogged by different computers. As well users Sir Floyd and Luigi28/Presbite are not sockpuppet!

I think you've made your point now. Please wait for a steward to look into this case. Thank you. Wutsje 15:11, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
That's clear, in fact Presbite is free to help the growth of it.wiki. Dai hai ammesso tutto qui, non serve continuare a mentire. --Vituzzu 15:13, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

this section is in English: use this language! I started over 1.000 new articles in six languages: Vituzzu you did many articles start? Who is Filipponio: your brother?

Evidence of disruption from this IP has already been provided, other findings are CU related and can be seen in part on SP lists and common interests for IVO/PIO/Tamburellista/Darius etc. --M/ 15:36, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Six languages? I can rember just three (pretending to belive you're croatian), any reference for your words? Filipponio is a sock of yours. Now that your lies have been exposed as such, I (or we) can safely stop here, unless we are willing to waste time and space in order to expose a troll as such, as well. --Vituzzu 15:44, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

I don't understand: Nick1915 are you responsable? It's impossible discuss with M7 and Vituzzu: they are like as a wall probably because they were insulted by an Italian user but global block by M7 is against all rules of this project! My question is: were insults in Portuguese section? If it's so, you can block this IP only in Portuguese section because sure IVO/PIO/Tamburellista/Darius/etc. never will edit in Croat or Chinese language but in this national library there are also Chinese and Croat guys like as me too! Global block by M7 is against growth of wikipedia: in this national library we are 30 guys who want to collaborate for this project! If you persist in this nonsense block, we 30 guys will edit a sort of petion in 30 different languages. I usually edit in these languages: Croat, Serb-Croat, Simple Eng., English, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, French--Milan7 14:30, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Really strange things happen at a library in Bari (yes, Bari). 30 different people willing to *edit* Wikimedia projects in 30 different languages! Somehow, that's always the same attitude shown here, with similar lexicon. Maybe that's just the same one person? --M/ 14:49, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

your link is evidence of situation in Bari: Bravo! The point is not if I and linked editor are solo guy but: I and IVO/PIO/Tamburellista/Darius/etc. are different persons!

  • @Stewards, in this case CU is total unreliable because we are 30 guys with same IP!

--Milan7 15:11, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Block IP 71.51.79.126

Please see this edits. I think it is crosswiki spam. Vasiľ 21:33, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

  Not done All spam was done within 15 minutes. If the spammers comes back, we can see whether blocking is an option, but for now I don't want to risk blocking what could be a dynamic ip, an internet connection that they used just once or somesuch. - Andre Engels 07:26, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Unblock 68.221.192.59

Status:    Not done

I was trying to edit the "Development of Windows Vista" article to have another picture on it, but it told me that my IP was blocked. I tried editing my talk page to appeal the block but I was blocked from editing my own talk page (linuxlove8088). I haven't done any malicious acts nor do I plan to. If I do, then most likely it will be someone who has hacked my account. So... Could I get this IP unblocked? Thanks.

  Not done This ip is not globally blocked. I guess there is a local block, in which case you also have to ask for unblocking (or getting an ipblock exempt) locally. - Andre Engels 21:12, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

A problem

Status:    Not done

I am editing from a neighborhood in Alabama that has been blocked for the reason "sock vandals". I have no idea how long it has been in effect but considering that who ever did it were bored teenagers that long forgotten about Wikipedia, can't you unblock the range? 68.221.199.166 22:49, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

  Not done Like the one above, this address is not currently globally blocked. Either the block is local, or it has already been lifted or ended. Nothing we can/should do either way. - Andre Engels 21:21, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Unblock User:samwaltz

Status:    Done

I am a formerly active editor of the English Wikipedia. I am currently living in the Empty Quarter - and, needless to say, I want to get more involved in Wikipedia again (because, yes, there's just as much social life here as the name suggests). However, the problem I have encountered is that there has been so much vandalism from this IP range that there has been a general block implemented. I am unable to start new articles. I can, however, still make edits. Will someone please fix this. 195.229.235.39 19:03, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Erk. To make matters more complicated, I'm being automatically logged off. Some of the changes I've been prevented from making have happened while not logged in. *shrug* I'll check things out from my side. Samwaltz 19:12, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello Samwaltz. Which IP address/range is currently being affected by a global block? Thank you, — Dferg (talk) 17:23, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
I don't believe he was blocked, he wrote creating a new article was not possible but editing existing ones was, that sounds like he was editing not logged in because afaik in en.wiki creating new articles for IPs is not possible. Best regards, --geimfyglið :^╡ 17:28, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
My bad, the IP from the user posted the first time is currently blocked. I'm going to ask the blocking steward wether we can switch from HB to SB. — Dferg (talk) 14:30, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
I would be in favor - I think this is a case of the "open proxy behind closed proxy" phenomenon (that is, someone had their computer in use as an open proxy, but is himself behind a regular proxy, and blocking what seems to be an open proxy in reality blocks much more). - Andre Engels 21:33, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
  Done - I've changed the settings of the block so that registered users are not affected. If you have further issues, let us know. Best regards, — Dferg (talk) 23:45, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Proxy server ip

Status:    Done
  • name hidden
  • since User:Kylu is taking a short break,I'm facing difficulties to edit pages in english wikipedia, I'd like one of the stewards to unblock this IP and explain how such proxy server should be treated in the future>
As this is UAE ISP proxy server ip's & as a sysop in arabic wikipedia I understand that the block for such proxy server ip's suits anonymouss users & at least excluding the registered users.--Antime • (My Talk) 00:01, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
  Done - After consulting with the blocking steward, I've changed the settings of the block so that registered users are not affected. If you have further issues, let us know. Best regards, — Dferg (talk) 23:45, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Unblock request on Wikiversity (User:Thekohser)

  • Sorry for this being out of format, etc., but the process of governance on the English Wikiversity is currently collapsing. I am hoping that a Meta Steward could please review whether "cross-wiki issues" is a blockable offense, and please make a determination if the process by which Jimmy Wales has intervened (beyond my particular case) in Wikiversity (de-sysopping an admin, blocking another good-faith user, then restoring their rights, but with conditions that dictate that Jimmy maintains supremacy on content issues) is within his remit? Thank you. -- Thekohser 14:52, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
    Note - I provided Thekohser a system in which he could produce the material he says he wants to add to Wikiversity from his user talk space. If it turns out that he is honest in that desire, that will be used as evidence in reconsidering his block. If his block is then not overturned, he was offered to have a proxy that would move content from his user talk to article space so he could continue to produce content while still blocked. At this time, I am unwilling to unblock Thekohser. Ottava Rima (talk) 14:57, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Crosswiki issues is a blockable offense (stewards globally block and lock for this all the time), but in this case, Jimmy is claiming working on behalf of the board, and in that case, your issue should be adressed to the board or the Foundation staff. Stewards can't override the board or the foundation, so this request is   Not done. Laaknor 15:00, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Jimbo considers thekohser "globally banned". -- Adrignola 18:47, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Unblock request for logged-in users from 209.221.90.204

Status:    Done

I was attempting to edit an article on en on a logged-in account from which I make constructive edits - the message that I got was that this IP address, registered to York Region District School Board, has been globally blocked for being a vandal. While that may be so, I have seen no indication that this block was meant to prevent students from editing while logged in. As long as anon editing and account creation are blocked, it has worked in the past as a deterrent for vandalism from YRDSB students. I'd just like to edit at school, and I have no problem - nay, embrace - using an account to do so. 209.221.90.204 16:32, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

I lowered the block level to anons only. THat specific ip has been the source of several harassing sockpuppets for couple of months. es:Drini 16:36, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Here's an edit to show that I am indeed editing from this IP. I am the SUL owner of the name and this account was registered when I confirmed it. Arcendet 16:36, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
I lowered the block level so it would only affect anons and disallow creating new accounts for a while. es:Drini 16:38, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
I must be slow. Thank you! Arcendet 16:38, 26 March 2010 (UTC)


Request for global (un)lock and (un)hiding

Redfox

Status:    Done
  • Redfox
  • Discussion: This account has been hijacked. At ro.wikipedia, this user's unified account's password has been made public and the password was changed by someone else (4 Jan 2010). The account was blocked indefinitely at ro.wp, and the user agreed to use another account. However, the former account has been used later (9 Jan 2010) as a sockpuppet(as shown by checkuser) in order to obtain adminship at ro.wikiquote, and possibly for distructive edits at other wikis. Most of the evidence is in Romanian, approximate translations are:
    • [1] "I found Redfox' access requisites: Username:Redfox Passowrd:digital-tower" - these credentials are not valid anymore, as they have been changed; message repeatedly written on the ro.wikipedia Village Pump, 4 Jan 2010.
    • [2] "We only wanted to scare redfox, today he came to work, looked at access logs and exposed us. (...) We never thought anyone would change his password. (...)"; message left on my talk page, 5 Jan 2010 - irrelevant parts are left out, they refer to the personal quarrel of the account's owner and those who exposed his credentials, I can translate that, too, if requested. Andrei Stroe 14:29, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Could Redfox (I mean the right one with his new account) confirm this request please? --თოგო (D) 14:20, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

This is the second of two edits made by the global account post-block (a quick 'hello!' on meta). A comment from redfox would help resolve this. Sj+ help translate 00:29, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
I asked him via e-mail for a confirmation.Andrei Stroe 10:53, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Also, this is related to the discussion above, Mr. man is the hijacker who used the account as a sockpuppet.Andrei Stroe 10:36, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
We would need Mike to confirm but this account is already locked, by Mike Lifeguard, I believe per CU evidence that it was Mr.Man when we were investigating his other account. James (T C) 10:40, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
I recived an e-mail from user Andrei Stroe and I confirm that my old account was hijacked, and for now on I will use a new account .Redfox_hq, so now you can do the required operations to block the old account. If you have further questions you can contact me via e-mail at redfox_hq@live.com. Best regards Redfox hq 11:34, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

I just marked this   Done it was done so long ago I think people forgot about it. Related to Mr.Man discussion I just archive to here. James (T C) 21:24, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Michaeldsuarez.

See User:Michaeldsuarez./sourceswiki and Michaeldsuarez. SUL - crosswiki vandalism and links to porno sites, regards -jkb- 18:43, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Done by Mike.lifeguard Kylu 21:01, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Request for unblocking IP 86.83.155.44 and User:D.A. Borgdorff

Status:    Not done

Due to a recent change in the policy on nl.wikipedia, blocked users should now be able (there has been a vote on this) to use their User Talk page for commenting on blocks of their account. Unfortunately the mentioned user is currently blocked globally, so he is not able to comment on his current block on the nl.wiki. I request unblocking this user, so at least he is able to comment on his native nl.wikipedia User talk page on the current block. If the user abuses his talk page after a possible unblock of that page the nl.wiki admins can block him from editing there with ease. I plea for lifting the current blocks, and see if this user is able to contribute in a normal way, and to provide an opportunity for him to comment his current block. If any form of disrupting editing should take place or follows after unblocking he user talk page, this user can be blocked easily again by local admins. Regards, Tjako 15:16, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

You can simply use nl:Special:GlobalBlockWhitelist to remove locally the globalblock, then you can give him a localblock allowing own talkpage editing. --Vituzzu 15:19, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
Thnx for the info. I will pass this to the nl.wiki admin crew. Tjako 15:23, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
Comment: User:D.A. Borgdorff is not just blocked, but globally locked (for reasons the requester is fully aware of), so that won't work. Wutsje 15:26, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
Uhm, I thought whitelisting were always possible. --Vituzzu 15:28, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
A locked user can not log in, see Locked global account. Wutsje 15:34, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
I was dealing with ip, btw taking a look at the edits it's not a great idea. --Vituzzu 15:40, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
In that case I plea for unlocking him -at least- for the nl.wiki, so local policy on nl.wiki can be followed. Regards, Tjako 15:42, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
As Wutsje said it cannot be done, even because so many abuses were done on talkpage. --Vituzzu 15:49, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
I don't see any real 'abusive' edits in the link you provide. Just some clumsy edits. Is that reason for locking a user? Tjako 15:57, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
p.s. Locking is only for certain mentioned reasons; and as far as I can see this user doesn't meet those criteria. That's one aspect. The other aspect is the standing policy on de nl.wiki, where the community decided that blocked users should be able to comment on their block. So I plea for an unlock, and the possibility for Dutch admin's to follow the standing nl.wiki policy : blocked nl:users should be able to comment on their talk page on the nl.wiki. Tjako 16:09, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
Several years of crosswiki damages, among with spam and selfpromotion, fulfills WMF policies about preventive blocks and this user is indeed aware that his behaviour is not tolerable. Many free web space are provided on the Internet and Wikimedia projects and users do not deserve to continue cleaning up original researches, adverts and promos left all around. --M/ 18:54, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Not done. I see no reason to unblock him. Besides that he is actually one of the examples for whom editing the talk page should be blocked. --Erwin 19:09, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Global lock for Andresutz

Status:    Done

Okey, this is a serious case about a conflictive troll and hoaxer. He created numerous hoaxes in Spanish and English Wikipedia, and he seems to attack the French, Italian and other Wikipedias, about channels that don't exist. He was blocked, but he created numerous sockpuppets with a scheme Andresutz+number (500, 1000, 2000, 3000, etc.) and reinitiates the hoaxes. More details about his sockpuppets: here(is neccesary the global lock for these sockpuppets also). The English and Spanish sysops are informated about this, and also Andresutz attacks the users that erased the hoaxes. --Taichi - (あ！) 23:46, 19 February 2010 (UTC) }}

  Done --es:Drini 00:07, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
He has created a 70000 account:
Now, to wait until he creates the millionth one xD. --MisterWiki 22:52, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
He've got the 90000th one. XD --MisterWiki 23:12, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
Two more done. Kylu 00:48, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
He's created new socks:
Thank you, — Dferg (talk) 19:34, 7 March 2010 (UTC) — Dferg (talk) 16:23, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
  Done Five above accounts have been locked. -- Avi 17:20, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Global lock/unlock for 一成的偽友

Status:    Done
Locked. Wutsje 11:31, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Block my bot

Hello,

I thinked I could run my global bot with cosmetic changes activated, but it seem I was wrong.

Unfortunatly I can't access the bot computer before this evening. To stop it, can you please block HerculeBot for 10 hours.

Sorry for my mistake.

Regards

--Hercule 10:10, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

  Done I've lock the account. Just inform us when you want it unlocked. Laaknor 10:18, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks --Hercule 10:21, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
It's correct now, the bot can be unlock.
Thanks for all, and sorry for the trouble
--Hercule 19:50, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
  Done, account has been unlocked. — Dferg (talk) 19:53, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Global lock/unlock for Keith Bridgeman

Status:    Done

Long-term cross-wiki spammer and vandal, Keith Bridgeman. Wknight94 11:01, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

All should be locked now. I also reverted some of those fake "libel" messages.--Shanel 13:36, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Also locked:

Wutsje 05:48, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

And some more:

Wutsje 01:03, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

--.snoopy. ✉ 07:26, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

  Done --Melos 08:13, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Wutsje 20:02, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

A few more needed please:

Wknight94 10:40, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

  Done --Mercy 10:43, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Also locked:

Wutsje 03:06, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Another - although I don't think this is an SUL:

Wknight94 08:27, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Done locally. --Mercy 08:38, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Two more:

Wknight94 09:49, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Done. --Mercy 09:50, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

One more:

Wutsje 14:53, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Odd - that one is in my list above... Wknight94 16:45, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
It was probably just missed the first time. It was a long list. :-)   Wutsje 16:49, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Ah, okay. I thought maybe "Lock" was broken, or didn't do what I thought it did. Wknight94 17:00, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Two more:

Wknight94 20:55, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

  Donelocked --Jyothis 21:25, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

More:

Wknight94 19:48, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

  Done, locked --Mercy 20:13, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Global lock for TownDown and his sockpuppets, blocked in several projects

Status:    Done

And see This Checkuser in Meta-Wiki, and this recomandation for global block.

And may be, others puppets Shooke 21:42, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

  Done by Jyothis and me, but I dont found the account Americko, is this the correct name? --- @lestaty discuţie 22:21, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
For Americko, check this, user Americko checked by Drini Shooke 22:35, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
  Done It is Amerikco. And is already locked by Sir Lestaty. --MisterWiki 22:36, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Americko account do not exist, is http://toolserver.org/~vvv/sulutil.php?user=Amerikco, see http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuario:Amerikco Shooke 22:39, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Shooke, I've already said that, and the account is already locked. Cheers. --MisterWiki 22:42, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Accounts on cawiki, dewiki, euwiki, glwiki, itwiki, nahwiki, commonswiki, ptwiki, frwiki and eswikinews = confirmed. Enwiki is not the same person, and account is unblocked. ---- @lestaty discuţie 03:11, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Global lock for user:幹久 and sock puppets

Status:    Can't be done

Cross wiki vandal. He seems to sock of a long term abuse. Thank you.--Tc651 (Hitachi-Train) 15:30, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

  Not done, sorry, none of the above accounts is a global account and thus, can't be locked. Thank you for reporting anyway. Best regards, — Dferg (talk) 17:19, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Global unlock for user:emesee

Status:    sockpuppet account

because i want it to be done. EME44

  Not done per v:en:Wikiversity:Community_Review/User:Wikademia#New_discussion. --Mercy 13:21, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Why should that have any bearing on whether or not the account is globally unlocked. i can stay banned from there even if my account is unlocked, i think. right?! no?! EME44

Global lock/unlock for name hidden

Status:    Done

please lock and hide this username --.snoopy. ✉ 20:15, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Global lock/unlock for メサミ怒フォス

Status:    In progress

Vandalism. Sock of long term abuse. Username is parody of methamidophos. --Marine-Blue [ talk contribs ] 10:03, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

  Done --Mercy 10:07, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Requests for global permissions

Global rollback for Incnis Mrsi

Status:    Done

I sometimes repair interwiki pollution made by interwiki bots (incorrect interwikis, which are created usually by making a redirect or just by mistake; see also my essay on interwiki conflicts). In such projects, where I do not have a rollback locally (these latter include en.wiki and ru.wiki), I promise to use this feature against bots only. Cases of pollution by incorrect interwikis could unlikely be resolved through talks with bot owners, because there is a dozen of such bots with almost no coordination, and all bots usually do the same silly thing, they propagate any link which can see in some article of the cluster. Relatively recent example: I started to remove incorrect links, but a filter in ar.wiki deterred me from cleaning its article, and bots brought junks back soon (which I reverted later). I am not a SWMT member, but the problem of interwiki is mainly a problem of large wikipedias, not small ones. Incnis Mrsi 16:57, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Hello Incnis Mrsi. You have an incompleted SUL account. There is an unattached account on it.wikibooks. IMO it will be better to request local rollback on the wikies where you are working than global rollback. --WizardOfOz talk 17:33, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
First, about b:it:Utente:Incnis_Mrsi. There is an evidence[4] that this account was not created from scratch locally, but was made by the SUL system when I already had a lot of accounts. This “incompleted” account apparently was never renamed and I have no clue when and how it could separate from my SUL – I even did not know that this thing is possible by some way except renaming. Let us ask MW programmers about this case? I do not see any obstacles for my use of rollback in Wikipedia anywise.
There are 53 languages of Wikipedia where I ever edited more than 1 article (those with only one are not counted), in approximately descending order: ru en fr de uk es fi it nl pl cs bg ja zh ko sv eo pt ca id simple no ar tr ro hu he lt sl sr el az fa da ms sk vi ka lv th eu is cy nn mk arz ast bpy be-x-old cv et tt new. About a half of these, if not more, are large- or medium-sized wikis, and I currently have the rollback only in the first two. Of course, I can request rollback separately in yet two dozen of most frequently used, but should we bother the people there? Incnis Mrsi 00:21, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
Just try to add it with b:it:special:mergeaccount (note You might need to use an old password if You changed it in the meantime, if You don't remember try password recovery), best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 04:48, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
Fixed. I do not know why my password did not match account in b:it, but E-mail password recovering interface (and subsequent change of password) helped. Thanks for “bug report” and advice. Incnis Mrsi 11:51, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
Okay,   Granted global rollback. Unanimous support over three weeks time for GR seems adequate for consensus on the matter, I think. Kylu 23:53, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Global/2010-03&oldid=24950753"