Steward requests/Permissions: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→‎Removal of access: I stop the resignation of globalrollback.
Line 248: Line 248:
==== Hosiryuhosi@jawiki ====
==== Hosiryuhosi@jawiki ====
{{sr-request
{{sr-request
|status = <!--don't change this line-->
|status = done
|domain = ja.wikipedia
|domain = ja.wikipedia
|user name = Hosiryuhosi
|user name = Hosiryuhosi
Line 254: Line 254:
}}
}}
Please remove my sysop access. --[[User:Hosiryuhosi|Hosiryuhosi]] 08:38, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Please remove my sysop access. --[[User:Hosiryuhosi|Hosiryuhosi]] 08:38, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

:Done, thank you for your service. --[[User:Mercy|Mercy]] 08:50, 25 August 2010 (UTC)


==== Hosiryuhosi@jawikisource ====
==== Hosiryuhosi@jawikisource ====

Revision as of 08:50, 25 August 2010

Shortcut:
SRP

This page is for requests to have stewards grant or revoke administrator, bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight rights on Wikimedia projects which do not have a local permissions procedure.

Old sections are archived. The list of archives is below.

  • Requests for bot flags are handled at SRB, and requests for global permissions are handled at SRGP.
  • If you are requesting adminship or bureaucratship, and your wiki has a local bureaucrat, submit your request to that user or to the relevant local request page (index).
  • For urgent requests, such as to combat large-scale vandalism on a small wiki, contact a steward in the #wikimedia-stewardsconnect IRC channel. In emergencies, type !steward in the channel to get the attention of stewards. Otherwise, you can type @steward for non-urgent help.

Other than requests to remove your own access or emergencies, please only make requests here after gaining the on-wiki approval of your local community.

Quick navigation: Administrator | Interface administrator | Bureaucrat | CheckUser | Oversight | Removal of access | Miscellaneous | Global permissions

(translate | edit)

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Using this page

1. Place the following code at the bottom of the appropriate section below: 

==== Username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = <!-- such as en.wikibooks -->
 |user name = 
 |discussion= 
}}
(your remarks) ~~~~

2. Fill in the values:

  • domain: the wiki's URL domain (like "ex.wikipedia" or "meta.wikimedia").
  • user name: the name of the user whose rights are to be changed (like "Exampleuser"). In case you're requesting access for multiple bots, leave this field blank and give a list of these bots in your remarks
  • discussion: a link to the local vote or discussion about the rights change (for example, "[[ex:Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#ExampleUser]]"). This should normally be for at least one week, but no more than three weeks (if so, you'll need to restart the process).

3. If anything is missing from your request, a steward will request more information.

Confirmation of signing confidentiality agreement

Certain permissions (notably CheckUser and Oversight) additionally require users to sign a confidentiality agreement. Users requesting these permissions must make a request below, and must also sign the confidentiality agreement with the Wikimedia Foundation. The request is placed on hold temporarily, until the receipt has been formally confirmed by the Office.

Requests

COPY THE FOLLOWING CODE to the bottom of the appropriate section below: 

==== user name@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    =
 |user name =
 |discussion= 
}}

Administrator access

See administrator for information about the position. Requests for removal of access belong in another section. Admins doing cross-wiki work may wish to see IRC/wikimedia-admin for information about joining #wikimedia-admin.

If you are requesting administrator status to translate the wiki interface, this should be done at the translatewiki.net instead (see mw:localisation). You can ask questions in the IRC channel or on the mailing list.

If you are requesting adminship to handle one-time vandalism incidents or clearing a deletion backlog, please see Vandalism reports and Steward requests/Speedy deletions.

Stewards
Currently-active temporary permissions are listed at /Approved temporary; copy granted requests to the appropriate section there, stating the date of removal in the section header and at the bottom of the request. Please invite new sysops to the admin IRC channel.
Archiving
Requests only need remain listed below for a few days, and may afterward be removed as long as they have been copied to the subpage. Users who archive requests on that page, please check if the request was correctly added to the temporary subpage before removing it from this page.

For permanent sysopship please provide a link to the local community approval. For temporary sysopship please state for how long and for which tasks you need it, and link to a local announcement.

hanberke@tk.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Please grant me 6-month temporary sysop status. I had four temporary terms up to now. I'm the only sysop there. Thanks in advance. Hanberke 11:38, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done Extended for six months from today. While you're there, would you mind setting up some of the community pages please? I mean tk:Wikipediýa:Oba güzeri and the two content portal pages in the navigation box primarily. Thanks! Kylu 17:10, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hanberke@tk.wiktionary

Status:    Done

Please extend my 6-month temporary sysop status for another 6 months.Hanberke 11:38, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done Extended six months from today. As above, please consider setting up some of the pages linked from the navigation box. Your administration request page, for instance, is hard to find unless you're both looking for it and familiar with MediaWiki. Kylu 17:12, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MalTsilna@tt.wikibooks

Status:    Done

Done three months temporary, expired at November 22nd, 2010. Come during the second part of November for extending temporary adminship. --Millosh 20:11, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Millosh/ --Ильнар Шайдуллов 11:50, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Devunt@kowikinews

Status:    Done

Devunt 07:33, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is anon. --Devunt 07:36, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Done, expires 20 october 2010, temp for 2 months, as your previous request. If you'll end before this date you can ask to remove this right Melos 08:00, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
thanks. Melos. --Devunt 08:02, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Murma174@frrwikipedia

Status:    Done
Vote is on frr:Wikipedia:Diskusjoon#Administraator. Meanwhile Temp admin possible? Merlissimo 12:01, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There is nobody on the new domain who could stop possibly vandalism there. Could this request be done soon (temp admion would help anyway)? See here. -jkb- 08:22, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strictly support. There is no admin which is familar with this project. But this is necessary for the first steps. I found no arguments for waiting until the until the voting is done. He is full supported by the community and a also temp adminship would help for the first steps. Xqt 12:58, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Done 7/0 works. Kylu 13:10, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merlissimo@frrwikipedia

Status:    Done
Temp admin for two month. New wikis need some initinal work.

Merlissimo 11:57, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Comment user wasn't active on the testwiki. Huib talk Abigor 12:01, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Vote is now on frr:Wikipedia:Administratoore#Temp-Administraator Merlissimo. -jkb- 19:57, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The vote started on 20 August, so please wait for a few more days.Jusjih 01:17, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merlissimo's adminship is key for the new WP IMO, so if there's any chance to grant the rights before Aug 27, the language community would appreciate it. Thanks! --Murma174 08:23, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Support since his adminship is only for 2 month and his help is needed during startup. Xqt 08:31, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done For two months - to expire October 23, 2010; consensus looks pretty clear on frrwiki that a second sysop would be helpful. -- Avi 17:13, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Erik@frrwikipedia

Status:    In progress
Vote just started. Need to wait a week. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 16:21, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree for three reasons: [1] Murma174 got this right (see a few requests above), but that vote had also just started and [2] the wiki just started, it is normal that they want to do some cleanup and [3] the whole community has already voted. SPQRobin (talk) 20:53, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I really should've noticed the date, my fault. If they're still both passing on the 27th, though, it's pretty simple to give Erik sysopness too. Kylu 02:30, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reder@roa-tarawikipedia

Status:    Done

Reder 02:24, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done temp access granted until 21-02-2011. Regards -- @lestaty discuţie 00:40, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaucrat access

Steward requests/Permissions/Crat-header

CheckUser access

Steward requests/Permissions/CU-header

Mxn@viwiki

Status:    In progress

Vietnamese Wikipedia community has concensus on creating local CheckUser. We have voted for Mxn to be one of 2 CUs (another one is DHN@viwiki). You stewards please contact him directly to ask for his identity. Tân (talk) 07:04, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mxn must identify himself to the Wikimedia Foundation. DHN must also do the same.--Shanel 08:42, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Faxed. Thanks for waiting. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 17:47, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Waiting for office confirmation. — Dferg ☎ 13:18, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but we do not know how long it takes new CheckUser right? We (viwikipedia community), waited so long ... minhhuy*= 14:39, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nobody here can do anything until the office posts receipt of the identification. Ionek 17:19, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The fax was received, but was illegible. I emailed Mxn to notify him at that time. The office has not received an alternate method or better fax as of yet. Bastique ☎ call me! 22:19, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Might it be easier if the user scanned his ID and sent it as an email? Kylu 12:11, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the delay. I just faxed over a more legible copy. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 16:24, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Mxn, we still cannot locate it in the office (and I am here today). Would you please send it again, to the attention of Kristen Powell? Bastique ☎ call me! 21:54, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Snail-mailed a copy to the Foundation's P.O. Box on Friday. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 14:24, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DHN@viwiki

Status:    In progress

Vietnamese Wikipedia community has concensus on creating local CheckUser. We have voted for DHN to be one of 2 CUs (another one is Mxn@viwiki). You stewards please contact him directly to ask for his identity. Tân (talk) 07:04, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See above.--Shanel 08:42, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Should I wait for the confirmation request or should I send my confirmation letter ASAP? DHN 18:11, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Send your identification ASAP. only after the foundation confirms, this will be decided. --Jyothis 18:24, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Identification sent. DHN 07:38, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I sent an email with my ID info several days ago to secure-info@wikimedia.org but haven't heard anything back. Is that the correct email address I should send it to or is there another one? DHN 04:32, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello DHN. Your ID were received and confirmed by Cary, but per CheckUser policy there must be at least 2 checkusers on a wiki or none at all so until Mxn identifies we can't promote you. Once his ID is confirmed, we will promote you both. Thanks, — Dferg ☎ 12:58, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thenub314@en.wikibooks

Status:    Done

We have the required 25 votes with 100% support. Please assign the permissions once the user identifies. Once he is identified, please restore my CheckUser access that was removed when Mike.lifeguard relinquished his use of the tools to provide the English Wikibooks with the two CU minimum. Thank you. Adrignola 01:12, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold till office post receipt of ID. --dferg ☎ talk 07:38, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed ID & policy for access met.
Done --dferg ☎ talk 16:46, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oversight access

To request to have content oversighted, ask in #wikimedia-stewards, or email oversight-l@lists.wikimedia.org for requests regarding English Wikipedia. This is the place to request Oversight access. Note that temporary Oversight access is not permitted and the temporary status is only used by Stewards.

Stewards
Do not grant Oversight access unless the user is identified to the foundation, which will be announced on the Identification noticeboard. When you give someone oversight access, list them on Oversight.

Removal of access

<translate>

  • If you're requesting the removal of your own permissions, make sure you're logged in to your account. If you have multiple flags, specify which you want removed. Stewards may delay your request a short time to ensure you have time to rethink your request (see [[<tvar name="self-discussion">Talk:Steward_requests/Permissions/2011#Self_requests</tvar>|previous discussion]] on 24 hour delays); the rights will not be restored by stewards once they are removed.
  • To request the removal of another user's permissions, you must gain consensus on the local wiki first. When there is community consensus that the user's access should be removed, provide a link to the discussion, with a brief explanation of the reason for the request, and summarize the results of discussion. However, as bureaucrats of some wikis may remove users from the administrator or bureaucrat group, please see also a [[<tvar name="crat-rem">Bureaucrat#Removing_access</tvar>|separate list of these specific wikis]].
  • To request the removal of another user's permissions for inactivity, link to your local inactivity policy. If your site does not have inactivity policy, the global policy [[<tvar name="aar">Admin activity review</tvar>|Admin activity review]] applies.
  • See the [[<tvar name="usage">#Using this page</tvar>|instructions above]] for adding new requests. Please post new requests at the bottom of the section.</translate>

Clytie@vi.wikisource

Status:    Not done

I would remove my admin rights on the Vietnamese Wikisource. Thanks. --Clytie 10:02, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This request was made by an IP see diff. -Barras 10:09, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but I've forgotten the password in the meta. What should I do? --Clytie 10:16, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Clytie@meta.wikimedia.org doesn't exists, you have to login on your homewiki as Clytie@vi.wikisource and then just open meta, so you'll automatically create your account here with SUL. --Vituzzu 10:20, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but I think this is only one impostor. Because Clytie (our sysop) very sick and has a very long time not to Vietnamese Wikisource --minhhuy*= 09:33, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Okie dokie, marking as Not done then. Hope Clytie gets better! Kylu 11:47, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Just for the record, I asked the user at vi.wikisource the 20th of August and got no reply as of today. --dferg ☎ talk 07:18, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

S.baroni@it.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Please remove "confirmed" status to that user, because now he is "autoconfirmed", so this flag is useless. --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 19:09, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done Melos 19:15, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wappi76@it.wikinews

Status:    On hold

--★ → Airon Ĉ 23:12, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hum, is to remove only the sysop flag, or bureaucrat flag too? - @lestaty discuţie 23:33, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sure that he could not be a sysop because he did bnot edit or did any admin operation for more than six months but I think that he could still be a bureaucrat. By now, could you proceed with desysopping the account? I ask tomorrow (here in Italy are 01:48) if he could still be a bureaucrat. Thank you --★ → Airon Ĉ 23:48, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I think that the best option is wait your confirmation about this. After your confirmation, I can remove the sysop flag or crat/sop flag. Anyway his request this  On hold. Regards - @lestaty discuţie 23:56, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please take the request on hold, I have sent a email to the user Melos 23:33, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Olando@it.wikinews

Status:    Done

--★ → Airon Ĉ 23:12, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done-- @lestaty discuţie 00:04, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hosiryuhosi@jawiki

Status:    Done

Please remove my sysop access. --Hosiryuhosi 08:38, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thank you for your service. --Mercy 08:50, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hosiryuhosi@jawikisource

Status:    In progress

Please remove my sysop access. Thank you. --Hosiryuhosi 08:38, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Miscellaneous requests

Steward requests/Permissions/Misc-header

Abigor@frr.wikipedia.org

Status:    In progress

Please give me sysop and import so I can import the content to this new wiki. --Huib talk Abigor 20:58, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Leinad. Poke us when finished. Thank you, --dferg ☎ talk 07:39, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Steward requests/Permissions/Footer

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Permissions&oldid=2093558"