Open research
How does CORE substitute Microsoft Academic Graph?
By Melanie Heeley
September 17, 2021
No Comments
The forest chatter has been clamorous since Microsoft’s announcement to retire Microsoft Academic (MAG) at the end of 2021. Like many others, at CORE, we have used MAG for a number of tasks including data quality enhancement and enrichment, to obtain citation data, for our research in semantic typing of citations and to enrich MAG and Microsoft Academic Search by supplying direct links to full text content (in a similar way we do for PubMed). 
At the same time as discussing how to move forward, we’ve received a lot of questions and helpful input from current MAG users and, as many others out there begin throwing their hat into the MAG-replacement ring, we thought it was time to discuss how CORE intends to contribute to the path forward. 
CORE already fulfils a number of the solutions supplied by MAG, but critically CORE is not a direct replacement for MAG. In fact, there is no direct replacement for MAG. As OurResearch clearly says in their announcement – a “perfect” replacement is very hard to come by. However, as a team with expertise in processing large quantities of scientific literature, text mining it, and having developed the harvesting and research papers aggregation tools of CORE, CORE is best placed to contribute to a global effort developing a solution responding to the community needs and requirements.
What does CORE replace? 
Although we don’t have direct replacements for all of MAG’s users, we do have a number of components of the solution and additional complementary data that was never part of MAG and that formed the reasons behind our cooperation with Kunsan Wang’s MAG team. 
What is CORE not suited to now? 
(If you want to talk to us about how to fill any of these gaps, then we will be all ears!)
What are we actively working on?
So what are we saying? If you’re looking to build a MAG replacement, we can help. If you’re scouting round for a MAG replacement tool, CORE might be the right place to come. As always, it just depends on your needs, so come and contact us and we will figure it out together. 
Suchetha Nambanoor Kunnath, David Pride, Bikash Gyawali, and Petr Knoth. 2020. Overview of the 2020 WOSP 3C citation context classification task. In Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Mining Scientific Publications, pages 75–83, Wuhan, China. Association for Computational Linguistics.
The CORE Team
Share and Enjoy !
Open Research
New podcast series incoming: Ready to talk research?
This week is ‘Peer Review Week’ – a time to ‘celebrate’ that aspect of scientific publishing that academia loves to hate.
Leave a Reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Notify me of followup comments via e-mail
Name *
Email *
Recent Posts
EOSC activities update and UK engagement
(Digital) Preservation first
Open access week 2021 – Sherpa international collaborations
OpenDOAR’s Plan S repository self-assessment tool
Open Access is useless …
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
Your email:

Log in
Entries feed
Comments feed
[Un]Subscribe to Posts
Applied research and commercialisation
Digital collections
Digital Preservation
General news
National research data infrastructure
Open research
Research information and analytics
#JiscOR #JiscRDM #wdpd2021 Carbon costCommunity CORE EOSCEOSC Synergy Events Expertise and skills FAIRJisc-CNI Open Access Open access policyOpenDOAR Open Research Plan Spodcast Publications RouterQuarterly Digest RDA RepositoriesResearch Sherpa Services SustainabilityTrust
Up ↑
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Cookie settingsACCEPT