pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
COVID-19 Information
Public health information (CDC)
Research information (NIH)
SARS-CoV-2 data (NCBI)
Prevention and treatment information (HHS)
Español
Log in

Advanced
Shortfalls and opportunities in terrestrial vertebrate species discovery
Mario R Moura et al. Nat Ecol Evol. 2021 May.
Abstract
Much of biodiversity remains undiscovered, causing species and their functions to remain unrealized and potentially lost in ignorance. Here we use extensive species-level data in a time-to-event model framework to identify taxonomic and geographic discovery gaps in terrestrial vertebrates. Biological, environmental and sociological factors all affect discovery probability and together provide strong predictive ability for species discovery. Our model identifies distinct taxonomic and geographic unevenness in future discovery potential, with greatest opportunities for amphibians and reptiles, and for Neotropical and Indo-Malayan forests. Brazil, Indonesia, Madagascar and Colombia emerge as holding greatest discovery opportunities, with a quarter of potential discoveries estimated. These findings highlight the importance of international policy support for basic taxonomic research and the potential of quantitative models to aid species discovery.
Similar articles
A metric for spatially explicit contributions to science-based species targets.
Mair L, et al. Nat Ecol Evol. 2021. PMID: 33833421
Environmental heterogeneity explains coarse-scale β-diversity of terrestrial vertebrates in Mexico.
Rodríguez P, et al. PLoS One. 2019.PMID: 30682061 Free PMC article.
Beta Diversity in a Highly Heterogeneous Area: Disentangling Species and Taxonomic Dissimilarity for Terrestrial Vertebrates.
Calderón-Patrón JM, et al. PLoS One. 2016.PMID: 27500934 Free PMC article.
A predictive framework and review of the ecological impacts of exotic plant invasions on reptiles and amphibians.
Martin LJ, et al. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2011.PMID: 20735378 Review.
There is no highly conserved embryonic stage in the vertebrates: implications for current theories of evolution and development.
Richardson MK, et al. Anat Embryol (Berl). 1997.PMID: 9278154 Review.
See all similar articles
References
Costello, M. J., May, R. M. & Stork, N. E. Can we name Earth’s species before they go extinct? Science 339, 413–416 (2013). - PubMed - DOI
Mora, C., Rollo, A. & Tittensor, D. P. Comment on ‘Can we name Earth’s species before they go extinct?’. Science 341, 237 (2013). - PubMed - DOI
Mora, C., Tittensor, D. P., Adl, S., Simpson, A. G. B. & Worm, B. How many species are there on Earth and in the Ocean? PLoS Biol. 9, e1001127 (2011). - PubMed - PMC - DOI
May, R. & Beverton, R. J. H. How many species? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 330, 293–304 (1990). - DOI
Scheffers, B. R., Joppa, L. N., Pimm, S. L. & Laurance, W. F. What we know and don’t know about Earth’s missing biodiversity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 501–510 (2012). - PubMed - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Nature Publishing Group
Other Literature Sources
scite Smart Citations
Research Materials
NCI CPTC Antibody Characterization Program
NCBI Literature Resources
MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer
FOLLOW NCBI
Follow NLM
National Library of Medicine
8600 Rockville Pike
Bethesda, MD 20894
Copyright
FOIA
Privacy
Help
Accessibility
Careers
NLMNIHHHSUSA.gov
Title & authorsAbstractSimilar articlesReferencesPublication typesMeSH termsLinkOut - more resources