I believe that we *do* actually publish the data about Singapore editor numbers — when I query wmf.geoeditors_public_monthly internally, I get ~2000 rows from Singapore, including from March 2024. And Singapore is considered a "Lower risk" country on the Country and Territory Protection List (you can open this tsv which is the official source of truth and ctrl-F "Singapore")...

@Htriedman do you know if there is a reason we do not publish data on Singapore editor numbers?

@Maurusian I am removing the wikistats tag on this task since this is a data quality question. Please let me know know if you have questions about this. Happy to answer them!

@Mayakp.wiki and @nshahquinn-wmf added this to Movement-Insights so you can check for data quality in May or June

Main task is done. Marking as resolved.

After some preliminary review by @nshahquinn-wmf and @Mayakp.wiki we would like to observe the trend for another two months in order to more confidently determine if the drop is due to a real drop in user page views or an issue with the data itself. Since the pageview rate returned to roughly the October 2022 range, it is likely a real drop in user page views, but we need more time to pass in order to analyze the trend.

@Maurusian thank you for reporting this. We will investigate and report back here on what we find.

Does selecting "Editor type" in "Dimensions" and only filtering by "Anonymous" not satisfy that?
https://stats.wikimedia.org/#/wikidata.org/contributing/edits/normal|bar|2-year|editor_type~anonymous|monthly
And if you want "unique" editors:
https://stats.wikimedia.org/#/wikidata.org/contributing/editors/normal|line|2-year|editor_type~anonymous*user|monthly

In T198425#9604028, @Sj wrote:

For en:wp, this seems to differ from WP:Statistics by a factor of two. (looks like the latter shows ~500 articles/day)

For en:wp, this seems to differ from WP:Statistics by a factor of two. (looks like the latter shows ~500 articles/day)