Advertisement 1

IOC abdicates its responsibility in Russian doping case on the wings of money and mythology

For all its championing of 'higher, faster, stronger,' the one comparative that few have had occasion to attach to the IOC is 'braver'

Article content

For all its championing of “higher, faster, stronger,” the one comparative that few have had occasion to attach to the International Olympic Committee is “braver.”

Rooted as it is in old world bluebloods and augmented by former sportsmen and women co-opted to further the mythology, the membership of the IOC has whistled past many a graveyard over the years in order to maintain the franchise’s iconic status.

Advertisement 2
Story continues below
Article content

[np_storybar title=”The IOC sanctions” link=””]
• The IOC has decided against a complete ban on Russian athletes from the Olympics in Rio de Janeiro.

Article content

• It is leaving it up to global federations to decide which Russian athletes to accept into competition in Rio.

• Athletes who have previously served doping bans will not be eligible, while international federations will also analyze an athlete’s testing history.

• The IOC says the federations have the authority, under their own rules, to exclude Russian teams as a whole from their sports.

The Associated Press
[/np_storybar]

Sunday, it whistled past Russia and Vladimir Putin and his twisted ministry of sport and his government-corrupted dope testers — giving new meaning to the term “laboratory rats” — and his sample-switching spy agency and his master plan to make world athletic dominance, by whatever means, an extension of his state’s arrogant trampling of all opposition in the political arena.

In the end, the IOC caved, as it always does, defaulting to whatever compromise it could safely adopt without offending a superpower.

Advertisement 3
Story continues below
Article content

The IOC executive board voted against a blanket ban of Russia from the Rio Olympics, instead leaving the issue of sanctions against Russian athletes up to the individual sports’ federations.

Track and field has already tossed the Russians. Other sports are to evaluate on a case-by-case basis, but if history teaches us anything, it is that no sport’s administration will ever look very hard to find evidence against a star player. Business comes first.

In evaluating Russian athletes who petition to compete, said the IOC statement, “the (federations) should carry out an individual analysis of each athlete’s anti-doping record, taking into account only reliable adequate international tests, and the specificities of the athlete’s sport and its rules, in order to ensure a level playing field.”

There is a fairly significant list of federations that have a terrible record of catching and enforcing bans on dopers, by the way.

The IOC had a chance here to go beyond the vested interests of the individual federations and make a bold statement against state-sponsored cheating, but when push came to shove, it shied away.

Advertisement 4
Story continues below
Article content

Maybe the board members were reminded of the secrets buried in the IOC’s own shameful file — acting surprised when East Germany’s State Plan 14.25, the Stasi-monitored steroid programs of the 1970s was revealed, looking the other way on the United States’ coverup of positive tests prior to the Seoul Olympics, inaction on China’s systemic doping transgressions — and decided it was a little late to take a holier-than-thou stance just because this time, it was the defiant Russians doing the lying and cheating.

Thomas Bach, the IOC president and theoretically its leader, had a chance to grow a conscience and stand up to a bully. He punted. The great compromiser this time compromised the values of Olympism.

Fabrice Coffrini / AFP / Getty Images
Fabrice Coffrini / AFP / Getty Images Photo by FABRICE COFFRINI /AFP-Getty Images
Recommended from Editorial
  1. Punishing clean Russian Olympians in doping scandal doesn’t seem fair, but there is no way around it
  2. Russia loses appeal against Rio 2016 ban on track and field athletes

Yes, a blanket ban would have meant throwing the baby out with the bathwater, punishing those Russian athletes who compete clean, as if we could trust in their cleanliness. But representing, as they do, an athletic system built on deception and lies, those who compete in Rio will never be free of the taint anyway.

Advertisement 5
Story continues below
Article content

No Russian medalist will be celebrated in Brazil for his or her excellence without an accompanying rolling of the eyes by the viewer, unless that viewer is living in Putin’s carefully crafted “us against the world” environment, in which everyone else is just jealous, making up lies about the Russians because they are too powerful.

The extent of the IOC’s tough stance against doping on Sunday was to refuse to allow any Russian athlete ever guilty of a doping violation — whether or not the athlete had served his or her suspension — to compete in Rio.

This included whistle-blower Yulia Stepanova, whom the IOC thanked for her contribution to the anti-doping fight and invited as a guest to Rio, but banned from competing under a neutral flag because it decided merely deploring the use of drugs, having used them herself, wasn’t cause for an exception.

So thanks for your help, Yulia. Now go stand over there.

Canadians, whose eyes were opened by the Ben Johnson scandal of 1988 — unlike the Americans, our guy wasn’t sufficiently immunized by political clout — should be proud that the groundwork for the details of Russia’s duplicity was contained in voluminous reports authored by World Anti-Doping Agency co-founder (and former IOC vice-president Dick Pound) and Western University law professor Richard McLaren.

But they could only lay out the facts.

The decision of what do about them came down to a vote by an executive board, and notably a president, Thomas Bach, whose bread is buttered by hobnobbing with the Vladimir Putins of the world, currying their favour, the more powerful the better.

Banning a corrupt sports system, when that system puts money and plenty of it in the IOC’s coffers, was always a longshot.

ccole@postmedia.com

Article content
Comments
You must be logged in to join the discussion or read more comments.
Join the Conversation

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.

Latest from Shopping Essentials
  1. Advertisement 2
    Story continues below
This Week in Flyers