pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
COVID-19 Information
Public health information (CDC)
Research information (NIH)
SARS-CoV-2 data (NCBI)
Prevention and treatment information (HHS)
Español
Log in

Advanced
Enhancing value of quality assurance rounds in improving radiotherapy management: a retrospective analysis from King Hussein Cancer Center in Jordan
Jamal K Khader et al. Radiat Oncol J. 2019 Mar.
Free PMC article
Abstract
Purpose: The quality assurance (QA) chart rounds are multidisciplinary meetings to review radiation therapy (RT) treatment plans. This study focus on describing the changes in RT management based on QA round reviews in a single institution.
Materials and methods: After 9 full years of implementation, a retrospective review of all patients whose charts passed through departmental QA chart rounds from 2007 to 2015. The reviewed cases were presented for RT plan review; subcategorized based on decision in QA rounds into: approved, minor modifications or major modifications. Major modification defined as any substantial change which required patient re-simulation or re-planning prior to commencement of RT. Minor modification included treatment plan changes which didn't necessarily require RT re-planning.
Results: Overall 7,149 RT treatment plans for different anatomical sites were reviewed at QA rounds. From these treatment plans, 6,654 (93%) were approved, 144 (2%) required minor modifications, while 351 (5%) required major modifications. Major modification included changes in: selected RT dose (96/351, 27%), target volume definition (127/351, 36%), organs-at-risk contouring (10/351, 3%), dose volume objectives/constraints criteria (90/351, 26%), and intent of treatment (28/351, 8%). The RT plans which required major modification according to the tumor subtype were as follows: head and neck (104/904, 12%), thoracic (12/199, 6%), gastrointestinal (33/687,5%), skin (5/106, 5%), genitourinary (16/359, 4%), breast (104/2387, 4%), central nervous system (36/846, 4%), sarcoma (11/277, 4%), pediatric (7/251, 3%), lymphoma (10/423, 2%), gynecological tumors (2/359, 1%), and others (11/351, 3%).
Conclusion: Multi-disciplinary standardized QA chart rounds provide a comprehensive and an influential method on RT plans and/ or treatment decisions.
Keywords: Multidisciplinary; Peer review; Quality management; Radiotherapy.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures
Fig. 1. Anatomical site distribution for presented…
Fig. 2. Percentage distribution of major modification…
Similar articles
Impact of quality assurance rounds in a Canadian radiation therapy department.
Lefresne S, et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013. PMID: 23195781
Prospective Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Real-Time Peer Review Quality Assurance Rounds Incorporating Direct Physical Examination for Head and Neck Cancer Radiation Therapy.
Cardenas CE, et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017. PMID: 28258898 Free PMC article.
Peer Review of Radiotherapy Planning: Quantifying Outcomes and a Proposal for Prospective Data Collection.
Mackenzie J, et al. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2016.PMID: 27633327
Quality assurance needs for modern image-based radiotherapy: recommendations from 2007 interorganizational symposium on "quality assurance of radiation therapy: challenges of advanced technology".
Williamson JF, et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008. PMID: 18406928
Radiotherapy Quality Assurance for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Van Gestel D, et al. Front Oncol. 2020.PMID: 32226773 Free PMC article. Review.
See all similar articles
Cited by 1 article
Factors influencing the use of adaptive radiation therapy in vulvar carcinoma.
Abuhijla F, et al. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2020.PMID: 32684858 Free PMC article.
References
Marks LB, Light KL, Hubbs JL, et al. The impact of advanced technologies on treatment deviations in radiation treatment delivery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69:1579–86. - PubMed
Jaradat I, Mula-Hussain L, Wadi-Ramahi S, et al. Practical steps for establishing ocular plaque therapy in developing countries. Brachytherapy. 2012;11:230–6. - PubMed
Khader J, Al-Mousa A, Hijla FA, et al. Requirements and implementation of a lung SBRT program in a developing country: benefits of international cooperation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;95:1236–8. - PubMed
Salem A, Al-Rashdan A, Jaradat I, Hashem SA, Almousa A. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer: how safe is safe? Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2011;4:192. - PubMed
World Health Organization . Radiotherapy risk profile technical manual. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2008.
Related information
MedGen
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Europe PubMed Central
M2PI
PubMed Central
NCBI Literature Resources
MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer
FOLLOW NCBI
Follow NLM
National Library of Medicine
8600 Rockville Pike
Bethesda, MD 20894
Copyright
FOIA
Privacy
Help
Accessibility
Careers
NLMNIHHHSUSA.gov
Title & authorsAbstractConflict of interest statementFiguresSimilar articlesCited byReferencesRelated informationLinkOut - more resources