Polterovich, Victor (2007): О стратегии догоняющего развития для России. Published in: Economics of Contemporary Russia , Vol. 38, No. 3 (2007): pp. 17-23.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_22014.pdf Download (148kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We argue that a system of strategic (indicative) planning is necessary to realize a successful catching-up strategy. The main task of the system is creation of a regular mechanism of interaction among government, business, trade unions, and consumers to facilitate strengthening of mutual confidence and coordination of efforts directed to mass scale restructuring of production sectors; these restructuring has to be based on mass imitation and adaptation of Western technologies. Contrary to broadly accepted opinion, indicative planning might facilitate improvement of institutions as well as civil society formation.
| Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
|---|---|
| Original Title: | О стратегии догоняющего развития для России |
| English Title: | About Strategies of Catching-up Development for Russia |
| Language: | Russian |
| Keywords: | catching-up strategy; indicative planning; adaptation of technologies |
| Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies > P21 - Planning, Coordination, and Reform |
| Item ID: | 22014 |
| Depositing User: | Victor Polterovich |
| Date Deposited: | 11 Apr 2010 06:36 |
| Last Modified: | 30 Sep 2019 15:17 |
| References: | Балацкий Е.В. Функциональные свойства институциональных ловушек // Экономика и математические методы. 2002. T. 38. № 3. Полтерович В.М. Институциональные ловушки и экономические реформы // Экономика и математические методы. 1999. Т. 35, вып. 2. Полтерович В.М. Трансплантация экономических институтов // Экономическая наука современной России. 2001 (a). № 3. Полтерович В.М. Стратегии институциональных реформ. Перспективные траектории // Экономика и математические методы. 2006 (a). Т. 42. № 1. С. 3–18. Полтерович В.М. Стратегии институциональных реформ. Китай и Россия // Экономика и математические методы. 2006 (b). Т. 42, № 2, С. 3–16. Полтерович В.М., Попов В. Эволюционная теория экономической политики. Часть I. Опыт быстрого развития // Вопросы экономики. 2006 (а). № 7. С. 4–23. Полтерович В.М., Попов В. Эволюционная теория экономической политики. Часть II. Необходимость своевременного переключения // Вопросы экономики. 2006 (b). № 8. С. 46–64. Полтерович В.М., Старков О.Ю. Проблема трансплантации ипотечных институтов в переходных экономиках: роль стройсберкасс / Препринт # WP/2006/210. М.: ЦЭМИ РАН, 2006. Cazes B. Indicative Planning in France // Journal of Comparative Economics. 1990. V. 14. № 4. P. 607–620. Chang H.-J. Kicking Away the Ladder. Cambridge University Press. 2002. Economic Survey of Europe. N.1. Economic Commission for Europe. United Nations. 2001. Chong, A. and Calderon, C. Causality and feedback between institutional measures and economic growth //Economics and Politics, 2000, V.12, 201–24. Jantti, M., J.Saari and J.Vartiainen. Country case study: Finland combining growth with equality// UNU-WIDER Jubilee Conference, Parallel session 7.3, 17-18 June 2005, Helsinki, Finland. 2005. Maddison, A. Monitoring the World Economy: 1820-1992// Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 1995. Matsuyama, K. Poverty trap// In L. Blume and S. Durlauf, ed., The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd edn. London: Macmillan. 2008. |
| URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/22014 |
All papers reproduced by permission. Reproduction and distribution subject to the approval of the copyright owners.
 |
View Item |
